Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Sportscars

2025 Auto Bild Sports Car All Season Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R18
Tires tested
10
Disciplines
14
Test vehicle
BMW 3 Series

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
114 ft -12 ft 0 mph
126 ft Best 0 mph
127 ft +1 ft 8 mph
130 ft +4 ft 13 mph
130 ft +4 ft 14 mph
131 ft +5 ft 15 mph
137 ft +11 ft 23 mph
RefReference Winter
142 ft +16 ft 27 mph
143 ft +17 ft 28 mph
146 ft +20 ft 30 mph
148 ft +22 ft 31 mph
151 ft +25 ft 33 mph

The difference between best and worst was 32.9% (37 ft ≈ 2.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Viking Fourtech Plus would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
58.8 mph +1.2 mph
57.6 mph Best
57.5 mph -0.1 mph
57.2 mph -0.4 mph
57.1 mph -0.5 mph
56.9 mph -0.7 mph
56.8 mph -0.8 mph
RefReference Winter
56.7 mph -0.9 mph
56.6 mph -1.0 mph
56.4 mph -1.2 mph
56.3 mph -1.3 mph
55.4 mph -2.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (3.4 mph).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
129 ft -12 ft 0 mph
141 ft Best 0 mph
146 ft +5 ft 15 mph
146 ft +5 ft 15 mph
146 ft +5 ft 15 mph
146 ft +5 ft 16 mph
151 ft +10 ft 20 mph
RefReference Winter
155 ft +14 ft 24 mph
157 ft +16 ft 26 mph
157 ft +16 ft 26 mph
162 ft +21 ft 29 mph
185 ft +44 ft 39 mph

The difference between best and worst was 43.3% (56 ft ≈ 3.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Delmax X Weather 4S would still be travelling at 39 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
48.1 mph +1.2 mph
46.9 mph Best
46.9 mph 0.0 mph
46.8 mph -0.1 mph
46.6 mph -0.3 mph
46.5 mph -0.4 mph
46.4 mph -0.5 mph
RefReference Winter
46.0 mph -0.9 mph
45.3 mph -1.6 mph
45.2 mph -1.7 mph
44.2 mph -2.7 mph
42.4 mph -4.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (5.7 mph).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
14.01 s -0.33 s
14.34 s Best
14.4 s +0.06 s
14.43 s +0.09 s
RefReference Winter
14.44 s +0.10 s
14.47 s +0.13 s
14.52 s +0.18 s
14.53 s +0.19 s
14.8 s +0.46 s
14.92 s +0.58 s
15.05 s +0.71 s
15.67 s +1.33 s

The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (1.66 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
49.9 mph Best
RefReference Summer
49.5 mph -0.4 mph
49.5 mph -0.4 mph
49.2 mph -0.7 mph
48.5 mph -1.4 mph
48.2 mph -1.7 mph
48.2 mph -1.7 mph
47.2 mph -2.7 mph
RefReference Winter
47.0 mph -2.9 mph
44.8 mph -5.1 mph
44.2 mph -5.7 mph
41.2 mph -8.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 17.4% (8.7 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.5 ft/s² Best
RefReference Winter
8.5 ft/s² 0.0 ft/s²
8.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
8.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
8.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
7.5 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
7.5 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
7.4 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
7.3 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
7.2 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
6.9 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 19.6% (1.6 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Winter
74 ft -3 ft 0 mph
77 ft Best 0 mph
78 ft +1 ft 7 mph
78 ft +1 ft 9 mph
78 ft +1 ft 10 mph
80 ft +3 ft 15 mph
81 ft +4 ft 18 mph
81 ft +4 ft 18 mph
83 ft +6 ft 21 mph
84 ft +7 ft 23 mph
89 ft +12 ft 30 mph
RefReference Summer
209 ft +132 ft 64 mph

The difference between best and worst was 180.2% (135 ft ≈ 9.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Linglong Sport Master 4S would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
655 lbf Best
RefReference Winter
649 lbf -6 lbf
637 lbf -18 lbf
631 lbf -24 lbf
631 lbf -24 lbf
611 lbf -44 lbf
611 lbf -44 lbf
604 lbf -51 lbf
598 lbf -57 lbf
598 lbf -57 lbf
562 lbf -93 lbf
RefReference Summer
210 lbf -445 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 67.9% (445 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
34.7 mph Best
RefReference Winter
34.7 mph 0.0 mph
34.6 mph -0.1 mph
34.4 mph -0.3 mph
33.9 mph -0.8 mph
33.8 mph -0.9 mph
33.7 mph -1.0 mph
33.4 mph -1.3 mph
33.2 mph -1.5 mph
32.7 mph -2.0 mph
32.6 mph -2.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.1% (2.1 mph).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
14.3 ft/s² Best
RefReference Winter
14.0 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
13.8 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
13.8 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
13.1 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
12.9 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
12.9 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
12.8 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
12.5 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
12.3 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
12.1 ft/s² -2.2 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 15.1% (2.2 ft/s²).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
13 Points Best
13 Points Best
13 Points Best
12 Points -1.00 Points
12 Points -1.00 Points
11 Points -2.00 Points
11 Points -2.00 Points
10 Points -3.00 Points
10 Points -3.00 Points
10 Points -3.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 23.1% (3 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
67.5 dB -0.30 dB
67.8 dB Best
RefReference Winter
68.1 dB +0.30 dB
68.6 dB +0.80 dB
68.9 dB +1.10 dB
68.9 dB +1.10 dB
69 dB +1.20 dB
69.1 dB +1.30 dB
69.1 dB +1.30 dB
69.2 dB +1.40 dB
69.3 dB +1.50 dB
69.4 dB +1.60 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.1 kg/t Best $0
7.8 kg/t +0.70 kg/t $29
7.9 kg/t +0.80 kg/t $33
8 kg/t +0.90 kg/t $37
8.1 kg/t +1.00 kg/t $41
8.3 kg/t +1.20 kg/t $50
8.4 kg/t +1.30 kg/t $54
8.6 kg/t +1.50 kg/t $62
RefReference Winter
8.7 kg/t +1.60 kg/t $66
8.7 kg/t +1.60 kg/t $66
RefReference Summer
8.8 kg/t +1.70 kg/t $70
8.8 kg/t +1.70 kg/t $70

The difference between best and worst was 23.9% (1.7 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 uses about 20 gal ($70) more fuel than the Delmax X Weather 4S.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.