Menu

Test source Auto Bild

2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test

Overall test winnerHankook Ventus Evo

Auto Bild's 2026 summer tire test covers the 245/45 R19 size - a common fitment on upper-mid-size cars including the BMW 5 Series, Audi A6 and Mercedes S-Class - and puts 50 tires through an initial qualifying round before selecting the 20…

Data analyzed and reviewed byJonathan Benson
12 min read
Tire shortlist Read the test
2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
245/45 R19 / 2026 View full image
2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
Tires tested
20
Tested size
245/45 R19
Disciplines
15

At a glance

Tire shortlist

20 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Hankook Ventus Evo

+The Hankook Ventus Evo has the best handling in the test on both dry and wet roads: fastest round the dry and wet handling tracks and the wet circle, and it shares the top subjective rating on both surfaces. It stops shortest in the dry by a clear margin and second shortest in the wet, shares the top comfort rating and is the cheapest tire per kilometer.

−Aquaplaning is its weaker side, in the bottom six in a straight line and below average in bends.

24 owner reviews Test Results
2nd

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

+The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has the highest predicted mileage in the test and is the best tire for aquaplaning in bends and second best in a straight line. It is also the second-quietest tire, shares the top comfort rating and is fourth on the wet circle.

−It is one of the dearer tires to buy, its dry braking is only mid-field, and it is mid-pack round the wet handling track.

229 owner reviews Test Results
3rd

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

+The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 shares the best subjective dry handling rating and is second fastest through the dry handling course, third on the wet handling track and third for aquaplaning in bends. Its predicted mileage is the second highest in the test and its abrasion the fifth lowest.

−It is the second-loudest tire on the noise test and one of the most expensive to buy, which makes it one of the dearer tires per kilometer. Braking is only mid-field, wet and dry.

138 owner reviews Test Results
Joint4th

Giti GitiSport S2+

+The Giti GitiSport S2 plus shares fourth place overall. It is third for straight-line aquaplaning, fourth in bends, joint fourth on the wet handling track and fifth for wet braking, and it is good value per kilometer.

−Ride comfort shares the lowest rating, rolling resistance is the third highest and its abrasion is above average.

Read owner reviews Test Results
Joint4th

Pirelli Cinturato C3

+The Pirelli Cinturato C3 is one of the best tires in the wet, second fastest round the wet handling track and third on the wet circle, and it shares the top subjective wet rating. It also has the fourth-lowest abrasion and the sixth-lowest rolling resistance.

−It is the loudest tire in the test, its subjective dry handling rating is only mid-field, and it is one of the more expensive tires per kilometer.

21 owner reviews Test Results
Joint6th

Continental PremiumContact 7

+The Continental PremiumContact 7 has the third-highest predicted mileage and the second-lowest abrasion in the test, safe and predictable handling in the wet, and braking in the top six on both wet and dry roads.

−It is the most expensive tire to buy and the most expensive per kilometer. Dry handling is in the bottom six on the clock and below average subjectively, and it is one of the louder tires.

72 owner reviews Test Results
Joint6th

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

+The Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is strong in the wet: second on the wet circle, fourth for wet braking and joint fourth on the wet handling track, and it shares the top subjective wet rating. It is also good value per kilometer.

−It is the third-loudest tire in the test, its aquaplaning resistance is below average both straight and in bends, and predicted mileage is below average.

42 owner reviews Test Results
8th

GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO

+The GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO is the second-cheapest tire per kilometer in the test, second best for aquaplaning in bends and one of the quieter tires, with the sixth-fastest wet handling lap.

−Dry braking is in the bottom five and ride comfort shares the lowest rating. Rolling resistance and abrasion are both on the high side.

Read owner reviews Test Results
Joint9th

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

+The Nexen N'Fera Sport SU2 is the quietest tire in the test and brakes well on both surfaces, joint second shortest in the dry and third in the wet. It is also the fourth-cheapest tire per kilometer.

−Turn-in is slightly delayed and it is in the bottom five through the dry handling course. Wet handling is only mid-field and its abrasion is high.

18 owner reviews Test Results
Joint9th

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

+The Vredestein Ultrac Pro is a dynamic tire on dry roads, third fastest through the dry handling course with a top-three subjective rating, and fifth for dry braking. It is also the third-quietest tire, fourth for rolling resistance and fifth on the wet circle.

−Predicted mileage is in the bottom four, wet braking is in the bottom six and it is weak against aquaplaning, especially in bends.

7 owner reviews Test Results
Joint11th

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

+The Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo shares the top comfort rating, has the sixth-highest predicted mileage and is sixth for aquaplaning in bends, with confident wet handling.

−It is one of the most expensive tires to buy and to run, one of the louder tires, and its rolling resistance is on the high side. Braking is below average, wet and dry.

16 owner reviews Test Results
Joint11th

Nokian Powerproof 2

+The Nokian Powerproof 2 has the second-lowest rolling resistance in the test and the sixth-lowest abrasion, and it is one of the quieter tires. Its dry braking and dry handling are around the middle of the field.

−Wet roads are its weak side: it is last for aquaplaning in bends, third from last in a straight line, and in the bottom five round the wet handling track.

1 owner review Test Results
Joint13th

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

+The Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 shares the top comfort rating, is fourth for straight-line aquaplaning and eighth in bends.

−It shares the longest dry braking distance in the test and its wet braking is in the bottom five. Predicted mileage is below average, which makes it one of the more expensive tires per kilometer.

95 owner reviews Test Results
Joint13th

Falken Azenis FK520

+The Falken Azenis FK520 has the fifth-highest predicted mileage and the third-lowest abrasion, which makes it reasonable value per kilometer, and its wet braking is mid-field.

−Turn-in feels spongy: it is the slowest tire through the dry handling course and shares the lowest subjective dry handling rating. It also shares the longest dry stop, and its wet handling and wet circle times are in the bottom five.

58 owner reviews Test Results
Joint13th

Yokohama Advan Sport V107

+The Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is strong on dry roads, fourth fastest through the dry handling course with a top-three subjective rating and fourth for dry braking. It is also fifth for straight-line aquaplaning.

−It has the longest wet braking distance in the test and the highest rolling resistance, its abrasion is the third highest and it is one of the louder tires.

25 owner reviews Test Results
16th

Linglong Sport Master

+The Linglong Sport Master stops shortest in the wet by a wide margin and joint second shortest in the dry, and it is the cheapest tire in the test to buy.

−It has the lowest predicted mileage and the highest abrasion in the test, and its rolling resistance is the second highest. Dry handling is in the bottom four, both on the clock and in the subjective rating.

