Menu

Test source Auto Bild Sportscars

2025 Autobild Crossover SUV All Season Test

Joint test winnersBridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

Auto Bild SportsCars published their second all-season tire test in October, evaluating ten tires in the 215/50 R 18 size.

2025 Autobild Crossover SUV All Season Test
215/50 R18 / 2025 View full image
2025 Autobild Crossover SUV All Season Test
Tires tested
10
Tested size
215/50 R18
Test vehicle
VW T-Roc R
Disciplines
13

At a glance

Tire shortlist

10 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

Joint1st

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

+The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 shares the win as a very balanced all-rounder: third for dry braking and dry handling, joint third for wet handling, and fourth for wet braking, snow handling and rolling resistance.

−It is the second-loudest tire and only seventh for aquaplaning both straight and in bends.

Joint1st

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

+The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 shares the win, with a share of the fastest snow handling lap, the second-lowest rolling resistance, second place for straight-line aquaplaning and third for wet braking and the snow slalom.

−Its dry braking is only sixth and its snow braking is the third longest.

Joint1st

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

+The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 shares the win with strong results everywhere: the shortest dry braking, the most snow traction and the best straight-line aquaplaning, second for wet braking, wet handling, dry handling and the slalom, and a share of the best comfort rating.

−Its snow braking is only seventh and it is one of the louder tires.

4th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

+The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 has the fastest dry and wet handling laps, a share of the fastest snow handling lap, the lowest rolling resistance and the second-best aquaplaning in bends.

−Its wet braking is the second longest, which costs it a downgrade, and it is the loudest tire.

5th

Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X

+The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X is fourth for straight-line aquaplaning and fifth for snow braking and aquaplaning in bends, with good all-round results.

−Its dry braking is the second longest, and its snow traction, snow handling and slalom are in the bottom three.

6th

Giti AllSeason AS2

+The Giti AllSeason AS2 is the best tire for aquaplaning in bends, second for snow braking and one of the cheaper tires.

−Its wet braking is the third longest and its dry handling feels slightly imprecise.

7th

Kleber Quadraxer SUV

+The Kleber Quadraxer SUV has the shortest snow braking and the best slalom result, is second for snow traction and has the third-lowest rolling resistance.

−It is second slowest on the dry and wet handling tracks and third from last for aquaplaning both straight and in bends.

8th

Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV

+The Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV is third for straight-line aquaplaning and joint third in bends, and the second-quietest tire, with a share of the best comfort rating.

−It has the highest rolling resistance and the weakest snow traction, and is second from last for snow braking, snow handling and the slalom.

9th

Linglong Sport Master 4S

+The Linglong Sport Master 4S has the shortest wet braking and the second-shortest dry braking, with joint third-fastest wet handling.

−It is last for snow braking, snow handling, the slalom and aquaplaning in bends, and second from last for snow traction and straight-line aquaplaning.

10th

Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S

+The Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S is the cheapest and quietest tire, third for snow braking and fourth in the slalom.

−Its wet braking is much too long, and it is last for wet braking, wet handling, dry braking, dry handling and straight-line aquaplaning, and hard to control in the wet.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2025 Autobild Crossover SUV All Season Test · 215/50 R18

TireBridgestone Turanza All Season 6Continental AllSeasonContact 2Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 XGiti AllSeason AS2Kleber Quadraxer SUVMaxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUVLinglong Sport Master 4SFortuna Ecoplus 2 4S
PositionJoint 1stJoint 1stJoint 1st4th5th6th7th8th9th10th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry97.9%95.6%99.8%95.6%94.7%94.5%96.6%96.7%97.9%92.1%
Wet96.6%97.4%98.8%95.4%95.1%94%92.4%96.6%96.7%85.3%
Snow96.8%97.1%97.9%97.4%95.1%96.3%99.5%89.5%87.8%96.3%
Comfort94.6%95.2%99.2%98.8%91.3%95.2%95%99.7%91.2%91.9%
Rolling Resistance91.8%95.6%89.5%100%85.7%88.8%92.2%80.4%84.3%85.3%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Auto Bild SportsCars published their second all-season tire test in October, evaluating ten tires in the 215/50 R 18 size. The test included products ranging from established premium manufacturers such as Continental, Pirelli, and Goodyear through to budget offerings from Linglong and Fortuna. All testing was conducted using a VW T-Roc R equipped with a 300 PS turbocharged engine and 4Motion all-wheel drive. 

