Nexen N Fera Primus
WatchThe Nexen N Fera Primus is a Premium Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.
Expected Mileage
18,811
miles
High Confidence
10
Reviews
83%
Average
51,847
miles driven
6
Tests (avg: 12th)
In Depth Tire Comparisons
All Tests
View Test Results6
Tests
12th
Average
10th
Best
17th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2024 Summer Tire Market Overview
11th/55
205/55 R16 • 2024
2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test
11th/16
215/55 R17 • 2024
The Nexen N'Fera Primus receives a satisfactory rating in driving safety, failing to achieve a good rating in both dry and wet conditions. On dry roads, it provides barely satisfactory steering feedback and does not surpass a satisfactory rating in handling at the limit. A lack of precise steering feedback makes it challenging to accurately adjust the steering angle for curves, leading to a tendency for the vehicle to oversteer during sudden evasion maneuvers. However, the tire achieves a clearly good rating in braking distance. On wet surfaces, the N'Fera Primus secures good ratings in braking distance measurements and lateral aquaplaning but only achieves satisfactory results in longitudinal aquaplaning and handling, preventing a good overall rating in wet performance. Environmentally, the Nexen narrowly misses a good rating, with its projected mileage, noise, and sustainability rated as just satisfactory, while its wear and efficiency are rated as good.
2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test
17th/21
205/55 R16 • 2024
Good braking performance, dynamic wet handling.
Delayed steering response, limited tread life/economic efficiency.
Satisfactory.
Alternative Tires
9.7/10
9.6/10
9.4/10
9.1/10
8.9/10
5.8/10
| Size | Fuel | Wet | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 inch | |||
| 195/65R15 95 H XL | A | B | 72 |
| 185/65R15 88 H | D | A | 70 |
| 195/65R15 91 V | D | B | 71 |
| 195/65R15 95 H XL | A | B | 69 |
| 195/65R15 95 H XL | A | B | 69 |
| 16 inch | |||
| 205/60R16 96 H XL | A | B | 72 |
| 205/55R16 91 V | D | A | 71 |
| 205/60R16 96 H XL | A | B | 70 |
| 205/60R16 92 V | A | A | 71 |
| 205/60R16 96 W XL | C | A | 72 |
| 17 inch | |||
| 225/60R17 99 H | C | B | 71 |
| 205/50R17 93 V XL | C | B | 72 |
| 225/60R17 99 V | C | B | 71 |
| 225/45R17 91 W | B | A | 71 |
| 225/50R17 94 V | D | A | 71 |
| 225/50R17 98 V XL | D | A | 71 |
| 215/55R17 94 V | C | B | 70 |
| 215/55R17 94 W | A | A | 71 |
| 215/55R17 94 W | A | A | 71 |
| 215/55R17 94 T | A | A | 70 |
| 18 inch | |||
| 245/45R18 96 W | B | B | 71 |
Questions and Answers for the Nexen N Fera Primus
Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nexen N Fera Primus. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Review Summary
Based on 10 user reviews
Most drivers rate the Nexen N Fera Primus highly for strong dry and wet grip, quiet ride, and comfort, with several noting excellent wear for the price. High-scoring reviews emphasize confident handling and braking, including in wet conditions, and generally low noise. A minority report longer braking vs Falken, higher noise on some cars, and slightly worse fuel economy; one low-score outlier cites sensitivity to pressure and variable wet performance. Overall, the N Fera Primus is praised as a comfortable, grippy, and good-value tire.
Strengths
- Dry grip
- Wet grip
- Comfort
- Low noise
- Handling confidence
- Tread wear/longevity
- Value/price
Areas for Improvement
- Noise (some users)
- Longer braking vs competitors (falken)
- Slightly worse fuel economy
Top 3 Nexen N Fera Primus Reviews
Given 81%
while driving a
Hyundai Tucson
(235/55 R18)
on mostly motorways
for 0 average miles
Nfera primus dry and wet grip is very good and comfort and wear rate is also good but my only concerned is that after 3years of using it, if forms a tiny crack in the upper side ot the tire and its not jst one tire, all four of them.
Given 87%
while driving a
Citroën C5 Tourer
(225/55 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 300 easy going miles
Very comfortable and quiet. The quality I value the most.
Given 83%
while driving a
Volkswagen Polo BlueGT 6R
(215/40 R17)
on mostly country roads
for 15,000 spirited miles
The best tire I've had so far. The grip on any surface is fantastic. Czech Republic production, very much a plus for this company. One thing I can only complain about is the very low tread, and from what I've noticed they wear down quite quickly. The price is also fantastic for such a quality tire.