14 owner reviews Test Results
17th

Toyo Proxes Sport 2

+The Toyo Proxes Sport 2 is the best tire for straight-line aquaplaning and seventh in bends. It is also fifth through the dry handling course with a top-three subjective rating, and one of the quieter tires.

−Predicted mileage is the second lowest, which makes it the second most expensive tire per kilometer. Wet braking and both wet handling times are in the bottom six.

9 owner reviews Test Results
18th

Maxxis Victra Sport 6

+The Maxxis Victra Sport 6 handles well on dry roads, sixth fastest through the dry handling course with a top-three subjective rating, and it is one of the cheaper tires to buy.

−Wet handling feels spongy: it is slowest on the wet circle, third from last round the wet handling track and shares the lowest subjective wet rating. It is last for straight-line aquaplaning, its abrasion is the second highest and ride comfort shares the lowest rating.

Read owner reviews Test Results
Joint19th

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

+The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 has the lowest rolling resistance and the lowest abrasion in the test, with predicted mileage and cost per kilometer in the top half.

−Grip is limited in the wet: it is slowest round the wet handling track, third longest for wet braking and in the bottom four for aquaplaning both straight and in bends. Dry handling is weak too, second slowest and sharing the lowest subjective rating.

6 owner reviews Test Results
Joint19th

Sava Intensa UHP 2

+The Sava Intensa UHP 2 is the third-cheapest tire per kilometer in the test, has the third-lowest rolling resistance and is fifth for aquaplaning in bends.

−Handling is imprecise on both wet and dry roads, with lap times and subjective ratings at or near the bottom, and its wet braking distance is the second longest. Dry braking is in the bottom three.

57 owner reviews Test Results

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test · 245/45 R19

TireHankook Ventus EvoGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Michelin Pilot Sport 5Giti GitiSport S2+Pirelli Cinturato C3Continental PremiumContact 7Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72GT Radial SportActive 2 EVONexen N Fera Sport SU2Vredestein Ultrac ProBridgestone Potenza Sport EvoNokian Powerproof 2Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2Falken Azenis FK520Yokohama Advan Sport V107Linglong Sport MasterToyo Proxes Sport 2Maxxis Victra Sport 6Kleber Dynaxer HP5Sava Intensa UHP 2
Position1st2nd3rdJoint 4thJoint 4thJoint 6thJoint 6th8thJoint 9thJoint 9thJoint 11thJoint 11thJoint 13thJoint 13thJoint 13th16th17th18thJoint 19thJoint 19th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry100%95.5%97.8%95.7%94.9%94.1%95.4%94.6%94.6%96.7%94%95.4%93%91.2%96.8%93.9%96.1%95.4%91.8%91.5%
Wet96.4%96.7%95.6%96.1%96.1%95.1%96%95.1%94.5%93.3%94.6%92.3%93%93.1%91.5%97%91.4%89.2%89%89.4%
Comfort99.2%99.9%93.1%91%92.6%94.2%93.3%91.5%95.6%95.3%97.8%94.9%98.8%94.7%93.9%94.4%95.1%91%94.8%94.3%
Value87.8%87.3%83.8%76.9%80.6%81.7%78.9%78.6%78.5%74.2%75.2%80.8%71.3%84.8%69.5%67.2%67.6%70.9%91.3%82.8%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results		Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Auto Bild's 2026 summer tire test covers the 245/45 R19 size - a common fitment on upper-mid-size cars including the BMW 5 Series, Audi A6 and Mercedes S-Class - and has put 50 tires through an initial qualifying round (linked in the tire test section) before selecting the 20 shortest-stopping for the full test!

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph

The results broadly confirm that the established premium brands remain the safest choice, with Hankook, Goodyear, Michelin and Pirelli all earning the top "exemplary" rating. The standout result, however, is Giti - a brand not typically associated with the premium tier - which scores highly enough across wet and dry tests to join that group, something the testers note in the article. This is a huge step forward for Giti, it's exciting to see how they perform in other tests and other categories across the coming months.

At the other end of the price scale, the Linglong Sport Master produces the single most impressive individual result of the entire test, recording the shortest wet braking distance of all fifty original candidates and the only sub-40-meter stop from 62 mph in the wet. Despite that, it finishes sixteenth overall, held back by the lowest projected mileage in the finalist group - meaning buyers drawn in by its low purchase price and strong safety performance will find themselves replacing it sooner than almost any other tire here, meaning it worked out to be more expensive than many of top tyers in this test.

Dry

Hankook sets the benchmark in dry braking with the shortest stopping distance in the test, with Linglong and Nexen close behind - an impressive result given both are significantly cheaper than most rivals. The Falken and Sava are at the back of the field, though the gap between first and last is just 8 feet.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
1Hankook Ventus Evo
 108 ft Best 0 mph
2Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 111 ft +3 ft 14 mph
2Linglong Sport Master
 111 ft +3 ft 14 mph
4Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 112 ft +4 ft 16 mph
5Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 112 ft +4 ft 16 mph
6Giti GitiSport S2+
 113 ft +5 ft 17 mph
6Pirelli Cinturato C3
 113 ft +5 ft 17 mph
6Continental PremiumContact 7
 113 ft +5 ft 17 mph
9Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 113 ft +5 ft 17 mph
9Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 113 ft +5 ft 17 mph
9Nokian Powerproof 2
 113 ft +5 ft 17 mph
12Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 113 ft +5 ft 18 mph
12Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 113 ft +5 ft 18 mph
14Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 114 ft +6 ft 18 mph
15Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 115 ft +7 ft 20 mph
16GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 115 ft +7 ft 20 mph
17Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 115 ft +7 ft 20 mph
18Sava Intensa UHP 2
 115 ft +7 ft 21 mph
19Falken Azenis FK520
 116 ft +8 ft 21 mph
19Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 116 ft +8 ft 21 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (8 ft ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Hankook Ventus Evo had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Hankook leads dry handling ahead of Michelin and Vredestein, with the top half of the field separated by a relatively narrow margin. Falken and Sava fall furthest behind, consistent with their weaker dry braking results - the two dry tests broadly agree on the order.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Position / TireResultGap to best
1Hankook Ventus Evo
 63.1 mph Best
2Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 62.9 mph -0.2 mph
3Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 62.8 mph -0.3 mph
4Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 62.6 mph -0.5 mph
5Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 62.6 mph -0.5 mph
6Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 62.5 mph -0.6 mph
7Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 62.4 mph -0.7 mph
8Giti GitiSport S2+
 62.3 mph -0.8 mph
9Nokian Powerproof 2
 62.2 mph -0.9 mph
10Pirelli Cinturato C3
 62.1 mph -1.0 mph
10Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 62.1 mph -1.0 mph
12GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 62.1 mph -1.0 mph
13Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 62.0 mph -1.1 mph
14Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 62.0 mph -1.1 mph
15Continental PremiumContact 7
 61.8 mph -1.3 mph
16Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 61.8 mph -1.3 mph
17Linglong Sport Master
 61.7 mph -1.4 mph
18Sava Intensa UHP 2
 61.5 mph -1.6 mph
19Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 61.5 mph -1.6 mph
20Falken Azenis FK520
 61.2 mph -1.9 mph

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

The subjective dry handling scores largely reflect the objective lap times, with Hankook and Michelin rated highest. Falken, Kleber and Sava receive the lowest ratings, with the test team noting imprecise or vague behavior at the limit.

