Menu

Test source Auto Bild

2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test

Overall test winnerHankook iON FlexClimate

Auto Bild have conducted mini three set all-season tire test specifically designed for electric vehicles, testing them in the 245/45 R19 size using a Hyundai Ionic 6S.

Tires tested
3
Tested size
245/45 R19
Test vehicle
Hyundai Ionic 6S
Disciplines
10

At a glance

Tire shortlist

3 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Hankook iON FlexClimate

+The Hankook iON FlexClimate is the best tire on dry and wet roads, first for braking and handling on both and for aquaplaning both straight and in bends, with direct steering and good balance.

−On snow it is second to the Michelin for braking, traction and handling, and its rolling resistance is slightly higher than the Michelin's.

2nd

Michelin CrossClimate 2

+The Michelin CrossClimate 2 is the best tire on snow, first for braking, traction and handling, and it has the lowest rolling resistance in the test. It is second for braking in the dry and the wet and for aquaplaning both straight and in bends.

−It is behind the Hankook on wet roads, last of the three for wet handling, and it is also third for dry handling.

3rd

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

+The Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV is second for dry and wet handling, with good, safe behavior on both, and it rides comfortably and quietly.

−Snow is its weakness, third of three for braking, traction and handling and well short of the other two. It is also third for braking in the dry and the wet, for aquaplaning and for rolling resistance.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test · 245/45 R19

TireHankook iON FlexClimateMichelin CrossClimate 2Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
Position1st2nd3rd
Category scores (% of best)
Dry100%97%94.9%
Wet100%95.4%93.1%
Snow97%100%92.3%
Rolling Resistance99%100%94.4%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Auto Bild have conducted mini three set all-season tire test specifically designed for electric vehicles, testing them in the 245/45 R19 size using a Hyundai Ionic 6S. The German publication put the Hankook iON FlexClimate, Michelin CrossClimate 2, and Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV through the usual testing across multiple climate zones to assess their performance in all weather conditions.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

While this test was an Auto Bild 'special test' with reduced numbers, it's still an interesting datapoint, especially for the new Hankook and Vredestein EV specific tires against the well established Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Dry

The Hankook stopped shortest at 128 feet, with the Michelin close behind at 132 feet. The Vredestein needed an extra 11 feet to stop - a meaningful difference in emergency braking situations.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
128 ft Best 0 mph
132 ft +4 ft 14 mph
139 ft +11 ft 22 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.5% (11 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Hankook iON FlexClimate had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Hankook led with the highest average speed of 68.4 mph through the handling course. The Vredestein and Michelin were closely matched, showing all three tires handle well in dry conditions.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
68.4 mph Best
66.8 mph -1.6 mph
66.5 mph -1.9 mph

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

Similar to dry braking, the Hankook achieved the shortest wet stopping distance at 128 feet. The 3.2-meter gap between best and worst shows important safety differences in wet conditions.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
128 ft Best 0 mph
132 ft +4 ft 14 mph
139 ft +11 ft 22 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.2% (11 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Hankook iON FlexClimate had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Hankook maintained its advantage in wet handling with 46.4 mph average speed. Its 2.2 mph lead over the Michelin demonstrates better wet grip and control.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
46.4 mph Best
44.4 mph -2.0 mph
44.2 mph -2.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (2.2 mph).

The Hankook resisted aquaplaning until 53.4 mph, giving the best safety margin on standing water. This 4.4 mph advantage over the worst performer is significant for heavy rain driving.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
53.4 mph Best
50.3 mph -3.1 mph
49.0 mph -4.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.3% (4.4 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
10.0 ft/s² Best
9.1 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
8.7 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 13.2% (1.3 ft/s²).

Snow

The Michelin excelled in winter conditions, stopping from 31 mph in just 105 feet. Its 3.3-meter advantage shows superior snow grip compared to the other tires.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
105 ft Best 0 mph
109 ft +4 ft 15 mph
116 ft +11 ft 24 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.3% (11 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV would still be travelling at 24 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Michelin accelerated fastest on snow, taking only 6.2 seconds to reach 25 mph. This makes it the best choice for drivers facing regular winter conditions.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
6.2 s Best
6.5 s +0.30 s
6.9 s +0.70 s

The difference between best and worst was 11.3% (0.7 s).

The Michelin completed its winter dominance with 33.9 mph average speed through the snow course, confirming its strong winter performance.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
33.9 mph Best
33.4 mph -0.5 mph
32.5 mph -1.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4% (1.4 mph).

