Menu

2020 ACE Mid Range Summer Tire Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
5 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. The Best of the Mid Range
  3. Results
  4. Maxxis Premitra HP5
  5. Sava Intensa UHP 2
  6. Fulda SportControl 2
  7. Apollo Aspire XP
  8. Toyo Proxes Sport
  9. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
  10. Firestone RoadHawk
  11. Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
  12. Avon ZV7

Test Summary
Wet Braking Maxxis Premitra HP5
Dry Braking Fulda SportControl 2
Wear Maxxis Premitra HP5
Rolling Resistance Firestone RoadHawk
Snow Handling Sava Intensa UHP 2
Fulda SportControl 2
Apollo Aspire XP
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Avon ZV7
Ice Braking Maxxis Premitra HP5
Sava Intensa UHP 2
The talented guys at ACE Europe have just released their first summer tire test for 2020, and interestingly they've tested nine 215/55 R17 summer tires from the mid range sector of the market!

Sadly, like ADAC, ACE doesn't provide any of the raw data, but the test still provides a rather unique insight into how the highly contested midrange sector of the market looks. These tires often save you money when compared to a premium tire, but don't fall into the performance category of "ditch finders" like budget tires can. It's a shame there's no premium tire as a benchmark, but it's something we're looking to do in the future!

The Best of the Mid Range

If you've been following tire tests from the past 12 months, it should be no surprise that the Maxxis Premitra HP5 wins the test, acing nearly all the categories and showing no real weakness.

Goodyear will be pleased with their second tier brands Sava and Fulda, as they essentially matched their overall performance, locking out second and third spots.

Apollo, the owners of Vredestein, take fourth place, with a slight weakness in the wet, and everyone's midrange favourite brand Toyo struggled a little more in the dry for fifth.

Kleber, owned by Michelin, could only manage sixth place overall, again struggling in the wet but proving to be very quiet, where the Bridgestone owned Firestone also struggled on the wet surfaces, but had very low fuel useage.

Rounding out the test are Hankook and Avon. Both brands will be disappointed, but in particular this is a very unusual result for Hankook who are now considered a premium brand, and often beat premium rivals.

Results

1st

Maxxis Premitra HP5

215/55 R17
Maxxis Premitra HP5
Total: 308
Dry 51
Wet 60
Rolling Resistance 18
Noise 7
Cost 18
Overall 154
2nd

Sava Intensa UHP 2

215/55 R17
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Total: 292
Dry 47
Wet 56
Rolling Resistance 17
Noise 8
Cost 18
Overall 146
3rd

Fulda SportControl 2

215/55 R17
Fulda SportControl 2
Total: 290
Dry 47
Wet 61
Rolling Resistance 17
Noise 8
Cost 12
Overall 145
4th

Apollo Aspire XP

215/55 R17
Apollo Aspire XP
Total: 272
Dry 45
Wet 51
Rolling Resistance 17
Noise 8
Cost 15
Overall 136
5th

Toyo Proxes Sport

215/55 R17
Toyo Proxes Sport
Total: 270
Dry 44
Wet 56
Rolling Resistance 16
Noise 7
Cost 12
Overall 135
6th

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

215/55 R17
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Total: 258
Dry 47
Wet 45
Rolling Resistance 17
Noise 8
Cost 12
Overall 129
7th

Firestone RoadHawk

215/55 R17
Firestone RoadHawk
Total: 252
Dry 44
Wet 43
Rolling Resistance 20
Noise 5
Cost 14
Overall 126
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Total: 244
Dry 47
Wet 36
Rolling Resistance 19
Noise 7
Cost 13
Overall 122
9th

Avon ZV7

215/55 R17
Avon ZV7
Total: 238
Dry 41
Wet 41
Rolling Resistance 16
Noise 8
Cost 13
Overall 119

comments powered by Disqus