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Position / TireResultGap to best
1Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 10 Points Best
1Hankook Ventus Evo
 10 Points Best
3Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 8.7 Points -1.30 Points
3Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 8.7 Points -1.30 Points
3Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 8.7 Points -1.30 Points
3Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 8.7 Points -1.30 Points
7Giti GitiSport S2+
 8 Points -2.00 Points
7GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 8 Points -2.00 Points
7Nokian Powerproof 2
 8 Points -2.00 Points
7Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 8 Points -2.00 Points
7Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 8 Points -2.00 Points
12Pirelli Cinturato C3
 7.3 Points -2.70 Points
13Continental PremiumContact 7
 6.7 Points -3.30 Points
13Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 6.7 Points -3.30 Points
13Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 6.7 Points -3.30 Points
13Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 6.7 Points -3.30 Points
17Linglong Sport Master
 6 Points -4.00 Points
18Falken Azenis FK520
 5.3 Points -4.70 Points
18Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 5.3 Points -4.70 Points
18Sava Intensa UHP 2
 5.3 Points -4.70 Points

The difference between best and worst was 47% (4.7 Points).

Wet

Linglong produces the standout result in wet braking - the only tire in the test to stop under 131 feet from 62 mph - despite being the cheapest finalist. Yokohama and Sava are at the back, with the full spread between best and worst reaching nearly 30 feet, a significant gap in a real-world emergency stop.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
1Linglong Sport Master
 129 ft Best 0 mph
2Hankook Ventus Evo
 138 ft +9 ft 21 mph
3Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 139 ft +10 ft 21 mph
4Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 139 ft +10 ft 22 mph
5Giti GitiSport S2+
 139 ft +10 ft 22 mph
6Continental PremiumContact 7
 140 ft +11 ft 23 mph
7Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 141 ft +12 ft 23 mph
8Pirelli Cinturato C3
 141 ft +12 ft 23 mph
9Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 142 ft +13 ft 24 mph
10Falken Azenis FK520
 142 ft +13 ft 25 mph
11GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 143 ft +14 ft 25 mph
12Nokian Powerproof 2
 144 ft +15 ft 26 mph
13Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 145 ft +16 ft 26 mph
14Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 147 ft +18 ft 28 mph
15Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 148 ft +19 ft 28 mph
16Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 149 ft +20 ft 30 mph
17Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 151 ft +22 ft 31 mph
18Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 153 ft +24 ft 32 mph
19Sava Intensa UHP 2
 155 ft +26 ft 33 mph
20Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 157 ft +28 ft 34 mph

The difference between best and worst was 21.9% (28 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 would still be travelling at 34 mph when the Linglong Sport Master had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Hankook leads wet handling ahead of Pirelli, which the test team identified as the strongest wet specialist in terms of lateral grip and handling response. Kleber and Maxxis are at the back, consistent with their longer wet braking distances - both show a pattern of reduced wet-weather ability across multiple tests.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Position / TireResultGap to best
1Hankook Ventus Evo
 51.9 mph Best
2Pirelli Cinturato C3
 51.8 mph -0.1 mph
3Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 51.4 mph -0.5 mph
4Giti GitiSport S2+
 51.3 mph -0.6 mph
4Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 51.3 mph -0.6 mph
6GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 51.3 mph -0.6 mph
7Linglong Sport Master
 51.2 mph -0.7 mph
7Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 51.2 mph -0.7 mph
9Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 51.1 mph -0.8 mph
9Continental PremiumContact 7
 51.1 mph -0.8 mph
11Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 51.1 mph -0.8 mph
11Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 51.1 mph -0.8 mph
13Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 51.0 mph -0.9 mph
13Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 51.0 mph -0.9 mph
15Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 50.8 mph -1.1 mph
16Nokian Powerproof 2
 50.8 mph -1.1 mph
17Falken Azenis FK520
 50.5 mph -1.4 mph
18Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 50.1 mph -1.8 mph
19Sava Intensa UHP 2
 50.1 mph -1.8 mph
20Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 49.3 mph -2.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5% (2.6 mph).

Subjective wet handling scores reflect the objective results closely, with Hankook and Pirelli rated highest. Maxxis and Sava receive the lowest ratings, with the test team specifically noting vague and imprecise wet behavior for both - a concern given wet tests account for 40% of the overall result.

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Position / TireResultGap to best
1Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 8.7 Points Best
1Hankook Ventus Evo
 8.7 Points Best
1Pirelli Cinturato C3
 8.7 Points Best
4Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 8 Points -0.70 Points
4Giti GitiSport S2+
 8 Points -0.70 Points
4Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 8 Points -0.70 Points
4Continental PremiumContact 7
 8 Points -0.70 Points
4Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 8 Points -0.70 Points
4Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 8 Points -0.70 Points
4Linglong Sport Master
 8 Points -0.70 Points
11Falken Azenis FK520
 7.3 Points -1.40 Points
11Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 7.3 Points -1.40 Points
11Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 7.3 Points -1.40 Points
11Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 7.3 Points -1.40 Points
11Nokian Powerproof 2
 7.3 Points -1.40 Points
11GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 7.3 Points -1.40 Points
17Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 6 Points -2.70 Points
17Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 6 Points -2.70 Points
19Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 5.3 Points -3.40 Points
19Sava Intensa UHP 2
 5.3 Points -3.40 Points

The difference between best and worst was 39.1% (3.4 Points).

Toyo and Goodyear lead straight aquaplaning resistance, both able to sustain higher speeds before losing contact than any other tire in the test. Maxxis and Nokian are at the back of the field, though notably Toyo's strong aquaplaning result does not carry over into wet handling, where it finishes in the lower half.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Position / TireResultGap to best
1Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 59.0 mph Best
2Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 58.8 mph -0.2 mph
3Giti GitiSport S2+
 58.7 mph -0.3 mph
4Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 57.9 mph -1.1 mph
5Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 57.8 mph -1.2 mph
6Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 57.7 mph -1.3 mph
6Pirelli Cinturato C3
 57.7 mph -1.3 mph
8Linglong Sport Master
 57.7 mph -1.3 mph
8GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 57.7 mph -1.3 mph
10Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 57.2 mph -1.8 mph
11Falken Azenis FK520
 56.9 mph -2.1 mph
12Continental PremiumContact 7
 56.9 mph -2.1 mph
13Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 56.6 mph -2.4 mph
14Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 56.5 mph -2.5 mph
15Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 56.2 mph -2.8 mph
15Hankook Ventus Evo
 56.2 mph -2.8 mph
15Sava Intensa UHP 2
 56.2 mph -2.8 mph
18Nokian Powerproof 2
 55.7 mph -3.3 mph
19Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 55.5 mph -3.5 mph
20Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 55.4 mph -3.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6% (3.6 mph).

