Menu

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Replaces the Kumho Ecsta HS51

A keenly priced touring summer tire with standout braking and confident dry manners. Strong all-round wet grip in normal conditions, but less convincing in standing water and not the most efficient option.

The quick answer

Owners say 82% from 30 owner reviews 75% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say 5th average finish across 8 independent tests Latest: P9 of 16 · 2026 See every test
Strengths & weaknesses Dry, Wet Comfort Relative to its rivals across every test we hold

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated October 2026.

  • 30owner reviews
  • 302,698miles driven
  • 8professional tests

Tire Reviews Score

Kumho Ecsta HS52

9.0/10

Better than 88% of summer tires

  • High Confidence
  • 8 tests
  • 30 owner reviews
Scores of the 406 summer tires we have tested

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent tests8 tests · 3 publications · 2022-2026 89% 86%
Owner reviews30 owner reviews · rated 82% 82% 14%
Combined 88% 9.0

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Category by category

How it compares with other summer tires in each area, and how much each area counts. 50 is the middle of the group.

Category Better than Weight Tests
WetBraking, handling and aquaplaning in the wet 85% 44% 8
DryBraking and handling on dry roads 89% 40% 8
ValueWear, efficiency and cost 65% 9% 6
ComfortNoise and ride comfort 21% 7% 5

Weights are shares of the test result. Owner reviews are blended in afterwards.

By discipline

The same results grouped by what the tire was doing. They are not counted a second time.

BrakingEvery braking test, on any surface 91% 8
HandlingEvery handling test, on any surface 74% 3

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Its own test results decide 98% of the test figure. The other 2% comes from its predecessor, the Kumho Ecsta HS51, and it shrinks as more tests arrive.

High needs at least 3 tests, with its own results deciding 90% or more. Medium needs 2 tests and 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as tests arrive.

The tests behind it

  1. 2026 2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test ADAC · 225/50 R17 P9 / 16
  2. 2024 2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test Auto Bild · 205/55 R16 P4 / 20
  3. 2024 2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test ADAC · 215/55 R17 P3 / 16
  4. 2024 2024 Summer Tire Market Overview Auto Bild · 205/55 R16 P2 / 55
  5. 2023 2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test ADAC · 205/55 R16 P8 / 50
  6. 2023 Tire Reviews Best Summer Touring Tires Tire Reviews · 205/55 R16 P8 / 13
Show all 8 tests
  1. 2022 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test Auto Bild · 215/55 R17 P6 / 21
  2. 2022 2022 Summer Tire Market Overview Auto Bild · 215/55 R17 P3 / 50

Tested 8 times by independent publications, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 averages a finish of 5th.

8 Tests
0 Test Wins
5th Average
2nd Best
9th Worst
Finishing position in each test1stLast20222026

Finishing position in each test

The latest test

2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test P9 of 16

The updated Ecsta HS52 scores well on wet roads but only fair overall because of weak dry-road performance and increased weight. According to the summary, dry-road steering feedback and precision are merely adequate; wet grip and braking are good. Environmental performance is fair due to high abrasion and heavy weight, despite good predicted mileage and efficiency. ADAC lists short dry braking, good wet handling and good mileage as strengths, but notes deficits in dry handling, aquaplaning behavior and slightly elevated abrasion and weight.

Weak: Fuel Consumption Winner: Continental PremiumContact 7

Every independent test of the Kumho Ecsta HS52, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20262026 ADAC Summer Tire TestADAC · 225/50 R17P9 / 16
20242024 AutoBild Summer Tire TestAuto Bild · 205/55 R16P4 / 20
20242024 ADAC Summer Tire TestADAC · 215/55 R17P3 / 16gut (Good)
20242024 Summer Tire Market OverviewAuto Bild · 205/55 R16P2 / 55
20232023 ADAC Summer Tire TestADAC · 205/55 R16P8 / 50
2023Tire Reviews Best Summer Touring TiresTire Reviews · 205/55 R16P8 / 13Tested by Tire Reviews Recommended
20222022 Auto Bild Summer Tire TestAuto Bild · 215/55 R17P6 / 21
20222022 Summer Tire Market OverviewAuto Bild · 215/55 R17P3 / 50

On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict

Videos

The Best Tires for Your Car? 13 Brands Compared and Rated!