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

The test produced a three-way tie for first place, with Bridgestone, Continental, and Pirelli all achieving a 1.2 overall grade and an "exemplary" rating. However, each arrived at this result via different routes. Continental demonstrated the strongest winter capabilities, coming closest to matching the reference winter tire on snow. Pirelli delivered the most balanced performance with no notable weaknesses in any discipline. Bridgestone similarly proved itself as a consistent all-rounder across all conditions.

Goodyear's fourth-place finish tells an interesting story of how a single weakness can derail an otherwise excellent product. The Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 matched the top performers on snow and led the all-season field in dry handling, yet received a downgrade due to wet braking distances approximately one vehicle length longer than competitors. 

The budget segment produced mixed and sometimes surprising results. Linglong recorded shorter wet braking distances than every premium manufacturer in the test, yet struggled with snow braking and aquaplaning resistance, earning only a conditional recommendation. Fortuna presented the opposite problem: acceptable snow performance but dangerously extended wet braking distances and unpredictable wet handling. The testers issued a clear "not recommended" verdict for Fortuna despite its attractive price point.

Kleber, the Michelin sub-brand, carved out a niche as the snow specialist, recording the shortest braking distances and highest lateral grip on snow-covered surfaces. This makes it particularly suitable for drivers without all-wheel drive who regularly encounter winter conditions. However, this specialisation came at the cost of wet and dry handling precision.

Summer and Winter Tires vs All Seasons

The reference summer and winter tires provided context for understanding all-season compromises. On snow, even the best all-season candidates required approximately 2.5 additional meters to stop compared to the winter reference. The gap widened dramatically in the opposite direction: the summer reference needed 154 feet to stop on snow versus 74 feet for the winter tire. In dry braking, the summer reference stopped in 112 feet while the best all-season tire (Pirelli) required 117 feet, demonstrating that modern all-season designs have significantly closed this traditional weakness. Wet handling showed the summer reference averaging 51 mph on the handling circuit compared to 50 mph for the best all-season (Goodyear), indicating all-season tires can now approach summer tire wet performance. 

Dry

Pirelli stopped shortest among all-season tires, with budget Linglong surprisingly close behind in second place. Fortuna required the longest distance, nearly five meters more than Pirelli.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
112 ft -5 ft 0 mph
117 ft Best 0 mph
121 ft +4 ft 14 mph
121 ft +4 ft 15 mph
122 ft +5 ft 17 mph
124 ft +7 ft 19 mph
127 ft +10 ft 22 mph
128 ft +11 ft 24 mph
128 ft +11 ft 24 mph
129 ft +12 ft 24 mph
RefReference Winter
132 ft +15 ft 27 mph
133 ft +16 ft 28 mph

The difference between best and worst was 18.1% (21 ft ≈ 1.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S would still be travelling at 28 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Goodyear led the all-season field in dry handling, with Pirelli and Bridgestone close behind. Fortuna trailed significantly, the only tire unable to break 62 mph average.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
64.9 mph +0.5 mph
64.4 mph Best
64.1 mph -0.3 mph
63.9 mph -0.5 mph
63.8 mph -0.6 mph
63.8 mph -0.6 mph
63.8 mph -0.6 mph
63.4 mph -1.0 mph
RefReference Winter
63.1 mph -1.3 mph
63.0 mph -1.4 mph
62.9 mph -1.5 mph
61.9 mph -2.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (3 mph).