Comfort

Hankook, Goodyear, Bridgestone and Dunlop receive the highest rolling comfort ratings from the test team. Giti, GT Radial and Maxxis are rated lowest - none of these three score particularly poorly in performance tests, so the comfort result is worth noting for buyers who prioritize ride quality on poorer road surfaces.

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Position / TireResultGap to best
1Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 8 Points Best
1Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 8 Points Best
1Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 8 Points Best
1Hankook Ventus Evo
 8 Points Best
5Sava Intensa UHP 2
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Nokian Powerproof 2
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Pirelli Cinturato C3
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Continental PremiumContact 7
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Falken Azenis FK520
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Linglong Sport Master
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
5Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 7.3 Points -0.70 Points
18Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 6.7 Points -1.30 Points
18GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 6.7 Points -1.30 Points
18Giti GitiSport S2+
 6.7 Points -1.30 Points

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (1.3 Points).

Goodyear and Nexen are the quietest tires in the test, with Pirelli at the opposite end - the loudest of all finalists by a clear margin. The noise ranking does not follow the performance ranking closely, and several of the higher-performing tires sit in the noisier half of the field.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Position / TireResultGap to best
1Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 70.6 dB Best
2Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 70.8 dB +0.20 dB
3Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 71 dB +0.40 dB
4GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 71.1 dB +0.50 dB
5Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 71.3 dB +0.70 dB
6Nokian Powerproof 2
 71.7 dB +1.10 dB
7Giti GitiSport S2+
 71.8 dB +1.20 dB
7Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 71.8 dB +1.20 dB
7Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 71.8 dB +1.20 dB
7Hankook Ventus Evo
 71.8 dB +1.20 dB
11Falken Azenis FK520
 72 dB +1.40 dB
12Linglong Sport Master
 72.4 dB +1.80 dB
12Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 72.4 dB +1.80 dB
14Sava Intensa UHP 2
 72.5 dB +1.90 dB
15Continental PremiumContact 7
 72.7 dB +2.10 dB
16Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 73.1 dB +2.50 dB
17Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 73.8 dB +3.20 dB
18Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 74.1 dB +3.50 dB
19Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 74.3 dB +3.70 dB
20Pirelli Cinturato C3
 75.2 dB +4.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.5% (4.6 dB).

Value

Goodyear, Michelin and Continental have the best wear, but all three carry higher purchase prices. Linglong and Toyo project the shortest mileage, which is significant.

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Position / TireResultGap to best
1Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 39,662 miles Best
2Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 37,077 miles -2,585 miles
3Continental PremiumContact 7
 35,014 miles -4,648 miles
4Hankook Ventus Evo
 34,989 miles -4,673 miles
5Falken Azenis FK520
 32,361 miles -7,301 miles
6Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 32,224 miles -7,438 miles
7Pirelli Cinturato C3
 31,286 miles -8,376 miles
8Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 31,218 miles -8,444 miles
9Nokian Powerproof 2
 31,118 miles -8,544 miles
10Giti GitiSport S2+
 31,081 miles -8,581 miles
11GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 30,721 miles -8,941 miles
12Sava Intensa UHP 2
 30,155 miles -9,507 miles
13Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 29,969 miles -9,693 miles
14Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 29,708 miles -9,954 miles
15Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 28,353 miles -11,309 miles
16Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 27,850 miles -11,812 miles
17Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 26,160 miles -13,502 miles
18Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 24,650 miles -15,012 miles
19Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 23,873 miles -15,789 miles
20Linglong Sport Master
 22,102 miles -17,560 miles

The difference between best and worst was 44.3% (17,560 miles).

Hankook offers the best cost-per-km ratio in the test, combining competitive mileage with a mid-range purchase price. Continental is the most expensive per kilometer despite its high projected mileage, reflecting its high upfront cost. The results show that purchase price alone is a poor guide to running cost.

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
1Hankook Ventus Evo
 11.01 Price/1000 Best €26.22
2GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 11.12 Price/1000 +0.11 Price/1000 €33.11
3Sava Intensa UHP 2
 11.75 Price/1000 +0.74 Price/1000 €26.89
4Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 12.13 Price/1000 +1.12 Price/1000 €30.61
5Giti GitiSport S2+
 12.2 Price/1000 +1.19 Price/1000 €36.66
6Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 12.22 Price/1000 +1.21 Price/1000 €32.00
7Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 12.44 Price/1000 +1.43 Price/1000 €31.78
8Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 12.54 Price/1000 +1.53 Price/1000 €22.42
9Linglong Sport Master
 12.65 Price/1000 +1.64 Price/1000 €39.32
10Falken Azenis FK520
 12.86 Price/1000 +1.85 Price/1000 €29.49
11Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 14.03 Price/1000 +3.02 Price/1000 €46.89
12Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 14.12 Price/1000 +3.11 Price/1000 €34.54
13Nokian Powerproof 2
 15.18 Price/1000 +4.17 Price/1000 €31.83
14Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 15.2 Price/1000 +4.19 Price/1000 €33.38
15Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 15.42 Price/1000 +4.41 Price/1000 €34.98
16Pirelli Cinturato C3
 15.69 Price/1000 +4.68 Price/1000 €34.05
17Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 15.84 Price/1000 +4.83 Price/1000 €41.19
18Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 16.39 Price/1000 +5.38 Price/1000 €41.74
19Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 16.4 Price/1000 +5.39 Price/1000 €41.68
20Continental PremiumContact 7
 17.39 Price/1000 +6.38 Price/1000 €37.38

The difference between best and worst was 57.9% (6.38 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Kleber Dynaxer HP5) works out €612 cheaper than the most expensive (Yokohama Advan Sport V107).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2026 test; financing costs are excluded.

