Auto Motor und Sport has tested nine all season tires in 195/55 R16, a size that fits a long list of superminis and small crossovers, from the Audi A1 and VW Polo to the Fiat 500e and Renault Zoe. The test car was a Hyundai i20, the snow work was done in northern Finland and the wet and dry work in a second climate zone, with the cars and tires covering some 7,000 km by truck between the two. Auto Motor und Sport weight this test wet 40 per cent, snow 20, dry 20 and environment 20, on the reasoning that a German winter is more often cold rain than snow.
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins, and it wins on breadth rather than on any single result: fastest round both the wet and the dry handling courses, most grip on the wet circle, and the lowest rolling resistance of the nine. The Vredestein Quatrac takes second and the value award, stopping shortest of all in the wet for a good deal less money. Behind them the Pirelli and the Nokian are the snow specialists, and the Bridgestone is the opposite, the tire Auto Motor und Sport call the sportiest of the nine on dry roads and last in three of the five snow tests. No tire in the test was rated below good, though Auto Motor und Sport also say up front that they withheld their top grade from the whole field, on the grounds that no all season tire yet matches a good summer tire on dry roads.
Two results are worth flagging before the charts. The Hankook produced the shortest snow braking distance and the most grip in the snow slalom, and then went round the snow handling course slower than anything else in the test and took the lowest subjective snow score of the nine, which is about as clear a split between static grip and dynamic confidence as a test produces. And the Nokian, best of all nine in curved aquaplaning, generated the least lateral grip in the test on a merely wet circle. What follows is our summary of the headline findings; for the complete data set, the full scoring matrix and the methodology, read Auto Motor und Sport's original test.
Dry
The Pirelli stopped shortest on dry tarmac, and the spread to the Uniroyal at the back was 18 feet, the widest braking spread in the test. The Continental, which wins the test overall, was only seventh.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 94 % | |
| 92 % | |
| 92 % | |
| 90 % | |
| 88 % |
The difference between best and worst was 12%.
The dry handling order is almost the reverse. The Continental was quickest round the 1,900 m course, with the Vredestein behind it, while the Pirelli that stopped shortest was seventh and the Kleber and Falken shared last place.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 98 % |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Subjectively the testers preferred the Nokian on dry roads, ahead of the Hankook, Vredestein and Continental. The Kleber and Falken took the lowest marks, the Kleber criticised for understeer and weak feedback through corners.
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 90 % | |
| 90 % | |
| 90 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 70 % | |
| 70 % |
The difference between best and worst was 30%.
Auto Motor und Sport score steering response separately from handling, shown here as the subjective road score. The Bridgestone and Nokian shared the top mark, the Kleber was last.
Subj. Road Score
Subjective Real World Driving Score
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 100 % | |
| 90 % | |
| 90 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 70 % | |
| 60 % |
The difference between best and worst was 40%.
Wet
The Vredestein recorded the shortest wet braking distance, with the Continental just behind and the Uniroyal an unusually strong third for the cheapest tire in the test. The Falken needed 10 feet more than the Vredestein to stop.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 95 % | |
| 94 % | |
| 93 % | |
| 92 % | |
| 91 % |
The difference between best and worst was 9%.
The Continental was fastest round the wet handling course, ahead of the Vredestein and the Uniroyal. The Kleber was slowest, almost 3 mph down on the Continental.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 96 % |
The difference between best and worst was 4%.
The drivers' scoring follows the same order at the top, with the Continental clear of the Vredestein. The Nokian scores poorly here despite its strength in standing water, and the Kleber is last again.
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 90 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 70 % | |
| 70 % | |
| 70 % | |
| 60 % |
The difference between best and worst was 40%.
On the 100 m wet circle the Continental again held the most lateral grip, with the Pirelli and Vredestein close behind. The Nokian was last of the nine.
Wet Circle
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 96 % |
The difference between best and worst was 4%.
Straight line aquaplaning split the field widely. The Pirelli floated at a speed more than 6 mph higher than the Falken at the bottom, with the Nokian the only other tire close to it. The Continental and Uniroyal both sit near the back here, which is the winner's one real weakness.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 94 % | |
| 94 % | |
| 94 % | |
| 93 % | |
| 89 % | |
| 88 % | |
| 88 % |
The difference between best and worst was 12%.
