Menu

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Test Results

Tested 2020 to 2024 3 publications

Tested 10 times by independent publications, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 averages a finish of 12th. Its strongest discipline is Dry Braking, beating 59% of the field across 7 tests; its weakest is Wet Braking, at 57% across 8 tests.

  • 10Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 12thAverage finish
  • 51%Field beaten on average
  • 3Publications

Record by discipline

Where the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking Strong 7 P13.3 of 37.9 59% -
Dry Handling 3 P16 of 21 25% -
Wet
Wet Braking Weak 8 P13.4 of 35.3 57% -
Wet Braking - Concrete 1 P24 of 50 53% -
Wet Handling 3 P17.7 of 21 17% -
Wet Circle 2 P17.5 of 21.5 20% -
Straight Aqua 4 P12.5 of 28.3 55% -
Curved Aquaplaning 3 P11.3 of 31 56% -
Comfort
Noise 4 P3.8 of 28.3 91% 1
Tire Weight 1 P34 of 50 33% -
Value
Wear 4 P11.3 of 27.8 51% -
Value 4 P10.8 of 27.8 57% -
Rolling Resistance 3 P8.3 of 21 64% -
Fuel Consumption 1 P10 of 50 82% -
Abrasion 1 P6 of 50 90% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Firestone RoadHawk 9 shared: 5 ahead, 4 behind 9 5 4 - 56%
Toyo Proxes Comfort 8 shared: 2 ahead, 6 behind 8 2 6 - 25%
BFGoodrich Advantage 7 shared: 4 ahead, 2 behind 7 4 2 1 67%
Semperit Speed Life 3 7 shared: 4 ahead, 3 behind 7 4 3 - 57%
Maxxis Premitra HP5 7 shared: 3 ahead, 4 behind 7 3 4 - 43%
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 7 shared: 1 ahead, 6 behind 7 1 6 - 14%
Bridgestone Turanza T005 7 shared: 0 ahead, 7 behind 7 0 7 - 0%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 7 shared: 0 ahead, 7 behind 7 0 7 - 0%
Uniroyal RainSport 5 6 shared: 4 ahead, 2 behind 6 4 2 - 67%
Dunlop Sport BluResponse 6 shared: 3 ahead, 3 behind 6 3 3 - 50%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 6 shared: 2 ahead, 4 behind 6 2 4 - 33%
Michelin Primacy 4 6 shared: 0 ahead, 6 behind 6 0 6 - 0%
Barum Bravuris 5HM 5 shared: 5 ahead, 0 behind 5 5 0 - 100%
GT Radial FE2 5 shared: 5 ahead, 0 behind 5 5 0 - 100%
Fulda EcoControl HP2 5 shared: 3 ahead, 2 behind 5 3 2 - 60%
Debica Presto HP 2 5 shared: 3 ahead, 2 behind 5 3 2 - 60%
Nexen N Fera Primus 5 shared: 2 ahead, 3 behind 5 2 3 - 40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52 5 shared: 0 ahead, 5 behind 5 0 5 - 0%
Continental Premium Contact 6 5 shared: 0 ahead, 5 behind 5 0 5 - 0%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5 shared: 0 ahead, 5 behind 5 0 5 - 0%

Against its own line

The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.

Against its own line
Tire Tests Wins Avg finish Field beaten
Kleber Dynaxer HP 3 Predecessor 14 0 20th 30%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 This tire 10 0 12th 51%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 10 tests. Updated August 26, 2025.

The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 delivers balanced mid-pack performance with standout comfort, low noise, and respectable efficiency and wear for a mid-range tire. Across 10 summer tests it typically ranks around the middle (avg. 12.2), with frequent top-tier noise results and solid value metrics. Wet performance is mixed-to-adequate, often trailing the leaders in wet braking and handling yet avoiding the bottom ranks, and aquaplaning resistance is usually mid-to-good. Dry braking/handling are generally average, occasionally slipping to lower-mid positions.

Overall, its strengths lie in cabin comfort, low abrasion/wear, and reasonable rolling resistance and pricing. Its primary weaknesses are wet grip consistency and dynamic handling pace, where it repeatedly sits outside the top groups. It suits comfort- and value-focused drivers more than those prioritizing peak wet/dry handling.

Performance Strengths

Performance Weaknesses

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (7 tests) and 19 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where owners and testers agree

  • Road noise strength in 3 of 7 tests 11 praise, 2 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry grip strength in 2 of 7 tests 11 praise, 0 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Ride comfort strength in 2 of 7 tests 5 praise, 2 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews

Where they disagree

  • Wet grip weakness in 3 of 7 tests 10 praise, 2 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire

  • Value for money no test mentions it 5 praise, 0 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry handling no test mentions it 3 praise, 1 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews

Flagged by testers, not mentioned by owners

  • Steering feel weakness in 3 of 7 tests no owner mentions it
  • Rolling resistance strength in 3 of 7 tests no owner mentions it

Every test, newest first 10

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2024 2 tests
2023 1 test
P12 of 50 Beat 78% of the field

2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test

ADAC 205/55 R16

Driving Safety: The driving safety of the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 does not go beyond a satisfactory rating. It offers the driver only average feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads and could prove to be a bit more stable during dynamic evasive maneuvers. Its braking distance is still classified as good, but overall it just misses out on a good rating on dry roads. On wet roads, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 does not get more than a satisfactory rating either. Although it scored well in the aquaplaning tests, it only performed satisfactorily in the braking distance measurements and handling. It lacks a bit of grip and precision for a better rating. Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Dynaxer HP4 secures a good result in the test. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are rated as good. The tire also scores with its low fuel consumption, but it just misses out on a good rating in terms of weight.

WinnerGoodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

2022 3 tests
P10 of 18 Beat 47% of the field

2022 ADAC 16" SUV Summer Tire Test

ADAC 215/60 R16

The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 offers good performance on dry roads and good wear behavior. In the wet, however, it shows slight weaknesses that lead to the devaluation of the overall rating. Overall, the tire is rated as recommendable.

WinnerContinental Premium Contact 6

2021 3 tests
P11 of 17 Beat 38% of the field

2021 ADAC Summer Tire Test - 225/50 R17

ADAC 225/50 R17

The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is balanced on dry roads good good grip, control at the limit and short dry braking distances. Unfortunately the Dynaxer 4 doesn't score higher than average in the wet, with poor wet grip levels. Average noise levels, but slightly better than average fuel use.

WinnerFalken Azenis FK510

2020 1 test

Back to the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Kleber tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.