Menu
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 View Gallery (4)
205-345/25-65 R17-22 196 sizes 2021
Tested by Tire Reviews 3 Tests
The BEST Performance Tires Tested 2022/23 Tire Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tire Test 2021 Tire Reviews UHP Summer Tire Test

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3

Previous Hankook Tires Max Performance Summer Next

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 is a premium max-performance summer tire that stands out for its dependable wet-weather ability and impressively refined road manners. Real-world drivers and independent tests consistently rate its wet grip and braking as a key highlight, alongside a comfortable, quiet ride that feels more 'grand touring' than many rivals in this category. It also tends to represent strong value versus the traditional premium benchmarks, especially if you want high confidence in the rain without paying top-tier prices.

8.6
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
84%
Wet Grip
83%
Road Feedback
72%
Handling
74%
Wear
69%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
72%
68 Reviews
76% Average
607,370 miles driven
25 Tests (avg: 5th)
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3

Summer Premium
BETA
8.6 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Comfort
76.5
0.32x / 22 tests
Wet
75.9
2x / 76 tests
Dry
75.7
1.8x / 43 tests
Value
72.3
0.42x / 39 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
85
42 tests
Handling
72.6
44 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 25
Publications: 10
Period: 2019 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 68
Avg Rating: 75.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.34
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tire Test Die Reifentester 2025 225/40 R18 6/8 8 metrics
2024 Auto Express Summer Tire Test Auto Express 2024 225/45 R17 5/8 0 metrics
2024 AZ Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2024 225/45 R17 3/9 8 metrics
The BEST Performance Tires Tested Tire Reviews 2023 225/40 R18 4/6 18 metrics
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 12/21 11 metrics
2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2023 225/40 R18 6/13 10 metrics
2023 Summer Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 1/48 2 metrics
2022 Auto Express Summer Tire Test Auto Express 2022 225/40 R18 4/7 0 metrics
2022 Auto Express SUV Tire Test Auto Express 2022 235/55 R18 2/7 0 metrics
2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2022 245/40 R19 2/10 10 metrics
2022/23 Tire Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tire Test Tire Reviews 2022 225/45 R17 3/9 10 metrics
2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2022 225/45 R18 5/11 10 metrics
2022 AMS Performance Summer Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2022 245/45 R19 3/10 10 metrics
2021 EVO Summer Tire Test EVO 2021 225/40 R18 7/9 10 metrics
2021 Auto Express Summer Tire Test Auto Express 2021 225/45 R17 1/10 0 metrics
2021 Tire Reviews UHP Summer Tire Test Tire Reviews 2021 225/40 R18 3/14 9 metrics
2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2021 235/35 R19 5/15 9 metrics
2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2021 265/35 R20 6/9 8 metrics
2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2021 225/40 R18 9/10 11 metrics
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 12/20 10 metrics
2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tire Test ADAC 2020 225/40 R18 14/16 1 metrics
2020 Tire Market Overview Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 10/49 2 metrics
2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tire Test Sport Auto 2019 245/30 R20 4/8 10 metrics
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 3/20 11 metrics
2019 Summer 53 Tire Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 3/45 2 metrics

Videos

Michelin vs Bridgestone vs Continental vs Goodyear vs Hankook vs Yokohama - What's the BEST Tire?

Michelin vs Bridgestone vs Continental vs Goodyear vs Hankook vs Yokohama - What's the BEST Tire?

EXCLUSIVE! Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Goodyear, Bridgestone, Continental, Hankook, Yokohama & More!

EXCLUSIVE! Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Goodyear, Bridgestone, Continental, Hankook, Yokohama & More!

In Depth Tire Comparisons
View More Comparisons
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Awards
The BEST Performance Tires Tested
2022/23 Tire Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tire Test
2021 Tire Reviews UHP Summer Tire Test
All Tests
View Test Results
25
Tests
5th
Average
1st
Best
14th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18 • 2025
6th/8
This tire is comfortable and quiet, and offers commendable wet braking and handling. The testers felt its dry handling lacked the sportiness of the leaders, but the Hankook’s low rolling resistance and high comfort make it a pleasant everyday option.
2024 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R17 • 2024
3rd/9
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo³ offers a comfortable and quiet ride with good handling characteristics, making it a balanced choice with a slightly sportier feel. While it performs well overall, it's not the best choice if fuel economy is your main concern.
2024 Auto Express Summer Tire Test
225/45 R17 • 2024
5th/8

Summary

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, previously a winner, performed well but couldn't match the top performers in this test. Its strongest results were in wet conditions, ranking third in wet braking and straight-line aquaplaning. However, it struggled in wet cornering and handling. In dry conditions, the tire showed decent performance, with good braking and mid-table handling results. While lacking the outright grip of the best tires, it demonstrated good feel, balance, and predictability in both wet and dry conditions. The tire also showed strong refinement with low cabin noise and good bump absorption. Its fuel economy was decent, contributing to a solid overall performance.