The curved aquaplaning result reorders things again. The Nokian held the most lateral acceleration before the tire floated, ahead of the Pirelli, while the Falken was last for the second time.
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 88 % | |
| 87 % | |
| 85 % | |
| 82 % | |
| 82 % | |
| 82 % | |
| 80 % |
The difference between best and worst was 20%.
Snow
The Hankook stopped shortest on packed snow, with the Kleber second. The Bridgestone was last, 7 feet behind the Hankook, with the other seven tires packed into the space between them.
Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 95 % | |
| 94 % | |
| 94 % | |
| 93 % | |
| 93 % | |
| 93 % |
The difference between best and worst was 7%.
The Pirelli produced the most acceleration on packed snow, ahead of the Nokian and Kleber. The Continental was second last and the Bridgestone last.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 93 % | |
| 91 % |
The difference between best and worst was 9%.
The Nokian and Pirelli were the two quickest round the 1,120 m snow handling course, and the Hankook that had just won the snow braking test was slowest of all nine.
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 100 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 96 % |
The difference between best and worst was 4%.
The testers' snow scores put the Pirelli and Nokian jointly at the top and the Hankook alone at the bottom, marked down for heavy understeer as soon as it was asked to change direction.
Subj. Snow Handling
Subjective Snow Handling Score
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 100 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 80 % | |
| 70 % | |
| 70 % | |
| 60 % |
The difference between best and worst was 40%.
Lateral grip in the snow slalom goes the other way: the Hankook held the most of any tire here, with the Falken second, while the Bridgestone was last for the third time in the snow tests.
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 96 % | |
| 95 % | |
| 95 % | |
| 95 % | |
| 94 % |
The difference between best and worst was 6%.
Comfort
The Bridgestone took the highest ride comfort score of the nine, with the Falken clearly the worst, criticised for road noise inside the car.
Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 89 % | |
| 89 % | |
| 89 % | |
| 78 % | |
| 78 % | |
| 78 % | |
| 78 % | |
| 56 % |
The difference between best and worst was 44%.
Measured external noise puts the Kleber and Nokian jointly quietest, and the Hankook loudest. The whole field sits inside two decibels.
Noise
External noise in dB
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 100 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 99 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 98 % | |
| 98 % |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Value
The Continental has the lowest rolling resistance in the test, with the Bridgestone next, and that is what earns it Auto Motor und Sport's recommendation for small electric cars. The Hankook is the highest, with the Pirelli behind it.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
relative index, 100 = best in test ↑| Position / Tire | Result |
|---|---|
| 100 % | |
| 97 % | |
| 93 % | |
| 93 % | |
| 93 % | |
| 92 % | |
| 91 % | |
| 90 % | |
| 86 % |
The difference between best and worst was 14%.
Results
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this test as the tire with the fewest weak points, and the Vredestein Quatrac takes the value award for finishing close behind at a lower price. The Pirelli and Nokian are the ones to look at if you actually see snow, the Bridgestone if you actively avoid it. With every tire in the field rated good or better and the top scores this close together, which one is right here is more a question of where you drive than of which is best.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
195/55 R16 91V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (18)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | % |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 6th / 9 | 92.02% |
| Dry Handling | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd / 9 | 90% |
| Subj. Road Score | 5th / 9 | 80% |
| Wet Braking | 2nd / 9 | 98.06% |
| Wet Handling | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Wet Circle | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Straight Aqua | 7th / 9 | 88.58% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 6th / 9 | 81.94% |
| Snow Braking | 3rd / 9 | 95.54% |
| Snow Traction | 8th / 9 | 93.48% |