The Best Tires for Your Car? 13 Brands Compared and Rated!

Running Costs
View Test

In 205/55 R16, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is projected to cost €25.72 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €643 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test.

Tire purchase + fittingExtra fuel vs the most efficient tirecost per 1,000 miles
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.
Dimensions & Label Scores
View All

Size Range87 sizes available

175-245Width40-65Profile14-20Rim81-104 H-YLoad/Speed Index

EU LabelAcross 87 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.

Noise

68-72dB A/B

Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Kumho Ecsta HS52 in the wet?
Across the 8 wet-braking tests it has featured in, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 stops 3% shorter than premium rivals, 5.9% shorter than mid-range rivals and 13.1% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews wet score of 85/100, and owners rate it 8.1/10 in the wet from 30 reviews.
How good is the Kumho Ecsta HS52 in the dry?
Across the 8 dry-braking tests it has featured in, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 stops 0.9% shorter than premium rivals, 2.9% shorter than mid-range rivals and 5.9% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews dry score of 89/100, and owners rate it 9.1/10 in the dry from 30 reviews.
How fuel efficient is the Kumho Ecsta HS52?
Across the 3 tests measuring rolling resistance, the Kumho Ecsta HS52's rolling resistance is 11.1% higher than premium rivals, level with mid-range rivals and 1.7% lower than budget rivals.
How many miles does the Kumho Ecsta HS52 last?
Based on test and owner data, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is expected to last around 25,324 miles (40,755 km).
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS52?
Across 30 owner ratings the Kumho Ecsta HS52 averages 82%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 9.1 out of 10 and Comfort lowest at 7.1. 14 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 85% of owners score it 70% or better.
More questions about the Kumho Ecsta HS52 (10)
How much does the Kumho Ecsta HS52 cost to run?
In 205/55 R16, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is projected to cost €25.72 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €643 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test. The cheapest to run in that test is the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, at €16.62.
What is the Kumho Ecsta HS52's EU tire label rating?
Across its range, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 most commonly carries EU label ratings of C for fuel efficiency, A for wet grip and 72 dB for noise.
How comfortable and quiet are the Kumho Ecsta HS52?
Owners rate the Kumho Ecsta HS52 7.1 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 27 reviews.
How well do the Kumho Ecsta HS52 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Kumho Ecsta HS52 7.8 out of 10 for wear across 27 reviews. 14 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 10,000 miles.
Would owners buy the Kumho Ecsta HS52 again?
75% of owners say they would buy the Kumho Ecsta HS52 again, based on the 28 owner reviews that answered the question. 54% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS52's dry grip?
Of the 24 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta HS52, 14 mention dry grip: 13 praise it (strong dry grip) and 1 criticise it (limited dry grip). One owner wrote: "Great tires in wet and dry". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS52's tread life?
Of the 24 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta HS52, 11 mention tread life: 7 praise it (long-lasting) and 4 criticise it (wears quickly). One owner wrote: "They still have a lot of rubber left on them considering having driven 40k km on them". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS52's dry handling?
Of the 24 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta HS52, 10 mention dry handling: 10 praise it (sharp dry handling) and 0 criticise it (vague dry handling). One owner wrote: "feels very direct with a nice bite into the corners". Read those reviews
What does the Kumho Ecsta HS52 replace?
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is the successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51 in Kumho's range.
What sizes does the Kumho Ecsta HS52 come in?
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is available in 161 sizes, ranging from 175-245/40-65 R14-20.
Owner Questions (1)
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Kumho Ecsta HS52

Does this tire have Alloy Wheel Rim protection built into the sidewall?
March 11, 2023
The size of the HS52 tire reviews tested (205/55 R16) did not have any rim protection built into the tire, however it might be that larger sizes of the HS52 do have rim protection. Kumho will be able to give you the best answer based on your size.

