Test Publication:
245/45 R18
20 tires
4 categories
Images courtesy of Auto Bild
Test Publication:
Images courtesy of Auto Bild
Test Size:
245/45 R18
Tires Tested:
20 tires
Following on from the
fifty tire braking shootout, Auto Bild have more thoroughly tested the best twenty 245/45 R18 summer tires using a RWD BMW 5 Series.
The top three tires should come as no surprise, with Continental, Goodyear and Michelin proving to be the most rounded tires across all the testing.
The Continental Premium Contact 6 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 tied for first place. As we found with our video comparison, both the Continental and Goodyear tires offer sporty handling, good levels of grip in the dry and wet, and good comfort levels. Both tires also topped the wear test, and when combined with their reasonable purchase price, offered some of the best value on test.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 was a close third, and like the Continental and Goodyear provided to have an excellent rounded performance in all conditions. One thing worth noting, he Michelin had significantly worse wear than the Contiental and Goodyear, which when combined with the most expensive purchase price on test, meant the French tire offered the worst value. An unusual situation for a Michelin tire.
Other notable performances again come from Vredestein and its parent company Apollo in fourth and fifth place, while Nexen and Falken round out the list of "highly recommended" tires in sixth and seventh.
Dry
Michelin had its usual dry braking advantage, stopping nearly a meter shorter than any other tire.
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Nokian PowerProof
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Bridgestone Potenza S001
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Kumho Ecsta PS71
- Toyo Proxes Sport
- Uniroyal RainSport 3
- Zeetex HP2000 vfm
- Falken Azenis FK510
Michelin's dry braking advantage could not be carried over to dry handling, with the Vredestien Ultrac Vorti proving to be best on test.
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Nokian PowerProof
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Bridgestone Potenza S001
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Toyo Proxes Sport
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Kumho Ecsta PS71
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Uniroyal RainSport 3
- Zeetex HP2000 vfm
Wet
Bridgestone highlight their wet grip improvements to the S001, winning the wet braking testing.
- Bridgestone Potenza S001
- Kumho Ecsta PS71
- Nokian PowerProof
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Toyo Proxes Sport
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Zeetex HP2000 vfm
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Uniroyal RainSport 3
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
Bridgestone continued the wet advantage through to the wet handling test.
- Bridgestone Potenza S001
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Nokian PowerProof
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Kumho Ecsta PS71
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Toyo Proxes Sport
- Zeetex HP2000 vfm
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Uniroyal RainSport 3
Michelin took a second test win, proving best during the straight aquaplaning testing.
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Kumho Ecsta PS71
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Toyo Proxes Sport
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Bridgestone Potenza S001
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Uniroyal RainSport 3
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Nokian PowerProof
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Zeetex HP2000 vfm
Wear
Continental has again shown to have the lowest wear on test, with Goodyear and Falken extremely close behind.
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Uniroyal RainSport 3
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Bridgestone Potenza S001
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Nokian PowerProof
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Toyo Proxes Sport
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Zeetex HP2000 vfm
- Kumho Ecsta PS71
Thanks to the excellent wear and reasonable purchase prices, the Falken, Goodyear and Continental prove to be the value of all twenty tires.
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Zeetex HP2000 vfm
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Uniroyal RainSport 3
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Nokian PowerProof
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Kumho Ecsta PS71
- Toyo Proxes Sport
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Bridgestone Potenza S001
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Environment
The Fulda SportControl 2 had the lowest rolling resistance on test, with the Bridgestone having the highest by a margin.
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Zeetex HP2000 vfm
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Uniroyal RainSport 3
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Nokian PowerProof
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Toyo Proxes Sport
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Kumho Ecsta PS71
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Bridgestone Potenza S001
The noise testing was relatively close, with the Nexen having the quietest pass-by noise levels.
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Toyo Proxes Sport
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Zeetex HP2000 vfm
- Uniroyal RainSport 3
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Kumho Ecsta PS71
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Nokian PowerProof
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Bridgestone Potenza S001
The budget Zeetex tire was the cheapest on test, but also the worst overall.
