The Kumho Ecsta HS51 is a mid-range premium touring summer tire that repeatedly stands out as a strong value alternative to pricier brands. Across driver feedback it delivers confident dry and wet grip with reassuring braking, plus a notably quiet, comfortable ride. Professional testing paints a more mixed picture overall, but highlights clear gains in newer generations, including very strong aquaplaning performance and competitive wet capability.
The quick answer
Owners say79%from 40 owner reviews65% would buy againRead the reviews
Strengths & weaknessesValue, WetComfortRelative to its rivals across every test we hold
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated October 2026.
In 205/55 R16, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 is projected to cost €25.96 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €649 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tire Test.
Tire purchase + fittingExtra fuel vs the most efficient tirecost per 1,000 miles
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2021 test; financing costs are excluded.
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Kumho Ecsta HS51 in the wet?
Across the 4 wet-braking tests it has featured in, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 stops 6.1% longer than premium rivals, 0.4% shorter than mid-range rivals and 3.6% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews wet score of 67/100, and owners rate it 8.2/10 in the wet from 40 reviews.
How good is the Kumho Ecsta HS51 in the dry?
Across the 4 dry-braking tests it has featured in, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 stops 2% longer than premium rivals, 0.6% shorter than mid-range rivals and 1.3% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews dry score of 59/100, and owners rate it 8.6/10 in the dry from 40 reviews.
How fuel efficient is the Kumho Ecsta HS51?
Across the 2 tests measuring rolling resistance, the Kumho Ecsta HS51's rolling resistance is 12.8% higher than premium rivals, 4.6% higher than mid-range rivals and 6.1% higher than budget rivals.
How many miles does the Kumho Ecsta HS51 last?
Based on test and owner data, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 is expected to last around 24,128 miles (38,830 km).
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS51?
Across 40 owner ratings the Kumho Ecsta HS51 averages 79%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 8.6 out of 10 and Road Feedback lowest at 7.7. 20 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 67% of owners score it 70% or better.
More questions about the Kumho Ecsta HS51(8)
How much does the Kumho Ecsta HS51 cost to run?
In 205/55 R16, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 is projected to cost €25.96 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €649 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tire Test. The cheapest to run in that test is the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, at €12.98.
How comfortable and quiet are the Kumho Ecsta HS51?
Owners rate the Kumho Ecsta HS51 8.3 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 36 reviews.
How well do the Kumho Ecsta HS51 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Kumho Ecsta HS51 7.7 out of 10 for wear across 36 reviews. 20 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 13,300 miles.
Would owners buy the Kumho Ecsta HS51 again?
65% of owners say they would buy the Kumho Ecsta HS51 again, based on the 40 owner reviews that answered the question. 40% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS51's tread life?
Of the 35 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta HS51, 18 mention tread life: 13 praise it (long-lasting) and 5 criticise it (wears quickly). One owner wrote: "Done 47K miles on Ecsta HS51 version". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS51's dry grip?
Of the 35 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta HS51, 16 mention dry grip: 15 praise it (strong dry grip) and 1 criticise it (limited dry grip). One owner wrote: "Summer: Excellent conditions (Grip+Handling+Feedback)". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta HS51's wet grip?
Of the 35 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta HS51, 15 mention wet grip: 14 praise it (confident wet grip) and 1 criticise it (weak wet grip). One owner wrote: "Wet grip/braking and wear are my two main objectives regarding tires and on these points and more they deliver". Read those reviews
Looking to have 4 new tires 215-55-16 to my Mercedes E280.
Which would you recommend, HS31, HS51, or any other.
Awaiting reply before purchasing.
July 24, 2016
Tire choice depends a lot on driving style and what you priorities from a tire's performance. The last test the Kumho HS51 was included in didn't go so well, so we'd suggest reading this test and selecting a tire which scored a little better.
Drivers generally rate the Kumho Ecsta HS51 as a strong value tire with confident dry and wet grip, good braking, and a quiet/comfortable ride that feels close to more expensive premium options. Many high-scoring reviews report solid mileage and consistent wear when rotated, making it a popular repeat purchase. However, a notable minority report the tire feels less sporty with soft sidewalls and reduced steering feedback, and some users experienced unusually fast wear or aquaplaning in standing water.
What owners mention most counted across 35 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 40 ratings
Owner score79%
Dry Grip86%
Comfort83%
Wet Grip82%
Handling79%
Wear77%
Road Feedback77%
Featured reviews
Most helpful 60%
“April 2019 - all new chinese Kumho tires, 7.5mm. May 2019 - the fine tread pattern completely disappeared. August 2019 - everything was finished, on front axle 2.5mm remaining. Very-very bad in aquaplaning. About 70...”
“Rubbish tires, only lasted 30,000kms. They do ok grip wise in summer but twice I've had them aquaplaning in small ruts in wet weather, the wet weather grip is terrible. They are also the noisiest tires I've ever owned...”
