Menu

Test source Auto Bild Sportscars

2025 Auto Bild Sports Car All Season Tire Test

Overall test winnerPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

AUTO BILD Sportscars conducted a comprehensive all-season tire test in their December 2025 issue, testing 10 all season tires in 225/45 R18.

2025 Auto Bild Sports Car All Season Tyre Test
225/45 R18 / 2025 View full image
2025 Auto Bild Sports Car All Season Tyre Test
Tires tested
10
Tested size
225/45 R18
Test vehicle
BMW 3 Series
Disciplines
14

At a glance

Tire shortlist

10 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

+The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 wins as the best tire in the wet: the shortest wet braking, the best aquaplaning both straight and in bends, and second on both wet handling tests. It also has the shortest dry braking and is second for dry handling, snow traction and the slalom.

−Its snow braking is only eighth.

Joint2nd

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

+The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 shares second place as a good all-rounder, with the second-shortest wet braking, the second-best aquaplaning in bends and third place for dry braking and straight-line aquaplaning.

−Comfort and pass-by noise are a little behind the best, and its snow results are only mid-field.

Joint2nd

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

+The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 shares second place, with the fastest wet circle time, third for dry handling and fourth for snow braking, wet handling and aquaplaning in bends, at a good price.

−It is the loudest tire with the highest rolling resistance, and its snow traction is third from last.

4th

Michelin CrossClimate 2

+The Michelin CrossClimate 2 is the snow king, best for snow braking, traction, handling and the slalom at winter-tire level, with the second-shortest dry braking and the second-lowest rolling resistance.

−Its wet handling is comparatively weak, third from last on the handling track, and it is the most expensive tire.

5th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

+The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 sets the fastest wet handling lap, is second for snow braking, snow handling and straight-line aquaplaning, and has the third-lowest rolling resistance.

−Its dry and wet braking are both the third longest.

6th

Kleber Quadraxer 3

+The Kleber Quadraxer 3 is the quietest tire with a share of the best comfort rating, and third for snow braking, the slalom and aquaplaning in bends.

−Its lateral grip in the wet is lower, second from last on the wet circle.

7th

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+

+The Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ is joint third for wet braking and third for wet handling.

−It is second from last for snow braking, the slalom and dry handling, with the second-highest rolling resistance and the second-loudest running.

8th

Linglong Sport Master 4S

+The Linglong Sport Master 4S sets the fastest dry handling lap, is joint third for wet braking and shares the best comfort rating, at a low price.

−It is last in every snow test and second from last for straight-line aquaplaning.

9th

Viking Fourtech Plus

+The Viking FourTech Plus is the second-quietest tire and fifth for snow braking and snow traction.

−It has the longest dry braking and the second-longest wet braking, and is second slowest on the wet handling track.

10th

Delmax X Weather 4S

+The Delmax X-Weather 4S is the cheapest tire and has the lowest rolling resistance by a clear margin.

−It is inadequate in the wet, last for wet braking, wet handling, the wet circle and straight-line aquaplaning, and slowest on the dry handling track.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2025 Auto Bild Sports Car All Season Tire Test · 225/45 R18

TirePirelli Cinturato All Season SF3Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6Hankook Kinergy 4S2Michelin CrossClimate 2Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3Kleber Quadraxer 3Vredestein Quatrac Pro+Linglong Sport Master 4SViking Fourtech PlusDelmax X Weather 4S
Position1stJoint 2ndJoint 2nd4th5th6th7th8th9th10th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry99.9%97.7%95.5%98.8%92.7%97.4%92.8%98.2%91%90.8%
Wet99.8%98%97.5%95.1%95.8%94.1%96.7%90.6%92.2%85.3%
Snow96.5%93.8%94.5%100%96.9%97.3%92%87.9%93.5%92.6%
Comfort99.2%87.5%95%87.5%95.3%100%91.2%99.2%87.9%91.3%
Rolling Resistance87.7%85.5%80.7%91%89.9%88.8%81.6%82.6%84.5%100%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

AUTO BILD Sportscars conducted a comprehensive all-season tire test in their December 2025 issue, testing 10 all season tires in 225/45 R18. This dimension is commonly fitted to performance-oriented volume models such as the BMW M240i, Mercedes CLA 45 S AMG, and Alfa Romeo Giulia. The test covered products across a wide price range, from budget offerings at €340 per set to premium options at €740 per set. 