- Zeetex HP2000 vfm
- Kumho Ecsta PS71
- Apollo Aspire XP
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Toyo Proxes Sport
- Nokian PowerProof
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Uniroyal RainSport 3
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Bridgestone Potenza S001
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Results
Balanced driving behavior at a high level. Dynamic handling with precise steering, short braking distances, best wear on test, low fuel use.
None mentioned.
Exemplary.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
33.2 M |
32.1 M |
+1.1 M |
96.69% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
116.8 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-0.2 Km/H |
99.83% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
47.2 M |
44.9 M |
+2.3 M |
95.13% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
73 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
97.86% |
| Straight Aqua |
15th |
93.6 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-5.5 Km/H |
94.45% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
19th |
73.5 dB |
71 dB |
+2.5 dB |
96.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
1st |
44900 KM |
|
|
100% |
| Value |
3rd |
12.81 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+0.91 Price/1000 |
92.9% |
| Price |
19th |
575 |
300 |
+275 |
52.17% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
7.63 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.5 kg / t |
93.45% |
Sporty handling tires in the wet and dry, precise steering, short braking distances, very good mileage, affordable price.
None mentioned.
Exemplary.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
33.2 M |
32.1 M |
+1.1 M |
96.69% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
116.2 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
99.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
48.1 M |
44.9 M |
+3.2 M |
93.35% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
74.3 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-0.3 Km/H |
99.6% |
| Straight Aqua |
14th |
93.9 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-5.2 Km/H |
94.75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
15th |
72.8 dB |
71 dB |
+1.8 dB |
97.53% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
2nd |
39063 KM |
44900 KM |
-5837 KM |
87% |
| Value |
2nd |
12.29 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+0.39 Price/1000 |
96.83% |
| Price |
12th |
480 |
300 |
+180 |
62.5% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
7.55 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.42 kg / t |
94.44% |
Sporty steering behaviour, excellent driving dynamics, good aquaplaning resistance, short braking distances.
Expensive.
Exemplary.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
32.1 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
116.4 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
99.49% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
46.5 M |
44.9 M |
+1.6 M |
96.56% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
71.9 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-2.7 Km/H |
96.38% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
99.1 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
14th |
72.5 dB |
71 dB |
+1.5 dB |
97.93% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
5th |
33226 KM |
44900 KM |
-11674 KM |
74% |
| Value |
20th |
20.01 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+8.11 Price/1000 |
59.47% |
| Price |
20th |
665 |
300 |
+365 |
45.11% |
| Rolling Resistance |
12th |
8.09 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.96 kg / t |
88.13% |
Good grip and excellent handling in the dry and wet, precise steering, good aquaplaning resistance, well priced.
High rolling resistance.
Exemplary.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
33.4 M |
32.1 M |
+1.3 M |
96.11% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
117 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
12th |
48.9 M |
44.9 M |
+4 M |
91.82% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
71.5 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-3.1 Km/H |
95.84% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
95.5 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-3.6 Km/H |
96.37% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
15th |
72.8 dB |
71 dB |
+1.8 dB |
97.53% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
7th |
32328 KM |
44900 KM |
-12572 KM |
72% |
| Value |
7th |
14.07 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+2.17 Price/1000 |
84.58% |
| Price |
7th |
455 |
300 |
+155 |
65.93% |
| Rolling Resistance |
19th |
9.16 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+2.03 kg / t |
77.84% |
Good handling, short braking distances, low wear, good price / wear ratio.
None mentioned.
Exemplary.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
34.7 M |
32.1 M |
+2.6 M |
92.51% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
115.4 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
98.63% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
47.3 M |
44.9 M |
+2.4 M |
94.93% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
70.6 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
94.64% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
96.6 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
97.48% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
71.2 dB |
71 dB |
+0.2 dB |
99.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
5th |
33226 KM |
44900 KM |
-11674 KM |
74% |
| Value |
5th |
13.09 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+1.19 Price/1000 |
90.91% |
| Price |
3rd |
435 |
300 |
+135 |
68.97% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
7.43 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.3 kg / t |
95.96% |
Safe driving behavior in the dry and wet,short braking distances, low noise, good comfort.