Kumho Ecsta HS52 Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say summarised from 23 reviews

Most owners rate the Kumho Ecsta HS52 highly, praising its strong dry grip and confident, direct dry handling, and many also feel it represents excellent value for money. Noise levels are often described as low and wet grip is generally considered reassuring, though a small minority report it can feel less secure in the wet at the limit. Longevity feedback is mixed: while many see good mileage, around one in seven owners mention uneven or abnormal wear and a similar share report faster-than-expected wear.

What owners mention most counted across 24 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 30 ratings

  • Owner score 82%
  • Dry Grip 91%
  • Road Feedback 86%
  • Handling 83%
  • Wet Grip 81%
  • Wear 78%
  • Comfort 71%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 91%

“Great tires! I have been driving them now for 3rd season, dry grip feels great, not much experience on the wet grip but overall great tire considering its price range. I was kinda reserved about the Kumho brand, this is...”

  • Honda 1997 Honda Civic EJ9 1.4iS
  • 25,000 miles
Read full review → 858 found this helpful
Most critical 63%

“This tire is definitely a good choice for average users, unfortunately, based on my experience and usage, the tire did not perform well. It provides adequate lateral grip on both wet and dry roads, but it spins easily...”

  • Volkswagen Passat B7
  • 16,000 miles
Read full review → 466 found this helpful
Longest term 100%

“I'm really happy about this tires. After changing my winter tires (Bridgestone), the difference is incredible. Dry handling and brake : Super good tires, really impressed. Wet handling and brake : Nothing to say, they...”

  • BMW 218i
  • 35,000 miles
Read full review → 944 found this helpful

All 27 Kumho Ecsta HS52 reviews

Score spread across 26 written reviews
74%
A Refaat
Initial Impressions

I had Michelin primacy 4s before these Kumhos. The HS52 has very good dry grip. This is its strong point. The handling is good. But I would not call it comfortable. It feels hard when it hits a speed bumps or a pothole. It is noisy on the highway, of course it depends on how smooth the road is. But it is not quiet. It does feel stable on the highway though, feels quite planted and gives great confidence when driving.
I replaced these tires after just over 2 years and about 18,000 km. The rubber got hard. It loses grip easily on hard acceleration at low speeds. And the braking is greatly affected as well. Especially during sudden emergency braking. This is the main reason I replaced it even though it had plenty of tread. I live in a hot and dry climate, so may be this affects the longevity of the rubber. When I bought these tires they were not cheap at all, so I saved nothing going with Kumhos. I got them based on the great reviews I read. And the tires are good when new. But may be would age better in a different climate.
I replaced these Kumhos with continental untracontact tires. Which were on sale and were cheaper. The ultracontacts by comparison are quieter and much more comfortable. They absorbe the initial impact of hitting a speed bump and make it smoother. The grip is probably not as good as the Kumhos. I’m just sick of trying expensive tires that perform poorly in a couple of years. I choose the ultracontacts as they were on sale and continental is a reputable brand.

The Kumhos rubber compound getting hand after just 2 years is not great but I got similar things happening with Michelins as well. I would still buy them if they were cheap though. Knowing that I will need to replace them after 2 years.

The included photos show the tires after 2 years. The sidewalls look new but the tread does not look great even though it has plenty of depth.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 0
94%
Member
End of Life

Excellent tire. Reliable.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 1
68%
Zazu0801
Initial Impressions

It's a nice a comfortable and quiet tire for road trips, and higway use. But I think lacks the peak grip both in the dry and in the wet. It loses grip quite suddenly. But if your driving far from the edge, its a really nice tire.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 6
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 0

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Kumho Ecsta HS52? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Kumho Ecsta HS52?
89%
Member
Mid-Life

Great tires.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 2
  1. Initial Impressions81% 1,500 miles
    Very good on dry roads, excellent handling,it isn't very comfortable but it is very safe on braking.
84%
Member
Initial Impressions