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

Summer and Winter Tire Findings

The testers included both a dedicated summer tire and winter tire as reference points outside the main scoring, and their performance clearly illustrates the compromises in all-season design. The summer specialist had significantly higher dry performance, achieving 58.8 mph in the dry handling test compared to the best all-season at 57.6 mph, and stopping from 62 mph in just 114 feet versus 126 feet for the leading all-season. However, it proved completely undrivable on snow. 

Conversely, the winter reference tire excelled on snow with a 22.7-meter stopping distance from 31 mph, but this came at a substantial cost in other conditions: wet braking from 62 mph required 155 feet (versus 141 feet for the best all-season), and dry braking extended to 142 feet. These results demonstrate that all-season tires position themselves closer to winter tire characteristics than summer tire performance, making them more accurately described as "improved winter tires for mild climates" rather than true year-round performance equivalents.

Balanced Performance Versus Specialization

The test winner, Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF 3, succeeded by finding what the testers called "the golden middle"—no single outstanding performance, but strong results across all disciplines. At €650 per set, it placed second in wet performance, second-fastest in dry handling, and maintained respectable snow capabilities. This contrasts sharply with more specialized approaches: the Linglong Sport Master 4S achieved the fastest dry handling speed (57.6 mph) among all-season competitors but suffered significantly on snow (27.2-meter stopping distance versus Michelin's 77 feet). The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 demonstrated strong wet and snow capabilities but extended dry braking to 146 feet. These results suggest that for sports car applications, consistency across conditions provides better real-world performance than excellence in any single area.

Secondary Brand Performance

Two secondary brands in the test revealed interesting patterns. The Kleber Quadraxer 3, Michelin's budget line, inherited strong snow credentials from its parent company and achieved the quietest operation in the test (61.6 dB at 31 mph, matching the summer reference), but showed weaker wet lateral grip. At €590, it offered a middle ground for buyers wanting Michelin-like winter performance at lower cost. The Viking Four Tech Plus, Continental's budget brand at €440, maintained decent snow performance but suffered from extended wet braking (162 feet) and finished last in dry handling (55.4 mph), suggesting that while secondary brands can inherit some parent company technology, they typically compromise on overall refinement.

Dry

Dry Braking

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
114 ft -12 ft 0 mph
126 ft Best 0 mph
127 ft +1 ft 8 mph
130 ft +4 ft 13 mph
130 ft +4 ft 14 mph
131 ft +5 ft 15 mph
137 ft +11 ft 23 mph
RefReference Winter
142 ft +16 ft 27 mph
143 ft +17 ft 28 mph
146 ft +20 ft 30 mph
148 ft +22 ft 31 mph
151 ft +25 ft 33 mph

The difference between best and worst was 32.9% (37 ft ≈ 2.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Viking Fourtech Plus would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
58.8 mph +1.2 mph
57.6 mph Best
57.5 mph -0.1 mph
57.2 mph -0.4 mph
57.1 mph -0.5 mph
56.9 mph -0.7 mph
56.8 mph -0.8 mph
RefReference Winter
56.7 mph -0.9 mph
56.6 mph -1.0 mph
56.4 mph -1.2 mph
56.3 mph -1.3 mph
55.4 mph -2.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (3.4 mph).