Results

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 achieved an overall score of 99.3%, priced at £99.16. In wet conditions, it ranked 3rd in wet braking (99.10%) and straight aquaplaning (98.20%), but struggled in wet cornering (8th, 97.40%) and handling (6th, 98.30%). It performed better in curved aquaplaning, ranking 6th (86.80%). Dry performance was mid-range, with 4th in dry braking (97.60%) and 5th in dry handling (98.60%). The tire ranked 6th in cabin noise (94.0%) and 4th in rolling resistance (92.50%).

.
View Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
225/45R17 94 Y XL C A 72
225/45R17 94 Y XL B A 70
225/50R17 98 Y XL A B 69
215/45R17 91 W XL C A 71
215/45R17 91 W XL B B 71
215/45R17 91 W XL B B 71
18 inch
225/40R18 92 Y XL C A 72
225/40R18 92 Y XL D A 72
245/45R18 100 Y XL B B 69
245/45R18 100 Y XL A A 70
19 inch
235/35R19 91 Y C A 69
235/35R19 91 Y XL C A 69
235/35R19 91 Y C A 69
20 inch
255/45R20 105 Y C A 73
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 >>

Questions and Answers for the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3

Ask a question
April 1, 2019

Anyone knows, if this tire will come at 255/55R19 size? So far I can't find it at that size.

It is likely the SUV version of the EVO 3 will be produced in this size soon.
July 27, 2020

Please, i would like to know UTQG informations about Ventus S1 EVO3 225/45 R17 94Y, treadwear, traction, temperature..thanks

Unfortunately I don't have access to that data, sory. You could check directly with Hankook.
July 24, 2021

Does the ventus S1 evo3 k127 have the rim protection?

In the sizes I've tested it does not, however I expect it to have rim protection in certain large wheel sizes.
December 26, 2021

depth of tire pattern?

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 usually starts around 7.8mm, though there can be variation depending on tire size.
January 29, 2022

Already been answered but have any of there evo 3 k127s have rim protection as of 2022? And are these tires rated as XL tires?

Rim protection varies by size, as does the XL rating. Your tire retailer should be able to help tell you which is XL.
February 21, 2023

Hello my car is with 245/45/18 and I’m thinking what to buy normal evo 3 C/A/72 or evo with * for bmw and A/A/70 my car is Citroen c5 2012 is not bmw but this stats is better

In your case I would stick with the aftermarket version of the tire, the * marked version of the evo3 will be tuned to work with the BMW platform, and even if the label doesn't show a reduction in wet grip for braking, it is likely to be worse in wet handling.
September 14, 2024

I am shopping for tires for a BMW 530i M sport, the sizes are 275/40/18 and 245/45/18 These are available in both the BMW (*) version --Run-Flat-- OR normal flavor, non run-flat, without the BMW (*) Should I avoid the run-flat meaning that I also forgo the BMW (*)?

Many people enjoy moving away from runflat tires, but it really is a personal choice. Generally non-* tires offer better wet grip so I wouldn't sweat that.

Review Summary

Based on 67 user reviews

Drivers generally describe the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 as a strong-value premium summer tire with very good wet and dry grip, confident braking, and a notably comfortable, refined ride for its category. High-scoring reviews frequently praise low noise levels and solid longevity when properly maintained, especially on heavier vehicles and long-mileage use. The most consistent drawback is a soft, vague steering feel (muted feedback/response), and a smaller but recurring group report earlier-than-expected aquaplaning and/or faster or uneven wear depending on vehicle setup and pressures.

