Hankook Ventus Evo vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 24
- TR Score
- 9.1/10
- Owners say
- 92% · 9
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Ventus Evo finished ahead 3 times and the Proxes Sport 2 not once. The Ventus Evo stopped 8.8% shorter in the wet; the Proxes Sport 2 resisted straight aquaplaning at a 3.2% higher speed.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Hankook Ventus Evo for the vast majority of drivers: it's the clear all-round winner with stronger wet safety (braking and handling), excellent dry performance, and a much better wear/value proposition. Consider the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 mainly if your top priority is aquaplaning resistance on high-speed, water-prone motorways-and you're willing to trade shorter wet braking distances and significantly shorter expected tread life to get it.
Where the Ventus Evo is stronger
- Consistently class-leading braking: ~5% shorter dry braking (32.8 m vs 34.6 m) and ~8-9% shorter wet braking across tests (e.g., 42.1 m vs 46.1 m; 27.0 m vs 29.5 m)
- Best-in-comparison wet dynamics: faster wet handling and wet circle results in both multi-discipline tests (e.g., 83.6 vs 81.8 km/h; 14.51 s vs 15.29 s)
- Strong efficiency and ownership case: lower rolling resistance (7.69 vs 8.61 kg/t in Autobild) plus clearly better value metrics (11.01 vs 16.4 price/1000) and much higher projected wear (56,310 vs 38,420 km)
Where the Proxes Sport 2 is stronger
- Aquaplaning specialist in these results: best/near-best straight aquaplaning and strong lateral aquaplaning grip (e.g., 94.9 vs 90.4 km/h; 3.51 vs 3.4 m/s²)
- Competitive dry handling pace in at least one test (104.9 vs 104.4 km/h), with testers noting good comfort
- Generally acceptable dry braking for the segment (though consistently behind Hankook), making it usable for spirited dry-road driving
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Ventus Evo vs Proxes Sport 2 at a glance
| Category | Ventus Evo | Gap | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won3 shared tests | 3 | 0 | |
| Dry6 measurements | 5 | The Ventus Evo stopped 5.2% shorter in the dry (3 tests) | 1 |
| Wet12 measurements | 8 | The Ventus Evo stopped 8.8% shorter in the wet (3 tests) | 4 |
| Off road4 measurements | 4 | 0 | |
| Comfort3 measurements | 2 | 1 | |
| Value4 measurements | 4 | The Ventus Evo had 5.9% lower rolling resistance (2 tests) | 0 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.4/10 | The Ventus Evo by 0.3 | 9.1/10 |
| Owner rating24 and 9 reviews | 86% | The Proxes Sport 2 by 6 points | 92% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 78% | The Proxes Sport 2 by 22 points | 100% |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | +2.1% | The Ventus Evo was dearer in 1 of 2 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 106 | 67 sizes made in both | 113 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Ventus Evo | Field | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Summer SUV Tire Test | P1 of 9 | P6 of 9 | |
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test | P1 of 20 | P17 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P2 of 50 | P16 of 50 |
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Ventus Evo
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 9 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Ventus Evo
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Ventus Evo
Not ahead in any category
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Ventus Evo | Gap | Proxes Sport 2 | Wins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 108 | 5.2% | 114 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 64 | 0.2% | 63.9 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 14.9% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 130 | 8.8% | 143 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 53.7 | 2.6% | 52.3 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 45% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 17.31 | 4% | 18 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 55.6 | 3.2% | 57.4 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 9.7 | 2% | 10 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 39.3 | 0.8% | 39 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 2,572 | 10.2% | 2,335 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 1,911 | 0.2% | 1,908 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 838 | 48.3% | 565 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 9.6% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 71.2 | 0 dB | 71.15 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 34,989 | 46.6% | 23,873 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 7.92 | 5.9% | 8.43 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 1,470 | 15.2% | 1,734 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ventus Evo scores 9.4 and the Proxes Sport 2 9.1 out of 10.
| Ventus Evo | Category | Proxes Sport 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | Dry | 92 | ||
| 99 | Wet | 81 | ||
| 50 | Comfort | 48 | ||
| 47 | Value | 14 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Ventus Evo | Category | Proxes Sport 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.3 | Dry Grip | 9.4 | ||
| 9.2 | Wet Grip | 9.3 | ||
| 8.3 | Road Feedback | 9 | ||
| 9 | Handling | 9.4 | ||
| 7.8 | Wear | 8.8 | ||
| 7.9 | Comfort | 8.5 | ||
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Hankook Ventus Evo
- 86%from 24 reviews
- 78%would buy again
- 106,316 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Hankook Ventus Evo very highly overall, with most praising strong dry and wet grip that inspires confidence. A clear majority also highlight low road noise and a comfortable, compliant ride for an everyday performance tire. The main drawback is steering feel: around one in three owners say it lacks initial feedback or sharpness versus premium rivals, even if outright grip remains strong.
- Very strong dry grip
- Very strong wet grip
- Generally quiet at speed
- Comfortable, compliant ride
- Steering feel lacks feedback/initial bite for some drivers
- Can be a bit noisy on certain surfaces or at particular speeds
- Ride can feel slightly firm on low-profile fitments
Summarised by AI from 21 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 24 Ventus Evo reviewsI bought set of these in SUV version to replace OEM worn-out Bridgestone Dueller tires. The Hankooks were one of few options available in size for Lexus RX and the price was very good. Obviously, they are sport-biased, not intended for a comfortable relaxed SUV. Their grip both in dry and wet is perfect, steering precise. But, they are not the choice for maximum comfort and silence. Winter set (Conti 870P) in the same size are significantly quieter and more comfortable. However, these tires are a smart choice- good price, peak safety and also good wear- after 20000km stil about 4-5mm. I would buy them again, but not for RX.
