2025 ADAC All Season Tire Test

The German motor club ADAC is at the very peak of tire testing, so any new test of theirs is extremely exciting. For 2025 ADAC has tested popular all season tires in the common 225/45 R17 size, and included a wear test and a real world economy test. Sadly this test was started before the introduction of the CrossClimate 3.

Test Publication:

225/45 R17 16 tires 6 categories

Similar Tests

Images courtesy of ADAC

Test Publication:

https://www.adac.de/rund-ums-fahrzeug/ausstattung-technik-zubehoer/reifen/reifentest/

Images courtesy of ADAC

Test Size: 225/45 R17

Tires Tested: 16 tires

Test Categories:
6 categories (13 tests)

Similar Tests

Even with ADAC's rather unique way of testing, the winners are not a surprise, with Goodyear, Continental and Pirelli taking the top spots. The most interesting piece of data was the wear result of the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 - all but matching the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and beating the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, but none of the leading tires could get close to the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 impressive wear results.

As usual, ADAC only present a selection of data, but be sure to visit their site for their detailed thoughts on the test results. This is perhaps the first year ADAC has described a number of the tires as good to replace a summer and winter tire combination, though half the tires were still not up to their high standards.

Dry

The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 led the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 in braking, with the cheaper tires performing poorly, stopping over 8 meters further on.

Wet

There was nearly a 10 meter difference between the best and worst all season tires in wet braking, with Continental, Bridgestone and Pirelli leading the pack.

The order was almost the same when wet braking on concrete.

PIrelli and Bridgestone were the best of the top performers in the deeper water of aquaplaning.

Snow

Barum, Michelin and Nexen tied for the best result in snow braking, with all the tires other than the Petlas performing relatively well.

Michelin, BFGoodrich and Nexen had the highest traction force in the snow traction test.

Ice

The Nexen N'Blue 4Season 2 also led the way in ice braking, with Aplus making a surprise appearance in second place.

Comfort

The Nexen was also the quietest tire in the passby noise test.

Value

Goodyear and Dunlop had a huge lead in the wear test.

When calculating wear vs purchase price, the Aplus AS909 proved to be the best value.

The amount of weight a tire loses during the wear test doesn't always match the wear results, but in this case it was fairly close, with Goodyear, APlus and Dunlop having the best wearing compounds in terms of particulate matter.

Finally, Aplus was the best in the fuel consumption test, however all the tires were only separated by 0.3 litres per 100 km driven.

Results

1^st

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/B/B70
• Origin: France
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 8.8 kgs
• Price: 135.00

The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 just misses a "good" rating for driving safety due to weaknesses on dry roads, but its very strong environmental performance secures a good overall grade. In summer conditions, the tire lacks precise steering response, requiring minor corrections in curves, and its dry braking is only satisfactory. It performs well on wet surfaces, especially in braking and handling, though its aquaplaning resistance is average. In winter conditions, the tire is impressive, offering short braking distances on snow and ice with excellent traction. Its only shortcoming is average handling performance on snow. Environmentally, the tire is a top performer with a very high projected mileage, low abrasion, and good marks for weight and fuel efficiency.

Dry

88.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	10th	42.8 M	38 M	+4.8 M	88.79%

Wet

96.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	4th	33.2 M	31.3 M	+1.9 M	94.28%
Wet Braking - Concrete	4th	39.1 M	38.4 M	+0.7 M	98.21%
Straight Aqua	9th	74.9 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-3.6 Km/H	95.41%
Curved Aquaplaning	4th	2.7 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.1 m/sec2	96.43%

Snow

96.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	4th	9.1 M	9 M	+0.1 M	98.9%
Snow Traction	9th	241 N	257 N	-16 N	93.77%

Ice

96.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	2nd	14.7 M	14.2 M	+0.5 M	96.6%

Comfort

97.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	12th	72.7 dB	71.1 dB	+1.6 dB	97.8%

Value

92%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	1st	68000 KM			100%
Value	5th	1.99 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+0.57 Price/1000	71.36%
Fuel Consumption	6th	5.7 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.2 l/100km	96.49%
Abrasion	1st	51 mg/km/t			100%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