Wet

Budget Linglong delivered a surprise win, stopping shorter than all premium competitors. Goodyear struggled here despite its dry handling prowess, while Fortuna's dangerously long stopping distance earned it a fail.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
131 ft -12 ft 0 mph
143 ft Best 0 mph
144 ft +1 ft 6 mph
146 ft +3 ft 12 mph
148 ft +5 ft 15 mph
150 ft +7 ft 17 mph
RefReference Winter
154 ft +11 ft 21 mph
154 ft +11 ft 21 mph
160 ft +17 ft 26 mph
160 ft +17 ft 26 mph
161 ft +18 ft 26 mph
180 ft +37 ft 36 mph

The difference between best and worst was 37.9% (49 ft ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Linglong Sport Master 4S had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Goodyear topped the wet handling test, matching its dry handling dominance. Fortuna again finished last by a considerable margin, reinforcing concerns about its wet weather safety.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
51.0 mph +1.3 mph
49.7 mph Best
48.9 mph -0.8 mph
48.7 mph -1.0 mph
48.7 mph -1.0 mph
48.5 mph -1.2 mph
48.3 mph -1.4 mph
RefReference Winter
48.2 mph -1.5 mph
47.9 mph -1.8 mph
47.8 mph -1.9 mph
47.7 mph -2.0 mph
44.8 mph -4.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 12.1% (6.2 mph).

Pirelli resisted aquaplaning longest, followed by Continental. Linglong and Fortuna were weakest, floating at speeds well below the leaders.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
50.4 mph Best
RefReference Winter
49.9 mph -0.5 mph
49.7 mph -0.7 mph
RefReference Summer
49.7 mph -0.7 mph
49.6 mph -0.8 mph
49.4 mph -1.0 mph
49.3 mph -1.1 mph
49.3 mph -1.1 mph
48.6 mph -1.8 mph
48.1 mph -2.3 mph
46.8 mph -3.6 mph
45.0 mph -5.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.8% (5.4 mph).

Giti topped curved aquaplaning, with Goodyear close behind. Linglong finished last, contrasting sharply with its strong wet braking result.

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
10.1 ft/s² Best
10.0 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
9.9 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
9.7 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
9.7 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
9.6 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
RefReference Winter
9.4 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
9.4 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
9.3 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
8.8 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
8.6 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
8.4 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (1.7 ft/s²).

Snow

Kleber stopped shortest on snow, followed by Giti. The premium trio of Pirelli, Continental, and Bridgestone sat mid-pack, while Linglong needed almost five meters more than Kleber.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Winter
74 ft -3 ft 0 mph
77 ft Best 0 mph
78 ft +1 ft 10 mph
79 ft +2 ft 15 mph
80 ft +3 ft 15 mph
80 ft +3 ft 16 mph
81 ft +4 ft 18 mph
83 ft +6 ft 21 mph
83 ft +6 ft 22 mph
89 ft +12 ft 29 mph
92 ft +15 ft 32 mph
RefReference Summer
154 ft +77 ft 57 mph

The difference between best and worst was 108% (80 ft ≈ 5.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Linglong Sport Master 4S would still be travelling at 32 mph when the Kleber Quadraxer SUV had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Pirelli led traction, important for pulling away on slippery surfaces. Maxxis and Linglong struggled most, a concern for drivers without all-wheel drive.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
693 lbf +26 lbf
667 lbf Best
664 lbf -3 lbf
656 lbf -11 lbf
654 lbf -13 lbf
646 lbf -21 lbf
641 lbf -26 lbf
641 lbf -26 lbf
635 lbf -32 lbf
573 lbf -94 lbf
565 lbf -102 lbf
RefReference Summer
369 lbf -298 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 46.8% (324 lbf).

Goodyear and Continental tied for fastest on the snow handling circuit. Linglong was slowest, consistent with its overall weak winter performance.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
37.7 mph +0.3 mph
37.4 mph Best
37.4 mph Best
37.2 mph -0.2 mph
37.0 mph -0.4 mph
36.9 mph -0.5 mph
35.9 mph -1.5 mph
35.9 mph -1.5 mph
35.8 mph -1.6 mph
35.6 mph -1.8 mph
34.2 mph -3.2 mph
RefReference Summer
22.4 mph -15.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 40.7% (15.3 mph).

