Hankook Ventus Evo vs Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
Ahead in each discipline
The Hankook Ventus Evo and the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 have met in one independent test so far, and the Ecsta Sport S PS72 finished ahead. The Ecsta Sport S PS72 was stronger in dry, wet and comfort.
Performance profile
6 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Ventus Evo
Not ahead on any measurement here
Ecsta Sport S PS72
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 98%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Ventus Evo
Ecsta Sport S PS72
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Ventus Evo
Ecsta Sport S PS72
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the Ecsta Sport S PS72 83% from 9. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | Ventus Evo | Gap | Ecsta Sport S PS72 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Ecsta Sport S PS72 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 114 | 4% | 110 |
| Dry Handling s | 87.62 | 0.7% | 86.98 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 13.5 | = | 13.5 |
| Wet Ecsta Sport S PS72 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 75 | 1.3% | 74 |
| Comfort Ecsta Sport S PS72 ahead | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 6.6 | 1.5% | 6.7 |
| Noise dB | 63.2 | 1 dB | 62.2 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Ventus Evo | Field | Ecsta Sport S PS72 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 AutoView Sports Tire Test | P4 of 5 | P3 of 5 |
Ventus Evo vs Ecsta Sport S PS72: your questions
Is the Hankook Ventus Evo or the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 the better tire?
The Hankook Ventus Evo and the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 have met in one independent test so far, and the Ecsta Sport S PS72 finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ventus Evo scores 9.4 and the Ecsta Sport S PS72 9.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Ventus Evo or the Ecsta Sport S PS72?
The Ecsta Sport S PS72 led 1 of the 1 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Ecsta Sport S PS72 led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.9/10 for the Ventus Evo and 6.7/10 for the Ecsta Sport S PS72.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the Ecsta Sport S PS72 83% from 9. 78% of Ventus Evo owners would buy it again, against 78% for the Ecsta Sport S PS72.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Ventus Evo is made in 106 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the Ecsta Sport S PS72 in 60 (18 to 22 inch). 52 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Ventus Evo is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Ecsta Sport S PS72 A and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
6-2 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
1-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
2-3 in 6 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
3-0 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
3-0 in 3 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.