Auto Bild conducted mini three set all-season tire test specifically designed for electric vehicles, testing them in the 245/45 R19 size using a Hyundai Ionic 6S. The German publication put the Hankook iON FlexClimate, Michelin CrossClimate 2, and Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV through the usual testing across multiple climate zones to assess their performance in all weather conditions.

Test Publication:

https://www.autobild.de/ratgeber/reifen/

Test Size: 245/45 R19

Tires Tested: 3 tires

Test Categories:
4 categories (10 tests)

View Test Summary

Similar Tests

---

Test Category	Best Performer	Worst Performer	Difference
Dry (2 tests)
Dry Braking	▲ Hankook iON FlexClimate: 39 M	▼ Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV: 42.3 M	3.3 M (7.8%)
Dry Handling	▲ Hankook iON FlexClimate: 110.1 Km/H	▼ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 107 Km/H	3.1 Km/H (2.9%)
Wet (4 tests)
Wet Braking	▲ Hankook iON FlexClimate: 39.1 M	▼ Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV: 42.3 M	3.2 M (7.6%)
Wet Handling	▲ Hankook iON FlexClimate: 74.6 Km/H	▼ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 71.1 Km/H	3.5 Km/H (4.9%)
Straight Aqua	▲ Hankook iON FlexClimate: 86 Km/H	▼ Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV: 78.9 Km/H	7.1 Km/H (9.0%)
Curved Aquaplaning	▲ Hankook iON FlexClimate: 3.04 m/sec2	▼ Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV: 2.64 m/sec2	0.4 m/sec2 (15.2%)
Snow (3 tests)
Snow Braking	▲ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 32 M	▼ Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV: 35.3 M	3.3 M (9.3%)
Snow Traction	▲ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 6.2 s	▼ Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV: 6.9 s	0.7 s (10.1%)
Snow Handling	▲ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 54.5 Km/H	▼ Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV: 52.3 Km/H	2.2 Km/H (4.2%)
Value (1 tests)
Rolling Resistance	▲ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 7.03 kg / t	▼ Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV: 7.45 kg / t	0.4 kg / t (5.6%)

While this test was an Auto Bild 'special test' with reduced numbers, it's still an interesting datapoint, especially for the new Hankook and Vredestein EV specific tires against the well established Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Dry

The Hankook stopped shortest at 39.0 meters, with the Michelin close behind at 40.3 meters. The Vredestein needed an extra 3.3 meters to stop - a meaningful difference in emergency braking situations.

The Hankook led with the highest average speed of 110.1 km/h through the handling course. The Vredestein and Michelin were closely matched, showing all three tires handle well in dry conditions.

Wet

Similar to dry braking, the Hankook achieved the shortest wet stopping distance at 39.1 meters. The 3.2-meter gap between best and worst shows important safety differences in wet conditions.

The Hankook maintained its advantage in wet handling with 74.6 km/h average speed. Its 3.5 km/h lead over the Michelin demonstrates better wet grip and control.

The Hankook resisted aquaplaning until 86.0 km/h, giving the best safety margin on standing water. This 7.1 km/h advantage over the worst performer is significant for heavy rain driving.

Snow

The Michelin excelled in winter conditions, stopping from 50 km/h in just 32.0 meters. Its 3.3-meter advantage shows superior snow grip compared to the other tires.

The Michelin accelerated fastest on snow, taking only 6.2 seconds to reach 40 km/h. This makes it the best choice for drivers facing regular winter conditions.

The Michelin completed its winter dominance with 54.5 km/h average speed through the snow course, confirming its strong winter performance.

Value

Lower rolling resistance means better EV range. The Michelin achieved the best result at 7.03 kg/t, with the Hankook very close at 7.10 kg/t. The Vredestein's higher resistance would reduce driving range, but not by a significant amount.