“After Long term review close 6 years, Done 47K miles on Ecsta HS51 version. I'm very pleased , one of the best tires *All weather conditions excellent . * The rear still have tread on them . It's time for new set of...”
Nearly 8000 miles for one year. Good handling, steering response fast and clear road feedback, big noise on rough road. Stable on wet road, no pulling when one side in water. But finally I changed the tires because the quality is very bad, tread deformation.
It is the least sporty kumho tire i have fitted... the Ecsta MX, Ecsta KU31 and Ecsta PS31 are much better performers than this one, as expected the tire performance degraded dramatically near its end of life... typical kumho tire behavior but it is the least impressive of the lot i tried
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
April 2019 - all new chinese Kumho tires, 7.5mm. May 2019 - the fine tread pattern completely disappeared. August 2019 - everything was finished, on front axle 2.5mm remaining. Very-very bad in aquaplaning. About 70 km/h.
I think, for test that make of a best rubber compound, and sell to ordinary people from a cheap one.
Which tires do you drive?
Researching the Kumho Ecsta HS51? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
Rubbish tires, only lasted 30,000kms. They do ok grip wise in summer but twice I've had them aquaplaning in small ruts in wet weather, the wet weather grip is terrible. They are also the noisiest tires I've ever owned. I'm looking forward to getting rid of them!
Replace them today fo the HS52, made 45000kms 27900mies (aprox), and they were ok for may work car. Had Michelein before and were not that much better in wet condition were worst.
43%
Member
Mercedes Benz
225/50 R16
400 miles
A Combination of Roads
Average
The worst tire I have ever bought.
Sidewalls are far too soft and dry grip is not what it should be.
The rear of the car actually sways when making a sharp turn as speed above 80km/h.
No, problem to get the traction control light on, never had this situation with the previous Bridgestone or Yokohama tires.
After only 600 kms I had to the Kumho's replaced by Yokohama 105V's.
83%
Member
Renault
195/50 R16
25,000 miles
A Combination of Roads
Average
I bought a set of 4 of these in 2016, prompted by a financially painful pot-hole experience, which made me reluctant to spash out on a replacement set of Michelins, which this was - and our three other cars are - equipped with. They were just as quiet, and satisfactory in wet and dry conditions (but untested in snow), given I don't push hard in corners, but do maintain momentum while generally averaging 60+ mpg. I swapped fronts to rears, and achieved about 25,000 miles from the set, and changed when they were down to around 2mm. Much lower mileage than I get from the usual tires, but less at stake in this pot-hole strewn country. One tire recently developed cracks on the inner sidewall, which would have been an MOT failure, if I hadn't been able to swap the spare there and then. I can't be sure about the cause of the cracking, which deveIoped on a rear tire, I've repalced the front tires with Michelins again, but have just fitted HS52s to the rear axle, to see how they fare, hoping that they do as well or better than the HS51s, and will be inspecting the inner sidewall more closely on this set.
After Long term review close 6 years,
Done 47K miles on Ecsta HS51 version.
I'm very pleased , one of the best tires
*All weather conditions excellent .
* The rear still have tread on them .
It's time for new set of tires .
I recommend these tires to all want a great Tire with a reasonable price not too expensive with high quality and durability.
This will be my last update on the Escata Hs51.
I have done 43K miles.
All type of weather conditions are excellent: grip, handling, breaking
High quality and good price.
No issues with blow outs for normal high speed driving excellent.
For track or extreme need a upgrade for specific tires (Track, Ultimate extreme).
I recommend them for all.
Winter time hopefully be updating or upgrading to the Hs52 or Ps version
Will have a update and throw review on them.
never had any problems with it, my car has never gotten into a slide with these tires, have been running these tires for a year and still have 50% tread left. would buy again.
I've had these on for a year now, and I am very pleasantly surprised at the outright grip both wet and dry these offer.
The tires that preceded these were Falken FK510, Hankook VP3 K125 and most recently Nokian Powerproof.
I found the Hankooks best for wear, Nokians were good for wet grip but did not last very long and the Falkens may as well have been made from chewing gum for the service life they gave.
I know the Honda Accord Type S Tourer is a fairly heavy vehicle and has a decent bit of torque and power but I have a commute that is 80km per day so wear is a factor, the remap adds some more as well.
With these HS51 I can say that I am very happy with their performance so far and would definately buy them again.
Wet grip/braking and wear are my two main objectives regarding tires and on these points and more they deliver.
They are not the most fuel efficient tires but they are very durable and that is worth more to me than some theoretical figure of fuel saving in the long run.
In summary I would say that I highly recommend these tires if you have a larger heavier car and don't want the lightweight quiet, fuel efficient tires that have the sidewall strength of a piece of overcooked pasta, these are old school tires that are heavy and solid and last while giving great grip and wear.
