Tire Rack published their latest all-terrain tire test in October 2025, testing nine different tires from three types of all-terrain categories. The test looked at one On-Road All-Terrain tire, four Off-Road All-Terrain tires, and four Rugged All-Terrain tires, checking how each performs on normal roads where most people drive.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 60 → 0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 60 → 0 mph
The test shows interesting results about how different tire types work on pavement. The On-Road (or mild) All-Terrain tire came first as expected, but some Rugged All-Terrain tires beat certain Off-Road (aggressive) All-Terrain models. This shows that the individual tire design matters more than just the category name. Some tire brands gave consistent results while others varied more between different driving conditions.
Tire Rack sets their final rankings based on how the tires feel to drive rather than just test numbers, letting their expert drivers decide what matters most for real driving. You can see the full results table on their website using the link above. Tire Rack does excellent tire testing that helps people choose the right tires. Read the complete test results and details on the Tire Rack website.
Continental TerrainContact AT
265/70 R17 115S
Continental TerrainContact A/T delivers what testers describe as one of the most competent experiences in both wet and dry conditions while offering the nicest road ride in the entire test. The tire impresses with responsive steering that feels precise and controlled, while maintaining reasonable noise levels that don't become intrusive during daily driving. Testers appreciated the strong braking performance and reliable grip when needed, making it feel trustworthy in various conditions. The only criticism noted was that drivers might appreciate slightly more cushioning for enhanced comfort on rough road surfaces, though this was a minor concern given the tire's overall excellence.
Dry99.9%
Wet99%
Comfort93.3%
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (10)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 9 | 129 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 6.25 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Dry CircleHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 0.75 g | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better | 5th / 9 | 6.75 Points | -0.75 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 9 | 156 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 1st / 9 | 37.24 s | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 7.25 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 0.6 g | -0.02 g |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 6.5 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 7.75 Points | Best in this discipline |
Goodyear Wrangler Workhorse AT2
265/70 R17 115T
Goodyear Wrangler Workhorse AT2 stands out as a worthy performer that delivers some of the best wet and dry handling characteristics in the entire test group. The tire provides one of the most comfortable road experiences available, with excellent ride quality that makes long highway journeys pleasant and fatigue-free. Testers praised its handling capabilities and overall driving dynamics as excellent in virtually every important aspect. The primary criticism centers on noise levels, which can become intrusive enough to detract from the otherwise excellent driving experience, though most users will likely consider this a worthwhile trade-off for the superior performance.
Dry98%
Wet98.2%
Comfort87.1%
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (10)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 133 ft | +4 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 6.25 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Dry CircleHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 0.74 g | -0.01 g |
| Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 7.5 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 9 | 165 ft | +9 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 37.28 s | +0.04 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 7.13 Points | -0.12 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 0.62 g | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 7.5 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 5.75 Points | -2.00 Points |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT
265/70 R17 116T XL
Mickey Thompson Baja Boss A/T represents a well-balanced option that manages to avoid disappointing in any particular area while delivering respectable performance across multiple conditions. The tire demonstrates very respectable wet handling characteristics and performs nicely in dry conditions, while maintaining decent on-road manners that make it suitable for daily driving. Testers appreciated its consistent performance and balanced character, noting that it doesn't exhibit any major flaws or concerning behaviors. The only improvement suggested would be slightly stronger wet braking performance, though testers emphasized they wouldn't want this at the expense of the tire's other positive qualities.
Dry95.2%
Wet92.3%
Comfort82%
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (10)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 9th / 9 | 139 ft | +10 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 9 | 6.06 Points | -0.19 Points |
| Dry CircleHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 0.73 g | -0.02 g |
| Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 7 Points | -0.50 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 9 | 184 ft | +28 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 6th / 9 | 38.47 s | +1.23 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 6.75 Points | -0.50 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 4th / 9 | 0.59 g | -0.03 g |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 6.25 Points | -1.25 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 6.25 Points | -1.50 Points |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Falken Rubitrek AT01
265/70 R17 115T
Falken Rubitrek A/T01 presents itself as a reasonable on-road option, though with some notable caveats that prevent it from being exceptional. The tire demonstrates strong wet braking capabilities and provides a decent road ride that most drivers would find acceptable for daily use. However, testers found the tire's wet weather character could be more balanced, and it lacks the dry grip levels that more performance-oriented drivers might desire. While it performs adequately across most conditions, it doesn't particularly excel in any specific area, making it a competent but not standout choice in the all-terrain category.
Dry96.5%
Wet96.2%
Comfort85.2%
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (10)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 133 ft | +4 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 5.69 Points | -0.56 Points |
| Dry CircleHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 0.73 g | -0.02 g |
| Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 6.5 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 162 ft | +6 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 4th / 9 | 37.88 s | +0.64 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 9 | 6.63 Points | -0.62 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 4th / 9 | 0.59 g | -0.03 g |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 6.25 Points | -1.25 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 6.75 Points | -1.00 Points |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Sumitomo Encounter AT2
265/70 R17 115T
Sumitomo Encounter AT2 falls into what testers describe as an "inoffensive middle-ground" category, providing adequate performance without standing out as particularly impressive or problematic. The tire offers usable wet traction that feels reasonably capable within its limits, though those limits are noticeably lower than competitors. Testers found the steering serviceable with reasonable response, even if it lacks precision, and the tire generally works well enough for most applications. However, the wet track performance revealed some concerning characteristics, with limits that feel more abrupt than gradual, and a tendency for the rear to become unsettled when pushed beyond its comfort zone.
