Following on from the fifty tire braking shootout, Auto Bild have more thoroughly tested the best twenty 245/45 R18 summer tires using a RWD BMW 5 Series.
The top three tires should come as no surprise, with Continental, Goodyear and Michelin proving to be the most rounded tires across all the testing.
The Continental Premium Contact 6 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 tied for first place. As we found with our video comparison, both the Continental and Goodyear tires offer sporty handling, good levels of grip in the dry and wet, and good comfort levels. Both tires also topped the wear test, and when combined with their reasonable purchase price, offered some of the best value on test.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 was a close third, and like the Continental and Goodyear provided to have an excellent rounded performance in all conditions. One thing worth noting, he Michelin had significantly worse wear than the Contiental and Goodyear, which when combined with the most expensive purchase price on test, meant the French tire offered the worst value. An unusual situation for a Michelin tire.
Other notable performances again come from Vredestein and its parent company Apollo in fourth and fifth place, while Nexen and Falken round out the list of "highly recommended" tires in sixth and seventh.
Dry
Michelin had its usual dry braking advantage, stopping nearly a meter shorter than any other tire.
Dry Braking
Spread: 3.90 M (12.1%)|Avg: 34.23 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire
Michelin's dry braking advantage could not be carried over to dry handling, with the Vredestien Ultrac Vorti proving to be best on test.
Dry Handling
Spread: 4.50 Km/H (3.8%)|Avg: 115.32 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
117.00 Km/H
Continental Premium Contact 6
116.80 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
116.40 Km/H
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
116.30 Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
116.20 Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
116.20 Km/H
Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
116.10 Km/H
Nokian PowerProof
115.90 Km/H
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
115.40 Km/H
Firestone RoadHawk
115.40 Km/H
Apollo Aspire XP
115.40 Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza S001
115.30 Km/H
Fulda SportControl 2
115.00 Km/H
Toyo Proxes Sport
114.90 Km/H
Falken Azenis FK510
114.80 Km/H
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
114.60 Km/H
Kumho Ecsta PS71
114.30 Km/H
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
114.20 Km/H
Uniroyal RainSport 3
113.70 Km/H
Zeetex HP2000 vfm
112.50 Km/H
Wet
Bridgestone highlight their wet grip improvements to the S001, winning the wet braking testing.
Wet Braking
Spread: 7.30 M (16.3%)|Avg: 48.48 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire
Bridgestone continued the wet advantage through to the wet handling test.
Wet Handling
Spread: 6.90 Km/H (9.2%)|Avg: 71.18 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Bridgestone Potenza S001
74.60 Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
74.30 Km/H
Nokian PowerProof
73.90 Km/H
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
73.30 Km/H
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73.20 Km/H
Continental Premium Contact 6
73.00 Km/H
Firestone RoadHawk
72.30 Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
72.10 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
71.90 Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
71.50 Km/H
Apollo Aspire XP
70.60 Km/H
Fulda SportControl 2
70.50 Km/H
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
70.00 Km/H
Toyo Proxes Sport
69.60 Km/H
Zeetex HP2000 vfm
69.50 Km/H
Falken Azenis FK510
69.20 Km/H
Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
68.90 Km/H
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
68.80 Km/H
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
68.70 Km/H
Uniroyal RainSport 3
67.70 Km/H
Michelin took a second test win, proving best during the straight aquaplaning testing.
Straight Aqua
Spread: 8.40 Km/H (8.5%)|Avg: 95.04 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
99.10 Km/H
Kumho Ecsta PS71
98.50 Km/H
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
97.20 Km/H
Toyo Proxes Sport
96.70 Km/H
Apollo Aspire XP
96.60 Km/H
Firestone RoadHawk
96.60 Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza S001
95.80 Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
95.50 Km/H
Falken Azenis FK510
95.50 Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
95.40 Km/H
Uniroyal RainSport 3
95.30 Km/H
Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
95.20 Km/H
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
95.00 Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
93.90 Km/H
Continental Premium Contact 6
93.60 Km/H
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
93.20 Km/H
Nokian PowerProof
92.70 Km/H
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
92.50 Km/H
Fulda SportControl 2
91.70 Km/H
Zeetex HP2000 vfm
90.70 Km/H
Wear
Continental has again shown to have the lowest wear on test, with Goodyear and Falken extremely close behind.
Wear
Spread: 22450.00 KM (50%)|Avg: 30307.50 KM
Predicted tread life in KM (Higher is better)
Continental Premium Contact 6
44900.00 KM
Falken Azenis FK510
39063.00 KM
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
39063.00 KM
Uniroyal RainSport 3
35920.00 KM
Apollo Aspire XP
33226.00 KM
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
33226.00 KM
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
32328.00 KM
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
31879.00 KM
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
30083.00 KM
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
29634.00 KM
Bridgestone Potenza S001
27838.00 KM
Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
27838.00 KM
Fulda SportControl 2
27389.00 KM
Firestone RoadHawk
27389.00 KM
Nokian PowerProof
27389.00 KM
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
26042.00 KM
Toyo Proxes Sport
23797.00 KM
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
23348.00 KM
Zeetex HP2000 vfm
23348.00 KM
Kumho Ecsta PS71
22450.00 KM
Thanks to the excellent wear and reasonable purchase prices, the Falken, Goodyear and Continental prove to be the value of all twenty tires.
The Fulda SportControl 2 had the lowest rolling resistance on test, with the Bridgestone having the highest by a margin.
Rolling Resistance
Spread: 2.69 kg / t (37.7%)|Avg: 8.10 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Fulda SportControl 2
7.13 kg / t
Zeetex HP2000 vfm
7.34 kg / t
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
7.40 kg / t
Apollo Aspire XP
7.43 kg / t
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
7.55 kg / t
Uniroyal RainSport 3
7.56 kg / t
Continental Premium Contact 6
7.63 kg / t
Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
7.65 kg / t
Nokian PowerProof
7.77 kg / t
Firestone RoadHawk
7.83 kg / t
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
7.94 kg / t
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
8.09 kg / t
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
8.15 kg / t
Toyo Proxes Sport
8.30 kg / t
Falken Azenis FK510
8.45 kg / t
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
8.86 kg / t
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
8.98 kg / t
Kumho Ecsta PS71
9.05 kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
9.16 kg / t
Bridgestone Potenza S001
9.82 kg / t
19,000 km
£1.45/L
8.0 L/100km
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.
The noise testing was relatively close, with the Nexen having the quietest pass-by noise levels.
Noise
Spread: 2.60 dB (3.7%)|Avg: 72.23 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
71.00 dB
Apollo Aspire XP
71.20 dB
Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
71.30 dB
Toyo Proxes Sport
71.30 dB
Fulda SportControl 2
71.50 dB
Zeetex HP2000 vfm
71.70 dB
Uniroyal RainSport 3
71.80 dB
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
72.10 dB
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
72.10 dB
Falken Azenis FK510
72.10 dB
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72.20 dB
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
72.20 dB
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72.40 dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
72.50 dB
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
72.80 dB
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
72.80 dB
Nokian PowerProof
73.20 dB
Firestone RoadHawk
73.20 dB
Continental Premium Contact 6
73.50 dB
Bridgestone Potenza S001
73.60 dB
The budget Zeetex tire was the cheapest on test, but also the worst overall.