Wet

Wet Braking

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
129 ft -12 ft 0 mph
141 ft Best 0 mph
146 ft +5 ft 15 mph
146 ft +5 ft 15 mph
146 ft +5 ft 15 mph
146 ft +5 ft 16 mph
151 ft +10 ft 20 mph
RefReference Winter
155 ft +14 ft 24 mph
157 ft +16 ft 26 mph
157 ft +16 ft 26 mph
162 ft +21 ft 29 mph
185 ft +44 ft 39 mph

The difference between best and worst was 43.3% (56 ft ≈ 3.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Delmax X Weather 4S would still be travelling at 39 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
48.1 mph +1.2 mph
46.9 mph Best
46.9 mph 0.0 mph
46.8 mph -0.1 mph
46.6 mph -0.3 mph
46.5 mph -0.4 mph
46.4 mph -0.5 mph
RefReference Winter
46.0 mph -0.9 mph
45.3 mph -1.6 mph
45.2 mph -1.7 mph
44.2 mph -2.7 mph
42.4 mph -4.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (5.7 mph).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
14.01 s -0.33 s
14.34 s Best
14.4 s +0.06 s
14.43 s +0.09 s
RefReference Winter
14.44 s +0.10 s
14.47 s +0.13 s
14.52 s +0.18 s
14.53 s +0.19 s
14.8 s +0.46 s
14.92 s +0.58 s
15.05 s +0.71 s
15.67 s +1.33 s

The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (1.66 s).

Straight Aqua

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
49.9 mph Best
RefReference Summer
49.5 mph -0.4 mph
49.5 mph -0.4 mph
49.2 mph -0.7 mph
48.5 mph -1.4 mph
48.2 mph -1.7 mph
48.2 mph -1.7 mph
47.2 mph -2.7 mph
RefReference Winter
47.0 mph -2.9 mph
44.8 mph -5.1 mph
44.2 mph -5.7 mph
41.2 mph -8.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 17.4% (8.7 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.5 ft/s² Best
RefReference Winter
8.5 ft/s² 0.0 ft/s²
8.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
8.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
8.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
7.5 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
7.5 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
7.4 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
7.3 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
7.2 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
6.9 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 19.6% (1.6 ft/s²).

Snow

Snow Braking

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Winter
74 ft -3 ft 0 mph
77 ft Best 0 mph
78 ft +1 ft 7 mph
78 ft +1 ft 9 mph
78 ft +1 ft 10 mph
80 ft +3 ft 15 mph
81 ft +4 ft 18 mph
81 ft +4 ft 18 mph
83 ft +6 ft 21 mph
84 ft +7 ft 23 mph
89 ft +12 ft 30 mph
RefReference Summer
209 ft +132 ft 64 mph

The difference between best and worst was 180.2% (135 ft ≈ 9.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Linglong Sport Master 4S would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
655 lbf Best
RefReference Winter
649 lbf -6 lbf
637 lbf -18 lbf
631 lbf -24 lbf
631 lbf -24 lbf
611 lbf -44 lbf
611 lbf -44 lbf
604 lbf -51 lbf
598 lbf -57 lbf
598 lbf -57 lbf
562 lbf -93 lbf
RefReference Summer
210 lbf -445 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 67.9% (445 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
34.7 mph Best
RefReference Winter
34.7 mph 0.0 mph
34.6 mph -0.1 mph
34.4 mph -0.3 mph
33.9 mph -0.8 mph
33.8 mph -0.9 mph
33.7 mph -1.0 mph
33.4 mph -1.3 mph
33.2 mph -1.5 mph
32.7 mph -2.0 mph
32.6 mph -2.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.1% (2.1 mph).

Snow Slalom

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
14.3 ft/s² Best
RefReference Winter
14.0 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
13.8 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
13.8 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
13.1 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
12.9 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
12.9 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
12.8 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
12.5 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
12.3 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
12.1 ft/s² -2.2 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 15.1% (2.2 ft/s²).

Comfort

Subj. Comfort

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
13 Points Best
13 Points Best
13 Points Best
12 Points -1.00 Points
12 Points -1.00 Points
11 Points -2.00 Points
11 Points -2.00 Points
10 Points -3.00 Points
10 Points -3.00 Points
10 Points -3.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 23.1% (3 Points).