2^nd

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/B/B71
• Origin: Slovakia
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 9.4 kgs
• Price: 135.00

The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is the only tire in the test to achieve a "good" rating in both driving safety and environmental impact, resulting in a good overall score. On dry roads, it performs well, offering good steering feedback and safe handling at the limit, along with above-average braking. It is also convincing on wet surfaces, scoring high marks for braking and handling, providing good grip and precise control, though its resistance to aquaplaning is only satisfactory. Uniquely, it also secures a good rating on winter roads, delivering above-average performance in all areas, including braking on ice and snow, traction, and safe handling. In the environmental assessment, the tire also earns a good score thanks to its positive predicted mileage, low abrasion, and low fuel consumption, though its slightly above-average weight prevents an even better rating.

Dry

93.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	6th	40.8 M	38 M	+2.8 M	93.14%

Wet

95.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	1st	31.3 M			100%
Wet Braking - Concrete	1st	38.4 M			100%
Straight Aqua	11th	73 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-5.5 Km/H	92.99%
Curved Aquaplaning	10th	2.5 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.3 m/sec2	89.29%

Snow

96.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	5th	9.2 M	9 M	+0.2 M	97.83%
Snow Traction	5th	245 N	257 N	-12 N	95.33%

Ice

91%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	12th	15.6 M	14.2 M	+1.4 M	91.03%

Comfort

98.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	7th	72.3 dB	71.1 dB	+1.2 dB	98.34%

Value

73.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	4th	48200 KM	68000 KM	-19800 KM	70.88%
Value	13th	2.8 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+1.38 Price/1000	50.71%
Fuel Consumption	6th	5.7 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.2 l/100km	96.49%
Abrasion	9th	67 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+16 mg/km/t	76.12%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

3^rd

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/A/B71
• Origin: Romania
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 8.7 kgs
• Price: 127.00

The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 narrowly misses a "good" result for driving safety but achieves a good rating for its environmental performance, securing a just-good overall score. It is the top-performing tire in the test on dry roads, offering precise steering, good handling at the limit, and nearly a "very good" rating for its short braking distance. It also scores best on wet roads, delivering good results in both braking and handling with strong grip and control, though its aquaplaning resistance is only rated as satisfactory. However, its performance dips on winter roads; braking and handling on snow are merely satisfactory as it struggles to combine longitudinal and cornering forces effectively. It does, however, earn good ratings for traction on snow and braking on ice. Environmentally, the tire performs well, with good projected mileage, low abrasion, low weight, and minimal impact on fuel consumption.

Dry

100%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	1st	38 M			100%

Wet

98.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	3rd	32.5 M	31.3 M	+1.2 M	96.31%
Wet Braking - Concrete	3rd	38.8 M	38.4 M	+0.4 M	98.97%
Straight Aqua	2nd	78.3 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-0.2 Km/H	99.75%
Curved Aquaplaning	1st	2.8 m/sec2			100%

Snow

93.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	15th	9.8 M	9 M	+0.8 M	91.84%
Snow Traction	5th	245 N	257 N	-12 N	95.33%

Ice

92.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	8th	15.4 M	14.2 M	+1.2 M	92.21%

Comfort

97.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	9th	72.6 dB	71.1 dB	+1.5 dB	97.93%

Value

76%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	7th	47400 KM	68000 KM	-20600 KM	69.71%
Value	11th	2.68 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+1.26 Price/1000	52.99%
Fuel Consumption	6th	5.7 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.2 l/100km	96.49%
Abrasion	6th	60 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+9 mg/km/t	85%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

4^th

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/B/B70
• Origin: Hungary
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 9.5 kgs
• Price: 126.00

The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 narrowly misses a "good" score for driving safety, but its strong environmental performance helps it secure a satisfactory overall result. On dry roads in summer, it shows slight weaknesses with only adequate steering feedback and response, requiring occasional corrections in long curves. However, it maintains good safety reserves at the limit and achieves a good rating for braking from high speeds. The tire performs well on wet surfaces, particularly in braking and handling, allowing for precise control. Its straight-line aquaplaning resistance is good, though only satisfactory when cornering. In winter conditions, its performance falters, receiving merely satisfactory scores for snow braking and handling. While it earns good ratings for snow traction and ice braking, it struggles to effectively combine cornering and straight-line forces on snow. Environmentally, the tire scores well with good projected mileage, low abrasion, and low fuel consumption, though its slightly above-average weight prevents a top mark in this category.