Latest Nexen N Fera Primus Reviews
Given 86%
while driving a
Alfa Romeo Giulietta
(225/40 R18)
on mostly town
for 20,000 average miles
I have been driving them for the last 20k km maybe even more. I went on a track day during wet conditions also and in entry and mid part of the corner was faster than RWD cars, only on exit was the front squealing for grip but never ran out of line, I tried to upset the car more but it felt stable and confident even when under steering into a sharp corner it held a good margin. So in extreme driving conditions it is good even if not a pure sport tire. On motorway it performs well with good comfort and noise level. tread wear for me is excellent, it has a marker for wear and it is only ate the first level out of four levels. Wet performance is good also with no issues to report. Never did it spin the tires on fast acceleration on a torquey 175hp diesel fwd Alfa. For this car it was great match, would buy again.
Given 76%
while driving a
Opel Signum 2.2 DTi
(215/50 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 0 average miles
They seems to have a bit longer breaking distance than Falkens and they feel softer. They stay soft even if the preasure is bigger than required. Comfortable.
Given 76%
while driving a
Renault Clio II 1.2 16v
(225/45 R17)
on mostly town
for 1,000 average miles
after 2 months of installation in the clio ii 12 16v i have to say that i am AMAZED about their wet performance, specially while braking. a little bit more noisy than the falkens i used to have but bearable.
Given 99%
while driving a
Kia Motors ceed
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 10,447 easy going miles
Second review to complement my first review of those tires. The summer season has passed and I have replaced summer tires with winter tires.
Everything said in my first review stands - the tires are very good. Magnificent grip, confidence inspiring and no surprises. Quiet, comfortable etc.
I have more information about fuel consumption - they are worse compared to Michelin. Although my driving profile has changed a bit, I've done more city driving and less long distance, average fuel consumption has increased since Nexen tires were installed.
Wear is great - after the summer season I measured 6.5 and 6.2mm tread left on rear and front tires. Initial tread depth was 7mm. With this rate of wear, these could easily go 50 000+ kilometres. Please note, my stated mileage in this review is not miles but kilometres.
I ran the tires on 2.4bar cold pressure since car's recommended 2.2bar felt a bit soft and wobbly. 2.4 and above and they are great.
Given 66%
while driving a
Renault Clio II 1.2 16v
(195/45 R16)
on mostly town
for 100 easy going miles
i fitted these tires a week ago. my braking became worst than the falkens i had fitted (ziex 914 , 185/60R14) . I will get back to report wear and wet performance. keep in mind that they are noisy no matter the km/h 50 or 150....
Mazda (195/45 R16)
on mostly town
for 4,000 spirited miles
I upgraded to 16 inches wheels and I was shopping for tires for my mazda 2 which is a very light car, so the XL rating it's a bit overkill for it and this affects comfort adding more sensitivity to every small imperfection of the road already compromised from the lower sidewall height. The tire itself it's very advisable for the car because the significant dry grip and cornering precision, being ligher than the stock one and having a better fuel economy rating i kept the unsprung masses almost identical (but measuring from a completely worn tire!). The feedback from the road at the limit is excellent in dry, lower and noticiable on wet, but never unsafe. Talking about wet grip and hydroplaning resistance i've owned better tires, I run the tire pressure 2 psi higher than what mazda advises tbh (for my suspensions going under 34 front and 32 rear causes a reduction in comfort), and the context of use it's not always ideal (11 degrees °C or lower) and maybe for this even with an underpowered car like mine I can slip at startup sometimes. When the wheather is hot they heat up very quickly and the pressure rises a lot, lowering comfort , increasing noise and reducing the contact patch resulting in dangerous longer braking distance. But all of this recovers if you study the right pressure for you needs which is nor the one on the door sticker, neither the one from the manufacturer.
Given 95%
while driving a
Kia Motors ceed
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 1,000 easy going miles
Bought those tires to replace a set of Michelin Primacy 3s that came new with the car. These are also XL tires.
Price was very decent. 51€ per tire.
After installing the tires car felt immediately smoother and softer. Also quiet. Michelins were quite hard, crashy and made unbearable noise. Now going over bumps does not make me flinch any more. Also, gone is the tramlining effect old tires had. Any imperfections in the road were directly translated to my steering wheel being yanked left and right. No more.
Grip is magnificent, braking feels confident and smooth. Even saw some snow with them. No problem at all.
Since this is an initial review and I have not gathered a lot of miles with them, I can't say much about wear. Initial tread depth was 7mm. I measured.
Fuel economy feels unchanged.