Noise

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
67.5 dB -0.30 dB
67.8 dB Best
RefReference Winter
68.1 dB +0.30 dB
68.6 dB +0.80 dB
68.9 dB +1.10 dB
68.9 dB +1.10 dB
69 dB +1.20 dB
69.1 dB +1.30 dB
69.1 dB +1.30 dB
69.2 dB +1.40 dB
69.3 dB +1.50 dB
69.4 dB +1.60 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

Rolling Resistance

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.1 kg/t Best $0
7.8 kg/t +0.70 kg/t $29
7.9 kg/t +0.80 kg/t $33
8 kg/t +0.90 kg/t $37
8.1 kg/t +1.00 kg/t $41
8.3 kg/t +1.20 kg/t $50
8.4 kg/t +1.30 kg/t $54
8.6 kg/t +1.50 kg/t $62
RefReference Winter
8.7 kg/t +1.60 kg/t $66
8.7 kg/t +1.60 kg/t $66
RefReference Summer
8.8 kg/t +1.70 kg/t $70
8.8 kg/t +1.70 kg/t $70

The difference between best and worst was 23.9% (1.7 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 uses about 20 gal ($70) more fuel than the Delmax X Weather 4S.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

1st

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF 3 strikes the golden middle ground and masters all test disciplines confidently. It demonstrates the best performance in the wet chapter overall, being the fastest in wet handling and second-fastest on dry surfaces. The tire delivers excellent rolling comfort and maintains composed behavior across all conditions. Pirelli has achieved what the testers call an exemplary compromise, successfully balancing the conflicting development goals that plague all-season tires. The tire offers sporty drivers crisp handling and maximum driving enjoyment while maintaining strong winter capabilities, making it the clear test winner despite being in the mid-price range.
Dry99.9%
Wet99.8%
Snow96.5%
Comfort99.2%
Rolling Resistance87.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 10126 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1057.5 mph-0.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 10141 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1046.9 mph0.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 1014.4 s+0.06 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1049.9 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 98.5 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 1083 ft+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 10637 lbf-18 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1034.4 mph-0.3 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better2nd / 1013.8 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 1013 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1068.9 dB+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 108.1 kg/t+1.00 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/71
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
8.75 kgs
Price
650.00
Joint 2nd

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

225/45 R18 95W XL
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is a strong all-rounder with low rolling resistance (testers note not ours.) However, this efficiency comes with slight compromises in rolling comfort and pass-by noise levels, which are marginally higher than some competitors. The tire demonstrates balanced performance across all test categories without any particular weaknesses, making it a safe choice for drivers who prioritize efficiency alongside year-round capability. Its consistent performance in all conditions justifies its "exemplary" rating and second-place finish.
Dry97.7%
Wet98%
Snow93.8%
Comfort87.5%
Rolling Resistance85.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 10130 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 1056.6 mph-1.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 10146 ft+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 1046.4 mph-0.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better4th / 1014.47 s+0.13 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 1049.2 mph-0.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 98.0 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 1081 ft+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better7th / 10604 lbf-51 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better6th / 1033.7 mph-1.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better5th / 1012.9 ft/s²-1.4 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 1010 Points-3.00 Points
NoiseLower is better6th / 1069.1 dB+1.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 108.3 kg/t+1.20 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
9.72 kgs
Price
610.00
Joint 2nd

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
The Hankook Kinergy 4S² proves to be another strong all-rounder with a particular affinity for snow conditions. It offers very good price-performance value, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers who don't want to compromise on safety. The tire shows slightly lower traction on snow compared to the best performers, but this is a minor weakness in an otherwise well-balanced package. Its handling characteristics are predictable and confidence-inspiring across all surfaces, earning it a shared second-place finish and "exemplary" rating.
Dry95.5%
Wet97.5%
Snow94.5%
Comfort95%
Rolling Resistance80.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 10137 ft+11 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1057.2 mph-0.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 10146 ft+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 1046.6 mph-0.3 mph
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 1014.34 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1047.2 mph-2.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 97.5 ft/s²-1.0 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 1078 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 10598 lbf-57 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 1033.8 mph-0.9 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better6th / 1012.9 ft/s²-1.4 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 1012 Points-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better10th / 1069.4 dB+1.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 108.8 kg/t+1.70 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
10.73 kgs
Price
580.00
4th

