Menu

2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tire Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
4 min read
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Dry braking
  3. Wet braking
  4. Dry handling - Yeongam circuit
  5. Results
  6. Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
  7. Yokohama Advan A052
  8. Nexen N Fera SUR4G

AutoView's 2025 extreme-performance shootout takes three of the most aggressive R-compound-flavoured summer tires available in the Korean market - the Nexen N'Fera SUR4G, the Bridgestone Potenza RE71RS and the Yokohama Advan A052 - and runs them on a BMW M3 (G80) in 275/35R19. The SUR4G is the staple of Korean sprint racing and goes in as the domestic benchmark; the RE71RS and A052 are the imported reference tires against which it has to defend that reputation. Michelin declined to send a Pilot Sport Cup 2 / 2R for this round, citing a worry about being beaten by tires with prior test wins overseas - so the obvious fourth contender is missing, but the three that did show up cover the price/performance spectrum cleanly.

The headline result is a narrow win for the Bridgestone Potenza RE71RS: shortest dry stop, shortest wet stop, and the fastest single lap of Korea International Circuit at Yeongam - 1:25.15, just 0.01 s clear of the Yokohama Advan A052. That gap is well inside AutoView's 0.03 s dead-heat threshold, so on outright pace those two tires are effectively tied; the RE71RS earns the overall by carrying its advantage into the braking columns as well. The Nexen N'Fera SUR4G is 1.25 s adrift on lap time, has the longest dry stop, and lacks the steering directness of the imports - but it also stays consistent across all three laps where both rivals fade, is the quietest of the three on highway pavement, and remains the obvious value pick for repeated track-day use.

Test Publication:
AutoView
275/35R19 3 tires 2 categories
Test Publication:
AutoView
Read the original test at AutoView →
A Korean automotive publication that does tire tests
Test Size: 275/35R19
Tires Tested: 3 tires
Test Categories:
2 categories (3 tests)
Similar Tests
AutoView is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tire Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.

Objective braking and skidpad work was done at KATRI on the M3 at factory cold pressures; the circuit session was run separately at Yeongam with AutoView's Jeon In-ho driving on a hot day with track surface temperatures over 50 °C. AutoView also captured tire weight, tread thickness, weight-to-weight deviation across the set, and a 40 km/h coast-down rolling-resistance proxy in the video, none of which convert cleanly into our breakdown units - the relevant observations from those are folded into the per-tire commentary below.

Dry braking

 The RE71RS pulls up roughly two metres shorter than the SUR4G - a wider margin than expected on what is supposed to be the home-market tire's strongest test.

Dry Braking

Spread: 1.90 M (6.2%)|Avg: 31.83 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
  1. Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
    30.80 M
  2. Yokohama Advan A052
    32.00 M
  3. Nexen N Fera SUR4G
    32.70 M

Wet braking

Wet braking from 80 km/h on a depth-controlled flooded surface. The order reshuffles in the lower placings: the Bridgestone holds its lead, but the SUR4G beats the A052 by nearly two metres here. The thin, narrow-grooved A052 tread shows its limits in standing water.

Wet Braking

Spread: 3.10 M (11.2%)|Avg: 29.07 M
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
  1. Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
    27.60 M
  2. Nexen N Fera SUR4G
    28.90 M
  3. Yokohama Advan A052
    30.70 M

Dry handling - Yeongam circuit

Three flying laps on the full 3.045 km Korea International Circuit at Yeongam, with the best lap from each tire recorded below. The RE71RS and A052 both peaked on their opening flying lap and fell off about a second on lap two; the SUR4G held its time consistently across all three laps but ~1.25 s slower than the imports. AutoView also ran a 30 m skidpad to find the lateral-grip limit on each tire - all three carried essentially the same ~68 km/h before sliding, so steady-state lateral grip on its own doesn't separate them; the difference is what they do around the limit.

Dry Handling

Spread: 1.26 s (1.5%)|Avg: 85.57 s
Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
    85.15 s
  2. Yokohama Advan A052
    85.16 s
  3. Nexen N Fera SUR4G
    86.41 s

Results

The Bridgestone Potenza RE71RS takes the overall on combined braking and one-lap pace, the Yokohama Advan A052 ties on lap time but loses both braking columns and degrades hardest, and the Nexen N'Fera SUR4G is the value and durability pick - slower, but the only tire on the test you would happily lap on all afternoon.

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
  • Weight: 0 kgs
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 1st 30.8 M 100%
Dry Handling 1st 85.15 s 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 1st 27.6 M 100%
2nd

Yokohama Advan A052

275/35R19
Yokohama Advan A052
  • Weight: 0 kgs
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 2nd 32 M 30.8 M +1.2 M 96.25%
Dry Handling 2nd 85.16 s 85.15 s +0.01 s 99.99%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 3rd 30.7 M 27.6 M +3.1 M 89.9%
3rd

Nexen N Fera SUR4G

275/35R19
Nexen N Fera SUR4G
  • Weight: 0 kgs
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 3rd 32.7 M 30.8 M +1.9 M 94.19%
Dry Handling 3rd 86.41 s 85.15 s +1.26 s 98.54%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 2nd 28.9 M 27.6 M +1.3 M 95.5%

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.