Dry

98.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	2nd	38.5 M	38 M	+0.5 M	98.7%

Wet

98.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	2nd	31.6 M	31.3 M	+0.3 M	99.05%
Wet Braking - Concrete	2nd	38.5 M	38.4 M	+0.1 M	99.74%
Straight Aqua	1st	78.5 Km/H			100%
Curved Aquaplaning	4th	2.7 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.1 m/sec2	96.43%

Snow

93.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	11th	9.6 M	9 M	+0.6 M	93.75%
Snow Traction	10th	240 N	257 N	-17 N	93.39%

Ice

91.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	10th	15.5 M	14.2 M	+1.3 M	91.61%

Comfort

97%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	14th	73.3 dB	71.1 dB	+2.2 dB	97%

Value

73.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	8th	47100 KM	68000 KM	-20900 KM	69.26%
Value	11th	2.68 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+1.26 Price/1000	52.99%
Fuel Consumption	13th	5.8 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.3 l/100km	94.83%
Abrasion	9th	67 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+16 mg/km/t	76.12%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

5^th

Michelin CrossClimate 2

225/45 R17 94Y

• EU Label: C/B/B71
• Origin: Italy
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 8.8 kgs
• Price: 145.00

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 receives a merely "satisfactory" overall rating because its performance on wet roads doesn't rise above that level, despite a good environmental score. On dry roads, the tire performs well, offering good steering feedback, precision, and safe handling at its limits, along with a good braking distance. However, on wet surfaces, it only achieves a satisfactory result; while its braking is still considered good, its resistance to aquaplaning and its general wet handling are rated as average due to mediocre grip levels. In contrast, the Michelin delivers the best winter performance in the test. It scores well for traction and braking on snow and ice, and it uniquely earns a "very good" rating for its outstandingly precise handling and high safety reserves on snow. Environmentally, the tire performs well, offering high projected mileage, low wear, and above-average results for both fuel consumption and weight.

Dry

97.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	3rd	38.9 M	38 M	+0.9 M	97.69%

Wet

93.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	6th	33.6 M	31.3 M	+2.3 M	93.15%
Wet Braking - Concrete	8th	40.5 M	38.4 M	+2.1 M	94.81%
Straight Aqua	4th	76 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-2.5 Km/H	96.82%
Curved Aquaplaning	10th	2.5 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.3 m/sec2	89.29%

Snow

100%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	1st	9 M			100%
Snow Traction	1st	257 N			100%

Ice

96%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	4th	14.8 M	14.2 M	+0.6 M	95.95%

Comfort

98.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	4th	72 dB	71.1 dB	+0.9 dB	98.75%

Value

77.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	6th	47500 KM	68000 KM	-20500 KM	69.85%
Value	14th	3.05 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+1.63 Price/1000	46.56%
Fuel Consumption	2nd	5.6 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.1 l/100km	98.21%
Abrasion	4th	53 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+2 mg/km/t	96.23%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

6^th

Dunlop All Season 2

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/B/B72
• Origin: France
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 8.6 kgs
• Price: 123.00

The Dunlop Sport All Season 2's driving safety is only rated "satisfactory" due to its performance on both dry and wet roads. While a good environmental score improves its standing slightly, the overall result remains satisfactory. The tire's weakest performance is on dry roads, where it offers only average steering feedback and lacks precision, requiring frequent driver corrections. Its braking distance is also below average. On wet surfaces, it narrowly misses a good rating, held back by merely satisfactory aquaplaning resistance. However, it earns good scores for wet braking and handling, providing precise and safe control. In winter conditions, the tire performs well, achieving good ratings across the board for traction on snow, braking on snow and ice, and secure handling. Environmentally, the Dunlop scores well with a very good rating for projected mileage and good results for wear, weight, and fuel consumption.