High rolling resistance.
Exemplary.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
33.2 M |
32.1 M |
+1.1 M |
96.69% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
115.4 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
98.63% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
11th |
48.3 M |
44.9 M |
+3.4 M |
92.96% |
| Wet Handling |
13th |
70 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-4.6 Km/H |
93.83% |
| Straight Aqua |
13th |
95 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-4.1 Km/H |
95.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
71 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
9th |
30083 KM |
44900 KM |
-14817 KM |
67% |
| Value |
8th |
15.12 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+3.22 Price/1000 |
78.7% |
| Price |
7th |
455 |
300 |
+155 |
65.93% |
| Rolling Resistance |
17th |
8.98 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+1.85 kg / t |
79.4% |
Safe handling, short wet braking distances, low noise, low wear, very good price / performance ratio.
None mentioned.
Exemplary.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
19th |
36 M |
32.1 M |
+3.9 M |
89.17% |
| Dry Handling |
15th |
114.8 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-2.2 Km/H |
98.12% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
48 M |
44.9 M |
+3.1 M |
93.54% |
| Wet Handling |
16th |
69.2 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-5.4 Km/H |
92.76% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
95.5 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-3.6 Km/H |
96.37% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
72.1 dB |
71 dB |
+1.1 dB |
98.47% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
2nd |
39063 KM |
44900 KM |
-5837 KM |
87% |
| Value |
1st |
11.9 Price/1000 |
|
|
100% |
| Price |
10th |
465 |
300 |
+165 |
64.52% |
| Rolling Resistance |
15th |
8.45 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+1.32 kg / t |
84.38% |
Good handling and short braking in the wet and dry, precise steering.
Average wear.
Good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
32.9 M |
32.1 M |
+0.8 M |
97.57% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
115.9 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-1.1 Km/H |
99.06% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
45.4 M |
44.9 M |
+0.5 M |
98.9% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
73.9 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
99.06% |
| Straight Aqua |
17th |
92.7 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-6.4 Km/H |
93.54% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
17th |
73.2 dB |
71 dB |
+2.2 dB |
96.99% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
13th |
27389 KM |
44900 KM |
-17511 KM |
61% |
| Value |
14th |
17.53 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+5.63 Price/1000 |
67.88% |
| Price |
12th |
480 |
300 |
+180 |
62.5% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
7.77 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.64 kg / t |
91.76% |
Well priced tires with balanced behavior in the wet and dry. good aquaplaning resistance.
Average wear.
Good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
34.3 M |
32.1 M |
+2.2 M |
93.59% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
115.4 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
98.63% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
48.1 M |
44.9 M |
+3.2 M |
93.35% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
72.3 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
96.92% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
96.6 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
97.48% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
17th |
73.2 dB |
71 dB |
+2.2 dB |
96.99% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
13th |
27389 KM |
44900 KM |
-17511 KM |
61% |
| Value |
11th |
16.61 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+4.71 Price/1000 |
71.64% |
| Price |
7th |
455 |
300 |
+155 |
65.93% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
7.83 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.7 kg / t |
91.06% |
Stable driving in the wet, short dry braking distances, good comfort, low rolling resistance.
Average wear, high price.
Good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
34.2 M |
32.1 M |
+2.1 M |
93.86% |
| Dry Handling |
13th |
115 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
98.29% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
14th |
49.5 M |
44.9 M |
+4.6 M |
90.71% |
| Wet Handling |
12th |
70.5 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-4.1 Km/H |
94.5% |
| Straight Aqua |
19th |
91.7 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-7.4 Km/H |
92.53% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
71.5 dB |
71 dB |
+0.5 dB |
99.3% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
13th |
27389 KM |
44900 KM |
-17511 KM |
61% |
| Value |
18th |
19.9 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+8 Price/1000 |
59.8% |
| Price |
17th |
545 |
300 |
+245 |
55.05% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
7.13 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
A wet specialist with a good balance and safe handling properties, good aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances.
Average wear, high rolling resistance.