Kleber continued its snow dominance with the best lateral grip. Pirelli placed second, while Linglong again finished last.

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
15.0 ft/s² +0.5 ft/s²
14.5 ft/s² Best
14.5 ft/s² 0.0 ft/s²
14.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
14.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
14.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
13.8 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
13.7 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
13.6 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
13.3 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
13.1 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
6.5 ft/s² -8.0 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 56.7% (8.5 ft/s²).

Comfort

Fortuna was the quietest tire tested, one of its few positive results. Goodyear was loudest, a trade-off for its otherwise strong performance.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
72.14 dB Best
72.58 dB +0.44 dB
RefReference Winter
72.66 dB +0.52 dB
72.73 dB +0.59 dB
72.82 dB +0.68 dB
73.04 dB +0.90 dB
73.05 dB +0.91 dB
73.06 dB +0.92 dB
73.28 dB +1.14 dB
RefReference Summer
73.61 dB +1.47 dB
73.67 dB +1.53 dB
73.97 dB +1.83 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

Goodyear recorded the lowest rolling resistance, beneficial for fuel economy. Maxxis was worst, potentially offsetting its lower purchase price over time.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.53 kg/t Best $0
7.88 kg/t +0.35 kg/t $14
RefReference Summer
8.13 kg/t +0.60 kg/t $23
8.17 kg/t +0.64 kg/t $25
8.2 kg/t +0.67 kg/t $26
RefReference Winter
8.38 kg/t +0.85 kg/t $33
8.41 kg/t +0.88 kg/t $34
8.48 kg/t +0.95 kg/t $37
8.79 kg/t +1.26 kg/t $49
8.83 kg/t +1.30 kg/t $51
8.93 kg/t +1.40 kg/t $55
9.37 kg/t +1.84 kg/t $72

The difference between best and worst was 24.4% (1.84 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV uses about 20 gal ($72) more fuel than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

Joint 1st

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

215/50 R18 92W
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Auto Bild Sportscars Test Winner / Exemplary Testsieger / vorbildlich
The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 emerges as a true all-rounder, delivering very balanced performance across all road conditions tested. Whether on snow, wet, or dry surfaces, this tire consistently performs without any significant weaknesses. The testers noted it as an "Alleskönner" (jack of all trades) that drivers can rely on throughout the year. The only minor criticism relates to a somewhat louder rolling noise compared to some competitors, but this does not detract from its overall exemplary rating.
Dry97.9%
Wet96.6%
Snow96.8%
Comfort94.6%
Rolling Resistance91.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 10121 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1063.9 mph-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 10148 ft+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1048.7 mph-1.0 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1048.6 mph-1.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 109.3 ft/s²-0.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 1081 ft+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 10646 lbf-21 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 1037.0 mph-0.4 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better5th / 1014.0 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 107.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better9th / 1073.67 dB+1.53 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 108.2 kg/t+0.67 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
3PMSF
Yes
Price
660.00
Joint 1st

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

215/50 R18 92W
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Auto Bild Sportscars Test Winner / Exemplary Testsieger / vorbildlich
The Continental AllSeason Contact 2 proves itself as a snow expert, offering convincing winter properties that bring it closest to a dedicated quality winter tire among all candidates tested. It also achieves top results in wet conditions, making it particularly suited for drivers who prioritize cold-weather safety. The tire's only notable weakness is a slightly extended braking distance on dry roads, suggesting a small compromise was made to achieve its excellent winter performance.
Dry95.6%
Wet97.4%
Snow97.1%
Comfort95.2%
Rolling Resistance95.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 10127 ft+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 1063.8 mph-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 10146 ft+3 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 1048.5 mph-1.2 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1049.7 mph-0.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 109.4 ft/s²-0.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 1083 ft+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better4th / 10654 lbf-13 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 1037.4 mphBest in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better3rd / 1014.3 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 107.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1072.73 dB+0.59 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 107.88 kg/t+0.35 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
3PMSF
Yes
Price
700.00
Joint 1st