Kleber has the lowest rolling resistance of all twenty finalists - a meaningful result for fuel or energy costs over the life of the tire. Yokohama is the worst in this test by a notable margin, and its rolling resistance result is flagged by the test team as a primary concern, directly increasing running costs regardless of performance in other areas.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
1Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 6.67 kg/t Best $0
2Nokian Powerproof 2
 7.48 kg/t +0.81 kg/t $36
3Sava Intensa UHP 2
 7.56 kg/t +0.89 kg/t $39
4Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 7.65 kg/t +0.98 kg/t $43
5Hankook Ventus Evo
 7.69 kg/t +1.02 kg/t $45
6Pirelli Cinturato C3
 7.7 kg/t +1.03 kg/t $45
7Falken Azenis FK520
 7.71 kg/t +1.04 kg/t $46
8Continental PremiumContact 7
 7.83 kg/t +1.16 kg/t $51
9Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 7.97 kg/t +1.30 kg/t $57
10Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 8.04 kg/t +1.37 kg/t $60
11Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 8.08 kg/t +1.41 kg/t $62
12Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 8.15 kg/t +1.48 kg/t $65
13Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 8.33 kg/t +1.66 kg/t $73
14Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 8.61 kg/t +1.94 kg/t $85
15GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 8.7 kg/t +2.03 kg/t $89
16Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 8.74 kg/t +2.07 kg/t $91
16Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 8.74 kg/t +2.07 kg/t $91
18Giti GitiSport S2+
 8.99 kg/t +2.32 kg/t $102
19Linglong Sport Master
 9.15 kg/t +2.48 kg/t $109
20Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 10.1 kg/t +3.43 kg/t $151

The difference between best and worst was 51.4% (3.43 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 uses about 42 gal ($151) more fuel than the Kleber Dynaxer HP5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Kleber again leads in tread abrasion after 2,485 miles, losing the least material of any tire in the test - consistent with its low rolling resistance and strong mileage projection. Linglong loses the most material, reinforcing the pattern seen in projected mileage. Continental and Falken also show low abrasion, supporting their higher mileage estimates.

Abrasion

Total weight loss after wear test in grams

Lower is better ↓
Position / TireResultGap to best
1Kleber Dynaxer HP5
 1122 g Best
2Continental PremiumContact 7
 1302 g +180.00 g
3Falken Azenis FK520
 1305 g +183.00 g
4Pirelli Cinturato C3
 1320 g +198.00 g
5Michelin Pilot Sport 5
 1353 g +231.00 g
6Nokian Powerproof 2
 1386 g +264.00 g
7Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
 1455 g +333.00 g
8Hankook Ventus Evo
 1470 g +348.00 g
9Sava Intensa UHP 2
 1521 g +399.00 g
10Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
 1533 g +411.00 g
11Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
 1605 g +483.00 g
12Vredestein Ultrac Pro
 1617 g +495.00 g
13Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
 1656 g +534.00 g
14Giti GitiSport S2+
 1713 g +591.00 g
15Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
 1719 g +597.00 g
16Toyo Proxes Sport 2
 1734 g +612.00 g
17GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
 1791 g +669.00 g
18Yokohama Advan Sport V107
 1794 g +672.00 g
19Maxxis Victra Sport 6
 1875 g +753.00 g
20Linglong Sport Master
 2022 g +900.00 g

The difference between best and worst was 80.2% (900 g).

Results

Hankook takes the overall win on the back of leading performances in both dry tests, with Goodyear and Michelin close behind - the top three are all established premium brands, though Giti and Pirelli join them in the "exemplary" rating category

1st

Hankook Ventus Evo

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Hankook Ventus Evo
Auto Bild Test Winner / Exemplary Testsieger / vorbildlich
The Hankook Ventus evo takes first place overall, with the strongest dry handling score and the shortest dry braking distance in the test. Wet performance is also strong, with the fastest wet handling lap time and competitive braking. The tire offers a good cost-per-km ratio relative to its performance level. Rolling comfort is above average. The main limitation is that wet grip, while good, falls slightly short of its dry performance level.
Dry100%
Wet96.4%
Comfort99.2%
Value87.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 20108 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 2063.1 mphBest in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 2010 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 20138 ft+9 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 2051.9 mphBest in this discipline
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 208.7 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 2014.51 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better15th / 2056.2 mph-2.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 2011.2 ft/s²-1.8 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 208 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better7th / 2071.8 dB+1.20 dB
WearHigher is better4th / 2034,989 miles-4,673 miles
ValueLower is better1st / 2011.01 Price/1000Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 207.69 kg/t+1.02 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better8th / 201470 g+348.00 g
EU Label
C/A/70
Origin
Hungary
Weight
11.69 kgs
Price
620.00
2nd

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Auto Bild Eco Champion / Exemplary Eco-Meister / vorbildlich
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 finishes second overall and wins the "Green Tire" award, primarily on the strength of its projected mileage - by far the highest in the test at 39,662 miles. Performance across wet and dry tests is consistently high without leading in any single area. Rolling comfort is good, and pass-by noise is among the lowest recorded. The main drawback is a relatively high purchase price.
Dry95.5%
Wet96.7%
Comfort99.9%
Value87.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better12th / 20113 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 2062.4 mph-0.7 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 208 Points-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 20141 ft+12 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 2051.1 mph-0.8 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 208 Points-0.70 Points
Wet CircleLower is better4th / 2014.68 s+0.17 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 2058.8 mph-0.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 2013.0 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 208 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better2nd / 2070.8 dB+0.20 dB
WearHigher is better1st / 2039,662 milesBest in this discipline
ValueLower is better6th / 2012.22 Price/1000+1.21 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better13th / 208.33 kg/t+1.66 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better7th / 201455 g+333.00 g
EU Label
C/A/70
Origin
Germany
Weight
11.22 kgs
Price
780.00
3rd

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Auto Bild Exemplary vorbildlich
The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 takes third place with a strong dry handling score, equal to the Hankook. Wet performance is solid across braking and handling. Mileage is the second highest in the test, which helps offset the high purchase price over the tire's life. Pass-by noise is slightly elevated compared to the top finishers, and the purchase price is among the higher end of the field.
Dry97.8%
Wet95.6%
Comfort93.1%
Value83.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 20113 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 2062.9 mph-0.2 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 2010 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 20142 ft+13 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 2051.4 mph-0.5 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 208 Points-0.70 Points
Wet CircleLower is better9th / 2014.74 s+0.23 s
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 2057.2 mph-1.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 2012.2 ft/s²-0.8 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better19th / 2074.3 dB+3.70 dB
WearHigher is better2nd / 2037,077 miles-2,585 miles
ValueLower is better15th / 2015.42 Price/1000+4.41 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 207.97 kg/t+1.30 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better5th / 201353 g+231.00 g
EU Label
C/A/72
Origin
Germany
Weight
11.25 kgs
Price
920.00
Joint 4th

