2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test

It's the 50th anniversary of the ADAC tire test, and to celebrate the German automotive body have tested fifty summer tires in the popular 205/55 R16 tire size, and have included wear testing for every tire!

There's a lot to unpack in this test, so we'll dive straight in! Headline notes, there are two Michelin tires in this test, the Michelin Primacy 4+ and the energy saving Michelin e.Primacy, the Continental on test is not the new PremiumContact 7, it's the previous model, the Continental PremiumContact 6, and Continental also have the new Continental UltraContact in the test which is meant to be a lower rolling resistance and higher mileage tire for those who drive a lot of distance!

Dry BrakingContinental Premium Contact 6: 35.9 MPremiorri Solazo: 42.9 M
Wet BrakingContinental Premium Contact 6: 34.4 MDouble-Coin DC99: 59.3 M
Wet Braking - ConcreteContinental Premium Contact 6: 35.2 MDouble-Coin DC99: 58.4 M
Straight AquaUniroyal RainSport 5: 86.7 Km/HDouble-Coin DC99: 70.3 Km/H
Curved AquaplaningUniroyal RainSport 5: 4 m/sec2Double-Coin DC99: 2.7 m/sec2
NoiseDelinte DH2: 69.1 dBPetlas Imperium PT515: 73.6 dB
Tire WeightTomket Sport 3 Series 3: 7.6 KgPremiorri Solazo: 9.9 Kg
WearMichelin e.Primacy: 71500 KMZeetex ZT1000: 23100 KM
ValueDouble-Coin DC99: 1.03 Price/1000Avon ZV7: 3.75 Price/1000
PricePremiorri Solazo: 45 Michelin e.Primacy: 124
Fuel ConsumptionMichelin e.Primacy: 5.5 l/100kmUniroyal RainSport 5: 5.9 l/100km
AbrasionMichelin e.Primacy: 34.8 mg/km/tAvon ZV7: 126 mg/km/t

Wear

Wear is a key quality of any tire - what good is a tire that has amazing grip if it only lasts a few thousand miles?! Road wear testing is incredibly expensive, and with 50 sets of tires on test ADAC had to split the tires between road and machine wearing with control tires between the two to ensure data correlation. 

As usual, Michelin led the wear test, but not with the tire you'd expect. The Michelin e.Primacy, which starts with lower than average tread depth and is designed for very low fuel use (more on that later) recorded a staggering estimated 71,500kms tread life! 

The second best tire was the impressive Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 which once again highlights the longevity of modern Goodyear products, and the low wearing Michelin Primacy 4+ was just beaten to third by the budget Doublecoin DC99. This also happens to be the best result for the Doublecoin, keep an eye on it later in the test.

Of the known brand names, it was a disappointing result for Uniroyal, Nokian and Dunlop, all projected to have less than half the miles of the best.

The advantage of having the prices of the tires and estimated mileage, you can get an idea of the value of the tires, based in Euros Per 1000km to see how much you get for your money.

As the Doublecoin was one of the best wearing AND one of the cheapest, it offered exceptional value, but we still wouldn't recommend fitting it unless you're really into sliding around. Of the good tires on test, it was again the Goodyear and Michelin offering great cost per mile, but the Kumho Ecsta HS52 was up there in the mix too.

Wet

Often wear comes at the expense of wet grip, but once again Goodyear and Michelin (with the Primacy 4+ at least) are proving to break that trend. ADAC only published their wet braking data, of which they use two surfaces, asphalt and concrete. This is where the Michelin, Goodyear and Continental stretch their legs, but it was also a good grip result for the Cooper, Hankook and ESA Tecar on both surfaces.

Straight aquaplaning was led by Uniroyal, with the Doublecoin and Michelin e.Primacy struggling. You can read the result of curved aquaplaning in the results table below.

Dry

Continental once again led the way in dry braking, narrowly beating out the Hankook and Michelin e.Primacy.

Environment

As the environmental impact of all industry is becoming ever more important, the big tire tests are now measuring "abrasion" which is how much rubber, measured in weight, the tire loses. While a high mileage tire should lead in this category, it isn't always a straight correlation as the tires have different amounts of material in them.

The best in test was the e.Primacy, and ignoring the budget Michelin also did very well with the Primacy 4+, but Continentals new high mileage tire, the UltraContact, also performed extremely well.

Fuel consumption was measured in a real world test rather than a machine rolling resistance test, and, well, there was a disappointingly small range of results. The total spread was 5.5 litres per 100km to 5.9 litres per 100km.

Given the relatively small real world advantage a tire like the e.Primacy has in this test over a tire like the Bridgestone Turanza T005, but the large disadvantage it has in wet grip, it makes me wonder if ultra low rolling resistance tires are really the correct choice for anyone.

Finally external noise was measured, but for the sake of avoiding another long chart, you can find the data below. The e.Primacy was impressively quiet, and the Petlas impressively loud!

Results

You can find the full results below, with some of the testers notes on key tires. If you want to see the full test we strongly suggest you learn German and head over to the ADAC website here.

1st: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: B/A/69
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking13th37.7 M35.9 M+1.8 M95.23%
Wet Braking11th37.4 M34.4 M+3 M91.98%
Wet Braking - Concrete5th36 M35.2 M+0.8 M97.78%
Straight Aqua27th80.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-6.4 Km/H92.62%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise15th70.6 dB69.1 dB+1.5 dB97.88%
Tire Weight11th8.3 Kg7.6 Kg+0.7 Kg91.57%
Wear2nd65700 KM71500 KM-5800 KM91.89%
Value8th1.67 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.64 Price/100061.68%
Price44th110 45 +65 40.91%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion5th61.3 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+26.5 mg/km/t56.77%
Very balanced, good on dry and wet roads, good environmental record, very high mileage (top grade), efficient.
None mentioned.
Driving safety: The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 secures an overall good rating for driving safety. It offers the driver decent feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, shows itself to be safe at the limit and boasts an above-average braking distance on dry roads. On wet roads, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 shines in braking distance measurements and wet handling with good grip and safe drivability. Only when it comes to aquaplaning behavior does it not get beyond a satisfactory rating.

Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scores with above-average mileage in the wear test and low abrasion. The efficiency is also impressive thanks to the low tire weight and low fuel consumption. When it comes to noise, the Goodyear performs satisfactorily.

Read Reviews    Buy from £70.62

2nd: Continental Premium Contact 6

Continental Premium Contact 6
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking1st35.9 M100%
Wet Braking1st34.4 M100%
Wet Braking - Concrete1st35.2 M100%
Straight Aqua27th80.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-6.4 Km/H92.62%
Curved Aquaplaning33rd3.3 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.7 m/sec282.5%
Noise33rd71.4 dB69.1 dB+2.3 dB96.78%
Tire Weight36th8.9 Kg7.6 Kg+1.3 Kg85.39%
Wear6th49700 KM71500 KM-21800 KM69.51%
Value32nd2.31 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.28 Price/100044.59%
Price48th115 45 +70 39.13%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion10th69.5 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+34.7 mg/km/t50.07%
Very balanced, high driving safety (top mark), good on dry and wet roads (top marks), high mileage.
Weaknesses in efficiency.
Driving safety: The Continental PremiumContact 6 is impressive across the board and secured the top mark in the test for driving safety. It offers the driver good feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, shows itself to be safe at the limit and claims the shortest braking distance in the test. This means that its performance on dry roads is clearly rated as good. But the Continental also shines with its performance on wet roads and also secured the top mark in the test here. It delivers the shortest braking distances in the test and is absolutely safe and easy to control over the wet handling course. Only when it comes to aquaplaning does it not get beyond a satisfactory rating.

Environmental balance: In terms of the environmental balance, the PremiumContact 6 just missed out on a good rating. In the wear test, it delivers a good predicted mileage and its abrasion is also low, in terms of efficiency it just misses a good rating due to the tire weight. When it comes to noise, it also performs satisfactorily.