Strengths
  • Strong wet grip and wet braking confidence
  • Very good dry grip and stable handling
  • High comfort/ride quality (absorbs small bumps well)
  • Generally low road noise/quiet motorway cruising
  • Good value for money versus premium rivals
  • Often strong tread life for a uhp tire when maintained/rotated
Areas for Improvement
  • Muted/indirect steering feel and feedback (soft sidewalls
  • Less precision)
  • Aquaplaning resistance can be weaker than key competitors
  • Wear can be inconsistent on some vehicles (faster wear or inner-edge wear reported)

Top 3 Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 Reviews

Given 51% while driving a Tesla Model Y Long Range (225/45 R19) on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles
These Hankook tires came with my Model Y. On 3 separate occasions the outer part of the tire has delaminated from the inner part causing a bubble in the tire. This leads to severe vibration so it is pretty obvious. Only solution is to replace the tire, which I've now done 3 times. In Scotland we have a lot of rough roads and pot holes so maybe that's why but I have never had this with any other vehicle or tire. Also, comfort I find to be awful. Compared to the Pirelli winter tires that I fit seasonally the Hankook is very harsh and uncomfortable over rough road surfaces. I'd steer clear unless you live in mainland Europe where there are no potholes.
Helpful 1111
April 1, 2025
Given 79% while driving a BMW 140i xdrive (245/30 R19) on mostly country roads for 3,500 spirited miles
Very good in wet conditions. Grip levels are ok in the dry but very safe feel when pushing hard. Noise and comfort very good. No signs of wear so far. Great allrounder,will try on trak i hope.
Helpful 1044
May 5, 2025
Given 87% while driving a Volkswagen Transporter (255/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 17,000 average miles
Decent, comfortable tires for a loaded campervan. The tires have lasted about 17-20k miles, which is amazingly good for a VW transporter. They are quiet, surefooted and not in the least noisy.
Helpful 844
August 11, 2025

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3? Rate the tires you actually drive — and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3?
I drive something else — review any tire →
96 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 20% while driving a Great Wall Motors (225/55 R19) on for 6,000 miles
On a front wheel haval h6 get plenty of wheel spin in take off have to feather accelerator. Only done 10000km and down to 4mm tread so probably only 3k left not good for factory fitted tires. Definitely won't buy these for replacement.
Helpful 15
May 20, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 77% while driving a Ram 1500 hemi (275/55 R20) on for 20,000 miles
My first need is: perfect cornering and cotrol on dry or wet tarmac only, for heavy RAM 1500 HEMI truck. This tires, with profile reduced from standard factory 60 to 55, are perfect for this condition. Full control in corners is maintained
Helpful 31
May 9, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 70% while driving a Volvo XC60 (255/45 R20) on for 4,733 miles
Fitted Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 in 255/45 R20 on my 2022 Volvo XC60 B5. Driving is mostly normal mixed use (suburban and motorway), including plenty of wet-weather commuting.

The standout is wet grip and confidence. In heavy rain the tires feel secure and predictable, with strong braking and good traction, and they deal with standing water better than I expected. Dry grip is also strong, with stable braking and cornering for an SUV.

Compared with the original OEM Michelin Primacy 4 (VOL), which were solid all-rounders, the Hankooks deliver noticeably better grip (especially in the wet), relatively low road noise (with some noise on uneven surfaces), and are just as comfortable day-to-day. Steering feel and feedback are a bit muted (more secure than “sharp”), but they’re progressive and never feel nervous. Though I note they are much better then the Primacy 4 was.

Value has been exceptional: they were around 60% cheaper than replacing with the Primacy 4 (VOL), despite performing at a level above many tires that cost more.

On wear, I’m tracking tread depth and so far it looks reasonable. Over 7,617 km the tires have gone from about 6.75 mm average at fitment to about 6.0–6.2 mm, with fairly even wear across the tread and only a small inside-edge bias (around 0.1–0.15 mm), I estimate I will get about 42,000-45,000km from them which is great value. I rotated them at around 6,800 km. For context, I achieved ~55,000 km from the OE Michelins before replacement (down to just under 3 mm).

Overall, I’d recommend these for a family SUV or sedan without hesitation. I’m not sure they’re the best choice if you prioritise maximum steering feel in a more sports-oriented vehicle, but for real-world use they’re an easy buy. I’d happily purchase them again, and would have no hesitation trying the new Hankook Evo next time.
Helpful 163
January 25, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 57% while driving a Ford Mustang gt (275/40 R19) on mostly country roads for 7,570 average miles
No real issues with these tires except that rear tires worn to indicators in less than 6000 miles! Surprised me ! Worn in the middle due to over inflation from the tire fitting company I used, set the tires to 36 psi cold even though the sticker says 32! I left the tires at 36 thinking they knew what pressure works best for said tire on said vehicle but obviously not! Trying another brand now and will make sure different tire company sets to 32.
Helpful 178
December 29, 2025
Given 79% while driving a BMW i4 e40 (255/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 14,000 spirited miles
These came with my BMW i4 e40 RWD.
Not really a performance tire but does the job.
Dry grip is very good, wet grip is somehow average/decent.
Im on 22.000km mark. I pressume they will last max 30.000km or so.
For this price, they are Okish for an EV.
For me, they are far below Michelin PS4S.
Helpful 346
November 27, 2025
Given 80% while driving a Volkswagen Passat B8 1.8 TSI RLine 180PS (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 2,500 average miles
I fitted a set of 2 Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 and driven for 2500mi, I also have Goodyear F1 Asy6 on the rear axle so I'll make some references to that tire too.

