Menu
Atlas Green 4S View Gallery (1)
145-255/35-80 R13-19 171 sizes 2015 Winter rated

Atlas Green 4S

Atlas Tires Touring All Season

The Atlas Green 4S is a Touring All Season tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

2.1
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
58%
Wet Grip
36%
Road Feedback
50%
Handling
42%
Wear
32%
Comfort
54%
Buy again
22%
Snow Grip
13%
Ice Grip
13%
6 Reviews
36% Average
30,500 miles driven
4 Tests (avg: 32nd)
Atlas Green 4S

Atlas Green 4S

All Season Economy
BETA
2.1 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Dry
67
1.5x / 3 tests
Wet
42.4
1.93x / 3 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
53.9
6 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 4
Publications: 1
Period: 2018 - 2023
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 35.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.71
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R17 33/35 2 metrics
2022 All Season Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 195/55 R16 35/37 2 metrics
2020 All Season Tire Market Overview - 32 Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 205/55 R16 32/33 2 metrics
2018 27 All Season Tire Shootout Auto Bild 2018 195/65 R15 26/27 0 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
4
Tests
32nd
Average
26th
Best
35th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout
225/45 R17 • 2023
33rd/35
2022 All Season Tire Market Overview
195/55 R16 • 2022
35th/37
2020 All Season Tire Market Overview - 32 Tire Braking Test
205/55 R16 • 2020
32nd/33
Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
155/80R13 79 T D D 69
155/80R13 79 T D C 69
14 inch
165/70R14 81 T D D 69
175/65R14 82 T D D 69
185/60R14 82 H D D 69
185/70R14 88 T D D 69
165/70R14 85 T XL D D 69
175/65R14 86 T XL D D 69
185/70R14 88 T D C 69
185/60R14 82 H D C 69
175/65R14 86 T XL D C 69
165/70R14 81 T D C 69
175/65R14 82 T D C 69
165/70R14 85 T XL D C 69
15 inch
185/65R15 92 T XL D D 69
185/65R15 88 H D D 69
195/65R15 95 H XL D D 69
195/65R15 91 H D D 69
195/55R15 85 H D D 69
185/65R15 92 T XL C C 69
195/65R15 95 H XL C C 69
185/65R15 88 H D C 69
195/55R15 85 H D C 69
195/65R15 91 H D C 69
16 inch
205/60R16 96 V XL D C 70
215/60R16 99 V XL D C 70
205/55R16 91 H D C 70
205/55R16 91 V D C 70
215/70R16 100 H D D 70
205/60R16 92 H D C 70
205/55R16 94 H XL D C 70
205/55R16 94 V XL D C 70
205/55R16 94 H XL C C 70
205/60R16 92 H C C 70
205/60R16 96 V XL C C 70
215/70R16 100 H C C 70
17 inch
205/50R17 93 W XL D C 70
225/50R17 98 W XL D C 70
225/45R17 94 W XL D C 70
215/45R17 91 W XL D C 70
215/55R17 98 W XL D C 70
235/65R17 108 V XL D C 70
225/60R17 99 V D C 70
235/65R17 108 V XL C C 70
18 inch
225/40R18 92 W XL D C 70
245/40R18 97 W XL D C 72
245/45R18 100 W XL D C 70
235/60R18 107 W XL D C 70
245/40R18 97 W XL C C 72
245/45R18 100 W XL C C 70
19 inch
235/35R19 91 W XL D C 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Atlas Green 4S >>

Questions and Answers for the Atlas Green 4S

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Atlas Green 4S. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Atlas Green 4S Reviews

Given 28% while driving a Volkswagen Caddy (195/65 R15) on mostly country roads for 0 easy going miles
worst tires ever, slipping when accelerating in the rain, a little snow and I was stuck after two meters while my neighbor on summer tires could leave and very worn after 12000 km despite a calm driving style. unworthy of four seasons or snowflake
Helpful 975
November 30, 2024
Given 46% while driving a Skoda (195/60 R15) on for 0 miles
I bought these tires for my Skoda Octavia 1, the mechanic only had these tires available right away, and he told me that they are good tires.

Totally false, I find these tires very dangerous in the rain, I can't even imagine the disaster in the snow.
After 20,000km of driving, the front tires are 70% worn, close to the wear indicator, and the tires slip when restarting in the rain.
I don't understand how the brand received European approval for the mountain symbol, but I don't recommend them.
Helpful 952
February 7, 2024
Given 20% while driving a Skoda (165/70 R14) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
These tires Are dangerous! My Girlfriend got her First car with a new set of Atlas Green 4S tires and i was absolutely shocked how Bad these tires where. She only drives a 60hp Skoda Fabia but Even with that car it was Not possible to Start driving on wet Surfaceswithout wheelspin. Braking was terrifying because of the horrible wet grip. I was Not able to Go faster than 15-20 km/h in a round-about on dry Surface without the tires i collapsing. It felt like driving a boat. I threw them away After one Month and bought some Continental AllSeason Contacts
Helpful 890
April 19, 2023

How would you rate the Atlas Green 4S?

Click a star to start your review

188 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Atlas Green 4S Reviews

Given 29% while driving a Toyota Yaris (185/60 R15) on a combination of roads for 6,500 easy going miles
These tires were given at a discount by our local service shop as our tires have worn out and they're not good at all. Grip was really bad on rainy days with constant wheel spins even for a 100 horsepower car. Performance on dry surfaces were average at best.

Steering feels very vague even in a normal driving environment. They don't last long too. One of it starts to bulge after 5 months of normal driving.
Helpful 805
July 30, 2023
Given 10% while driving a Renault Master (2018) (225/65 R16) on track for 15,000 easy going miles
Has these tires in Commercial version at the back of the Luton van for 7/8 months. Then had both blown out within 4 days period. With the first blow out the van was loaded, with the second blow out, the van was empty. Ended up without the wheel to replace as it happened during international trip and used the spare at the first blow out. Luckily the driver and the van are OK, but the tires should be removed from the market.
Helpful 832
February 13, 2022
Rate the Atlas Green 4S