Satisfactory.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
33.5 M |
32.1 M |
+1.4 M |
95.82% |
| Dry Handling |
12th |
115.3 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
98.55% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
44.9 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
74.6 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
95.8 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
96.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
20th |
73.6 dB |
71 dB |
+2.6 dB |
96.47% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
11th |
27838 KM |
44900 KM |
-17062 KM |
62% |
| Value |
19th |
19.94 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+8.04 Price/1000 |
59.68% |
| Price |
18th |
555 |
300 |
+255 |
54.05% |
| Rolling Resistance |
20th |
9.82 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+2.69 kg / t |
72.61% |
Convincing performance on wet and dry roads, short braking distances, good aquaplaning resistance, good price.
Average wear.
Satisfactory.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
34.7 M |
32.1 M |
+2.6 M |
92.51% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
116.2 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
99.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
47.3 M |
44.9 M |
+2.4 M |
94.93% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
72.1 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
96.65% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
95.4 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-3.7 Km/H |
96.27% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
11th |
72.2 dB |
71 dB |
+1.2 dB |
98.34% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
16th |
26042 KM |
44900 KM |
-18858 KM |
58% |
| Value |
13th |
16.9 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+5 Price/1000 |
70.41% |
| Price |
4th |
440 |
300 |
+140 |
68.18% |
| Rolling Resistance |
13th |
8.15 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+1.02 kg / t |
87.48% |
Sporty handling qualities, good dry grip, low rolling resistance.
Understeer in the wet, average wear.
Satisfactory.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
34 M |
32.1 M |
+1.9 M |
94.41% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
116.1 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
99.23% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
18th |
51 M |
44.9 M |
+6.1 M |
88.04% |
| Wet Handling |
17th |
68.9 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-5.7 Km/H |
92.36% |
| Straight Aqua |
12th |
95.2 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-3.9 Km/H |
96.06% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71.3 dB |
71 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
11th |
27838 KM |
44900 KM |
-17062 KM |
62% |
| Value |
10th |
15.99 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+4.09 Price/1000 |
74.42% |
| Price |
6th |
445 |
300 |
+145 |
67.42% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
7.65 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.52 kg / t |
93.2% |
Good lateral grip, short dry braking, low rolling resistance.
Understeer handling and long wet braking.
Satisfactory.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
34.3 M |
32.1 M |
+2.2 M |
93.59% |
| Dry Handling |
16th |
114.6 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-2.4 Km/H |
97.95% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
19th |
51.6 M |
44.9 M |
+6.7 M |
87.02% |
| Wet Handling |
18th |
68.8 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-5.8 Km/H |
92.23% |
| Straight Aqua |
16th |
93.2 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-5.9 Km/H |
94.05% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
72.1 dB |
71 dB |
+1.1 dB |
98.47% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
10th |
29634 KM |
44900 KM |
-15266 KM |
66% |
| Value |
12th |
16.87 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+4.97 Price/1000 |
70.54% |
| Price |
16th |
500 |
300 |
+200 |
60% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
7.4 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.27 kg / t |
96.35% |
Short dry braking, low wear, low rolling resistance, low price.
Average wet performance.
Satisfactory.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
34.1 M |
32.1 M |
+2 M |
94.13% |
| Dry Handling |
18th |
114.2 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-2.8 Km/H |
97.61% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
16th |
50.5 M |
44.9 M |
+5.6 M |
88.91% |
| Wet Handling |
19th |
68.7 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-5.9 Km/H |
92.09% |
| Straight Aqua |
18th |
92.5 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-6.6 Km/H |
93.34% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
11th |
72.2 dB |
71 dB |
+1.2 dB |
98.34% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
8th |
31879 KM |
44900 KM |
-13021 KM |
71% |
| Value |
9th |
15.21 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+3.31 Price/1000 |
78.24% |
| Price |
14th |
484 |
300 |
+184 |
61.98% |
| Rolling Resistance |
11th |
7.94 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.81 kg / t |
89.8% |
Low wear, low rolling resistance.
Understeer handling, slow steering in the wet.