| Snow Handling | 7th / 9 | 97.31% |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 3rd / 9 | 80% |
| Snow Slalom | 3rd / 9 | 96.98% |
| Subj. Comfort | 2nd / 9 | 88.89% |
| Noise | 4th / 9 | 99.16% |
| Rolling Resistance | 1st / 9 | 100% |
- EU Label
- B/B/71
- Origin
- Romania
- Weight
- 7.72 kgs
- Tread
- 7.84 mm
- Price
- 122.00
Vredestein Quatrac
195/55 R16 91V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (18)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | % |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 8th / 9 | 90.11% |
| Dry Handling | 2nd / 9 | 99.48% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd / 9 | 90% |
| Subj. Road Score | 3rd / 9 | 90% |
| Wet Braking | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Wet Handling | 2nd / 9 | 99.1% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 2nd / 9 | 90% |
| Wet Circle | 3rd / 9 | 98.97% |
| Straight Aqua | 6th / 9 | 92.89% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 5th / 9 | 84.91% |
| Snow Braking | 7th / 9 | 93.46% |
| Snow Traction | 4th / 9 | 95.65% |
| Snow Handling | 4th / 9 | 98.54% |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 3rd / 9 | 80% |
| Snow Slalom | 4th / 9 | 95.98% |
| Subj. Comfort | 5th / 9 | 77.78% |
| Noise | 6th / 9 | 98.47% |
| Rolling Resistance | 3rd / 9 | 93.33% |
- EU Label
- C/B/70
- Origin
- Hungary
- Weight
- 7.6 kgs
- Tread
- 7.74 mm
- Price
- 103.00
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
195/55 R16 87VCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (18)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | % |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Dry Handling | 7th / 9 | 98.45% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 5th / 9 | 80% |
| Subj. Road Score | 5th / 9 | 80% |
| Wet Braking | 4th / 9 | 95.6% |
| Wet Handling | 5th / 9 | 97.31% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 3rd / 9 | 80% |
| Wet Circle | 2nd / 9 | 99.1% |
| Straight Aqua | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 2nd / 9 | 97.84% |
| Snow Braking | 4th / 9 | 94.64% |
| Snow Traction | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Snow Handling | 2nd / 9 | 99.89% |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Snow Slalom | 7th / 9 | 95.23% |
| Subj. Comfort | 5th / 9 | 77.78% |
| Noise | 3rd / 9 | 99.44% |
| Rolling Resistance | 8th / 9 | 89.74% |
- EU Label
- C/A/72
- Origin
- Romania
- Weight
- 7.42 kgs
- Tread
- 6.99 mm
- Price
- 127.00
Nokian Seasonproof 2
195/55 R16 91V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (18)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | % |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 5th / 9 | 94.23% |
| Dry Handling | 3rd / 9 | 98.88% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Subj. Road Score | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Wet Braking | 6th / 9 | 94.12% |
| Wet Handling | 7th / 9 | 96.86% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 6th / 9 | 70% |
| Wet Circle | 9th / 9 | 96.41% |
| Straight Aqua | 2nd / 9 | 99.07% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Snow Braking | 5th / 9 | 94.04% |
| Snow Traction | 2nd / 9 | 97.83% |
| Snow Handling | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Snow Slalom | 6th / 9 | 95.48% |
| Subj. Comfort | 2nd / 9 | 88.89% |
| Noise | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Rolling Resistance | 3rd / 9 | 93.33% |
- EU Label
- B/A/70
- Origin
- Romania
- Weight
- 7.79 kgs
- Tread
- 8.14 mm
- Price
- 103.00
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
195/55 R16 87HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (18)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | % |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 2nd / 9 | 97.03% |
| Dry Handling | 6th / 9 | 98.54% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 5th / 9 | 80% |
| Subj. Road Score | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Wet Braking | 5th / 9 | 95% |
| Wet Handling | 4th / 9 | 97.87% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 3rd / 9 | 80% |
| Wet Circle | 5th / 9 | 98.07% |
| Straight Aqua | 5th / 9 | 93.59% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 3rd / 9 | 87.6% |
| Snow Braking | 9th / 9 | 93.17% |
| Snow Traction | 9th / 9 | 90.58% |
| Snow Handling | 6th / 9 | 97.42% |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 7th / 9 | 70% |
| Snow Slalom | 9th / 9 | 94.47% |
| Subj. Comfort | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Noise | 8th / 9 | 98.06% |
| Rolling Resistance | 2nd / 9 | 97.22% |
- EU Label
- C/B/70
- Origin
- Spain
- Weight
- 7.61 kgs
- Tread
- 7.25 mm
- Price
- 127.00
Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3
195/55 R16 87VCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (18)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | % |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 9th / 9 | 87.5% |
| Dry Handling | 5th / 9 | 98.63% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 5th / 9 | 80% |
| Subj. Road Score | 5th / 9 | 80% |
| Wet Braking | 3rd / 9 | 96.2% |
| Wet Handling | 3rd / 9 | 98.32% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 3rd / 9 | 80% |
| Wet Circle | 4th / 9 | 98.72% |
| Straight Aqua | 8th / 9 | 88.46% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 6th / 9 | 81.94% |
| Snow Braking | 7th / 9 | 93.46% |
| Snow Traction | 4th / 9 | 95.65% |
| Snow Handling | 3rd / 9 | 98.66% |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 3rd / 9 | 80% |
| Snow Slalom | 7th / 9 | 95.23% |
| Subj. Comfort | 2nd / 9 | 88.89% |
| Noise | 7th / 9 | 98.2% |
| Rolling Resistance | 6th / 9 | 92.11% |
- EU Label
- C/B/72
- Origin
- Germany
- Weight
- 7.6 kgs
- Tread
- 7.51 mm
- Price
- 89.00
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
195/55 R16 91V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (18)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | % |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 6th / 9 | 92.02% |
| Dry Handling | 3rd / 9 | 98.88% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 2nd / 9 | 90% |
| Subj. Road Score | 3rd / 9 | 90% |
| Wet Braking | 7th / 9 | 92.97% |
| Wet Handling | 8th / 9 | 96.53% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 6th / 9 | 70% |
| Wet Circle | 5th / 9 | 98.07% |
| Straight Aqua | 4th / 9 | 94.17% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 6th / 9 | 81.94% |
| Snow Braking | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Snow Traction | 4th / 9 | 95.65% |
| Snow Handling | 9th / 9 | 96.3% |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 9th / 9 | 60% |
| Snow Slalom | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Subj. Comfort | 5th / 9 | 77.78% |
| Noise | 9th / 9 | 97.66% |
| Rolling Resistance | 9th / 9 | 86.42% |
- EU Label
- C/B/72
- Origin
- Korea
- Weight
- 8.05 kgs
- Tread
- 7.52 mm
- Price
- 97.00
Kleber Quadraxer 3
195/55 R16 87VCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (18)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | % |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 3rd / 9 | 95.84% |
| Dry Handling | 8th / 9 | 98.11% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 8th / 9 | 70% |
| Subj. Road Score | 9th / 9 | 60% |
| Wet Braking | 8th / 9 | 91.57% |
| Wet Handling | 9th / 9 | 95.63% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 9th / 9 | 60% |
| Wet Circle | 8th / 9 | 97.3% |
| Straight Aqua | 3rd / 9 | 94.29% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 4th / 9 | 86.79% |
| Snow Braking | 2nd / 9 | 96.77% |
| Snow Traction | 3rd / 9 | 96.38% |
| Snow Handling | 5th / 9 | 98.1% |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 7th / 9 | 70% |
| Snow Slalom | 4th / 9 | 95.98% |
| Subj. Comfort | 5th / 9 | 77.78% |
| Noise | 1st / 9 | 100% |
| Rolling Resistance | 7th / 9 | 90.91% |
- EU Label
- D/B/69
- Origin
- Poland
- Weight
- 8.02 kgs
- Tread
- 7.51 mm
- Price
- 101.00
Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
195/55 R16 91V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (18)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | % |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 3rd / 9 | 95.84% |
| Dry Handling | 8th / 9 | 98.11% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 8th / 9 | 70% |
| Subj. Road Score | 8th / 9 | 70% |
| Wet Braking | 9th / 9 | 91.29% |
| Wet Handling | 6th / 9 | 97.2% |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 6th / 9 | 70% |
| Wet Circle | 7th / 9 | 97.95% |
| Straight Aqua | 9th / 9 | 87.88% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 9th / 9 | 80.32% |
| Snow Braking | 5th / 9 | 94.04% |
| Snow Traction | 4th / 9 | 95.65% |
| Snow Handling | 7th / 9 | 97.31% |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 3rd / 9 | 80% |
| Snow Slalom | 2nd / 9 | 97.49% |
| Subj. Comfort | 9th / 9 | 55.56% |
| Noise | 5th / 9 | 98.88% |
| Rolling Resistance | 3rd / 9 | 93.33% |
- EU Label
- D/B/70
- Origin
- Thailand
- Weight
- 7.6 kgs
- Tread
- 7.00 mm
- Price
- 93.00


Discussion