Dry96.3%
Wet97.3%
Comfort78.8%
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (10)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 132 ft | +3 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 9 | 6.06 Points | -0.19 Points |
| Dry CircleHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 0.71 g | -0.04 g |
| Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 7 Points | -0.50 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 160 ft | +4 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 37.44 s | +0.20 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 9 | 6.44 Points | -0.81 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 0.6 g | -0.02 g |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 6.25 Points | -1.25 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 5.75 Points | -2.00 Points |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Kumho Road Venture RT
265/70 R17 116T XL
Kumho Road Venture RT feels like a decent commuter tire that prioritizes comfort and refinement over outright performance, though this approach results in uninspiring overall capabilities. The tire excels at noise mitigation, creating a quiet cabin environment that many daily drivers will appreciate, while the steering feel and almost cushy road ride make it pleasant for regular commuting duties. However, testers noted that the steering response can feel somewhat laggy and unresponsive, and the tire lacks the wet and dry grip levels that more demanding drivers expect. While it serves adequately as a comfortable daily driver, it fails to inspire confidence when performance matters.
Dry95.5%
Wet90.8%
Comfort82%
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (10)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 9 | 136 ft | +7 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 5.56 Points | -0.69 Points |
| Dry CircleHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 0.73 g | -0.02 g |
| Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 7.5 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 9 | 176 ft | +20 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 7th / 9 | 39.22 s | +1.98 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 6.13 Points | -1.12 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 0.56 g | -0.06 g |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 6.25 Points | -1.25 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 6.25 Points | -1.50 Points |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Toyo Open Country AT III
265/70 R17 115T
Toyo Open Country A/T III earns praise for its predictable and trustworthy behavior, particularly in emergency situations where it cleared the Emergency Lane Change test every time with consistent reliability. Within its operational limits, the tire feels reasonably capable and manageable, providing drivers with confidence in its behavior. However, the tire suffers from a notably stiff ride quality that feels jarringly rigid over sharp bumps and bridge joints, while noise levels remain consistently high with multiple intrusive tones present across all driving conditions. The steering feels rubbery and delayed at low speeds, improving somewhat at highway speeds but never achieving true precision or responsiveness.
Dry96.3%
Wet94.4%
Comfort73.9%
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (10)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 5th / 9 | 134 ft | +5 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 6.19 Points | -0.06 Points |
| Dry CircleHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 0.72 g | -0.03 g |
| Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better | 5th / 9 | 6.75 Points | -0.75 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 9 | 164 ft | +8 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 5th / 9 | 38.07 s | +0.83 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 6.31 Points | -0.94 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 0.57 g | -0.05 g |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 6 Points | -1.50 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 5.25 Points | -2.50 Points |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Falken Wildpeak RT
265/70 R17 121R
Falken WildPeak R/T01 offers decent performance characteristics for an LT-rated tire, though it falls short when compared to other tires in the test group. The tire's strongest attribute is its light and reactive steering response when driving on paved roads, providing a more car-like feel than many truck tires. However, the tire's wet traction capabilities represent its most significant weakness, requiring drivers to exercise considerable caution in wet conditions. While acceptable for basic truck duties, testers found the overall performance merely adequate rather than impressive when held against the broader competition.
Dry94.8%
Wet87.7%
Comfort78.7%
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (10)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 9 | 135 ft | +6 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 5.75 Points | -0.50 Points |
| Dry CircleHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 0.71 g | -0.04 g |
| Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 6.5 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 7th / 9 | 181 ft | +25 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 8th / 9 | 40.19 s | +2.95 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 6 Points | -1.25 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 0.53 g | -0.09 g |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 5.75 Points | -1.75 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 6.25 Points | -1.50 Points |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Toyo Open Country RT Trail
265/70 R17 115T
Toyo Open Country R/T Trail represents the lowest-performing option in the test group, failing to excel in any meaningful way across the various evaluation criteria. The tire provides a firm ride with residual bumpiness that becomes particularly noticeable over repeating road undulations, while noise levels remain high with a steady tread growl that becomes wearing during extended drives. The wet weather performance proves particularly concerning, with the lowest wet grip in the group leading to early and conservative braking requirements, delayed steering inputs, and frequent wheelspin even with careful throttle application. Emergency lane change performance suffers from heavy, slow steering with poor responsiveness and limited traction that results in frequent test failures.
Dry93%
Wet83.4%
Comfort67.3%
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (10)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 9 | 137 ft | +8 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 5.38 Points | -0.87 Points |
| Dry CircleHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 0.7 g | -0.05 g |
| Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better | 5th / 9 | 6.75 Points | -0.75 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 9 | 184 ft | +28 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 9th / 9 | 41.25 s | +4.01 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 4.81 Points | -2.44 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 0.49 g | -0.13 g |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 5.5 Points | -2.00 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 4.75 Points | -3.00 Points |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
I had a 2007 Tahoe that I put the terrain contact AT’s on and loved the ride loved the control that I had. I now have a 2012 Toyota tundra that I’m seriously looking into getting the terrain contact AT tires once again. When I bought those tires six years ago for the Tahoe, the price was right at $175 per so now in 2026 I think they’ve gone up about $110 per tire and I think still worth the benefits of this tire.
That's a crazy increase in price, but you're right. The Terrain Contact AT is still an excellent product. Don't sleep on the Firestone equivalent, though. From my test of the AT, that's also a great tire.
Ryan, everything I read indicates that the terraincontacts are excellent everywhere except snow. Do you have any personal experience in snow that you could share? Thanks.
Jonathan, there's an error on the Tire Rack Website link. I believe you must have an automatic orthographic corrector set to change the word "tire" for "tire". I ended up on the link and that´s the difference I found. Best regards!
Thanks, I've fixed the link