Michelin CrossClimate 2

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Michelin CrossClimate 2
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 is the undisputed snow king, delivering outstanding winter performance that actually surpasses the dedicated winter tire reference in three out of four snow disciplines. However, the French manufacturer appears to have over-emphasized winter properties, as the tire shows comparatively weak wet handling characteristics. This represents the classic compromise dilemma of all-season tires taken to an extreme. Despite being the most expensive tire in the test, it's an excellent choice for drivers who frequently encounter snow and ice but comes with the highest purchase price and a fourth-place overall finish.
Dry98.8%
Wet95.1%
Snow100%
Comfort87.5%
Rolling Resistance91%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 10127 ft+1 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 1056.8 mph-0.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 10151 ft+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 1045.2 mph-1.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better7th / 1014.8 s+0.46 s
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1048.2 mph-1.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 97.5 ft/s²-1.0 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 1077 ftBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 10655 lbfBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 1034.7 mphBest in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better1st / 1014.3 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 1010 Points-3.00 Points
NoiseLower is better6th / 1069.1 dB+1.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 107.8 kg/t+0.70 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
9.68 kgs
Price
740.00
5th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

225/45 R18 95W XL
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 demonstrates good performance in both snow and wet conditions, with particularly impressive straight-line aquaplaning reserves. The tire delivers confident handling and good feedback to the driver. Its weaknesses include a slightly extended braking distance on dry surfaces and a speed rating limited to 168 mph (W-rated), which may disappoint owners of higher-performance sports cars. Overall, it represents a solid choice for drivers prioritizing wet and winter safety over ultimate dry performance.
Dry92.7%
Wet95.8%
Snow96.9%
Comfort95.3%
Rolling Resistance89.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 10146 ft+20 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 1057.1 mph-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 10157 ft+16 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 1046.9 mphBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 1014.43 s+0.09 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1049.5 mph-0.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 97.4 ft/s²-1.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 1078 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 10631 lbf-24 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1034.6 mph-0.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 1013.1 ft/s²-1.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 1012 Points-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better5th / 1069 dB+1.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 107.9 kg/t+0.80 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
9.03 kgs
Price
670.00
6th

Kleber Quadraxer 3

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Kleber Quadraxer 3
The Kleber Quadraxer 3 is a snow expert from the Michelin stable, offering a more affordable alternative to its premium sibling while maintaining strong winter credentials. The tire delivers excellent rolling comfort with the quietest operation in the test. However, it shows comparatively lower lateral grip on wet surfaces, which affects confidence in wet corners. The tire represents good value for money, particularly for drivers who want Michelin-like snow performance without the premium price tag, though wet handling requires a more cautious driving style.
Dry97.4%
Wet94.1%
Snow97.3%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance88.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 10130 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 1056.4 mph-1.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 10157 ft+16 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 1045.3 mph-1.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better9th / 1015.05 s+0.71 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1048.5 mph-1.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 98.0 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 1078 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 10631 lbf-24 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 1033.9 mph-0.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better3rd / 1013.8 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 1013 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better1st / 1067.8 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 108 kg/t+0.90 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
10.3 kgs
Price
590.00
7th

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
The Vredestein Quatrac Pro + is a wet specialist with good traction and short braking distances on snow. However, the tire suffers from limited handling qualities on both snowy and dry surfaces, which affects driving enjoyment and precision. The rolling comfort is acceptable but not exceptional, and it shows surprisingly weak performance in the dry handling tests despite being positioned as a performance-oriented option. For drivers who rarely encounter challenging winter conditions and prioritize wet performance, it offers decent value, but enthusiastic drivers will find the handling compromises frustrating.
Dry92.8%
Wet96.7%
Snow92%
Comfort91.2%
Rolling Resistance81.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 10143 ft+17 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 1056.3 mph-1.3 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 10146 ft+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1046.8 mph-0.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 1014.52 s+0.18 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1044.8 mph-5.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 97.2 ft/s²-1.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 1084 ft+7 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 10611 lbf-44 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 1033.4 mph-1.3 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better9th / 1012.3 ft/s²-2.0 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 1011 Points-2.00 Points
NoiseLower is better9th / 1069.3 dB+1.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 108.7 kg/t+1.60 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
10.54 kgs
Price
560.00
8th