Read Reviews    Buy from £79.99

3rd: Michelin Primacy 4+

Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/69
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking5th36.9 M35.9 M+1 M97.29%
Wet Braking6th36.7 M34.4 M+2.3 M93.73%
Wet Braking - Concrete11th37.7 M35.2 M+2.5 M93.37%
Straight Aqua7th83.5 Km/H86.7 Km/H-3.2 Km/H96.31%
Curved Aquaplaning14th3.6 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.4 m/sec290%
Noise12th70.5 dB69.1 dB+1.4 dB98.01%
Tire Weight26th8.6 Kg7.6 Kg+1 Kg88.37%
Wear4th61300 KM71500 KM-10200 KM85.73%
Value16th1.96 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.93 Price/100052.55%
Price49th120 45 +75 37.5%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion4th53.7 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+18.9 mg/km/t64.8%
Very balanced, good on dry and wet roads, good environmental record, very high mileage (top grade.)
None mentioned.
Driving safety: The Michelin Primacy 4+ secures an overall good rating for driving safety. The Michelin already offers the driver only satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on a dry road, but still shows itself to be safe in the limit area. Its braking distance is classified as good compared to the test field. On wet roads, the Michelin gets good ratings in terms of braking distance measurements, aquaplaning behavior and handling. This makes it very balanced on wet roads. It offers good grip and safe driving characteristics.

Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Primacy 4+ secures the second best rating in the test (best: Michelin e.Primacy). Its predicted mileage is classified as very good and its abrasion is also low.

Read Reviews    Buy from £101.03

4th: Bridgestone Turanza T005

Bridgestone Turanza T005
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: B/A/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking9th37.3 M35.9 M+1.4 M96.25%
Wet Braking12th37.7 M34.4 M+3.3 M91.25%
Wet Braking - Concrete19th39.1 M35.2 M+3.9 M90.03%
Straight Aqua8th82.8 Km/H86.7 Km/H-3.9 Km/H95.5%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise44th72.3 dB69.1 dB+3.2 dB95.57%
Tire Weight3rd7.7 Kg7.6 Kg+0.1 Kg98.7%
Wear17th40400 KM71500 KM-31100 KM56.5%
Value43rd2.75 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.72 Price/100037.45%
Price46th111 45 +66 40.54%
Fuel Consumption3rd5.6 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.1 l/100km98.21%
Abrasion15th73.3 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+38.5 mg/km/t47.48%
Balanced, good on dry and wet roads, good environmental balance, high efficiency (top mark.)
None mentioned.
Driving safety: The Bridgestone Turanza T005 secures an overall good rating for driving safety. The Bridgestone Turanza T005 offers the driver decent feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, shows itself to be safe at the limit and boasts a short braking distance on dry roads. On wet roads, the Bridgestone excels in braking distance measurements, longitudinal aquaplaning and wet handling with good grip and safe drivability. Only when aquaplaning transversely does it not get beyond a satisfactory rating.

Environmental balance: The Bridgestone Turanza T005 achieves a good result in the environmental balance. It shines in terms of efficiency thanks to its low weight and fuel consumption, but its predicted mileage is rated as just good.

Read Reviews    Buy from £67.94

5th: Nokian WetProof

Nokian WetProof
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/68
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking14th37.8 M35.9 M+1.9 M94.97%
Wet Braking3rd35.8 M34.4 M+1.4 M96.09%
Wet Braking - Concrete8th37.3 M35.2 M+2.1 M94.37%
Straight Aqua2nd84.6 Km/H86.7 Km/H-2.1 Km/H97.58%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise15th70.6 dB69.1 dB+1.5 dB97.88%
Tire Weight11th8.3 Kg7.6 Kg+0.7 Kg91.57%
Wear31st35500 KM71500 KM-36000 KM49.65%
Value34th2.45 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.42 Price/100042.04%
Price30th87 45 +42 51.72%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion41st90.9 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+56.1 mg/km/t38.28%
Balanced, good on dry and wet roads, efficient.
Weakness in the environmental balance, weaknesses in mileage and abrasion, slight weaknesses in sustainability.
Driving safety: The Nokian Wetproof impresses with its driving characteristics and thus secures a good rating for driving safety. It offers the driver good feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, is absolutely safe at the limit and also impresses with short braking distances on dry roads. Overall, its performance on dry roads is clearly rated as good. But the Nokian also offers good properties on wet roads. It has good ratings for braking distance measurements, longitudinal aquaplaning and handling. Only in lateral aquaplaning does it not get beyond a satisfactory rating.

Environmental balance: In terms of environmental balance, the Wetproof does not get more than a satisfactory rating. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are classified as only satisfactory in relation to the test field. Thanks to the low tire weight and low fuel consumption, however, it achieves a good rating for efficiency.

Read Reviews

6th: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/67
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking11th37.4 M35.9 M+1.5 M95.99%
Wet Braking7th36.8 M34.4 M+2.4 M93.48%
Wet Braking - Concrete4th35.8 M35.2 M+0.6 M98.32%
Straight Aqua33rd79.7 Km/H86.7 Km/H-7 Km/H91.93%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise42nd71.9 dB69.1 dB+2.8 dB96.11%
Tire Weight40th9 Kg7.6 Kg+1.4 Kg84.44%
Wear15th40800 KM71500 KM-30700 KM57.06%
Value25th2.18 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.15 Price/100047.25%
Price33rd89 45 +44 50.56%
Fuel Consumption43rd5.9 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.4 l/100km93.22%
Abrasion22nd75.7 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+40.9 mg/km/t45.97%
Balanced, good on wet and dry roads (top mark.)
Slight weaknesses in the environmental balance, weakness in efficiency, weaknesses in sustainability.
Driving safety: The Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN sets the bar high on dry roads and also secures a good rating on wet roads, which leads to a good assessment of driving safety. The Falken secured the top mark in the test on dry roads. It offers the driver exemplary feedback on the steering wheel, is absolutely safe at the limit and also impresses with a short braking distance. The Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN also gets a good rating on wet roads. It gets good ratings for braking distance measurements, lateral aquaplaning and wet handling. The test car can be driven safely and easily controlled over the course. Only in lateral aquaplaning does it not get beyond a satisfactory rating.

Environmental balance: When it comes to the environmental balance, the ZIEX ZE310 does not get more than a satisfactory result. It does get good ratings for its predicted mileage and abrasion, but since it's quite heavy in comparison, it doesn't get more than a satisfactory rating for efficiency. In terms of sustainability, the tire produced in Turkey does not go beyond an adequate assessment.

Read Reviews    Buy from £80.65

7th: Continental UltraContact

Continental UltraContact
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: B/A/69
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking7th37.1 M35.9 M+1.2 M96.77%
Wet Braking16th38.3 M34.4 M+3.9 M89.82%
Wet Braking - Concrete16th38.7 M35.2 M+3.5 M90.96%
Straight Aqua46th76.5 Km/H86.7 Km/H-10.2 Km/H88.24%
Curved Aquaplaning46th2.9 m/sec24 m/sec2-1.1 m/sec272.5%
Noise23rd71 dB69.1 dB+1.9 dB97.32%
Tire Weight9th8.2 Kg7.6 Kg+0.6 Kg92.68%
Wear5th55900 KM71500 KM-15600 KM78.18%
Value20th2.02 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.99 Price/100050.99%
Price47th113 45 +68 39.82%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion3rd52.5 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+17.7 mg/km/t66.29%
Balanced, good on dry roads, good environmental record, very high mileage.
Slight weakness on wet roads.
Driving safety: The Continental UltraContact is rated as just satisfactory when it comes to driving safety. The UltraContact offers the driver satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on a dry road, but is still safe at the limit. Thanks to its short braking distance, it can still secure a good overall rating on dry roads. On wet roads, however, the UltraContact does not get more than a satisfactory rating. Although it scores in the braking distance measurements and also in handling with good grip and safe driving characteristics, it falters when it comes to aquaplaning. In the case of longitudinal aquaplaning, he does not get more than a satisfactory result, and in the case of transverse aquaplaning, even more than an adequate result.

Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the UltraContact secures one of the best results in the test. His predicted mileage is classified as very good, and he only just misses a very good rating for wear. The tire also scores with its low weight and low fuel consumption.

Read Reviews    Buy from £98.75

8th: Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho Ecsta HS52
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking3rd36.7 M35.9 M+0.8 M97.82%
Wet Braking17th38.4 M34.4 M+4 M89.58%
Wet Braking - Concrete9th37.6 M35.2 M+2.4 M93.62%
Straight Aqua13th81.9 Km/H86.7 Km/H-4.8 Km/H94.46%
Curved Aquaplaning33rd3.3 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.7 m/sec282.5%
Noise23rd71 dB69.1 dB+1.9 dB97.32%
Tire Weight41st9.1 Kg7.6 Kg+1.5 Kg83.52%
Wear12th43500 KM71500 KM-28000 KM60.84%
Value13th1.89 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.86 Price/100054.5%
Price24th82 45 +37 54.88%
Fuel Consumption43rd5.9 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.4 l/100km93.22%
Abrasion29th79.3 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+44.5 mg/km/t43.88%
Balanced, good on dry and wet roads.
Slight weaknesses in the environmental balance, weaknesses in efficiency, weaknesses in sustainability.
Driving safety: The Kumho Ecsta HS52 secures an overall good rating for driving safety. The HS52 offers the driver only satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, but is still safe at the limit. Its braking distance is classified as good compared to the test field. On wet roads, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores in the braking distance measurements, longitudinal aquaplaning and wet handling with good grip and safe drivability. However, its transverse aquaplaning behavior is only rated as satisfactory. Overall, the Kumho secured a good rating for wet performance.

Environmental balance: When it comes to the environmental balance, the Kumho does not get more than a satisfactory result. Although it scores in terms of predicted mileage and abrasion, but offers only satisfactory efficiency due to the higher tire weight. In terms of sustainability, the tire produced in China is rated as sufficient.

Read Reviews    Buy from £66.68

9th: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/69
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking2nd36.6 M35.9 M+0.7 M98.09%
Wet Braking3rd35.8 M34.4 M+1.4 M96.09%
Wet Braking - Concrete2nd35.5 M35.2 M+0.3 M99.15%
Straight Aqua43rd77.6 Km/H86.7 Km/H-9.1 Km/H89.5%
Curved Aquaplaning39th3.2 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.8 m/sec280%
Noise38th71.7 dB69.1 dB+2.6 dB96.37%
Tire Weight41st9.1 Kg7.6 Kg+1.5 Kg83.52%
Wear13th42200 KM71500 KM-29300 KM59.02%
Value22nd2.11 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.08 Price/100048.82%
Price33rd89 45 +44 50.56%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion8th67.6 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+32.8 mg/km/t51.48%
Balanced, good on dry and wet roads.
Slight weakness when aquaplaning, slight weaknesses in the environmental balance, weaknesses in efficiency.
Driving safety: The Hankook Ventus Prime4 secured a good overall rating for driving safety. The Ventus Prime 4 offers the driver satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, but is still safe at the limit. Its braking distance is classified as good compared to the test field. On wet roads, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores in braking distance measurements and in wet handling with good grip and safe drivability. However, its aquaplaning behavior is only rated as satisfactory. Overall, the Hankook secured a good rating for wet performance.

Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Ventus Prime4 gets a good rating for the predicted mileage and for its abrasion. In terms of efficiency, on the other hand, it loses out due to its relatively high weight. All in all, it does not go beyond a satisfactory result in terms of the environmental balance.

Read Reviews    Buy from £88.06

10th: Nexen N Fera Primus

Nexen N Fera Primus
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: D/A/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking19th38.2 M35.9 M+2.3 M93.98%
Wet Braking15th38.2 M34.4 M+3.8 M90.05%
Wet Braking - Concrete12th37.9 M35.2 M+2.7 M92.88%
Straight Aqua4th84.5 Km/H86.7 Km/H-2.2 Km/H97.46%
Curved Aquaplaning8th3.7 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.3 m/sec292.5%
Noise18th70.7 dB69.1 dB+1.6 dB97.74%
Tire Weight19th8.4 Kg7.6 Kg+0.8 Kg90.48%
Wear38th33300 KM71500 KM-38200 KM46.57%
Value39th2.58 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.55 Price/100039.92%
Price27th86 45 +41 52.33%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion40th88.1 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+53.3 mg/km/t39.5%
Balanced, good on dry and wet roads.
Weakness in the environmental balance, weaknesses in mileage, slight weaknesses in sustainability.
Driving Safety: The Nexen N'Fera Primus secures an overall good rating for driving safety. The Nexen offers the driver good feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads and is still safe even at the limit. In addition, its braking distance is rated as good compared to the test field. On wet roads, the N'Fera Primus gets good ratings for both braking distance measurements and aquaplaning behavior. In terms of handling, the Nexen just missed out on a good rating. All in all, it is still enough for a good assessment of the wet performance.

Environmental balance: In terms of environmental balance, the Nexen does not get more than a satisfactory result. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are classified as satisfactory.

Read Reviews

11th: Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210

Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/69
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking32nd39.5 M35.9 M+3.6 M90.89%
Wet Braking22nd40.2 M34.4 M+5.8 M85.57%
Wet Braking - Concrete25th40.1 M35.2 M+4.9 M87.78%
Straight Aqua5th84.1 Km/H86.7 Km/H-2.6 Km/H97%
Curved Aquaplaning8th3.7 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.3 m/sec292.5%
Noise23rd71 dB69.1 dB+1.9 dB97.32%
Tire Weight36th8.9 Kg7.6 Kg+1.3 Kg85.39%
Wear33rd35100 KM71500 KM-36400 KM49.09%
Value28th2.25 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.22 Price/100045.78%
Price21st79 45 +34 56.96%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion38th87 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+52.2 mg/km/t40%
Good on dry and wet roads.
Not quite balanced, weaknesses in the environmental balance, relatively low mileage (devaluation), significant weakness in sustainability.
Driving safety: The Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 secures an overall good rating for driving safety. The Kenda offers the driver good feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads and is also safe at the limit. In addition, its braking distance is rated as good compared to the test field. On wet roads, the Kenetica Pro KR210 missed a good rating in the braking distance measurements, but was able to secure good marks in aquaplaning behavior and handling. All in all, it is enough for a still good assessment of the wet performance.

Environmental balance: When it comes to the environmental balance, the Kenda does not get beyond a satisfactory result. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are classified as satisfactory. In terms of sustainability, the tire produced in Taiwan is rated as sufficient.

Read Reviews

12th: Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kleber Dynaxer HP4
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/68
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking9th37.3 M35.9 M+1.4 M96.25%
Wet Braking22nd40.2 M34.4 M+5.8 M85.57%
Wet Braking - Concrete24th39.5 M35.2 M+4.3 M89.11%
Straight Aqua19th81.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-5.4 Km/H93.77%
Curved Aquaplaning8th3.7 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.3 m/sec292.5%
Noise8th70.3 dB69.1 dB+1.2 dB98.29%
Tire Weight34th8.8 Kg7.6 Kg+1.2 Kg86.36%
Wear7th48000 KM71500 KM-23500 KM67.13%
Value11th1.83 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.8 Price/100056.28%
Price31st88 45 +43 51.14%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion6th63.5 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+28.7 mg/km/t54.8%
Good for the environmental balance, good for mileage, abrasion and efficiency.
Not quite balanced, weakness on wet roads.
Driving Safety: The driving safety of the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 does not go beyond a satisfactory rating. It offers the driver only average feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads and could prove to be a bit more stable during dynamic evasive maneuvers. Its braking distance is still classified as good, but overall it just misses out on a good rating on dry roads. On wet roads, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 does not get more than a satisfactory rating either. Although it scored well in the aquaplaning tests, it only performed satisfactorily in the braking distance measurements and handling. It lacks a bit of grip and precision for a better rating.

Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Dynaxer HP4 secures a good result in the test. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are rated as good. The tire also scores with its low fuel consumption, but it just misses out on a good rating in terms of weight.

Read Reviews

13th: Fulda EcoControl HP2

Fulda EcoControl HP2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking17th38 M35.9 M+2.1 M94.47%
Wet Braking26th40.8 M34.4 M+6.4 M84.31%
Wet Braking - Concrete31st41.1 M35.2 M+5.9 M85.64%
Straight Aqua23rd80.8 Km/H86.7 Km/H-5.9 Km/H93.19%
Curved Aquaplaning3rd3.8 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.2 m/sec295%
Noise30th71.2 dB69.1 dB+2.1 dB97.05%
Tire Weight5th7.9 Kg7.6 Kg+0.3 Kg96.2%
Wear8th47500 KM71500 KM-24000 KM66.43%
Value13th1.89 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.86 Price/100054.5%
Price35th90 45 +45 50%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion11th70.1 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+35.3 mg/km/t49.64%
Good for the environment, good for mileage, abrasion and efficiency.
Not quite balanced, weakness on wet roads.
Driving safety: The Fulda EcoControl HP2 can get a good rating on dry roads, but it does not get more than a satisfactory rating in the wet and thus overall driving safety. Overall, the Fulda still achieves a good rating on dry roads. Although it only offers the driver satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel, it is still safe at the limit. Its braking distance is also classified as clearly good compared to the test field. The EcoControl HP2 misses out on a good rating on wet roads. Although it can show good results in aquaplaning behavior, it does not get more than a satisfactory rating in wet braking and handling. It offers a medium level of grip and can only satisfactorily combine longitudinal and lateral forces.

Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the EcoControl HP2 secures a good result in the test. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are rated as good. In addition, it can also get a good result with its low fuel consumption and low weight in terms of efficiency.

Read Reviews

14th: Toyo Proxes Comfort

Toyo Proxes Comfort
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking14th37.8 M35.9 M+1.9 M94.97%
Wet Braking25th40.6 M34.4 M+6.2 M84.73%
Wet Braking - Concrete17th38.8 M35.2 M+3.6 M90.72%
Straight Aqua40th78.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-8.4 Km/H90.31%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise10th70.4 dB69.1 dB+1.3 dB98.15%
Tire Weight11th8.3 Kg7.6 Kg+0.7 Kg91.57%
Wear14th41700 KM71500 KM-29800 KM58.32%
Value19th2.01 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.98 Price/100051.24%
Price26th84 45 +39 53.57%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion25th75.9 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+41.1 mg/km/t45.85%
Still good on dry roads, good environmental balance.
Not quite balanced, slight weakness on wet roads (devaluation), significant weakness in sustainability
Driving safety: The Toyo Tires Proxes Comfort just missed out on a good result when it came to driving safety. The Toyo Tires Proxes Comfort offers the driver only average feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, but still shows itself to be safe in the limit area. Thanks to its short braking distance, the Toyo Tires Proxes Comfort just about got a good rating for dry performance. The Toyo Tires Proxes Comfort narrowly missed out on a good rating on wet roads. Its performance is rated as satisfactory for both braking distance and aquaplaning measurements. In wet handling he still gets good ratings, but overall that's not enough to get a good result in the wet.

Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Proxes Comfort secured a good result in the test. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are rated as good. In addition, it can also get a good result with its low fuel consumption and low weight in terms of efficiency. In terms of sustainability, the tire produced in Japan does not go beyond a sufficient result.

Read Reviews    Buy from £73.06

15th: Debica Presto HP 2

Debica Presto HP 2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: D/B/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking28th39.4 M35.9 M+3.5 M91.12%
Wet Braking33rd41.8 M34.4 M+7.4 M82.3%
Wet Braking - Concrete34th41.7 M35.2 M+6.5 M84.41%
Straight Aqua12th82.1 Km/H86.7 Km/H-4.6 Km/H94.69%
Curved Aquaplaning2nd3.9 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.1 m/sec297.5%
Noise28th71.1 dB69.1 dB+2 dB97.19%
Tire Weight8th8.1 Kg7.6 Kg+0.5 Kg93.83%
Wear10th45700 KM71500 KM-25800 KM63.92%
Value10th1.77 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.74 Price/100058.19%
Price23rd81 45 +36 55.56%
Fuel Consumption43rd5.9 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.4 l/100km93.22%
Abrasion19th74 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+39.2 mg/km/t47.03%
Good environmental record, good for mileage, abrasion and efficiency.
Not quite balanced, weakness on wet roads.
Driving safety: The Debica Presto HP 2 does not get more than a satisfactory rating in either dry or wet conditions and therefore also overall in terms of driving safety. The Debica offers the driver only satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, so that it is difficult to set the steering angle required for the curve right away. But its handling at the limit is only classified as satisfactory. After all, he can get a good rating for the braking distance. On wet roads, the Debica Presto HP 2 does not get more than a satisfactory rating either. Although the tire received good ratings for its aquaplaning behavior, its properties in braking tests and handling were only rated as satisfactory. It offers a medium level of grip and can only satisfactorily combine longitudinal and lateral forces.

Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Presto HP 2 secures a good result in the test. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are rated as good. In addition, it can also get a good result with its fuel consumption and low weight in terms of efficiency.

Read Reviews

16th: Dunlop Sport BluResponse

Dunlop Sport BluResponse
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: B/A/68
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking14th37.8 M35.9 M+1.9 M94.97%
Wet Braking31st41.5 M34.4 M+7.1 M82.89%
Wet Braking - Concrete26th40.2 M35.2 M+5 M87.56%
Straight Aqua9th82.5 Km/H86.7 Km/H-4.2 Km/H95.16%
Curved Aquaplaning3rd3.8 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.2 m/sec295%
Noise39th71.8 dB69.1 dB+2.7 dB96.24%
Tire Weight3rd7.7 Kg7.6 Kg+0.1 Kg98.7%
Wear28th36900 KM71500 KM-34600 KM51.61%
Value47th2.98 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.95 Price/100034.56%
Price44th110 45 +65 40.91%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion32nd80.2 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+45.4 mg/km/t43.39%
Read Reviews    Buy from £70.03

17th: Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/69
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking6th37 M35.9 M+1.1 M97.03%
Wet Braking24th40.3 M34.4 M+5.9 M85.36%
Wet Braking - Concrete19th39.1 M35.2 M+3.9 M90.03%
Straight Aqua15th81.8 Km/H86.7 Km/H-4.9 Km/H94.35%
Curved Aquaplaning8th3.7 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.3 m/sec292.5%
Noise12th70.5 dB69.1 dB+1.4 dB98.01%
Tire Weight29th8.7 Kg7.6 Kg+1.1 Kg87.36%
Wear21st39500 KM71500 KM-32000 KM55.24%
Value42nd2.71 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.68 Price/100038.01%
Price43rd107 45 +62 42.06%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion36th82.1 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+47.3 mg/km/t42.39%
Good on dry roads, still good for mileage and efficiency.
Not quite balanced, weaknesses on wet roads, weaknesses in the environmental balance, slight weakness in abrasion (devaluation.)
Driving safety: The Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 is rated as just satisfactory in terms of driving safety due to its wet properties. The Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 offers the driver good feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, can be steered precisely and is safe even at the limit. In addition, it can score with its short braking distance and thus secures a good rating for dry performance. On wet roads, however, the Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 does not go beyond a satisfactory verdict. Although it scored well in the aquaplaning tests and secured good ratings, it was only satisfactory in the braking distance measurements and handling. It offers a medium level of grip and can only satisfactorily combine longitudinal and lateral forces.