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

215/50 R18 92W
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
Auto Bild Sportscars Test Winner / Exemplary Testsieger / vorbildlich
The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF 3 is described as the "compromise ace" of the test, delivering strong results across all test disciplines without any notable slip-ups. This tire demonstrates convincing grip in wet conditions, consistently placing near the top in all wet-weather tests. The testers could not identify any significant weaknesses, making it an excellent choice for drivers seeking a well-rounded all-season solution that excels everywhere rather than specializing in one area.
Dry99.8%
Wet98.8%
Snow97.9%
Comfort99.2%
Rolling Resistance89.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 10117 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1064.1 mph-0.3 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 10144 ft+1 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1048.9 mph-0.8 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1050.4 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 109.7 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 1083 ft+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 10667 lbfBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1037.2 mph-0.2 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better2nd / 1014.5 ft/s²0.0 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 108 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better8th / 1073.28 dB+1.14 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 108.41 kg/t+0.88 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
680.00
4th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

215/50 R18 92W
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 performs like a snow plow in winter conditions while also delivering a strong showing on dry roads. Its handling characteristics are sporty and engaging, particularly appreciated in dry conditions where it leads the field. However, the tire receives a downgrade due to an extended braking distance in wet conditions, which the testers described as a full vehicle length longer than the best performers. This safety-relevant weakness prevents an otherwise impressive tire from achieving an exemplary rating.
Dry95.6%
Wet95.4%
Snow97.4%
Comfort98.8%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 10128 ft+11 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 1064.4 mphBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 10161 ft+18 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 1049.7 mphBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 1049.3 mph-1.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 1010.0 ft/s²-0.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 1080 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 10656 lbf-11 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 1037.4 mphBest in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better7th / 1013.7 ft/s²-0.8 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 108 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better10th / 1073.97 dB+1.83 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 107.53 kg/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
C/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Price
700.00
5th

Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X

215/50 R18 92W
Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X
The Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X distinguishes itself as an aquaplaning expert, offering reassuring resistance to hydroplaning in both straight-line and cornering situations. It delivers consistently good performance across all disciplines without any dramatic weaknesses, combined with an attractive price point. The testers noted that braking distances in both wet and dry conditions are somewhat longer compared to the class leaders, but overall the tire represents solid value for money-conscious drivers.
Dry94.7%
Wet95.1%
Snow95.1%
Comfort91.3%
Rolling Resistance85.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 10129 ft+12 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 1063.4 mph-1.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 10154 ft+11 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 1047.9 mph-1.8 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1049.4 mph-1.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 109.6 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 1080 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 10635 lbf-32 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better8th / 1035.8 mph-1.6 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better8th / 1013.6 ft/s²-0.9 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 106.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better5th / 1073.04 dB+0.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 108.79 kg/t+1.26 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
580.00
6th

Giti AllSeason AS2

215/50 R18 92W
Giti AllSeason AS2
The Giti All Season AS 2 shows its strengths as a winter performer, achieving impressively short braking distances on snow-covered roads and excelling in curved aquaplaning resistance. However, the tire struggles with extended wet braking distances and displays slightly imprecise handling characteristics on dry pavement. These inconsistencies across different conditions result in a satisfactory rather than good overall rating, despite the competitive pricing.
Dry94.5%
Wet94%
Snow96.3%
Comfort95.2%
Rolling Resistance88.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 10128 ft+11 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 1063.0 mph-1.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 10160 ft+17 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 1047.8 mph-1.9 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1049.3 mph-1.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 1010.1 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 1078 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 10641 lbf-26 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better6th / 1035.9 mph-1.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better6th / 1013.8 ft/s²-0.7 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 107.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better4th / 1072.82 dB+0.68 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 108.48 kg/t+0.95 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
450.00
7th