Great tire. Like a glue in dry, decent to good in the rain. Definetely buy it again.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 3
85%
Member
Initial Impressions

Great tires in wet and dry . Been through a complete set in a couple of years with a bit of tread left. Sensible driving . Lasted better than my old Bridgestone turanza tires. Great tires for around £65 quid a tire. . On a fresh set now with a confidence they will keep you on the road

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 7
91%
Member
Initial Impressions

Simply great tires compared to their price. Very good dry grip (I didn’t try their wet grip as it rarely rains where I live). Road noise is noticeably low & wear is minimal.
I recommended them to my friends and they are all happy with them.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 8
94%
MonstersBG
Initial Impressions
Coming from Lassa Greenways, this is a definite improvement in all categories, the tire feels very direct with a nice bite into the corners. It has incredible road feedback giving you a lot of confidence. As for comfort it's not all that noisy, especially compared to the Lassa's, as for comfort they are a bit hard though not annoyingly so.
Some reviews say that they feel a bit of an imbalance when doing 110-130km/h and I can confirm got that as well, though it did clear up as they are driven(broken in).
You do feel the bumps and imperfections in the road a lot(but Bulgarian roads are harsh no matter the tire really).

First impressions are that this tire is definitely worth the money, especially for the price point they are at, 50 euro a tire is incredible.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 76
89%
Member
I bought these tires to replace a set of Goodyear EfficientGrip 1 that were on the car when I bought it (used). I drove the goodyear tires for about one month before replacing them due to age. The main difference between those tires is the fuel consumption. With the goodyears, I managed to get around 4.8L/100km while on the Kumhos, the car needs 5.2l/100km on the same journey.
Dry grip is excellent, I have not hit the ABS in the dry yet. Also cornering is absolutly fine.
Wet grip is also quite good, although I have hit the ABS a few times and broke the tires loose once when having to merge onto the Autobahn from a standstill. They outperform the (8 year old) Goodyears that were on the car before by quite some margine.
Comfort is fine, although they seem to be a bit louder than the goodyears.
The tires tend to get slightly flatspotted when parking for a few days. This causes a bit of a vibration that goes away after driving for a few kilometers. Neither the goodyears or the wintertires that are on the car now (Vredestein) do that.
The wear on these tires seems to be relativly low. I ran them for 15.000km this summer and they still have 6-6,5mm left. They had a bit more than 7.5mm when new. I expect them to last for another 30-40k km before needing to be replaced due to wear.

As I am working in forestry, I also drive these tires on forest dirt and gravel roads. On there, they are absolutly fine as long as its dry but get very slippery on dirt as soon as it gets wet. On some kinds of gravel, it feels like driving on ice when its wet, however thats more related to the kind of gravel (limestone) and not so much the tire. Every summertire I had so far showed this behavior. This part off the review has not been taken into account when rating the tire.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 335
71%
Member
I find them quite good in the dry, even in dynamic driving. The wear is also very good, after more than 15,000 km.
But I'm extremely disappointed in the wet - in lateral support. On changes of surface in turns, or in roundabouts, I have to take it easy on the roads where I ride. So, it's not catastrophic, but it slips where I don't have problems with a Continental (the kumho is supposedly at the same level in the "tests" ).
When braking in a straight line, it didn't bother me.
It's better than Chinese, but I wouldn't buy it again for myself. I regularly and easily reach the limit of grip in corners when it's raining, even when I think I'm going slowly enough, I don't like it.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 4
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 381
63%
Member
This tire is definitely a good choice for average users, unfortunately, based on my experience and usage, the tire did not perform well. It provides adequate lateral grip on both wet and dry roads, but it spins easily when accelerating and I do not feel confident when braking either. Probably due to the way it was used or a manufacturing defect, the tire started to wear out after the first season. This was the second season I've run it, and I feel like it's time for a change. The tread is now very badly damaged and I don't feel safe. 26.000 km / 16.000 miles
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 4
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 4
Helpful 466
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.