Pros:
Braking both in the wet and dry
Comfort both for noise and bumps, very comfortable for a sporty tire, much more so than the asy6
Wet grip is very good.

Cons:
Aquaplaning even when brand new, the Asy6 is far superior on that
Not much feedback
They took some miles to gain their full grip, almost 2000.

I would buy again, it's a wierdly pleasant combination a comfortable tire with sports tire levels of wet grip however the aquaplaning performance needs to improve, be aware of that.
Helpful 260
November 11, 2025
Given 51% while driving a Cupra Leon (235/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Trash tire, came with my cupra leon. Very slippery on both dry and wet conditions. Would never buy again.
Helpful 371
September 18, 2025
Given 63% while driving a Audi A4 Avant Quattro 252 bhp S Line Sport (8W/B9) (245/35 R19) on mostly country roads for 25,000 average miles
Good tire, the grip is good in all conditions (except in winter on snow because I haven’t tested that). I’m quite dissatisfied because the tire that came as the stock first installation on the Audi A4 45 TDI, 3.0 is unusually worn, where the inner edge is abnormally worn out. From the outside it’s not visible how much the tire wore down on the inside until it became unusable. I don’t know if the tire has such characteristics that it’s soft and that’s the reason, or if I drove with too low pressure (to be fair, I didn’t check the pressure very often), but the wear pattern is quite strange. With another set of tires (different manufacturer and different dimensions) I didn’t have such problems. As a tire itself, it’s okay.
Helpful 465
September 11, 2025
Given 82% while driving a Kia Motors Stinger 2.0 RWD (225/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
The main reason I bought it was because of the price and the wet braking performance on a couple of Tire Reviews' tests. I have a staggered setup (225/40R19 in front and 255/35/R19 in the rear). I can definitely feel it more comfortable than the previous tire that the car came with (Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 in front and Asymmetric 5 in the rear). I haven't had the chance to test deep water, but on dry it has enough grip. It gives a little less feedback than the Goodyear but on highways is stable. can't say anything about the wear yet because I fitted it recently. So far I think I can strongly recommend this tire.
Helpful 421
September 7, 2025
Given 72% while driving a Volkswagen Golf GTI (235/35 R19) on mostly country roads for 6,500 spirited miles
These came on my Mk8 GTI 380 with many mods, which I've put 6500 miles on and I've had all of the following Max/Ultra High Performance Summer Tires on hot hatches or sports coupes. I live in western NC and value handling, dry grip and feedback above wear and comfort. 18-20K is all that I've ever gotten out of a set of skins. That said, I was really disappointed that it didn't come with Contentals and really wanted to hate the Hankooks - but they are a pretty decent tire. I've had Bridgestones and Continentals (Loved), Michelins (Disappointing) most recently, and the Hankooks are just below the Michelins in dry handling and feedback. Breakaway is gradual, with the Hankooks giving you enough feedback to warn you that you're about to trash your new shiny toy. Would I replace them with the new Evo? It's an intriguing question - I've got a little time to do a Lot of research.
Helpful 890
April 17, 2025
Given 100% while driving a Alfa Romeo Giulietta (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 100 average miles
Alfa Romeo Giulietta Qvline 2.0 diesel. Real good tires, before this I'll drive on Pirelli Powergy.
Helpful 953
March 5, 2025
Given 76% while driving a MINI Cooper S Coupe (205/45 R17) on mostly town for 9,000 easy going miles
Still unsure if they are runflats or not one tire has a bubble despite only having travelled 14000 and dealer telling us 2 fronts need replacement
Helpful 954
January 19, 2025
Tyre reviews and ratingsTire Reviews Replies
If they are a runflat version it will be clearly marked on the sidewall. Hankook call their runflat system HRS.
Which tires do you drive?
Driving the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3?
No — review a different tire →
Rate your tires