Linglong Sport Master 4S

225/45 R18 95W XL
Linglong Sport Master 4S
The Linglong Sport Master 4S is the price fighter of the test, offering respectable driving performance on wet and dry surfaces while being the fastest in dry handling among all-season competitors. The tire provides excellent rolling comfort, matching the best in this category. However, it's comparatively weak on snow, making it unsuitable for regions with regular winter weather. Additionally, it's limited to 168 mph (W-rated). For drivers in mild climates who rarely see snow but want all-season versatility at an attractive price, the Linglong represents good value, but winter capability is clearly sacrificed.
Dry98.2%
Wet90.6%
Snow87.9%
Comfort99.2%
Rolling Resistance82.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 10131 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 1057.6 mphBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 10146 ft+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 1046.5 mph-0.4 mph
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 1014.53 s+0.19 s
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1044.2 mph-5.7 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better10th / 1089 ft+12 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better10th / 10562 lbf-93 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better10th / 1032.6 mph-2.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better10th / 1012.1 ft/s²-2.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 1013 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1068.9 dB+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 108.6 kg/t+1.50 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
9.58 kgs
Price
420.00
9th

Viking Fourtech+

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Viking Fourtech Plus
The Viking Four Tech Plus is a budget-friendly second brand from Continental, showing good performance on snow-covered roads. However, the tire suffers from an extended braking distance in wet conditions and finishes last in dry performance, which significantly impacts overall safety and driving enjoyment. The rolling comfort is below average, and the tire lacks the precision and feedback that sporty drivers expect. While the low price may be tempting, the compromises in wet safety and dry handling make it difficult to recommend for performance-oriented vehicles.
Dry91%
Wet92.2%
Snow93.5%
Comfort87.9%
Rolling Resistance84.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 10151 ft+25 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 1056.9 mph-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 10162 ft+21 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better9th / 1044.2 mph-2.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 1014.92 s+0.58 s
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1048.2 mph-1.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 97.3 ft/s²-1.2 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 1080 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 10611 lbf-44 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better8th / 1033.2 mph-1.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better8th / 1012.5 ft/s²-1.8 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 1010 Points-3.00 Points
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1068.6 dB+0.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 108.4 kg/t+1.30 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
9.21 kgs
Price
440.00
10th

Delmax X Weather 4S

225/45 R18 95W XL
Delmax X Weather 4S
The Delmax X-Weather 4S offers the lowest purchase price of all candidates and features the lowest rolling resistance for maximum fuel efficiency. On snow, it still delivers respectable performance. However, the tire shows inadequate performance on wet surfaces, with dangerously extended braking distances—stopping over 43 feet later than the best tire from 62 mph. This is a critical safety deficiency that the testers describe as "really dangerous." Despite acceptable rolling comfort, the severe wet weather shortcomings make this tire "not recommendable" for any application where safety is a priority, regardless of the price savings.
Dry90.8%
Wet85.3%
Snow92.6%
Comfort91.3%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 10148 ft+22 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better10th / 1055.4 mph-2.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 10185 ft+44 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 1042.4 mph-4.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better10th / 1015.67 s+1.33 s
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 1041.2 mph-8.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 96.9 ft/s²-1.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 1081 ft+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better9th / 10598 lbf-57 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better9th / 1032.7 mph-2.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better7th / 1012.8 ft/s²-1.5 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 1011 Points-2.00 Points
NoiseLower is better8th / 1069.2 dB+1.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 107.1 kg/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
C/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
9.72 kgs
Price
340.00

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.