Menu

Fulda SportControl 2 Test Results

Tested 2017 to 2026 4 publications

Tested 16 times by independent publications, the Fulda SportControl 2 averages a finish of 11th. Its strongest discipline is Rolling Resistance, beating 70% of the field across 6 tests; its weakest is Wet Handling, at 36% across 7 tests.

  • 16Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 1Podium finishes
  • 11thAverage finish
  • 59%Field beaten on average
  • 4Publications

Record by discipline

Where the Fulda SportControl 2 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 14 P11.6 of 30.6 56% -
Dry Handling 7 P11.1 of 17.9 38% -
Wet
Wet Braking 14 P15.5 of 30.6 43% -
Wet Braking - Concrete 1 P10 of 16 40% -
Wet Handling Weak 7 P11.4 of 18 36% -
Wet Circle 2 P6 of 16.5 66% -
Straight Aqua 7 P11.3 of 17.3 36% -
Curved Aquaplaning 4 P6.5 of 17.5 71% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 2 P9.5 of 15.5 39% -
Noise 7 P8.7 of 17.3 56% -
Value
Wear 6 P11.2 of 19.5 44% -
Value 5 P11.8 of 19.4 40% -
Rolling Resistance Strong 6 P6.2 of 17.7 70% 1
Fuel Consumption 1 P7 of 16 60% -
Abrasion 1 P14 of 16 13% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Fulda SportControl 2. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 13 shared: 3 ahead, 10 behind 13 3 10 - 23%
Sava Intensa UHP 2 12 shared: 7 ahead, 5 behind 12 7 5 - 58%
Toyo Proxes Sport 8 shared: 7 ahead, 1 behind 8 7 1 - 88%
Maxxis Premitra HP5 8 shared: 6 ahead, 2 behind 8 6 2 - 75%
Continental Premium Contact 6 8 shared: 0 ahead, 8 behind 8 0 8 - 0%
Firestone RoadHawk 7 shared: 5 ahead, 1 behind 7 5 1 1 83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71 7 shared: 3 ahead, 4 behind 7 3 4 - 43%
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 7 shared: 2 ahead, 5 behind 7 2 5 - 29%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 7 shared: 2 ahead, 5 behind 7 2 5 - 29%
Falken Azenis FK510 7 shared: 1 ahead, 6 behind 7 1 6 - 14%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP 6 shared: 6 ahead, 0 behind 6 6 0 - 100%
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ 6 shared: 5 ahead, 1 behind 6 5 1 - 83%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 6 shared: 0 ahead, 6 behind 6 0 6 - 0%
Imperial Ecosport 2 5 shared: 5 ahead, 0 behind 5 5 0 - 100%
Cooper Zeon CS8 5 shared: 5 ahead, 0 behind 5 5 0 - 100%
Avon ZV7 5 shared: 5 ahead, 0 behind 5 5 0 - 100%
Uniroyal RainSport 3 5 shared: 4 ahead, 1 behind 5 4 1 - 80%
Semperit Speed Life 3 5 shared: 4 ahead, 1 behind 5 4 1 - 80%
Apollo Aspire XP 5 shared: 3 ahead, 2 behind 5 3 2 - 60%
Debica Presto UHP2 5 shared: 3 ahead, 2 behind 5 3 2 - 60%

Against its own line

The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.

Against its own line
Tire Tests Wins Avg finish Field beaten
Fulda SportControl Predecessor 10 0 8th 51%
Fulda SportControl 2 This tire 16 0 11th 59%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 16 tests. Updated March 13, 2026.

Across 16 summer tests, the Fulda SportControl 2 shows a clear “capable mid-pack” profile: typically competitive in dry performance and notably strong on efficiency-related metrics, but repeatedly held back by wet braking (and, in some tests, broader wet safety). Overall results fluctuate from strong mid-field (e.g., 6/20 and 7/16) to weak lower-half showings in mega shootouts (e.g., 30/52 and 21/50), aligning with the reported average overall position of 11.4 across mixed field sizes.

Its most consistent highlights are rolling resistance/energy efficiency and aquaplaning resilience, while its most consistent weakness is wet braking distance-often far off the best and sometimes near the bottom of the field. Wear and value are generally average-to-below-average depending on test, preventing the tire from converting its efficiency strengths into a clearly “recommended” all-round outcome.

Performance Strengths

Performance Weaknesses

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Fulda SportControl 2 (9 tests) and 24 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where owners and testers agree

  • Ride comfort strength in 3 of 9 tests 13 praise, 0 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Road noise strength in 2 of 9 tests 11 praise, 1 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry handling strength in 3 of 9 tests 7 praise, 1 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Tread life weakness in 4 of 9 tests 1 praise, 3 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Value for money strength in 3 of 9 tests 4 praise, 0 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire

Flagged by testers, not mentioned by owners

  • Dry braking strength in 6 of 9 tests no owner mentions it

Every test, newest first 16

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2026 1 test
2025 1 test
2024 1 test
P7 of 16 Beat 60% of the field

2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test

ADAC 215/55 R17

The Fulda SportControl 2 achieves a good rating on dry roads but does not surpass a satisfactory rating in wet conditions, impacting its overall safety rating. On dry roads, it provides satisfactory steering feedback but is considered safe at the limit, with its braking distance rated clearly good compared to the test field. However, on wet surfaces, the SportControl 2 misses a good rating, showing strength in aquaplaning resistance but only achieving satisfactory results in wet braking and handling, offering a medium level of grip and suboptimal combination of longitudinal and lateral forces. In terms of environmental impact, the SportControl 2 narrowly misses a good rating, with its projected mileage and wear assessed as just satisfactory. However, its efficiency is rated as good due to low weight and fuel consumption.

WeakWet Braking WinnerContinental PremiumContact 7

2023 2 tests
2022 3 tests
2020 3 tests
P9 of 20 Beat 53% of the field

2020 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test

Auto Bild 245/45 R18

Good.

StrongRolling Resistance WeakStraight Aqua WinnerContinental Premium Contact 6

2019 3 tests
P11 of 11 Beat 0% of the field

2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tire Test

Auto Bild Sportscars 245/45 R18

Satisfactory.

StrongRolling Resistance WeakDry BrakingDry HandlingWet HandlingStraight Aqua WinnerPirelli P Zero PZ4

2017 2 tests

Back to the Fulda SportControl 2 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Fulda tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.