Dry

88%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	12th	43.2 M	38 M	+5.2 M	87.96%

Wet

94.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	8th	33.7 M	31.3 M	+2.4 M	92.88%
Wet Braking - Concrete	7th	40.2 M	38.4 M	+1.8 M	95.52%
Straight Aqua	8th	75.3 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-3.2 Km/H	95.92%
Curved Aquaplaning	7th	2.6 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.2 m/sec2	92.86%

Snow

96.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	5th	9.2 M	9 M	+0.2 M	97.83%
Snow Traction	4th	246 N	257 N	-11 N	95.72%

Ice

96%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	4th	14.8 M	14.2 M	+0.6 M	95.95%

Comfort

98.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	8th	72.4 dB	71.1 dB	+1.3 dB	98.2%

Value

89.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	2nd	62700 KM	68000 KM	-5300 KM	92.21%
Value	4th	1.96 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+0.54 Price/1000	72.45%
Fuel Consumption	6th	5.7 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.2 l/100km	96.49%
Abrasion	2nd	52 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+1 mg/km/t	98.08%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

7^th

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/B/A69
• Origin: Poland
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 8.8 kgs
• Price: 129.00

The BFGoodrich Advantage All-Season tire does not surpass a "satisfactory" rating in either driving safety or environmental performance, leading to a satisfactory overall grade. On dry roads, it performs well, offering good steering feedback, precision, and safe handling at the limit, along with a significantly shorter-than-average braking distance. However, on wet surfaces, its performance is only satisfactory. It fails to deliver good results in braking and aquaplaning tests, and its handling is also rated as merely satisfactory because it struggles to combine lateral and longitudinal forces, leading to early understeer or oversteer. In contrast, the tire is convincing in winter conditions, earning good ratings for its braking, traction, and secure handling on snow. Environmentally, the tire just misses a good rating due to its projected mileage, though its wear, fuel consumption, and weight are all rated as good.

Dry

96.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	4th	39.3 M	38 M	+1.3 M	96.69%

Wet

93.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	10th	34.3 M	31.3 M	+3 M	91.25%
Wet Braking - Concrete	10th	42.1 M	38.4 M	+3.7 M	91.21%
Straight Aqua	3rd	77.1 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-1.4 Km/H	98.22%
Curved Aquaplaning	7th	2.6 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.2 m/sec2	92.86%

Snow

97%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	8th	9.3 M	9 M	+0.3 M	96.77%
Snow Traction	2nd	250 N	257 N	-7 N	97.28%

Ice

92.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	7th	15.3 M	14.2 M	+1.1 M	92.81%

Comfort

98.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	5th	72.2 dB	71.1 dB	+1.1 dB	98.48%

Value

72.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	14th	41800 KM	68000 KM	-26200 KM	61.47%
Value	15th	3.09 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+1.67 Price/1000	45.95%
Fuel Consumption	2nd	5.6 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.1 l/100km	98.21%
Abrasion	6th	60 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+9 mg/km/t	85%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

8^th

Viking Fourtech+

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/C/B72
• Origin: Romania
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 9.1 kgs

The Viking FourTech Plus does not exceed a "satisfactory" rating in any driving safety category (dry, wet, or winter). Although it scores a "good" rating for its environmental performance, its overall grade is only satisfactory. The tire's weakest area is on dry roads, where steering feedback and precision are lacking, requiring the driver to make corrections to hold a line. Its dry braking distance is also below average. On wet roads, it narrowly misses a good rating; while braking is good, its performance in aquaplaning and handling is only satisfactory due to a tendency to understeer or oversteer. In winter conditions, the results are also merely satisfactory across the board in traction, braking on snow and ice, and handling, with a lack of precision at the limit. On a positive note, the tire's environmental performance is good, thanks to high marks for projected mileage, low wear, low weight, and very low fuel consumption.