Satisfactory.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
18th |
35.7 M |
32.1 M |
+3.6 M |
89.92% |
| Dry Handling |
19th |
113.7 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
97.18% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
17th |
50.6 M |
44.9 M |
+5.7 M |
88.74% |
| Wet Handling |
20th |
67.7 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-6.9 Km/H |
90.75% |
| Straight Aqua |
11th |
95.3 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
96.17% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
71.8 dB |
71 dB |
+0.8 dB |
98.89% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
4th |
35920 KM |
44900 KM |
-8980 KM |
80% |
| Value |
6th |
13.78 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+1.88 Price/1000 |
86.36% |
| Price |
15th |
495 |
300 |
+195 |
60.61% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
7.56 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.43 kg / t |
94.31% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, short wet braking.
Understeer in the dry, average wear, high fuel use.
Conditionally Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
16th |
34.9 M |
32.1 M |
+2.8 M |
91.98% |
| Dry Handling |
17th |
114.3 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-2.7 Km/H |
97.69% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
45.3 M |
44.9 M |
+0.4 M |
99.12% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
73.2 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.12% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
98.5 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
99.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
13th |
72.4 dB |
71 dB |
+1.4 dB |
98.07% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
20th |
22450 KM |
44900 KM |
-22450 KM |
50% |
| Value |
16th |
19.15 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+7.25 Price/1000 |
62.14% |
| Price |
2nd |
430 |
300 |
+130 |
69.77% |
| Rolling Resistance |
18th |
9.05 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+1.92 kg / t |
78.78% |
Sport handling, good aquaplaning safety, short braking distances.
Long wet braking, high wear.
Conditionally Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
15th |
34.8 M |
32.1 M |
+2.7 M |
92.24% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
116.3 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
99.4% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
20th |
52.2 M |
44.9 M |
+7.3 M |
86.02% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
73.3 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.26% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
97.2 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
98.08% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
72.1 dB |
71 dB |
+1.1 dB |
98.47% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
18th |
23348 KM |
44900 KM |
-21552 KM |
52% |
| Value |
15th |
18.85 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+6.95 Price/1000 |
63.13% |
| Price |
4th |
440 |
300 |
+140 |
68.18% |
| Rolling Resistance |
16th |
8.86 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+1.73 kg / t |
80.47% |
High aquaplaning resistance, short wet and dry braking distances.
Understeer in the wet, poor wear.
Conditionally Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
17th |
35.4 M |
32.1 M |
+3.3 M |
90.68% |
| Dry Handling |
14th |
114.9 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
98.21% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
13th |
49.2 M |
44.9 M |
+4.3 M |
91.26% |
| Wet Handling |
14th |
69.6 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-5 Km/H |
93.3% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
96.7 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-2.4 Km/H |
97.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71.3 dB |
71 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
17th |
23797 KM |
44900 KM |
-21103 KM |
53% |
| Value |
17th |
19.75 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+7.85 Price/1000 |
60.25% |
| Price |
11th |
470 |
300 |
+170 |
63.83% |
| Rolling Resistance |
14th |
8.3 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+1.17 kg / t |
85.9% |
Short wet and dry braking distances, low price, low rolling resistance.
Understeer in the dry and wet, low aquaplaning resistance, high wear.
Conditionally Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
19th |
36 M |
32.1 M |
+3.9 M |
89.17% |
| Dry Handling |
20th |
112.5 Km/H |
117 Km/H |
-4.5 Km/H |
96.15% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
15th |
49.7 M |
44.9 M |
+4.8 M |
90.34% |
| Wet Handling |
15th |
69.5 Km/H |
74.6 Km/H |
-5.1 Km/H |
93.16% |
| Straight Aqua |
20th |
90.7 Km/H |
99.1 Km/H |
-8.4 Km/H |
91.52% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
71.7 dB |
71 dB |
+0.7 dB |
99.02% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
18th |
23348 KM |
44900 KM |
-21552 KM |
52% |
| Value |
4th |
12.85 Price/1000 |
11.9 Price/1000 |
+0.95 Price/1000 |
92.61% |
| Price |
1st |
300 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.34 kg / t |
7.13 kg / t |
+0.21 kg / t |
97.14% |