Kleber Quadraxer SUV

215/50 R18 92V
Kleber Quadraxer SUV
The Kleber Quadraxer 3 SUV emerges as the snow specialist of the test, recording the best lateral grip and shortest braking distance on snow among all candidates. Drivers without all-wheel drive should particularly appreciate its strong traction values for getting moving on slippery surfaces. However, the tire's winter focus comes at the expense of wet handling and braking performance, as well as dry handling precision, making it best suited for regions with significant snowfall.
Dry96.6%
Wet92.4%
Snow99.5%
Comfort95%
Rolling Resistance92.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 10122 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 1062.9 mph-1.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 10160 ft+17 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better9th / 1047.7 mph-2.0 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1048.1 mph-2.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 108.8 ft/s²-1.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 1077 ftBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 10664 lbf-3 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 1036.9 mph-0.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better1st / 1014.5 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 107.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better6th / 1073.05 dB+0.91 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 108.17 kg/t+0.64 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Price
590.00
8th

Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV

215/50 R18 92W
Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV
The Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV positions itself as a rain king, boasting large aquaplaning reserves that inspire confidence in heavy downpours. Unfortunately, this tire is overall weaker on snow and records the highest rolling resistance among all candidates, which diminishes its fuel-saving potential. The elevated rolling resistance represents a hidden ongoing cost that offsets some of the initial purchase price savings.
Dry96.7%
Wet96.6%
Snow89.5%
Comfort99.7%
Rolling Resistance80.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 10124 ft+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 1063.8 mph-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 10150 ft+7 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 1048.3 mph-1.4 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 1049.6 mph-0.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 109.7 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 1089 ft+12 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better10th / 10565 lbf-102 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better9th / 1035.6 mph-1.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better9th / 1013.3 ft/s²-1.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 108 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1072.58 dB+0.44 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 109.37 kg/t+1.84 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Price
400.00
9th

Linglong Sport Master 4S

215/50 R18 96W XL
Linglong Sport Master 4S
The Linglong Sport Master 4S presents itself as a dry-condition specialist and offers the highest permissible load capacity among the candidates tested. However, its winter performance raises concerns, with extended braking distances on snow and weaker aquaplaning resistance. These shortcomings in safety-critical areas result in a conditional recommendation, suggesting drivers in regions with harsh winters should look elsewhere.
Dry97.9%
Wet96.7%
Snow87.8%
Comfort91.2%
Rolling Resistance84.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 10121 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 1063.8 mph-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 10143 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1048.7 mph-1.0 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1046.8 mph-3.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10th / 108.4 ft/s²-1.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better10th / 1092 ft+15 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better9th / 10573 lbf-94 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better10th / 1034.2 mph-3.2 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better10th / 1013.1 ft/s²-1.4 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 106.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better7th / 1073.06 dB+0.92 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 108.93 kg/t+1.40 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Price
450.00
10th

Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S

215/50 R18 92W
Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S
The Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S attracts attention as a budget option with surprisingly good performance on snow. However, this is where the positives end. The tire exhibits significantly excessive wet braking distances that pose a genuine safety concern, combined with difficult-to-control handling behavior in wet conditions and an unharmonious feel on dry roads. The testers conclude with a clear warning: drivers should avoid this tire entirely despite its tempting low price.
Dry92.1%
Wet85.3%
Snow96.3%
Comfort91.9%
Rolling Resistance85.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 10133 ft+16 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better10th / 1061.9 mph-2.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 10180 ft+37 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 1044.8 mph-4.9 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 1045.0 mph-5.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 108.6 ft/s²-1.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 1079 ft+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 10641 lbf-26 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 1035.9 mph-1.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 1014.0 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 106.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better1st / 1072.14 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 108.83 kg/t+1.30 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/68
3PMSF
Yes
Price
330.00

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

6 comments
  1. Ivy311 archived

    Could you possibly name the reference tires please?

    #10526
    1. TireReviews Ivy311 archived

      Unfortunately Autobild don't publish their reference tires

      #10528
      1. Ivy311 TireReviews archived

        Thanks for your quick anwer. That's a real pity and the information you can draw out of it is of limited value. 🤷‍♂️

        #10530
        1. TireReviews Ivy311 archived

          I agree, which is why I always share my reference tire, but I seem to be the only person that thinks this way

          #10531
  2. dufonrafal . archived

    you miis-referenced a tire : The Kleber is the Quadraxer SUV not "3 SUV" :)

    #10498
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.