Dry

86.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	13th	43.9 M	38 M	+5.9 M	86.56%

Wet

96.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	9th	34.1 M	31.3 M	+2.8 M	91.79%
Wet Braking - Concrete	5th	39.7 M	38.4 M	+1.3 M	96.73%
Straight Aqua	6th	75.7 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-2.8 Km/H	96.43%
Curved Aquaplaning	1st	2.8 m/sec2			100%

Snow

91.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	10th	9.5 M	9 M	+0.5 M	94.74%
Snow Traction	13th	227 N	257 N	-30 N	88.33%

Ice

90.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	13th	15.7 M	14.2 M	+1.5 M	90.45%

Comfort

97.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	9th	72.6 dB	71.1 dB	+1.5 dB	97.93%

Value

78.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	13th	44800 KM	68000 KM	-23200 KM	65.88%
Fuel Consumption	6th	5.7 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.2 l/100km	96.49%
Abrasion	11th	69 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+18 mg/km/t	73.91%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

9^th

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+

225/45 R17 94Y

• EU Label: D/B/B72
• Origin: Hungary
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 9.9 kgs
• Price: 121.00

The Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ receives a mere "adequate" rating for driving safety due to its poor performance on dry roads, which also downgrades its overall score. On dry surfaces, it offers only adequate steering feedback and lacks precision, with delayed responses that require driver corrections to maintain a consistent line through curves. The tire also tends to oversteer early during dynamic maneuvers, and its braking is rated as only satisfactory. On wet roads, it misses a good rating; while braking is still good, its aquaplaning resistance and handling are only satisfactory due to understeer/oversteer tendencies. Winter performance is also just satisfactory, with average results in traction and braking on snow and ice. While it narrowly misses a good score in snow handling, it lacks overall precision. Environmentally, the tire achieves a satisfactory result, with good scores for projected mileage and wear, but its high weight leads to only a satisfactory efficiency rating, despite good fuel consumption.

Dry

88.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	11th	43.1 M	38 M	+5.1 M	88.17%

Wet

90.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	5th	33.4 M	31.3 M	+2.1 M	93.71%
Wet Braking - Concrete	5th	39.7 M	38.4 M	+1.3 M	96.73%
Straight Aqua	13th	70.6 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-7.9 Km/H	89.94%
Curved Aquaplaning	12th	2.3 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.5 m/sec2	82.14%

Snow

90.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	11th	9.6 M	9 M	+0.6 M	93.75%
Snow Traction	14th	224 N	257 N	-33 N	87.16%

Ice

86.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	14th	16.5 M	14.2 M	+2.3 M	86.06%

Comfort

98.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	2nd	71.9 dB	71.1 dB	+0.8 dB	98.89%

Value

70.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	9th	46500 KM	68000 KM	-21500 KM	68.38%
Value	10th	2.6 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+1.18 Price/1000	54.62%
Fuel Consumption	13th	5.8 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.3 l/100km	94.83%
Abrasion	16th	78 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+27 mg/km/t	65.38%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

10^th

Barum Quartaris 5

225/45 R17 94Y

• EU Label: C/C/B72
• Origin: Germany
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 9.2 kgs
• Price: 107.00

The Barum Quartaris 5 receives an "adequate" rating for driving safety, which also defines its overall grade. Its performance is weak on dry roads and only satisfactory on wet surfaces, though it performs well in winter and earns a good score for its environmental impact. On dry roads, the tire provides poor steering feedback and precision, requiring constant corrections as it responds with a delay and tends to oversteer early during lane changes. On wet roads, it scores as merely satisfactory across all criteria, with average grip levels and a tendency to understeer or oversteer. In contrast, the tire performs well in winter conditions, earning good scores for braking and traction on snow, and its handling is rated as secure and largely precise. Environmentally, the German-made tire achieves a good rating thanks to good projected mileage, low wear, low weight, and good fuel efficiency.

Dry

83.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	16th	45.3 M	38 M	+7.3 M	83.89%

Wet

90.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	11th	35.6 M	31.3 M	+4.3 M	87.92%
Wet Braking - Concrete	11th	43.3 M	38.4 M	+4.9 M	88.68%
Straight Aqua	10th	73.3 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-5.2 Km/H	93.38%
Curved Aquaplaning	7th	2.6 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.2 m/sec2	92.86%

Snow

97.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	1st	9 M			100%
Snow Traction	8th	244 N	257 N	-13 N	94.94%

Ice

91.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	10th	15.5 M	14.2 M	+1.3 M	91.61%