Environmental balance: The Cinturato P7 C2 also missed out on a good result in terms of the environmental balance. His predicted mileage is still rated as good, but he does not get more than a satisfactory result when it comes to abrasion. It doesn't help that its fuel consumption and weight are rated as good.

Read Reviews    Buy from £83.99

18th: Sava Intensa HP2

Sava Intensa HP2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking19th38.2 M35.9 M+2.3 M93.98%
Wet Braking27th40.9 M34.4 M+6.5 M84.11%
Wet Braking - Concrete30th40.9 M35.2 M+5.7 M86.06%
Straight Aqua19th81.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-5.4 Km/H93.77%
Curved Aquaplaning3rd3.8 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.2 m/sec295%
Noise34th71.5 dB69.1 dB+2.4 dB96.64%
Tire Weight6th8 Kg7.6 Kg+0.4 Kg95%
Wear23rd38600 KM71500 KM-32900 KM53.99%
Value27th2.23 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.2 Price/100046.19%
Price27th86 45 +41 52.33%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion34th81.4 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+46.6 mg/km/t42.75%
Read Reviews

19th: Semperit Speed Life 3

Semperit Speed Life 3
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking36th39.7 M35.9 M+3.8 M90.43%
Wet Braking10th37.2 M34.4 M+2.8 M92.47%
Wet Braking - Concrete3rd35.7 M35.2 M+0.5 M98.6%
Straight Aqua15th81.8 Km/H86.7 Km/H-4.9 Km/H94.35%
Curved Aquaplaning3rd3.8 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.2 m/sec295%
Noise18th70.7 dB69.1 dB+1.6 dB97.74%
Tire Weight22nd8.5 Kg7.6 Kg+0.9 Kg89.41%
Wear18th40000 KM71500 KM-31500 KM55.94%
Value30th2.28 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.25 Price/100045.18%
Price38th91 45 +46 49.45%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion29th79.3 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+44.5 mg/km/t43.88%
Read Reviews

20th: Firestone RoadHawk

Firestone RoadHawk
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking18th38.1 M35.9 M+2.2 M94.23%
Wet Braking32nd41.7 M34.4 M+7.3 M82.49%
Wet Braking - Concrete28th40.6 M35.2 M+5.4 M86.7%
Straight Aqua6th83.6 Km/H86.7 Km/H-3.1 Km/H96.42%
Curved Aquaplaning3rd3.8 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.2 m/sec295%
Noise47th72.4 dB69.1 dB+3.3 dB95.44%
Tire Weight1st7.6 Kg100%
Wear25th38200 KM71500 KM-33300 KM53.43%
Value31st2.3 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.27 Price/100044.78%
Price31st88 45 +43 51.14%
Fuel Consumption43rd5.9 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.4 l/100km93.22%
Abrasion9th68.7 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+33.9 mg/km/t50.66%
Read Reviews    Buy from £67.99

21st: BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich Advantage
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking8th37.2 M35.9 M+1.3 M96.51%
Wet Braking21st39.8 M34.4 M+5.4 M86.43%
Wet Braking - Concrete18th39 M35.2 M+3.8 M90.26%
Straight Aqua19th81.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-5.4 Km/H93.77%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise44th72.3 dB69.1 dB+3.2 dB95.57%
Tire Weight29th8.7 Kg7.6 Kg+1.1 Kg87.36%
Wear26th37300 KM71500 KM-34200 KM52.17%
Value38th2.57 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.54 Price/100040.08%
Price40th96 45 +51 46.88%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion12th71.2 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+36.4 mg/km/t48.88%
Read Reviews

22nd: GT Radial FE2

GT-Radial FE2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/69
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking28th39.4 M35.9 M+3.5 M91.12%
Wet Braking28th41.1 M34.4 M+6.7 M83.7%
Wet Braking - Concrete32nd41.3 M35.2 M+6.1 M85.23%
Straight Aqua17th81.5 Km/H86.7 Km/H-5.2 Km/H94%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise36th71.6 dB69.1 dB+2.5 dB96.51%
Tire Weight29th8.7 Kg7.6 Kg+1.1 Kg87.36%
Wear33rd35100 KM71500 KM-36400 KM49.09%
Value17th1.99 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.96 Price/100051.76%
Price10th70 45 +25 64.29%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion37th83.8 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+49 mg/km/t41.53%
Read Reviews

23rd: ESA Tecar Spirit Pro

ESA-Tecar Spirit Pro
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking32nd39.5 M35.9 M+3.6 M90.89%
Wet Braking5th36.3 M34.4 M+1.9 M94.77%
Wet Braking - Concrete6th36.2 M35.2 M+1 M97.24%
Straight Aqua17th81.5 Km/H86.7 Km/H-5.2 Km/H94%
Curved Aquaplaning14th3.6 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.4 m/sec290%
Noise23rd71 dB69.1 dB+1.9 dB97.32%
Tire Weight19th8.4 Kg7.6 Kg+0.8 Kg90.48%
Wear10th45700 KM71500 KM-25800 KM63.92%
Value3rd1.47 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.44 Price/100070.07%
Price6th67 45 +22 67.16%
Fuel Consumption3rd5.6 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.1 l/100km98.21%
Abrasion21st74.3 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+39.5 mg/km/t46.84%
Read Reviews

24th: Barum Bravuris 5HM

Barum Bravuris 5HM
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking47th41 M35.9 M+5.1 M87.56%
Wet Braking29th41.4 M34.4 M+7 M83.09%
Wet Braking - Concrete35th41.9 M35.2 M+6.7 M84.01%
Straight Aqua26th80.4 Km/H86.7 Km/H-6.3 Km/H92.73%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise47th72.4 dB69.1 dB+3.3 dB95.44%
Tire Weight11th8.3 Kg7.6 Kg+0.7 Kg91.57%
Wear30th36000 KM71500 KM-35500 KM50.35%
Value33rd2.39 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.36 Price/100043.1%
Price27th86 45 +41 52.33%
Fuel Consumption3rd5.6 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.1 l/100km98.21%
Abrasion35th81.7 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+46.9 mg/km/t42.59%
Read Reviews

25th: Viking Protech Newgen

Viking Protech Newgen
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking43rd40.3 M35.9 M+4.4 M89.08%
Wet Braking40th44.2 M34.4 M+9.8 M77.83%
Wet Braking - Concrete33rd41.5 M35.2 M+6.3 M84.82%
Straight Aqua31st80 Km/H86.7 Km/H-6.7 Km/H92.27%
Curved Aquaplaning14th3.6 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.4 m/sec290%
Noise15th70.6 dB69.1 dB+1.5 dB97.88%
Tire Weight11th8.3 Kg7.6 Kg+0.7 Kg91.57%
Wear18th40000 KM71500 KM-31500 KM55.94%
Value18th2 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.97 Price/100051.5%
Price22nd80 45 +35 56.25%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion27th78.2 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+43.4 mg/km/t44.5%
Read Reviews

26th: Norauto Prevensys 4

Norauto Prevensys 4
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking23rd39 M35.9 M+3.1 M92.05%
Wet Braking9th36.9 M34.4 M+2.5 M93.22%
Wet Braking - Concrete12th37.9 M35.2 M+2.7 M92.88%
Straight Aqua27th80.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-6.4 Km/H92.62%
Curved Aquaplaning8th3.7 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.3 m/sec292.5%
Noise6th70.1 dB69.1 dB+1 dB98.57%
Tire Weight22nd8.5 Kg7.6 Kg+0.9 Kg89.41%
Wear31st35500 KM71500 KM-36000 KM49.65%
Value11th1.83 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.8 Price/100056.28%
Price5th65 45 +20 69.23%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion44th94.3 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+59.5 mg/km/t36.9%
Read Reviews