Giti GitiSport S2+

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Giti GitiSport S2+
Auto Bild Exemplary vorbildlich
The Giti GitiSport S2+ finishes fourth and is one of the more surprising results in the test. It delivers competent wet and dry performance across all tests without a clear weak area, and its purchase price is among the lower half of the finalists. Rolling resistance is slightly higher than average, which will have a small impact on fuel consumption. The result represents strong value relative to its performance level.
Dry95.7%
Wet96.1%
Comfort91%
Value76.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 20113 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 2062.3 mph-0.8 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 208 Points-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 20139 ft+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 2051.3 mph-0.6 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 208 Points-0.70 Points
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 2014.7 s+0.19 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 2058.7 mph-0.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 2011.8 ft/s²-1.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better18th / 206.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better7th / 2071.8 dB+1.20 dB
WearHigher is better10th / 2031,081 miles-8,581 miles
ValueLower is better5th / 2012.2 Price/1000+1.19 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better18th / 208.99 kg/t+2.32 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better14th / 201713 g+591.00 g
EU Label
C/A/70
Origin
China
Weight
12.15 kgs
Price
610.00
Joint 4th

Pirelli Cinturato C3

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Pirelli Cinturato C3
Auto Bild Exemplary vorbildlich
The Pirelli Cinturato C3 shares fourth place with an emphasis on wet performance - wet handling and lateral grip scores are among the best in the test. Dry braking is also competitive. Rolling comfort is acceptable. The notable weakness is pass-by noise, which is the highest recorded in the test. Rolling resistance is low, which benefits running costs.
Dry94.9%
Wet96.1%
Comfort92.6%
Value80.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 20113 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better10th / 2062.1 mph-1.0 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better12th / 207.3 Points-2.70 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 20141 ft+12 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 2051.8 mph-0.1 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 208.7 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 2014.64 s+0.13 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 2057.7 mph-1.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 2011.4 ft/s²-1.6 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better20th / 2075.2 dB+4.60 dB
WearHigher is better7th / 2031,286 miles-8,376 miles
ValueLower is better16th / 2015.69 Price/1000+4.68 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 207.7 kg/t+1.03 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better4th / 201320 g+198.00 g
EU Label
B/A/71
Origin
Romania
Weight
10.95 kgs
Price
790.00
Joint 6th

Continental PremiumContact 7

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Continental PremiumContact 7
Auto Bild Good gut
The Continental PremiumContact 7 finishes sixth with a balanced all-round profile across wet and dry tests. Wet handling and braking are both strong, and dry braking is competitive. Tread wear after 2,485 miles is one of the lowest in the test, which contributes to longevity. The main downside is the highest purchase price of any tire in the test.
Dry94.1%
Wet95.1%
Comfort94.2%
Value81.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 20113 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better15th / 2061.8 mph-1.3 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 206.7 Points-3.30 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 20140 ft+11 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better9th / 2051.1 mph-0.8 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 208 Points-0.70 Points
Wet CircleLower is better7th / 2014.72 s+0.21 s
Straight AquaHigher is better12th / 2056.9 mph-2.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 2011.4 ft/s²-1.6 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better15th / 2072.7 dB+2.10 dB
WearHigher is better3rd / 2035,014 miles-4,648 miles
ValueLower is better20th / 2017.39 Price/1000+6.38 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 207.83 kg/t+1.16 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better2nd / 201302 g+180.00 g
EU Label
C/A/72
Origin
Czech Republic
Weight
11.14 kgs
Price
980.00
Joint 6th

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Auto Bild Good gut
The Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 also finishes sixth and performs particularly well in wet conditions, with good braking and handling results. Dry performance is competitive across the board. The purchase price is among the lowest in the finalist group, making it a strong value option. Rolling noise is slightly above average, which is the main comfort-related limitation.
Dry95.4%
Wet96%
Comfort93.3%
Value78.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 20113 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better10th / 2062.1 mph-1.0 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 208 Points-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 20139 ft+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 2051.3 mph-0.6 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 208.7 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 2014.6 s+0.09 s
Straight AquaHigher is better14th / 2056.5 mph-2.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11th / 2011.3 ft/s²-1.7 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better18th / 2074.1 dB+3.50 dB
WearHigher is better13th / 2029,969 miles-9,693 miles
ValueLower is better7th / 2012.44 Price/1000+1.43 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better12th / 208.15 kg/t+1.48 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better11th / 201605 g+483.00 g
EU Label
C/A/72
Origin
South Korea
Weight
12.13 kgs
Price
600.00
8th

GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO

245/45 R19 102Y XL
GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO
Auto Bild Good gut
The GT Radial SportActive 2 Evo finishes eighth with competitive wet and dry results and the second-lowest cost-per-km figure in the test. Wet safety margins are adequate, and dry performance is consistent. Rolling resistance is slightly higher than average, and rolling comfort is rated below the mid-field. For buyers prioritising running costs, it offers a strong case.
Dry94.6%
Wet95.1%
Comfort91.5%
Value78.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better16th / 20115 ft+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better12th / 2062.1 mph-1.0 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 208 Points-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 20143 ft+14 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 2051.3 mph-0.6 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 207.3 Points-1.40 Points
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 2014.82 s+0.31 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 2057.7 mph-1.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 2012.6 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better18th / 206.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better4th / 2071.1 dB+0.50 dB
WearHigher is better11th / 2030,721 miles-8,941 miles
ValueLower is better2nd / 2011.12 Price/1000+0.11 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better15th / 208.7 kg/t+2.03 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better17th / 201791 g+669.00 g
EU Label
C/A/69
Origin
China
Weight
12.04 kgs
Price
550.00
Joint 9th

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Auto Bild Good gut
The Nexen N'Fera Sport finishes ninth with short braking distances in both wet and dry conditions and good overall safety margins. It qualifies as a solid mid-range choice. The noted handling weakness is a slightly delayed turn-in response, which affects steering precision. Pass-by noise is low, placing it among the quieter tires in the test.
Dry94.6%
Wet94.5%
Comfort95.6%
Value78.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 20111 ft+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better16th / 2061.8 mph-1.3 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 206.7 Points-3.30 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 20139 ft+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better13th / 2051.0 mph-0.9 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 207.3 Points-1.40 Points
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 2014.82 s+0.31 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 2057.7 mph-1.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better13th / 2011.1 ft/s²-1.9 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better1st / 2070.6 dBBest in this discipline
WearHigher is better14th / 2029,708 miles-9,954 miles
ValueLower is better4th / 2012.13 Price/1000+1.12 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 208.04 kg/t+1.37 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better15th / 201719 g+597.00 g
EU Label
C/A/71
Origin
Czech Republic
Weight
12.25 kgs
Price
580.00
Joint 9th