Value

Lower rolling resistance means better EV range. The Michelin achieved the best result at 7.03 kg/t, with the Hankook very close at 7.10 kg/t. The Vredestein's higher resistance would reduce driving range, but not by a significant amount.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra energy / year
7.03 kg/t Best $0
7.1 kg/t +0.07 kg/t $1
7.45 kg/t +0.42 kg/t $8

The difference between best and worst was 6% (0.42 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $0.15/kWh, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV uses about 52 kWh ($8) more electricity than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

1st

Hankook iON FlexClimate

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Hankook iON FlexClimate
The Hankook iON FlexClimate emerges as the overall winner, earning first place with an overall grade of 1.4 ("very good"). This specialized EV tire demonstrates exceptional all-around performance, particularly excelling in wet conditions where it significantly outperforms its competitors. The tire provides outstanding safety reserves in aquaplaning situations and delivers impressive handling characteristics with direct steering response and good balance on dry surfaces. While it performs reliably on snow and ice, it doesn't quite match the winter performance of the Michelin. However, its strength lies in its balanced approach across all weather conditions, offering excellent driving dynamics that don't compromise on driving enjoyment. The tire successfully combines low rolling resistance for extended EV range with strong wet weather performance, proving that energy efficiency doesn't require sacrificing safety or handling quality.
Dry100%
Wet100%
Snow97%
Rolling Resistance99%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 3128 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 368.4 mphBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 3128 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 346.4 mphBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 353.4 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 310.0 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 3109 ft+4 ft
Snow TractionLower is better2nd / 36.5 s+0.30 s
Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 333.4 mph-0.5 mph
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 37.1 kg/t+0.07 kg/t
EU Label
B/B/70
3PMSF
Yes
2nd

Michelin CrossClimate 2

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Michelin CrossClimate 2
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 secures second place with an overall grade of 1.9 ("good"), establishing itself as a well-rounded performer with exceptional winter capabilities. This tire truly shines on snow and ice, delivering performance that rivals dedicated winter tires and setting the benchmark in these conditions. It offers reliable handling characteristics with short braking distances on both dry and wet surfaces, making it a dependable choice for safety-conscious drivers. The tire also benefits from low rolling resistance, contributing to energy efficiency. While it performs competently across all weather conditions, its standout feature is its unbeatable snow performance, making it an excellent choice for drivers who frequently encounter winter conditions. The CrossClimate 2 represents proven all-season technology that prioritizes winter safety while maintaining good performance in other conditions.
Dry97%
Wet95.4%
Snow100%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 3132 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 366.5 mph-1.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 3132 ft+4 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 344.2 mph-2.2 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 350.3 mph-3.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 39.1 ft/s²-0.9 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 3105 ftBest in this discipline
Snow TractionLower is better1st / 36.2 sBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 333.9 mphBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 37.03 kg/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
B/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
3rd

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

245/45 R19 102W XL
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
The Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV finishes third with an overall grade of 2.8 ("satisfactory"), positioning itself as a comfort-oriented option with some notable limitations. This tire delivers good and safe driving characteristics on both dry and wet surfaces, providing reliable performance in fair weather conditions. It excels in comfort aspects, offering excellent ride quality and operating quietly, which enhances the driving experience. The tire also features low rolling resistance, contributing to energy efficiency for electric vehicles. However, its significant weakness lies in snow and ice performance, where it falls considerably short of the competition. This makes it less suitable for drivers who regularly encounter winter conditions. The Quatrac Pro EV is best suited for drivers in milder climates who prioritize comfort and quiet operation over winter performance, representing a viable option for those who rarely face snowy conditions.
Dry94.9%
Wet93.1%
Snow92.3%
Rolling Resistance94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 3139 ft+11 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 366.8 mph-1.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 3139 ft+11 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 344.4 mph-2.0 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 349.0 mph-4.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 38.7 ft/s²-1.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 3116 ft+11 ft
Snow TractionLower is better3rd / 36.9 s+0.70 s
Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 332.5 mph-1.4 mph
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 37.45 kg/t+0.42 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
3PMSF
Yes

Discussion

4 comments
  1. JM archived

    The dominance of the Hankook is impressive. It don't think that even the new CC3 could compete in wet and dry because of the low difference to CC2. Why don't they replace the old K4S2 completely?

    #10266
    1. TireReviews JM archived

      I'm sure there's an update coming. Worth keeping in mind this was tested at Hankooks proving ground, other tests might not have the iON quite as far ahead but there's no doubt it's an impressive tire.

      #10268
      1. FE TireReviews archived

        Based in the current data, can we assume that this tire is better than continental all saison contact 2 & pirelli cinturato all season sf3?

        #10308
        1. TireReviews FE archived

          It depends on your priority but I would not go so far as to state that.

          #10316
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.