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
- 92%from 9 reviews
- 100%would buy again
- 88,100 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 delivers standout performance for the price, with consistently strong dry and wet grip, high confidence at speed, and sharp, predictable handling/steering response. Many comparisons against premium competitors (Michelin/Goodyear/Continental/Bridgestone) describe the Toyo as matching or exceeding them in real-world traction and stability while offering excellent value. Wear/longevity feedback is generally very positive where reported, with several users noting robust tread life. A smaller number of drivers mention trade-offs such as limited rim-protection and a sport-tire firmness (and occasional noise) depending on vehicle setup.
- Strong dry grip and traction
- Excellent wet grip and confidence in the rain
- Sharp handling, steering response, and stability at speed
- Predictable behavior under hard braking/cornering
Summarised by AI from 9 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 9 Proxes Sport 2 reviewsI have had these tires on my Audi TT 2.0 TFSI Quattro for a year and a half now and coming from an avid PS4S user I must say I'm shocked at how good these are for the money! They were about £70 per corner cheaper than the PS4S' for the TT in 255/35/19 so initially I was sceptical but I am amazing at the handling, dry AND wet grip they provide and the longevity of the tires! I have covered a good mix of country roads, motorways and long trips across Europe in the year and a half I have had these on and they have never missed a beat! I'm so confident in the wet, even when driving very "spiritedly"! Granted they aren't as comfortable as a BluEarth GT AE51 for example but the car is lowered on coil overs so its not all the tires fault. 10/10 would defiantly purchase again and recommend to others.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 106 sizes of the Ventus Evo and 113 of the Proxes Sport 2, 67 of them made in both.
| Category | Ventus Evo | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 106 sizes, 17 to 22 inch | 113 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 67 sizes 205/45 R17215/45 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17245/45 R17215/40 R18215/45 R18225/40 R18225/45 R18235/40 R18235/45 R18and 55 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A97%B3% | A100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C83%A10%B7%D1% | C72%D28% |
| EU label noise | 68-73 dB B76%A24% | 71-72 dB B80%A20% |
| Replaced | Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 (2021) | - |
| Awards | Winner: Performance Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2026/27) Winner: Performance Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2025) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Ventus Evo was the dearer tire in 1 of the 2 tests that listed prices, by 2.1% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Hankook's Ventus Evo and Toyo's Proxes Sport 2 sit in the same broad space-modern, road-focused summer performance tires-but the shared test data shows they pursue performance in noticeably different ways. Across three independent 2026 tests (including a large 20-tire Autobild group test and a 50-tire braking shootout), the Ventus Evo repeatedly scores at the very top of the field, while the Proxes Sport 2 tends to land mid-pack to lower-pack overall despite showing a few standout traits.
The headline is that Hankook's new Ventus Evo behaves like a true “complete package” tire: it combines elite wet grip and consistently shorter braking with strong dry pace, plus unusually strong multi-surface traction results in the SUV-focused test. The Toyo counters with strong aquaplaning reserves (both straight-line and lateral) and respectable dry handling speed, but it gives away meaningful distance in wet braking and-critically for many buyers-its projected wear/value metrics are significantly weaker in the Autobild data.
Conclusion
On the road, the Ventus Evo is the safer, faster, and more rounded tire in these shared results. It wins all three overall comparisons and dominates the most safety-critical metric: braking. Depending on the test, Hankook stops roughly 5% shorter in the dry (32.8 m vs 34.6 m) and around 8-9% shorter in the wet (e.g., 42.1 m vs 46.1 m; 27.0 m vs 29.5 m). It also carries strong wet cornering/handling advantages (e.g., wet handling 83.6 vs 81.8 km/h; wet circle 14.51 s vs 15.29 s) that translate to more confidence and stability when the road is greasy.
The Proxes Sport 2's best argument is aquaplaning resistance: it is consistently better in straight aquaplaning (e.g., 94.9 vs 90.4 km/h) and slightly better in lateral/curved aquaplaning. If your priority is high-speed motorway standing-water stability, that matters. But the Toyo's weaker wet braking and especially its much shorter projected wear in Autobild (38,420 km vs 56,310 km) undermine its overall value and everyday usability. The practical takeaway: unless your driving is heavily biased toward deep-water aquaplaning resistance, the Hankook delivers the more complete performance tire with stronger safety margins and markedly better cost-per-kilometer.
Ventus Evo vs Proxes Sport 2: your questions
Is the Hankook Ventus Evo or the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 the better tire?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Ventus Evo finished ahead 3 times and the Proxes Sport 2 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ventus Evo scores 9.4 and the Proxes Sport 2 9.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Ventus Evo or the Proxes Sport 2?
The Ventus Evo led 8 of the 12 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 8.8% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Ventus Evo led 5 of the 6 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.2% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Ventus Evo had 5.9% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.8/10 for the Ventus Evo and 8.8/10 for the Proxes Sport 2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.9/10 for the Ventus Evo and 8.5/10 for the Proxes Sport 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. 78% of Ventus Evo owners would buy it again, against 100% for the Proxes Sport 2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Ventus Evo was the dearer tire in 1 of them, by 2.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Ventus Evo is made in 106 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the Proxes Sport 2 in 113 (17 to 22 inch). 67 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Ventus Evo is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Proxes Sport 2 A and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
6-2 in 8 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
2-3 in 6 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
5-0 in 5 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion