Kumho Ecsta HS52
WatchThe Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a mid-range premium touring summer tire that feels notably confident on the road, with standout braking and secure dry grip. In both independent tests and real-world use it delivers a predictable, easy-going driving balance that suits everyday cars and longer mileage. It also tends to represent strong value, helped by competitive wear and running costs. The main trade-off is performance in standing water, where aquaplaning resistance can lag the best in class.
Videos
The Best Tires for Your Car? 13 Brands Compared and Rated!
In Depth Tire Comparisons
All Tests
View Test ResultsAlternative Tires
| Size | Fuel | Wet | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 inch | |||
| 185/60 R14 82 H | D | B | 70 |
| 175/65 R14 82 H | D | B | 70 |
| 175/65 R14 82 H | D | B | 70 |
| 185/60R14 82 H | D | B | 70 |
| 15 inch | |||
| 185/65 R15 88 H | C | B | 70 |
| 195/55 R15 85 V | D | A | 71 |
| 195/65 R15 91 V | C | A | 71 |
| 185/65 R15 88 H | C | B | 70 |
| 195/55 R15 85 H | D | A | 71 |
| 195/65 R15 91 H | C | A | 71 |
| 195/65 R15 91 H | C | A | 71 |
| 195/55 R15 85 V | D | A | 71 |
| 185/65 R15 88 H | A | B | 70 |
| 195/65R15 91 V | C | A | 71 |
| 195/65R15 91 H | C | A | 71 |
| 195/55R15 85 H | D | A | 71 |
| 195/55R15 85 V | D | A | 71 |
| 16 inch | |||
| 205/55 R16 91 V | C | A | 71 |
| 215/60 R16 95 V | A | A | 70 |
| 215/60 R16 95 V | A | A | 70 |
| 205/55 R16 91 V | C | A | 71 |
| 205/55 R16 94 V XL | C | A | 72 |
| 205/55 R16 94 V XL | C | A | 72 |
| 205/55R16 91 H | A | B | 69 |
| 205/55R16 91 V | A | A | 71 |
| 205/55R16 91 V | A | A | 71 |
| 17 inch | |||
| 225/60 R17 99 V | B | A | 71 |
| 205/50R17 89 V | B | A | 70 |
| 18 inch | |||
| 225/40R18 92 Y XL | B | A | 72 |
| 225/40R18 92 Y XL | B | A | 70 |
Questions and Answers for the Kumho Ecsta HS52
Ask a questionDoes this tire have Alloy Wheel Rim protection built into the sidewall?
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Review Summary
Based on 20 user reviews
Most drivers rate the Kumho Ecsta HS52 positively, praising its strong dry grip, confident wet braking, predictable handling, and good value. Many report low to moderate wear with some high-mileage success, though a minority cite faster front wear or abnormal wear. Noise is generally acceptable but occasionally noted as higher, and comfort is mid-firm. Overall, the HS52 delivers balanced performance with standout braking and dry grip, while a few users report wet lateral grip limits and isolated wear issues.
Strengths
- Dry grip
- Wet braking
- Predictable handling
- Value for money
- Overall comfort/noise balance
- Steering response
Areas for Improvement
- Wet lateral grip in corners
- Occasional higher noise
- Faster wear for some users
Top 3 Kumho Ecsta HS52 Reviews
I came across these after the owner of my local tire shop (who I know well) recommended them to me. I was a little skeptical at first, since I origninally wanted a set of Bridgestone’s, but he said these would do the same job for approx £200 less.
Straight away I was surprised by how different the car felt after the change. The steering felt more responsive, and the car felt more compliant over bumps. The handling is very predictable and compared to previous tires there's virtually no tire squeal, even if I really push. I've only driven with them a few times in the rain, but they feel perfectly fine and stable even in heavy downpours. I guess the big question for me is if I regret not buying the Bridgestone’s? And I'm happy to report that I don't. For my type of driving, they do everything I ask, and I've never found myself wishing I had more grip even on some spirited drives.
The negatives: Compared to the previous set of Yokohama’s I had on the car, there's not quite as much feel through the steering wheel. It's not a big problem for me, as my car has adjustable shocks, so a few more clicks of rebound and that feel comes back. But it's worth mentioning for those who are looking for a sportier tire. The only other negative I would mention is the looks. I feel a bit daft for saying that, as I've never really cared how my tires look on the car, but after coming from other brands, these look like economy tires by comparison. But this is hardly a big issue, just a small note. Overall, these tires are the best I've experienced on the car yet, which is high praise from me, so I would absolutely buy them again.
Latest Kumho Ecsta HS52 Reviews
Dry grip is excellent, I have not hit the ABS in the dry yet. Also cornering is absolutly fine.
Wet grip is also quite good, although I have hit the ABS a few times and broke the tires loose once when having to merge onto the Autobahn from a standstill. They outperform the (8 year old) Goodyears that were on the car before by quite some margine.
Comfort is fine, although they seem to be a bit louder than the goodyears.
The tires tend to get slightly flatspotted when parking for a few days. This causes a bit of a vibration that goes away after driving for a few kilometers. Neither the goodyears or the wintertires that are on the car now (Vredestein) do that.
The wear on these tires seems to be relativly low. I ran them for 15.000km this summer and they still have 6-6,5mm left. They had a bit more than 7.5mm when new. I expect them to last for another 30-40k km before needing to be replaced due to wear.
As I am working in forestry, I also drive these tires on forest dirt and gravel roads. On there, they are absolutly fine as long as its dry but get very slippery on dirt as soon as it gets wet. On some kinds of gravel, it feels like driving on ice when its wet, however thats more related to the kind of gravel (limestone) and not so much the tire. Every summertire I had so far showed this behavior. This part off the review has not been taken into account when rating the tire.
But I'm extremely disappointed in the wet - in lateral support. On changes of surface in turns, or in roundabouts, I have to take it easy on the roads where I ride. So, it's not catastrophic, but it slips where I don't have problems with a Continental (the kumho is supposedly at the same level in the "tests" ).
When braking in a straight line, it didn't bother me.
It's better than Chinese, but I wouldn't buy it again for myself. I regularly and easily reach the limit of grip in corners when it's raining, even when I think I'm going slowly enough, I don't like it.
I've never seen that in 27 years of driving with my other tires.
First of all sound; l would say all 3 have a similar level of road sound, which is remarkably low. And that reminds me when l tried Kumho KU31 back in 2015 which was so hard & loud, so that’s a huge improvement for Kumho in that section.
Then comes the comfort, and l believe that the HS52 is midway between being too soft+ comfortable & too hard+tough. And that suits my driving on a combination of different roads and conditions.
Being in the summer, I haven’t tried the wet grip yet but the dry grip is decent and l feel safe driving the car near it’s limits.
It’s too early for me to comment on the longevity but l will update that later on.
Overall, l’m satisfied with my purchase and l believe that the HS52 is an excellent value for money amongst most competitors.