Kumho Ecsta HS51 Reviews - Page 3
Given 90%
while driving a
SEAT 1.4 TSI
(215/45 R16 V)
on mostly town
for 10,000 easy going miles
I have fitted those tires in wife's car, they are very comfortable and better than the old OEM - Dunlop, the car become softer with less noise.
Good grip on dry and wet, with acceptable wear level so far.
I would buy them again.
Good grip on dry and wet, with acceptable wear level so far.
I would buy them again.
Given 83%
while driving a
(205/55 R16)
on a combination of roads
for 20,000 spirited miles
Sidewall soft. Comfortable. Handling when straight line ok. But when cornering, wobble.. not recommend for highspeed cornering. When road wet, cornering bad. U can hear the tire sound.. aquaplanning,not very good.
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 89%
while driving a
Nissan Micra
(185/50 R16)
on a combination of roads
for 0 easy going miles
Original fit was continental fitted set of these four years ago and just replaced with latest kumho ecsta tires had 2mm. Left even wear across tread I travel mixed roads a and motorway daily .
Given 85%
while driving a
Renault Clio III dci 106
(195/50 R16 V)
on a combination of roads
for 5,000 spirited miles
I'm really satisfied with this tires, despite they are less comfortable then previous ones (Hankook Ventus Prime 2), tire feedback is more responsive, manufacturer's approach is more Dunlop-like. I still can't estimete tire wear but they promise good.
Given 91%
while driving a
Ford Focus MK3
(215/50 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 13,300 average miles
I have these tires for a year (13,300 Miles) on them.
Summer: Excellent conditions (Grip+Handling+Feedback)
Winter: Excellent Conditions (Grip+Handling+Feedback) Wet
They are good price , I'll buy again .
Summer: Excellent conditions (Grip+Handling+Feedback)
Winter: Excellent Conditions (Grip+Handling+Feedback) Wet
They are good price , I'll buy again .
Given 83%
while driving a
Ford Focus MK3
(215/50 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 9,300 average miles
I have these Tires less than year (9,300 miles)
Winter : Were very good (Grip-Stopping-Handling) (Wet Surface)
Summer Are very good (All around)
Excellent for its price quality(high) like having Premium.
Had stock Michelin HP, were good but on wet not that so like the Kumho .
,
:
Winter : Were very good (Grip-Stopping-Handling) (Wet Surface)
Summer Are very good (All around)
Excellent for its price quality(high) like having Premium.
Had stock Michelin HP, were good but on wet not that so like the Kumho .
,
:
Given 60%
while driving a
Lexus CT200h
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 7,000 average miles
Worst tires I've ever bought for wear, had to replace after 5 months, 7,000 miles.
Given 45%
while driving a
MG MGF VVC
(215/40 R16 W)
on a combination of roads
for 5 spirited miles
Bought these to replace what I think are shockingly dangerous Toyo proxes T1r's on my MGF,
I have only done around 5miles on these but there is more control of the car as its mid engine rwd I now feel confident i can now throw the car onto a corner and come out facing the correct direction.
These are very good tires and going to buy 2 more for the front of my car shortly!
I have only done around 5miles on these but there is more control of the car as its mid engine rwd I now feel confident i can now throw the car onto a corner and come out facing the correct direction.
These are very good tires and going to buy 2 more for the front of my car shortly!
Given 97%
while driving a
Kia Motors Cerato 2 litre auto (Tiptronic)
(205/55 R16 V)
on a combination of roads
for 4,000 average miles
Excellent tire for summer and even winter on wet road. Very quite and comfort & excellent grip on wet and dry conditions.
One of the best tire which I bought and i'll buy again.
One of the best tire which I bought and i'll buy again.
Given 100%
while driving a
Peugeot 206 1.6 xt
(205/45 R16)
on mostly town
for 10,000 easy going miles
this good tire