27th: Apollo Alnac 4g

Apollo Alnac 4g
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/C/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking26th39.3 M35.9 M+3.4 M91.35%
Wet Braking34th42.2 M34.4 M+7.8 M81.52%
Wet Braking - Concrete28th40.6 M35.2 M+5.4 M86.7%
Straight Aqua13th81.9 Km/H86.7 Km/H-4.8 Km/H94.46%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise30th71.2 dB69.1 dB+2.1 dB97.05%
Tire Weight19th8.4 Kg7.6 Kg+0.8 Kg90.48%
Wear44th29700 KM71500 KM-41800 KM41.54%
Value48th3.03 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+2 Price/100033.99%
Price35th90 45 +45 50%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion39th87.3 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+52.5 mg/km/t39.86%
Read Reviews    Buy from £66.99

28th: General Altimax One S

General Altimax One S
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking41st40.2 M35.9 M+4.3 M89.3%
Wet Braking39th43.9 M34.4 M+9.5 M78.36%
Wet Braking - Concrete38th43.3 M35.2 M+8.1 M81.29%
Straight Aqua41st78.1 Km/H86.7 Km/H-8.6 Km/H90.08%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise10th70.4 dB69.1 dB+1.3 dB98.15%
Tire Weight11th8.3 Kg7.6 Kg+0.7 Kg91.57%
Wear15th40800 KM71500 KM-30700 KM57.06%
Value6th1.57 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.54 Price/100065.61%
Price3rd64 45 +19 70.31%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion22nd75.7 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+40.9 mg/km/t45.97%
Read Reviews

29th: Giti GitiSynergyH2

Giti GitiSynergyH2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking28th39.4 M35.9 M+3.5 M91.12%
Wet Braking36th43.5 M34.4 M+9.1 M79.08%
Wet Braking - Concrete38th43.3 M35.2 M+8.1 M81.29%
Straight Aqua10th82.4 Km/H86.7 Km/H-4.3 Km/H95.04%
Curved Aquaplaning14th3.6 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.4 m/sec290%
Noise39th71.8 dB69.1 dB+2.7 dB96.24%
Tire Weight36th8.9 Kg7.6 Kg+1.3 Kg85.39%
Wear23rd38600 KM71500 KM-32900 KM53.99%
Value15th1.94 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.91 Price/100053.09%
Price16th75 45 +30 60%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion33rd80.6 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+45.8 mg/km/t43.18%
Read Reviews

30th: Petlas Imperium PT515

Petlas Imperium PT515
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking26th39.3 M35.9 M+3.4 M91.35%
Wet Braking37th43.6 M34.4 M+9.2 M78.9%
Wet Braking - Concrete37th43.1 M35.2 M+7.9 M81.67%
Straight Aqua35th79.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-7.4 Km/H91.46%
Curved Aquaplaning33rd3.3 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.7 m/sec282.5%
Noise50th73.6 dB69.1 dB+4.5 dB93.89%
Tire Weight46th9.2 Kg7.6 Kg+1.6 Kg82.61%
Wear8th47500 KM71500 KM-24000 KM66.43%
Value4th1.56 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.53 Price/100066.03%
Price14th74 45 +29 60.81%
Fuel Consumption43rd5.9 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.4 l/100km93.22%
Abrasion14th72.6 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+37.8 mg/km/t47.93%
Read Reviews

31st: Uniroyal RainSport 5

Uniroyal RainSport 5
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking24th39.1 M35.9 M+3.2 M91.82%
Wet Braking7th36.8 M34.4 M+2.4 M93.48%
Wet Braking - Concrete7th36.3 M35.2 M+1.1 M96.97%
Straight Aqua1st86.7 Km/H100%
Curved Aquaplaning1st4 m/sec2100%
Noise22nd70.9 dB69.1 dB+1.8 dB97.46%
Tire Weight22nd8.5 Kg7.6 Kg+0.9 Kg89.41%
Wear38th33300 KM71500 KM-38200 KM46.57%
Value44th2.76 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.73 Price/100037.32%
Price39th92 45 +47 48.91%
Fuel Consumption43rd5.9 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.4 l/100km93.22%
Abrasion43rd93.2 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+58.4 mg/km/t37.34%
Good on wet roads.
Less balanced, significant weaknesses on dry roads (devaluation), weakness in environmental performance and sustainability, low mileage, high fuel consumption.
Driving safety: The Uniroyal RainSport 5 is only rated as satisfactory for driving safety due to its dry properties. The RainSport 5 only offers the driver sufficient feedback on the steering wheel on a dry road and also receives an adequate rating for its handling at the limit - in the event of sudden evasive maneuvers, the test car tends to oversteer with the tires, but skilful steering maneuvers can prevent skidding. When it comes to the braking distance, the Uniroyal can secure a good mark with a short value. Overall, its drying properties are classified as satisfactory. On wet roads, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 receives very good ratings for its aquaplaning behavior, for its braking performance and its behavior in wet handling, thanks to good grip and safe and precise driveability, good reviews. Overall, the overall wet performance is rated as good.

Environmental balance: In terms of environmental balance, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 is also clearly rated as satisfactory. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are classified as satisfactory. The efficiency is still rated as good thanks to the relatively low fuel consumption and weight.

Read Reviews    Buy from £63.54

32nd: Hifly HF201

Hifly HF201
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: D/C/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking37th39.8 M35.9 M+3.9 M90.2%
Wet Braking42nd44.5 M34.4 M+10.1 M77.3%
Wet Braking - Concrete36th42.9 M35.2 M+7.7 M82.05%
Straight Aqua37th79.2 Km/H86.7 Km/H-7.5 Km/H91.35%
Curved Aquaplaning40th3.1 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.9 m/sec277.5%
Noise8th70.3 dB69.1 dB+1.2 dB98.29%
Tire Weight26th8.6 Kg7.6 Kg+1 Kg88.37%
Wear22nd39100 KM71500 KM-32400 KM54.69%
Value7th1.64 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.61 Price/100062.8%
Price3rd64 45 +19 70.31%
Fuel Consumption43rd5.9 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.4 l/100km93.22%
Abrasion17th73.6 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+38.8 mg/km/t47.28%
Read Reviews

33rd: Cooper Zeon CS8

Cooper Zeon CS8
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: D/A/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking21st38.6 M35.9 M+2.7 M93.01%
Wet Braking2nd35 M34.4 M+0.6 M98.29%
Wet Braking - Concrete9th37.6 M35.2 M+2.4 M93.62%
Straight Aqua22nd80.9 Km/H86.7 Km/H-5.8 Km/H93.31%
Curved Aquaplaning33rd3.3 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.7 m/sec282.5%
Noise7th70.2 dB69.1 dB+1.1 dB98.43%
Tire Weight49th9.6 Kg7.6 Kg+2 Kg79.17%
Wear42nd31500 KM71500 KM-40000 KM44.06%
Value40th2.63 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.6 Price/100039.16%
Price25th83 45 +38 54.22%
Fuel Consumption43rd5.9 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.4 l/100km93.22%
Abrasion47th97.7 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+62.9 mg/km/t35.62%
Read Reviews    Buy from £86.59

34th: Westlake Z 107

Westlake  Z 107
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: D/B/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking24th39.1 M35.9 M+3.2 M91.82%
Wet Braking29th41.4 M34.4 M+7 M83.09%
Wet Braking - Concrete15th38.4 M35.2 M+3.2 M91.67%
Straight Aqua2nd84.6 Km/H86.7 Km/H-2.1 Km/H97.58%
Curved Aquaplaning8th3.7 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.3 m/sec292.5%
Noise34th71.5 dB69.1 dB+2.4 dB96.64%
Tire Weight26th8.6 Kg7.6 Kg+1 Kg88.37%
Wear46th27100 KM71500 KM-44400 KM37.9%
Value41st2.69 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.66 Price/100038.29%
Price13th73 45 +28 61.64%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion42nd92.2 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+57.4 mg/km/t37.74%
Read Reviews