Results

1st: Hankook iON FlexClimate
245/45 R19 102Y EU Label: B/B/70 3PMSF: yes	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 1st 39 M 100% Dry Handling 1st 110.1 Km/H 100% Wet Braking 1st 39.1 M 100% Wet Handling 1st 74.6 Km/H 100% Straight Aqua 1st 86 Km/H 100% Curved Aquaplaning 1st 3.04 m/sec2 100% Snow Braking 2nd 33.1 M 32 M +1.1 M 96.68% Snow Traction 2nd 6.5 s 6.2 s +0.3 s 95.38% Snow Handling 2nd 53.8 Km/H 54.5 Km/H -0.7 Km/H 98.72% Rolling Resistance 2nd 7.1 kg / t 7.03 kg / t +0.07 kg / t 99.01% The Hankook iON FlexClimate emerges as the overall winner, earning first place with an overall grade of 1.4 ("very good"). This specialized EV tire demonstrates exceptional all-around performance, particularly excelling in wet conditions where it significantly outperforms its competitors. The tire provides outstanding safety reserves in aquaplaning situations and delivers impressive handling characteristics with direct steering response and good balance on dry surfaces. While it performs reliably on snow and ice, it doesn't quite match the winter performance of the Michelin. However, its strength lies in its balanced approach across all weather conditions, offering excellent driving dynamics that don't compromise on driving enjoyment. The tire successfully combines low rolling resistance for extended EV range with strong wet weather performance, proving that energy efficiency doesn't require sacrificing safety or handling quality. Read Reviews
2nd: Michelin CrossClimate 2
245/45 R19 102Y EU Label: B/B/71 3PMSF: yes	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 2nd 40.3 M 39 M +1.3 M 96.77% Dry Handling 3rd 107 Km/H 110.1 Km/H -3.1 Km/H 97.18% Wet Braking 2nd 40.3 M 39.1 M +1.2 M 97.02% Wet Handling 3rd 71.1 Km/H 74.6 Km/H -3.5 Km/H 95.31% Straight Aqua 2nd 80.9 Km/H 86 Km/H -5.1 Km/H 94.07% Curved Aquaplaning 2nd 2.76 m/sec2 3.04 m/sec2 -0.28 m/sec2 90.79% Snow Braking 1st 32 M 100% Snow Traction 1st 6.2 s 100% Snow Handling 1st 54.5 Km/H 100% Rolling Resistance 1st 7.03 kg / t 100% The Michelin CrossClimate 2 secures second place with an overall grade of 1.9 ("good"), establishing itself as a well-rounded performer with exceptional winter capabilities. This tire truly shines on snow and ice, delivering performance that rivals dedicated winter tires and setting the benchmark in these conditions. It offers reliable handling characteristics with short braking distances on both dry and wet surfaces, making it a dependable choice for safety-conscious drivers. The tire also benefits from low rolling resistance, contributing to energy efficiency. While it performs competently across all weather conditions, its standout feature is its unbeatable snow performance, making it an excellent choice for drivers who frequently encounter winter conditions. The CrossClimate 2 represents proven all-season technology that prioritizes winter safety while maintaining good performance in other conditions. Read Reviews
3rd: Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
245/45 R19 102W EU Label: C/B/70 3PMSF: yes	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 3rd 42.3 M 39 M +3.3 M 92.2% Dry Handling 2nd 107.5 Km/H 110.1 Km/H -2.6 Km/H 97.64% Wet Braking 3rd 42.3 M 39.1 M +3.2 M 92.43% Wet Handling 2nd 71.4 Km/H 74.6 Km/H -3.2 Km/H 95.71% Straight Aqua 3rd 78.9 Km/H 86 Km/H -7.1 Km/H 91.74% Curved Aquaplaning 3rd 2.64 m/sec2 3.04 m/sec2 -0.4 m/sec2 86.84% Snow Braking 3rd 35.3 M 32 M +3.3 M 90.65% Snow Traction 3rd 6.9 s 6.2 s +0.7 s 89.86% Snow Handling 3rd 52.3 Km/H 54.5 Km/H -2.2 Km/H 95.96% Rolling Resistance 3rd 7.45 kg / t 7.03 kg / t +0.42 kg / t 94.36% The Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV finishes third with an overall grade of 2.8 ("satisfactory"), positioning itself as a comfort-oriented option with some notable limitations. This tire delivers good and safe driving characteristics on both dry and wet surfaces, providing reliable performance in fair weather conditions. It excels in comfort aspects, offering excellent ride quality and operating quietly, which enhances the driving experience. The tire also features low rolling resistance, contributing to energy efficiency for electric vehicles. However, its significant weakness lies in snow and ice performance, where it falls considerably short of the competition. This makes it less suitable for drivers who regularly encounter winter conditions. The Quatrac Pro EV is best suited for drivers in milder climates who prioritize comfort and quiet operation over winter performance, representing a viable option for those who rarely face snowy conditions. Read Reviews