Comfort

95.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	16th	74.5 dB	71.1 dB	+3.4 dB	95.44%

Value

72.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	12th	45700 KM	68000 KM	-22300 KM	67.21%
Value	7th	2.34 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+0.92 Price/1000	60.68%
Fuel Consumption	6th	5.7 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.2 l/100km	96.49%
Abrasion	14th	77 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+26 mg/km/t	66.23%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

11^th

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: D/A/B72
• Origin: Czech Republic
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 9.6 kgs
• Price: 104.00

The Nexen N'Blue 4Season 2 receives a mere "adequate" rating for driving safety due to significant weaknesses on dry roads, which downgrades its overall score. On dry surfaces, it offers poor steering feedback and is imprecise, requiring driver corrections due to delayed responses and a tendency to oversteer early during quick maneuvers. Its dry braking, however, is rated as good. On wet roads, its performance is satisfactory overall, though it is weak in resisting lateral aquaplaning. Winter performance is a major strength, achieving the second-best result in the test. It scores well for snow traction, braking, and handling, and is notably the only tire to earn a "very good" rating for braking on ice. Environmentally, the tire narrowly misses a good rating; while its fuel consumption is low, its satisfactory projected mileage and average weight bring down its score.

Dry

93.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	5th	40.6 M	38 M	+2.6 M	93.6%

Wet

86.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	6th	33.6 M	31.3 M	+2.3 M	93.15%
Wet Braking - Concrete	9th	41 M	38.4 M	+2.6 M	93.66%
Straight Aqua	12th	71.7 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-6.8 Km/H	91.34%
Curved Aquaplaning	14th	1.9 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.9 m/sec2	67.86%

Snow

98.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	1st	9 M			100%
Snow Traction	3rd	249 N	257 N	-8 N	96.89%

Ice

100%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	1st	14.2 M			100%

Comfort

100%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	1st	71.1 dB			100%

Value

70.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	15th	41400 KM	68000 KM	-26600 KM	60.88%
Value	9th	2.51 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+1.09 Price/1000	56.57%
Fuel Consumption	2nd	5.6 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.1 l/100km	98.21%
Abrasion	14th	77 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+26 mg/km/t	66.23%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

12^th

Superia Ecoblue2 4S

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/C/A68
• Origin: China
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 9.3 kgs
• Price: 83.00

The Superia Ecoblue2 4S receives an overall "adequate" rating for driving safety, with its final score being downgraded due to very weak performance on wet roads. On dry surfaces, it provides poor steering feedback and is imprecise, requiring frequent corrections and exhibiting a tendency to oversteer, leading to a barely satisfactory rating. Its performance on wet roads is particularly poor, scoring as "adequate" for braking, lateral aquaplaning, and handling due to low grip levels and early, prolonged sliding. In contrast, its winter performance is good, with positive results for braking on snow and ice and good traction, though its snow handling just misses a good rating. Environmentally, the Chinese-made tire scores a satisfactory grade; while its wear and weight are acceptable, its projected mileage is not, and its sustainability is rated as merely adequate due to the manufacturer's failure to provide requested ISO certifications or other sustainability credentials.

Dry

90.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	7th	41.9 M	38 M	+3.9 M	90.69%

Wet

81.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	14th	37.6 M	31.3 M	+6.3 M	83.24%
Wet Braking - Concrete	14th	46.5 M	38.4 M	+8.1 M	82.58%
Straight Aqua	14th	70.4 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-8.1 Km/H	89.68%
Curved Aquaplaning	13th	2 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.8 m/sec2	71.43%

Snow

96.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	5th	9.2 M	9 M	+0.2 M	97.83%
Snow Traction	5th	245 N	257 N	-12 N	95.33%

Ice

93.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	6th	15.2 M	14.2 M	+1 M	93.42%

Comfort

98.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	5th	72.2 dB	71.1 dB	+1.1 dB	98.48%

Value

68.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	16th	34700 KM	68000 KM	-33300 KM	51.03%
Value	8th	2.39 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+0.97 Price/1000	59.41%
Fuel Consumption	13th	5.8 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.3 l/100km	94.83%
Abrasion	13th	75 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+24 mg/km/t	68%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

