Menu

CST Medallion All Season ACP1 Test Results

Tested 2020 to 2025 2 publications

Tested 5 times by independent publications, the CST Medallion All Season ACP1 averages a finish of 21st. Its strongest discipline is Wet Braking, beating 34% of the field across 5 tests; its weakest is Dry Braking, at 19% across 5 tests.

  • 5Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 21stAverage finish
  • 30%Field beaten on average
  • 2Publications

5 tests, 2020 to 2025

Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 30%
The latest test

2025 ADAC All Season Tire Test P13 of 16

The CST Medallion All Season ACP1's overall driving safety is rated as "deficient" due to significant weaknesses, particularly on winter roads, and it fails to achieve more than a satisfactory rating on dry or wet surfaces. On dry roads, it offers poor steering feedback and is imprecise, requiring corrections and showing a tendency to oversteer, resulting in a barely satisfactory score. On wet pavement, its braking and aquaplaning resistance are satisfactory, but its handling is rated even lower due to a lack of grip and precision. The tire's performance on winter roads is especially poor, with its handling rated as "deficient." It struggles to combine forces, leading to early understeer and oversteer with almost no safety reserves, and it posts the worst result in the test for braking on ice. Environmentally, the Chinese-made tire misses a good rating; while its projected mileage and wear are good, its high weight results in a merely satisfactory efficiency score. Its sustainability is rated as just adequate due to the manufacturer's failure to provide requested ISO certifications or other sustainability credentials.

Strong: Curved Aquaplaning Weak: Dry Braking, Snow Traction, Ice Braking, Noise Winner: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

Record by discipline

Where the CST Medallion All Season ACP1 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking Weak 5 P25 of 31 19% -
Wet
Wet Braking Strong 5 P20.2 of 31 34% -
Wet Braking - Concrete 1 P13 of 16 20% -
Straight Aqua 1 P7 of 16 60% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P1 of 16 100% 1
Snow
Snow Braking 1 P11 of 16 33% -
Snow Traction 1 P15 of 16 7% -
Ice
Ice Braking 1 P16 of 16 0% -
Comfort
Noise 1 P15 of 16 7% -
Value
Wear 1 P5 of 16 73% -
Value 1 P3 of 15 86% -
Fuel Consumption 1 P13 of 16 20% -
Abrasion 1 P12 of 16 27% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the CST Medallion All Season ACP1. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 5 shared: 0 ahead, 5 behind 5 0 5 - 0%
Fulda MultiControl 4 shared: 4 ahead, 0 behind 4 4 0 - 100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind Compare with CrossClimate 2 4 0 4 - 0%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Barum Quartaris 5 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Atlas Green 4S 3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind 3 3 0 - 100%
Continental AllSeasonContact 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Vredestein Quatrac 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Dunlop Sport All Season 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 5 tests. Updated October 15, 2025.

Across five all-season tests, the CST Medallion All Season ACP1 consistently finishes in the lower mid-pack with an average position around 21st. Its standout trait is aquaplaning resistance-especially curved aquaplaning-paired with competitive value and decent wear in the latest ADAC test. However, braking performance is repeatedly weak in dry, wet, and especially on ice, which heavily limits overall safety margins.

Overall, the tire suits budget-focused drivers prioritizing hydroplaning security and longevity over outright braking and grip. Persistent bottom-tier braking ranks and elevated stopping distances across years indicate a clear performance deficit in core safety metrics.

Performance Strengths

  • Aquaplaning Resistance Strong
    Details
    • 1st/16 curved aquaplaning in 2025 ADAC
    • 7/16 straight aquaplaning, +3.9% from best in 2025 ADAC
  • Value and Operating Costs Moderate
    Details
    • Value: 3/15 (2025 ADAC)
    • Wear: 5/16, +30% from best in 2025 ADAC

Performance Weaknesses

  • Dry Braking Performance Strong
    Details
    • 15/16 (+17.6%) in 2025 ADAC
    • 31/35 (+17.2%) in 2023 Auto Bild
    • 29/37 (+27.7%) in 2022 Auto Bild
    • 29/34 (+18.8%) in 2021 Auto Bild
    • 21/33 (+13.6%) in 2020 Auto Bild
  • Wet Braking Performance Strong
    Details
    • 13/16 (+16.9%) in 2025 ADAC
    • 24/35 (+20.9%) in 2023 Auto Bild
    • 17/37 (+22.4%) in 2022 Auto Bild
    • 26/34 (+15.2%) in 2021 Auto Bild
    • 21/33 (+15.3%) in 2020 Auto Bild
  • Winter Braking (Ice/Snow) Strong
    Details
    • Ice braking: 16/16 (+31.7%) in 2025 ADAC
    • Snow traction: 15/16 (+16%) in 2025 ADAC
    • Snow braking: 11/16 (+6.7%) in 2025 ADAC
  • Noise/Comfort and Efficiency Moderate
    Details
    • Noise: 15/16 (+3.4%) in 2025 ADAC
    • Fuel consumption: 13/16 (+5.5%) in 2025 ADAC
    • Abrasion: 12/16 (+43.1%) in 2025 ADAC
  • Ice grip Strong in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
  • Snow handling Strong in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
  • Steering feel Strong in 1 of 1 tests
    Details

Every test, newest first 5

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2025 1 test
P13 of 16 Beat 20% of the field

2025 ADAC All Season Tire Test

ADAC 225/45 R17

The CST Medallion All Season ACP1's overall driving safety is rated as "deficient" due to significant weaknesses, particularly on winter roads, and it fails to achieve more than a satisfactory rating on dry or wet surfaces. On dry roads, it offers poor steering feedback and is imprecise, requiring corrections and showing a tendency to oversteer, resulting in a barely satisfactory score. On wet pavement, its braking and aquaplaning resistance are satisfactory, but its handling is rated even lower due to a lack of grip and precision. The tire's performance on winter roads is especially poor, with its handling rated as "deficient." It struggles to combine forces, leading to early understeer and oversteer with almost no safety reserves, and it posts the worst result in the test for braking on ice. Environmentally, the Chinese-made tire misses a good rating; while its projected mileage and wear are good, its high weight results in a merely satisfactory efficiency score. Its sustainability is rated as just adequate due to the manufacturer's failure to provide requested ISO certifications or other sustainability credentials.

StrongCurved Aquaplaning WeakDry BrakingSnow TractionIce BrakingNoise WinnerGoodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

2023 1 test
2022 1 test
2021 1 test
2020 1 test

Back to the CST Medallion All Season ACP1 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All CST tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.