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Auto Bild Good gut
The Vredestein Ultrac Pro also finishes ninth with its strongest performance in dry handling, where it matches the top scorers. Dry braking is short and rolling resistance is low. Projected mileage is one of the lower figures in the finalist group, which reduces its cost efficiency and is its main weakness relative to its performance level.
Dry96.7%
Wet93.3%
Comfort95.3%
Value74.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 20112 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 2062.8 mph-0.3 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 208.7 Points-1.30 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better15th / 20148 ft+19 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better9th / 2051.1 mph-0.8 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 208 Points-0.70 Points
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 2014.69 s+0.18 s
Straight AquaHigher is better15th / 2056.2 mph-2.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better17th / 2010.6 ft/s²-2.4 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better3rd / 2071 dB+0.40 dB
WearHigher is better17th / 2026,160 miles-13,502 miles
ValueLower is better14th / 2015.2 Price/1000+4.19 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 207.65 kg/t+0.98 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better12th / 201617 g+495.00 g
EU Label
C/A/72
Origin
Netherlands
Weight
11.53 kgs
Price
640.00
Joint 11th

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Auto Bild Good gut
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo finishes eleventh with consistently solid dry and wet results without standing out in any individual test. Rolling comfort is rated above average. The tire is competent across conditions but is limited by a high purchase price and slightly above-average rolling resistance, both of which affect overall cost efficiency.
Dry94%
Wet94.6%
Comfort97.8%
Value75.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better12th / 20113 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 2062.0 mph-1.1 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 206.7 Points-3.30 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better13th / 20145 ft+16 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 2051.2 mph-0.7 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 208 Points-0.70 Points
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 2014.73 s+0.22 s
Straight AquaHigher is better13th / 2056.6 mph-2.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 2011.6 ft/s²-1.4 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 208 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better17th / 2073.8 dB+3.20 dB
WearHigher is better6th / 2032,224 miles-7,438 miles
ValueLower is better18th / 2016.39 Price/1000+5.38 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better16th / 208.74 kg/t+2.07 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better10th / 201533 g+411.00 g
EU Label
C/A/72
Origin
Italy
Weight
11.52 kgs
Price
850.00
Joint 11th

Nokian Powerproof 2

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Nokian Powerproof 2
Auto Bild Good gut
The Nokian Powerproof 2 also finishes eleventh with strong braking results on both wet and dry surfaces and a competitive rolling resistance figure. Dry handling is good. The overall wet performance package is rated slightly below the front-runners, which holds it back in the standings. Mileage is reasonable and cost-per-km is acceptable.
Dry95.4%
Wet92.3%
Comfort94.9%
Value80.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 20113 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 2062.2 mph-0.9 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 208 Points-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better12th / 20144 ft+15 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better16th / 2050.8 mph-1.1 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 207.3 Points-1.40 Points
Wet CircleLower is better13th / 2014.9 s+0.39 s
Straight AquaHigher is better18th / 2055.7 mph-3.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better20th / 2010.2 ft/s²-2.8 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better6th / 2071.7 dB+1.10 dB
WearHigher is better9th / 2031,118 miles-8,544 miles
ValueLower is better13th / 2015.18 Price/1000+4.17 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 207.48 kg/t+0.81 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better6th / 201386 g+264.00 g
EU Label
B/A/70
Origin
Romania
Weight
12.62 kgs
Price
760.00
Joint 13th

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
Auto Bild Good gut
The Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2 finishes thirteenth. Its strongest area is water dispersal and straight aquaplaning resistance, where it finishes mid-field. Dry braking is competitive and rolling comfort is rated positively. However, it loses ground in the cost tests, with higher tread wear and above-average price-per-km, which drags down the overall result.
Dry93%
Wet93%
Comfort98.8%
Value71.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better19th / 20116 ft+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better14th / 2062.0 mph-1.1 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 206.7 Points-3.30 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better16th / 20149 ft+20 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 2051.1 mph-0.8 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 207.3 Points-1.40 Points
Wet CircleLower is better15th / 2014.97 s+0.46 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 2057.9 mph-1.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 2011.4 ft/s²-1.6 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 208 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better12th / 2072.4 dB+1.80 dB
WearHigher is better16th / 2027,850 miles-11,812 miles
ValueLower is better17th / 2015.84 Price/1000+4.83 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better16th / 208.74 kg/t+2.07 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better13th / 201656 g+534.00 g
EU Label
C/A/72
Origin
Luxembourg
Weight
11.44 kgs
Price
710.00
Joint 13th

Falken Azenis FK520

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Falken Azenis FK520
Auto Bild Good gut
The Falken Azenis FK520 finishes thirteenth with competent wet braking and good dry safety reserves. Mileage per cost is reasonable. The handling characteristic noted is a vague or imprecise turn-in, which reduces driver confidence in cornering. Rolling resistance is low-to-average. It represents a mid-range option without a standout strength or major weakness.
Dry91.2%
Wet93.1%
Comfort94.7%
Value84.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better19th / 20116 ft+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better20th / 2061.2 mph-1.9 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better18th / 205.3 Points-4.70 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 20142 ft+13 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better17th / 2050.5 mph-1.4 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 207.3 Points-1.40 Points
Wet CircleLower is better16th / 2015 s+0.49 s
Straight AquaHigher is better11th / 2056.9 mph-2.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better16th / 2010.8 ft/s²-2.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better11th / 2072 dB+1.40 dB
WearHigher is better5th / 2032,361 miles-7,301 miles
ValueLower is better10th / 2012.86 Price/1000+1.85 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 207.71 kg/t+1.04 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better3rd / 201305 g+183.00 g
EU Label
C/A/70
Origin
Turkey
Weight
11.98 kgs
Price
670.00
Joint 13th

Yokohama Advan Sport V107

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Auto Bild Good gut
The Yokohama Advan Sport V107 finishes thirteenth with strong dry handling qualities and the highest straight aquaplaning resistance in the test. However, it carries the highest rolling resistance figure of all finalists, which directly increases fuel or energy consumption. It also scores weaker in wet handling relative to the top tier, and the overall cost rating is pulled down by higher running costs.
Dry96.8%
Wet91.5%
Comfort93.9%
Value69.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 20112 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 2062.6 mph-0.5 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 208.7 Points-1.30 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better20th / 20157 ft+28 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better13th / 2051.0 mph-0.9 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 207.3 Points-1.40 Points
Wet CircleLower is better14th / 2014.95 s+0.44 s
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 2057.8 mph-1.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better15th / 2010.9 ft/s²-2.1 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better16th / 2073.1 dB+2.50 dB
WearHigher is better15th / 2028,353 miles-11,309 miles
ValueLower is better11th / 2014.03 Price/1000+3.02 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better20th / 2010.1 kg/t+3.43 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better18th / 201794 g+672.00 g
EU Label
D/A/71
Origin
Japan
Weight
12.08 kgs
Price
640.00
16th