13^th

CST Medallion All Season ACP1

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/B/B71
• Origin: China
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 10.1 kgs
• Price: 81.00

The CST Medallion All Season ACP1's overall driving safety is rated as "deficient" due to significant weaknesses, particularly on winter roads, and it fails to achieve more than a satisfactory rating on dry or wet surfaces. On dry roads, it offers poor steering feedback and is imprecise, requiring corrections and showing a tendency to oversteer, resulting in a barely satisfactory score. On wet pavement, its braking and aquaplaning resistance are satisfactory, but its handling is rated even lower due to a lack of grip and precision. The tire's performance on winter roads is especially poor, with its handling rated as "deficient." It struggles to combine forces, leading to early understeer and oversteer with almost no safety reserves, and it posts the worst result in the test for braking on ice. Environmentally, the Chinese-made tire misses a good rating; while its projected mileage and wear are good, its high weight results in a merely satisfactory efficiency score. Its sustainability is rated as just adequate due to the manufacturer's failure to provide requested ISO certifications or other sustainability credentials.

Dry

85%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	15th	44.7 M	38 M	+6.7 M	85.01%

Wet

92%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	13th	36.6 M	31.3 M	+5.3 M	85.52%
Wet Braking - Concrete	13th	44.4 M	38.4 M	+6 M	86.49%
Straight Aqua	7th	75.4 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-3.1 Km/H	96.05%
Curved Aquaplaning	1st	2.8 m/sec2			100%

Snow

88.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	11th	9.6 M	9 M	+0.6 M	93.75%
Snow Traction	15th	216 N	257 N	-41 N	84.05%

Ice

75.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	16th	18.7 M	14.2 M	+4.5 M	75.94%

Comfort

96.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	15th	73.5 dB	71.1 dB	+2.4 dB	96.73%

Value

79.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	5th	47600 KM	68000 KM	-20400 KM	70%
Value	3rd	1.7 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+0.28 Price/1000	83.53%
Fuel Consumption	13th	5.8 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.3 l/100km	94.83%
Abrasion	12th	73 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+22 mg/km/t	69.86%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

14^th

Aplus AS909

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/C/B71
• Origin: China
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 9.6 kgs
• Price: 84.00

Translation and Summary The APlus AS909 is rated as "deficient" overall for driving safety, a score dictated by its significant weaknesses on wet roads which led to a downgrade of its final grade. On dry roads, its performance is merely "adequate," offering poor and imprecise steering feedback that requires constant driver correction and early oversteering in dynamic maneuvers. On wet surfaces, the tire reaches its limits, earning a "deficient" rating for its braking distance and handling due to very low grip, making it difficult to control. Its winter performance is deemed satisfactory overall, securing good scores for braking and traction but only an "adequate" rating for handling, as it struggles to combine forces effectively. In contrast, the Chinese-made tire achieves a good environmental score thanks to very good projected mileage and low fuel consumption. However, its sustainability is rated as just adequate because the manufacturer failed to provide requested ISO certifications or other sustainability credentials, and its weight is high.

Dry

90.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	8th	42.2 M	38 M	+4.2 M	90.05%

Wet

76.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	15th	39.1 M	31.3 M	+7.8 M	80.05%
Wet Braking - Concrete	15th	49.6 M	38.4 M	+11.2 M	77.42%
Straight Aqua	15th	66.4 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-12.1 Km/H	84.59%
Curved Aquaplaning	16th	1.8 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-1 m/sec2	64.29%

Snow

94%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	9th	9.4 M	9 M	+0.4 M	95.74%
Snow Traction	11th	237 N	257 N	-20 N	92.22%

Ice

96.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	2nd	14.7 M	14.2 M	+0.5 M	96.6%

Comfort

97.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	9th	72.6 dB	71.1 dB	+1.5 dB	97.93%

Value

96.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	3rd	59000 KM	68000 KM	-9000 KM	86.76%
Value	1st	1.42 Price/1000			100%
Fuel Consumption	1st	5.5 l/100km			100%
Abrasion	2nd	52 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+1 mg/km/t	98.08%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

15^th

Arivo Carlorful AS

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/C/B71
• Origin: China
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 9.3 kgs
• Price: 72.00