35th: Minerva Radial 209

Minerva Radial 209
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: D/B/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking45th40.8 M35.9 M+4.9 M87.99%
Wet Braking43rd45.3 M34.4 M+10.9 M75.94%
Wet Braking - Concrete45th44.8 M35.2 M+9.6 M78.57%
Straight Aqua30th80.1 Km/H86.7 Km/H-6.6 Km/H92.39%
Curved Aquaplaning30th3.4 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.6 m/sec285%
Noise30th71.2 dB69.1 dB+2.1 dB97.05%
Tire Weight11th8.3 Kg7.6 Kg+0.7 Kg91.57%
Wear35th34600 KM71500 KM-36900 KM48.39%
Value24th2.14 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.11 Price/100048.13%
Price14th74 45 +29 60.81%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion17th73.6 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+38.8 mg/km/t47.28%
Read Reviews

36th: King Meiler Sport 1 KM

King-Meiler Sport 1 KM
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking35th39.6 M35.9 M+3.7 M90.66%
Wet Braking35th43.1 M34.4 M+8.7 M79.81%
Wet Braking - Concrete40th43.4 M35.2 M+8.2 M81.11%
Straight Aqua32nd79.9 Km/H86.7 Km/H-6.8 Km/H92.16%
Curved Aquaplaning40th3.1 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.9 m/sec277.5%
Noise28th71.1 dB69.1 dB+2 dB97.19%
Tire Weight34th8.8 Kg7.6 Kg+1.2 Kg86.36%
Wear28th36900 KM71500 KM-34600 KM51.61%
Value21st2.03 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1 Price/100050.74%
Price16th75 45 +30 60%
Fuel Consumption1st5.5 l/100km100%
Abrasion28th78.9 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+44.1 mg/km/t44.11%
Read Reviews

37th: Tomket Sport 3 Series 3

Tomket Sport 3 Series 3
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/69
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking22nd38.8 M35.9 M+2.9 M92.53%
Wet Braking41st44.3 M34.4 M+9.9 M77.65%
Wet Braking - Concrete44th44.4 M35.2 M+9.2 M79.28%
Straight Aqua44th77.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-9.4 Km/H89.16%
Curved Aquaplaning40th3.1 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.9 m/sec277.5%
Noise36th71.6 dB69.1 dB+2.5 dB96.51%
Tire Weight1st7.6 Kg100%
Wear42nd31500 KM71500 KM-40000 KM44.06%
Value23rd2.13 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.1 Price/100048.36%
Price6th67 45 +22 67.16%
Fuel Consumption3rd5.6 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.1 l/100km98.21%
Abrasion22nd75.7 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+40.9 mg/km/t45.97%
Read Reviews

38th: Michelin e.Primacy

Michelin e.Primacy
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: A/B/69
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking3rd36.7 M35.9 M+0.8 M97.82%
Wet Braking38th43.7 M34.4 M+9.3 M78.72%
Wet Braking - Concrete41st43.8 M35.2 M+8.6 M80.37%
Straight Aqua48th72.8 Km/H86.7 Km/H-13.9 Km/H83.97%
Curved Aquaplaning47th2.8 m/sec24 m/sec2-1.2 m/sec270%
Noise2nd69.8 dB69.1 dB+0.7 dB99%
Tire Weight6th8 Kg7.6 Kg+0.4 Kg95%
Wear1st71500 KM100%
Value9th1.73 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.7 Price/100059.54%
Price50th124 45 +79 36.29%
Fuel Consumption1st5.5 l/100km100%
Abrasion1st34.8 mg/km/t100%
Very good environmental balance, best sustainability, very high mileage (top grade), very little abrasion (top mark), light and very economical (top mark)
Unbalanced, weaknesses on dry and particularly wet roads (devaluation.)
Driving safety: The Michelin e.Primacy is rated as sufficient for driving safety due to its wet performance. The Michelin e.Primacy offers the driver satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads and does not get more than a satisfactory rating when driving at the limit. When it comes to the braking distance, however, the tire scores well and even gets a good rating for it. All in all, however, it does not get more than a satisfactory result in terms of dry performance. On wet roads, the e.Primacy shows clear weaknesses compared to the test field. Its braking, aquaplaning and handling performance is rated as only adequate. The tire can only moderately combine longitudinal and lateral forces, which means that the test car can only be controlled imprecisely and in the limit area with great difficulty. Overall, the wet performance is rated as sufficient.

Environmental balance: In terms of environmental balance, the e.Primacy sets the standard in the test field. It offers a very high predicted mileage, gets a very good rating for the lowest wear and also scores points in terms of efficiency with very low fuel consumption and low tire weight. The Michelin e.Primacy also sets the bar high when it comes to sustainability and is the only tire that just barely misses a good rating. It offers a very high predicted mileage, gets a very good rating for the lowest wear and also scores points in terms of efficiency with very low fuel consumption and low tire weight. The Michelin e.Primacy also sets the bar high when it comes to sustainability and is the only tire that just barely misses a good rating. It offers a very high predicted mileage, gets a very good rating for the lowest wear and also scores points in terms of efficiency with very low fuel consumption and low tire weight. The Michelin e.Primacy also sets the bar high when it comes to sustainability and is the only tire that just barely misses a good rating.

Read Reviews    Buy from £88.87

39th: Laufenn S Fit EQ+

Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking12th37.6 M35.9 M+1.7 M95.48%
Wet Braking20th39.5 M34.4 M+5.1 M87.09%
Wet Braking - Concrete21st39.3 M35.2 M+4.1 M89.57%
Straight Aqua41st78.1 Km/H86.7 Km/H-8.6 Km/H90.08%
Curved Aquaplaning30th3.4 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.6 m/sec285%
Noise23rd71 dB69.1 dB+1.9 dB97.32%
Tire Weight9th8.2 Kg7.6 Kg+0.6 Kg92.68%
Wear48th25300 KM71500 KM-46200 KM35.38%
Value46th2.96 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.93 Price/100034.8%
Price16th75 45 +30 60%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion46th96.8 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+62 mg/km/t35.95%
Read Reviews

40th: Delinte DH2

Delinte DH2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: B/B/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking32nd39.5 M35.9 M+3.6 M90.89%
Wet Braking14th38.1 M34.4 M+3.7 M90.29%
Wet Braking - Concrete14th38 M35.2 M+2.8 M92.63%
Straight Aqua45th77.2 Km/H86.7 Km/H-9.5 Km/H89.04%
Curved Aquaplaning49th2.7 m/sec24 m/sec2-1.3 m/sec267.5%
Noise1st69.1 dB100%
Tire Weight29th8.7 Kg7.6 Kg+1.1 Kg87.36%
Wear45th27500 KM71500 KM-44000 KM38.46%
Value36th2.55 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.52 Price/100040.39%
Price10th70 45 +25 64.29%
Fuel Consumption3rd5.6 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.1 l/100km98.21%
Abrasion45th96.1 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+61.3 mg/km/t36.21%
Read Reviews

41st: Zeetex ZT1000

Zeetex ZT1000
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: E/C/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking39th39.9 M35.9 M+4 M89.97%
Wet Braking18th39 M34.4 M+4.6 M88.21%
Wet Braking - Concrete21st39.3 M35.2 M+4.1 M89.57%
Straight Aqua35th79.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-7.4 Km/H91.46%
Curved Aquaplaning40th3.1 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.9 m/sec277.5%
Noise2nd69.8 dB69.1 dB+0.7 dB99%
Tire Weight29th8.7 Kg7.6 Kg+1.1 Kg87.36%
Wear50th23100 KM71500 KM-48400 KM32.31%
Value49th3.29 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+2.26 Price/100031.31%
Price19th76 45 +31 59.21%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion49th112.6 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+77.8 mg/km/t30.91%
Read Reviews