Linglong Sport Master

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Linglong Sport Master
The Linglong Sport Master finishes sixteenth - the lowest-priced tire in the finalist group - and produces the shortest wet braking distance of the entire test at 129 ft, the only tire to stop under 131 ft from 62 mph in the wet. Dry braking is also competitive. The main limitation is mileage, which is the lowest of all twenty finalists, meaning the low purchase price advantage is partially offset by more frequent replacement.
Dry93.9%
Wet97%
Comfort94.4%
Value67.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 20111 ft+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better17th / 2061.7 mph-1.4 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better17th / 206 Points-4.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 20129 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 2051.2 mph-0.7 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 208 Points-0.70 Points
Wet CircleLower is better9th / 2014.74 s+0.23 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 2057.7 mph-1.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better13th / 2011.1 ft/s²-1.9 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better12th / 2072.4 dB+1.80 dB
WearHigher is better20th / 2022,102 miles-17,560 miles
ValueLower is better9th / 2012.65 Price/1000+1.64 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better19th / 209.15 kg/t+2.48 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better20th / 202022 g+900.00 g
EU Label
C/A/69
Origin
Serbia
Weight
12.60 kgs
Price
450.00
17th

Toyo Proxes Sport 2

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
The Toyo Proxes Sport 2 finishes seventeenth with strong dry handling and the highest resistance to straight aquaplaning in the test. Dry braking is competitive. The significant weakness is a short projected mileage, one of the lowest in the group, which substantially increases cost-per-km. Wet performance is adequate but not a strength.
Dry96.1%
Wet91.4%
Comfort95.1%
Value67.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better14th / 20114 ft+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 2062.6 mph-0.5 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 208.7 Points-1.30 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better17th / 20151 ft+22 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better15th / 2050.8 mph-1.1 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better17th / 206 Points-2.70 Points
Wet CircleLower is better18th / 2015.29 s+0.78 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 2059.0 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 2011.5 ft/s²-1.5 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better5th / 2071.3 dB+0.70 dB
WearHigher is better19th / 2023,873 miles-15,789 miles
ValueLower is better19th / 2016.4 Price/1000+5.39 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better14th / 208.61 kg/t+1.94 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better16th / 201734 g+612.00 g
EU Label
C/A/71
Origin
Japan
Weight
11.69 kgs
Price
630.00
18th

Maxxis Victra Sport 6

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Maxxis Victra Sport 6
The Maxxis Victra Sport 6 finishes eighteenth with competitive dry braking and a low purchase price. However, wet handling is rated as imprecise, with vague behavior reducing confidence in wet cornering. Tread wear is high - one of the highest in the test - which contributes to an elevated cost-per-km figure and limits the value proposition of the low upfront price.
Dry95.4%
Wet89.2%
Comfort91%
Value70.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better17th / 20115 ft+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 2062.5 mph-0.6 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 208.7 Points-1.30 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better14th / 20147 ft+18 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better18th / 2050.1 mph-1.8 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better19th / 205.3 Points-3.40 Points
Wet CircleLower is better20th / 2015.51 s+1.00 s
Straight AquaHigher is better20th / 2055.4 mph-3.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better19th / 2010.4 ft/s²-2.6 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better18th / 206.7 Points-1.30 Points
NoiseLower is better7th / 2071.8 dB+1.20 dB
WearHigher is better18th / 2024,650 miles-15,012 miles
ValueLower is better12th / 2014.12 Price/1000+3.11 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better11th / 208.08 kg/t+1.41 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better19th / 201875 g+753.00 g
EU Label
C/A/72
Origin
China
Weight
12.11 kgs
Price
560.00
Joint 19th

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 finishes nineteenth with the lowest rolling resistance of all twenty finalists, which translates to measurably lower fuel or energy consumption. Projected mileage is reasonable and tread wear is the lowest recorded in the test. The main limitation is wet grip, where braking distances and lateral performance are below the mid-field, requiring more caution in wet conditions.
Dry91.8%
Wet89%
Comfort94.8%
Value91.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better15th / 20115 ft+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better19th / 2061.5 mph-1.6 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better18th / 205.3 Points-4.70 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better18th / 20153 ft+24 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better20th / 2049.3 mph-2.6 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better17th / 206 Points-2.70 Points
Wet CircleLower is better17th / 2015.28 s+0.77 s
Straight AquaHigher is better19th / 2055.5 mph-3.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better18th / 2010.4 ft/s²-2.6 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better7th / 2071.8 dB+1.20 dB
WearHigher is better8th / 2031,218 miles-8,444 miles
ValueLower is better8th / 2012.54 Price/1000+1.53 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 206.67 kg/tBest in this discipline
AbrasionLower is better1st / 201122 gBest in this discipline
EU Label
B/A/70
Origin
Romania
Weight
10.62 kgs
Price
630.00
Joint 19th

Sava Intensa UHP 2

245/45 R19 102Y XL
Sava Intensa UHP 2
The Sava Intensa UHP 2 also finishes nineteenth and shares the lowest rolling resistance with Kleber. Dry braking is adequate and tire weight is the lowest of all finalists. However, wet performance is a clear weakness - braking distances are among the longest in the final group and handling is rated as imprecise. The overall wet safety margin is the main concern for this tire.
Dry91.5%
Wet89.4%
Comfort94.3%
Value82.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better18th / 20115 ft+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better18th / 2061.5 mph-1.6 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better18th / 205.3 Points-4.70 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better19th / 20155 ft+26 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better19th / 2050.1 mph-1.8 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better19th / 205.3 Points-3.40 Points
Wet CircleLower is better19th / 2015.48 s+0.97 s
Straight AquaHigher is better15th / 2056.2 mph-2.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 2011.7 ft/s²-1.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 207.3 Points-0.70 Points
NoiseLower is better14th / 2072.5 dB+1.90 dB
WearHigher is better12th / 2030,155 miles-9,507 miles
ValueLower is better3rd / 2011.75 Price/1000+0.74 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 207.56 kg/t+0.89 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better9th / 201521 g+399.00 g
EU Label
B/A/71
Origin
Germany
Weight
10.07 kgs
Price
570.00

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

More tire tests2026 Die Reifentester Summer Tire Test - 235/55 R182026 AutoView Sport Tire Test2026 Tire Rack Streetable Track Tire Test2026 Auto Express Summer Tire TestAll tests: Summer Tires
Best tiresBest UUHP TiresBest Performance Summer TiresBest Summer Tires
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.