The Arivo Carlorful A/S receives an overall driving safety rating of "deficient." This is primarily due to significant weaknesses on wet roads, which led to a downgrade of the final score. On dry roads, its performance is merely "adequate," providing poor steering feedback and precision, requiring constant corrections from the driver, and exhibiting early oversteer during lane changes. On wet surfaces, the tire reaches its limits, earning a "deficient" rating for its braking distance and handling due to very low grip, making it difficult to control. Its winter performance is deemed satisfactory overall, securing good marks for ice braking and snow traction, but only satisfactory or adequate ratings for snow braking and handling. In contrast, the Chinese-made tire achieves a good environmental result, with positive scores for projected mileage, wear, and low fuel consumption. However, its sustainability is rated as just "adequate" because the manufacturer failed to provide requested ISO certifications or other sustainability credentials.

Dry

90.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	8th	42.2 M	38 M	+4.2 M	90.05%

Wet

74.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	16th	42.6 M	31.3 M	+11.3 M	73.47%
Wet Braking - Concrete	16th	52.6 M	38.4 M	+14.2 M	73%
Straight Aqua	16th	65.6 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-12.9 Km/H	83.57%
Curved Aquaplaning	14th	1.9 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.9 m/sec2	67.86%

Snow

91.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	11th	9.6 M	9 M	+0.6 M	93.75%
Snow Traction	12th	231 N	257 N	-26 N	89.88%

Ice

92.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	8th	15.4 M	14.2 M	+1.2 M	92.21%

Comfort

98.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	2nd	71.9 dB	71.1 dB	+0.8 dB	98.89%

Value

87.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	11th	46000 KM	68000 KM	-22000 KM	67.65%
Value	2nd	1.57 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+0.15 Price/1000	90.45%
Fuel Consumption	2nd	5.6 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.1 l/100km	98.21%
Abrasion	5th	55 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+4 mg/km/t	92.73%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

16^th

Petlas Multi Action PT 565

225/45 R17 94W

• EU Label: C/C/B72
• Origin: Türkiye
• 3PMSF: yes
• Weight: 9.4 kgs
• Price: 97.00

The Petlas Multi Action PT565 is rated "deficient" for overall driving safety, receiving the worst score in the test due to its very poor performance on winter roads. On dry surfaces, its performance is merely "adequate," characterized by imprecise steering, delayed responses requiring constant correction, and early oversteer. Its wet road performance is only "satisfactory," limited by average grip and a tendency to under- or oversteer. The tire is completely overwhelmed in winter conditions, earning a "deficient" rating for snow braking and handling; it fails to combine forces, has no safety reserves, and loses traction early. Its performance on ice and in snow traction is also rated as just "adequate." In contrast, the Turkish-made tire secures a barely "good" environmental rating, thanks to good projected mileage, low wear, and good fuel efficiency, though its weight is slightly above average.

Dry

86.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	13th	43.9 M	38 M	+5.9 M	86.56%

Wet

91.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	12th	36.3 M	31.3 M	+5 M	86.23%
Wet Braking - Concrete	12th	44 M	38.4 M	+5.6 M	87.27%
Straight Aqua	4th	76 Km/H	78.5 Km/H	-2.5 Km/H	96.82%
Curved Aquaplaning	4th	2.7 m/sec2	2.8 m/sec2	-0.1 m/sec2	96.43%

Snow

69.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	16th	12.5 M	9 M	+3.5 M	72%
Snow Traction	16th	173 N	257 N	-84 N	67.32%

Ice

78%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Ice Braking	15th	18.2 M	14.2 M	+4 M	78.02%

Comfort

97.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Noise	13th	73.2 dB	71.1 dB	+2.1 dB	97.13%

Value

78.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	9th	46500 KM	68000 KM	-21500 KM	68.38%
Value	6th	2.09 Price/1000	1.42 Price/1000	+0.67 Price/1000	67.94%
Fuel Consumption	6th	5.7 l/100km	5.5 l/100km	+0.2 l/100km	96.49%
Abrasion	8th	62 mg/km/t	51 mg/km/t	+11 mg/km/t	82.26%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts