“After a few thousand kilometers, I had the OE tire Pirelli P Zero removed and the Kumho Ecsta Sport S installed. The only thing that is roughly the same is the noise level inside the vehicle. In everything else that...”
Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
Replaces the Kumho Ecsta PS71
The Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 is a mid-range max-performance summer tire that punches above its price with genuinely sporty grip and strong braking. Drivers and tests agree it delivers confident wet and dry traction, fast steering response and a stable, tied-down feel that can feel close to premium rivals. It stands out particularly for braking confidence and balanced all-round dynamics, making it a compelling value-focused UUHP option.
The quick answer
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated July 2026.
- 9owner reviews
- 25,350miles driven
- 4professional tests
- 117sizes available
All Tests
View Test ResultsTested 4 times by independent publications, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 has taken 1 test wins with an average finish of 3rd.
Finishing position in each test
Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tire Test P2 of 3
The Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 finished a strong second overall. It has no real weakness and genuine strengths in aquaplaning resistance and comfort, and for the money it makes a compelling case against the established premium names in the UUHP class.
| Year | Test | Result | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tire TestTopTireReview · 255/35 R19 | P2 / 3 | Highly Recommended |
| 2026 | 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tire TestAuto Bild Sportscars · 255/35 R19 | P5 / 8 | gut (Good) |
| 2025 | 2025 AutoView Sports Tire TestAutoView · 275/35R19 | P3 / 5 | |
| 2025 | 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire TestTire Rack · 275/35 R19 | P1 / 10 |
On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict
Alternative Tires
View AllDimensions & Label Scores
View AllSize Range60 sizes available
225-325Width30-50Profile18-22Rim88-111 YLoad/
EU LabelAcross 60 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.
Fuel
Wet
Noise
71-75dB B
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 in the wet?
How good is the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 in the dry?
How fuel efficient is the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72?
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72?
What is the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72's EU tire label rating?
More questions about the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 (5)
How comfortable and quiet are the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72?
How well do the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 wear, according to owners?
Would owners buy the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 again?
What does the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 replace?
What sizes does the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 come in?
Owner Questions
Ask a questionQuestions and Answers for the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 Owner Reviews
Review this tireWhat owners say summarised from 9 reviews
Drivers report the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 delivers strong, sporty performance with high confidence dry and wet grip, quick/precise steering response, and good feedback-often comparing it favorably to more expensive premium options for the price. Most reviews also praise its value for money and stable handling, helped by a notably stiff sidewall. Minority drawbacks center on a firmer ride/comfort trade-off from the stiff construction and some reports of slightly higher road noise versus competitors.
What owners mention most counted across 9 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 9 ratings
- Owner score 79%
- Handling 96%
- Dry Grip 94%
- Road Feedback 88%
- Wet Grip 88%
- Comfort 67%
- Wear 48%
Featured reviews
“I use my car for sport driving only on deserted roads so I should preface this review with the knowledge that they have a short life especially on the rear. Most of the 800 miles have been in wet/damp or drying...”
All 9 Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 reviews
- Mazda 6 Series
- 225/45 R17
- 3,000 miles
Kumho's feel very sporty and grippy, as they should. Sidewall is quite stiff for a road tire. Dry grip is awesome and should be more than enough for normal driving in traffic, even for spirited drivers. Wet grip also very good, I've never had any issues in the rain with these. (Yes, they are new tires.) Only downside is road noise which is not their best quality, but noise is not very loud, maybe average in their class.
Car came with almost new Minerva F205's and Kumho's beat these in every category hands on. Kumho is excellent tire and I highly recommend this. True value for money as they are cheaper than competitors (Michelin, Continental, etc) but offer same quality and driving characteristics.
I mostly drive city traffic and motorway in mixed conditions sun or rain.
- BMW E39 540i
- 265/35 R18
- 1,000 miles
- Audi S3
- 225/40 R18
- 7,000 miles
Do not get the non 'S' variant - was fitted by accident at the tire shop, had to return them within 48h, they have terrible grip.
Which tires do you drive?
Researching the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Porsche 718 GTS
- 275/35 R20
- 850 miles
Most of the 800 miles have been in wet/damp or drying conditions.
Tread depth shocked me as they are down to 4mm already.
I have no complaints about the grip, they have excellent traction in wet conditions so I have no doubt the same applies to dry.
I can’t comment on steering feel etc as they are only on the rears.
- Ford Mustang
- 275/35 R20
- 4,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Since I previously had 19" rims, I had to look for new tires. The Kumho Ecsta Sport S came out this year and piqued my interest, especially since Kumho promised many improvements over the PS91.
Since the price was very reasonable and the preliminary tests available at the time were all positive, I ultimately decided on the Kumhos.
What was noticable was the very stiff sidewall. I can almost put my entire weight (~90 kg) on the tire without it being pressed down.
Once it was fitted, I immediately noticed the very precise and direct steering response, and that the tire is relatively comfortable despite its 20-inch size and sporty design.
The grip level with this tire is very high, regardless of whether it is dry or wet, and it conveys confidence in the car at all times.
The noise level is unobtrusive, and even potholes are well filtered.
So, everything is great? There is one point where I am absolutely disappointed, and that is wear.
When new, the tire has a tread depth of 7.1 mm, and after approx. 6500 km (~4000 miles), despite mostly calm driving (no racetrack), there is only just 5 mm of tread left at the rear and approx. 5.2 mm at the front. Since I run the tires down to a maximum of 3.0 mm for safety reasons, this means that the tires would not even last 15,000 km (assuming linear wear). The Michelin Pilot Sport 4s lasted for around 40,000 km (~25,000 mls) and still had over 4 mm of tread left!
This is truly devastating. Even though they cost only half as much as Michelin tires, I would have liked to see a higher mileage.
I don't know yet whether I will buy these tires again. The tire itself is really great, but the wear ruins the overall impression.
I am not yet certain whether I would purchase this tire again. On the one hand, it is incredibly enjoyable and gives the Mustang a significantly more direct and enjoyable driving experience while maintaining a high level of driving safety. On the other hand, the wear is abnormally high, which is definitely something to consider. My decision will depend on which alternative tires are available on the market when these tires are worn out.
- Mercedes Benz s320 cdi
- 275/35 R19
- 7,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
245 40 19 at the front ps72 Sport and 275 35 19 sport s ps72.
These tires are amazing but when they are cold they do juggle the car from left to right vertically the suspension is working extremely hard because these tires are design for Precision cornering and the side wall is extremely hard but this is what I wanted, the reason behind is I did try before the Michelin PS4 acoustic on the set of 20 inch by eight and a half original Mercedes and unfortunately Michelin PS4 acoustic for a price of £1200 were disappointment, I spent a lot of money on the tires and I said to myself never again I will spend so much money on some branded tires which actually do not live to the hype, now these PS72 have outsmarted all the big brands and when I bought my four tires from ATS Euromaster in UK I spent with fitting £125 pounds each so that's that's a huge difference between spending 300 pounds each for a Michelin PS4 but that was a while ago since then I changed the other wheels to 19 inch then I went for a budget option of banoze tires, they were super soft and very comfy very good in wet however because the 275 35 and the way my S-Class is sitting on the airmatic was causing bulges on the inner side of the tire by the rim and I really dont want to end my life too early because of the tire blowout decided to swap it for something that is more reliable in terms of the sidewall because these tires and this profile, this low they tend to crack and cause bulges and they can burst so all in all in comparing to continental Sport contact five Sport contact 6 which I had a pleasure to drive in compared to Uniroyal 3 which was amazing tire but very soft going really quickly but with a right turning of the tires you could still squeeze 40,000 miles out of them so out of all these tires these are the most precise tires I ever had.
I can only compare them to the tires I had before so starting from Goodyear eagle F1 AS2 then Michelin PS4 continental Sport contact 5 then continental Sport contact Three Some budget tires I had some tires oh of course we cannot forget Pirelli p zero.
So after all this mileage I have done over the years these tires are just beating them all in one go there so these tires are perfect in dry perfect in wet amazing in wet amazing heading back home yesterday there was a huge amount of rain starting going around roundabout or starting from a junction no ESP no traction control on after giving it some revs so absolutely amazing grip breaking same story it's super nice and super precise and size for the back 275 35 19 is in a sport s brand so the thing is the car is very jerky from left to right in vertical position when so like your head your whole body is moving with the car the suspension if it's airmatic and set up for comfort mode it's still the tires they dont want to give in, is just the tires are like stiff but when they are warm after a couple of miles it's it's a less of an issue it's still there but not as much but when it comes to a cornering when it comes to changing lanes acceleration breaking absolutely amazing tires amazing the only drawback I mentioned above is that they are so stiff that your whole body is shaking together with the car because the the tires don't want to give up they just don't want to hand over you know like they don't want to give up they are just keeping the form you know and doesn't matter, but luckily for me after a couple of thousands of miles I did inspect the tires there is a almost no visible wear the Tires at the moment and because the size of the different is different to the back then I I can only swap them side from left to right that's it so not sure if that's even necessary but then let's see how it goes amazing tires amazing amazing Tires at the Unbelievable price low price of low of a budget tire with the where the premium brands failed to be the desire so I would buy this tire again even if it means that they are not as comfy as the budget tires which were just too soft probably over time probably they will get more comfy I'm not sure I'm not sure if this is the case I am not so sure but so far I'm very happy with.
I scored in five in a comfort category because of the jerking of the car left and right and that the suspension must work extremely hard to compensate the road imperfections so much because the previous tires and Tires before the previous ones and the tiles before that where just soft and they were really good in like extending the comfort of the airmatic system these tires are just yes not that comfy they're okay but you you win some you lose some I prefer to lose a bit of comfort however they are extremely quiet extremely quiet you don't hear them at all you don't hear them at all it's just that stiffness that's the only issue if you're if you want the tires that have extremely stiff and strong sidewall you go for these you will.
275 35 19 are sport s and sidewall is more hard than sport on the front.
- Jaguar F Type
- 295/30 R20
- 1,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
The only thing that is roughly the same is the noise level inside the vehicle.
In everything else that happens on the road, the Ecsta Sport S is superior by far.
Grip on both wet and dry roads, shorter braking distances, better acceleration, better steering and better feedback.
If you don't overdo it, this tire just doesn't want to slip.
I have the impression that I have a changed car.
Unbeatable price/performance ratio.
- BMW M4
- 295/30 R20
- 500 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Spirited
TBH im a Michelin fan, but at this price… it is one of the best tires. Sidewalls are good looking, almost Michelin satin like texture. They don’t look cheap.
(I was able to get the set of 4 for $700)
- Ford Focus ST250
- 235/40 R18
- 1,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Spirited
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tire
All tire testsThe latest Tire Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tires for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tires Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tires for 2026/27 →
Summer Tires
All Season Tires
Winter Tires
SUV and All Terrain Tires
Track Tires
Which tires do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tires.