42nd: Avon ZV7

Avon ZV7
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: D/A/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking28th39.4 M35.9 M+3.5 M91.12%
Wet Braking13th38 M34.4 M+3.6 M90.53%
Wet Braking - Concrete21st39.3 M35.2 M+4.1 M89.57%
Straight Aqua10th82.4 Km/H86.7 Km/H-4.3 Km/H95.04%
Curved Aquaplaning30th3.4 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.6 m/sec285%
Noise39th71.8 dB69.1 dB+2.7 dB96.24%
Tire Weight47th9.3 Kg7.6 Kg+1.7 Kg81.72%
Wear49th24000 KM71500 KM-47500 KM33.57%
Value50th3.75 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+2.72 Price/100027.47%
Price35th90 45 +45 50%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion50th126 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+91.2 mg/km/t27.62%
Read Reviews    Buy from £63.99

43rd: Radar RPX800

Radar RPX800
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking44th40.5 M35.9 M+4.6 M88.64%
Wet Braking19th39.1 M34.4 M+4.7 M87.98%
Wet Braking - Concrete27th40.5 M35.2 M+5.3 M86.91%
Straight Aqua39th79 Km/H86.7 Km/H-7.7 Km/H91.12%
Curved Aquaplaning45th3 m/sec24 m/sec2-1 m/sec275%
Noise4th69.9 dB69.1 dB+0.8 dB98.86%
Tire Weight36th8.9 Kg7.6 Kg+1.3 Kg85.39%
Wear46th27100 KM71500 KM-44400 KM37.9%
Value35th2.47 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.44 Price/100041.7%
Price6th67 45 +22 67.16%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion48th101 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+66.2 mg/km/t34.46%
Read Reviews    Buy from £57.10

44th: Rotalla RH01 E Pace

Rotalla RH01 E Pace
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/B/69
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking40th40.1 M35.9 M+4.2 M89.53%
Wet Braking44th45.9 M34.4 M+11.5 M74.95%
Wet Braking - Concrete43rd44.2 M35.2 M+9 M79.64%
Straight Aqua23rd80.8 Km/H86.7 Km/H-5.9 Km/H93.19%
Curved Aquaplaning33rd3.3 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.7 m/sec282.5%
Noise18th70.7 dB69.1 dB+1.6 dB97.74%
Tire Weight22nd8.5 Kg7.6 Kg+0.9 Kg89.41%
Wear41st32900 KM71500 KM-38600 KM46.01%
Value26th2.19 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.16 Price/100047.03%
Price12th72 45 +27 62.5%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion15th73.3 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+38.5 mg/km/t47.48%
Read Reviews

45th: Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1 G2

Berlin-Tires Summer UHP 1 G2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: D/B/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking45th40.8 M35.9 M+4.9 M87.99%
Wet Braking48th54 M34.4 M+19.6 M63.7%
Wet Braking - Concrete47th49 M35.2 M+13.8 M71.84%
Straight Aqua47th75 Km/H86.7 Km/H-11.7 Km/H86.51%
Curved Aquaplaning40th3.1 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.9 m/sec277.5%
Noise21st70.8 dB69.1 dB+1.7 dB97.6%
Tire Weight41st9.1 Kg7.6 Kg+1.5 Kg83.52%
Wear38th33300 KM71500 KM-38200 KM46.57%
Value4th1.56 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.53 Price/100066.03%
Price2nd52 45 +7 86.54%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion31st80 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+45.2 mg/km/t43.5%
Read Reviews

46th: Lassa DriveWays

Lassa DriveWays
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: B/B/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking41st40.2 M35.9 M+4.3 M89.3%
Wet Braking45th46.4 M34.4 M+12 M74.14%
Wet Braking - Concrete42nd44.1 M35.2 M+8.9 M79.82%
Straight Aqua25th80.7 Km/H86.7 Km/H-6 Km/H93.08%
Curved Aquaplaning33rd3.3 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.7 m/sec282.5%
Noise44th72.3 dB69.1 dB+3.2 dB95.57%
Tire Weight41st9.1 Kg7.6 Kg+1.5 Kg83.52%
Wear36th33700 KM71500 KM-37800 KM47.13%
Value45th2.91 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.88 Price/100035.4%
Price41st98 45 +53 45.92%
Fuel Consumption3rd5.6 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.1 l/100km98.21%
Abrasion26th76.1 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+41.3 mg/km/t45.73%
Read Reviews

47th: Evergreen DynaComfort EH226

Evergreen DynaComfort EH226
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: D/C/68
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking48th41.4 M35.9 M+5.5 M86.71%
Wet Braking47th50.9 M34.4 M+16.5 M67.58%
Wet Braking - Concrete48th49.7 M35.2 M+14.5 M70.82%
Straight Aqua37th79.2 Km/H86.7 Km/H-7.5 Km/H91.35%
Curved Aquaplaning19th3.5 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.5 m/sec287.5%
Noise12th70.5 dB69.1 dB+1.4 dB98.01%
Tire Weight41st9.1 Kg7.6 Kg+1.5 Kg83.52%
Wear18th40000 KM71500 KM-31500 KM55.94%
Value36th2.55 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.52 Price/100040.39%
Price42nd102 45 +57 44.12%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion13th72.2 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+37.4 mg/km/t48.2%
Read Reviews

48th: Riken Road Performance

Riken Road Performance
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/C/71
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking37th39.8 M35.9 M+3.9 M90.2%
Wet Braking46th48.4 M34.4 M+14 M71.07%
Wet Braking - Concrete46th45.7 M35.2 M+10.5 M77.02%
Straight Aqua34th79.6 Km/H86.7 Km/H-7.1 Km/H91.81%
Curved Aquaplaning14th3.6 m/sec24 m/sec2-0.4 m/sec290%
Noise43rd72.1 dB69.1 dB+3 dB95.84%
Tire Weight11th8.3 Kg7.6 Kg+0.7 Kg91.57%
Wear36th33700 KM71500 KM-37800 KM47.13%
Value29th2.26 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+1.23 Price/100045.58%
Price19th76 45 +31 59.21%
Fuel Consumption10th5.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.2 l/100km96.49%
Abrasion7th67 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+32.2 mg/km/t51.94%
Read Reviews    Buy from £70.13

49th: Double Coin DC99

Double-Coin DC99
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/C/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking49th42.5 M35.9 M+6.6 M84.47%
Wet Braking50th59.3 M34.4 M+24.9 M58.01%
Wet Braking - Concrete50th58.4 M35.2 M+23.2 M60.27%
Straight Aqua50th70.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-16.4 Km/H81.08%
Curved Aquaplaning49th2.7 m/sec24 m/sec2-1.3 m/sec267.5%
Noise5th70 dB69.1 dB+0.9 dB98.71%
Tire Weight47th9.3 Kg7.6 Kg+1.7 Kg81.72%
Wear3rd64800 KM71500 KM-6700 KM90.63%
Value1st1.03 Price/1000100%
Price6th67 45 +22 67.16%
Fuel Consumption3rd5.6 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.1 l/100km98.21%
Abrasion2nd45.9 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+11.1 mg/km/t75.82%
Read Reviews

50th: Premiorri Solazo

Premiorri Solazo
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: D/B/70
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking50th42.9 M35.9 M+7 M83.68%
Wet Braking49th58.1 M34.4 M+23.7 M59.21%
Wet Braking - Concrete49th57.1 M35.2 M+21.9 M61.65%
Straight Aqua49th71.3 Km/H86.7 Km/H-15.4 Km/H82.24%
Curved Aquaplaning47th2.8 m/sec24 m/sec2-1.2 m/sec270%
Noise49th72.5 dB69.1 dB+3.4 dB95.31%
Tire Weight50th9.9 Kg7.6 Kg+2.3 Kg76.77%
Wear26th37300 KM71500 KM-34200 KM52.17%
Value2nd1.21 Price/10001.03 Price/1000+0.18 Price/100085.12%
Price1st45 100%
Fuel Consumption28th5.8 l/100km5.5 l/100km+0.3 l/100km94.83%
Abrasion19th74 mg/km/t34.8 mg/km/t+39.2 mg/km/t47.03%
Read Reviews


Discussion:

comments powered by Disqus