Menu

Falken Azenis FK520

Replaces the Falken Azenis FK510

A keenly priced max-performance summer tire with genuinely strong dry and wet braking and a surprisingly refined ride, but with a less consistent feel at the limit in the wet. It can be a smart alternative to premium options if you value stopping power and comfort over ultimate steering sharpness.

The quick answer

Owners say 81% from 55 owner reviews 76% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say 7th average finish across 19 independent tests Latest: P8 of 9 · 2026 See every test
Strengths & weaknesses Dry, Wet Value Relative to its rivals across every test we hold

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated October 2026.

  • 55owner reviews
  • 403,489miles driven
  • 19professional tests

Tire Reviews Score

Falken Azenis FK520

9.1/10

Better than 89% of summer tires

  • High Confidence
  • 16 tests
  • 55 owner reviews
Scores of the 406 summer tires we have tested

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent tests16 tests · 9 publications · 2023-2026 90% 86%
Owner reviews55 owner reviews · rated 81% 84% 14%
Combined 89% 9.1

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Category by category

How it compares with other summer tires in each area, and how much each area counts. 50 is the middle of the group.

Category Better than Weight Tests
WetBraking, handling and aquaplaning in the wet 83% 44% 16
DryBraking and handling on dry roads 90% 40% 16
ValueWear, efficiency and cost 54% 9% 14
ComfortNoise and ride comfort 57% 7% 14

Weights are shares of the test result. Owner reviews are blended in afterwards.

By discipline

The same results grouped by what the tire was doing. They are not counted a second time.

BrakingEvery braking test, on any surface 93% 16
HandlingEvery handling test, on any surface 73% 13

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Its own test results decide 99% of the test figure. The other 1% comes from its predecessor, the Falken Azenis FK510, and it shrinks as more tests arrive.

High needs at least 3 tests, with its own results deciding 90% or more. Medium needs 2 tests and 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as tests arrive.

The tests behind it

Only measured results count. A test that published its placings alone is listed, but not scored.

  1. 2026 2026 Summer SUV Tire Test Auto Bild Allrad · 255/45 R19 P8 / 9
  2. 2026 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tire Test Sport Auto · 205/45 R17 P3 / 7
  3. 2026 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test Auto Bild · 245/45 R19 P13 / 20
  4. 2026 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? Auto Bild · 245/45 R19 P14 / 50
  5. 2026 2026 ACE Summer Tire Test ACE · 225/40 R18 P4 / 10 Placing only
  6. 2025 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Allrad · 255/55 R18 P2 / 10
Show all 19 tests
  1. 2025 Best Performance Tires For 2025 Tire Reviews · 225/40 R18 P5 / 7
  2. 2025 2025 AZ Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 225/45 R18 P8 / 10
  3. 2025 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test ADAC · 225/40 R18 P8 / 18
  4. 2024 2024 EVO Summer Tire Test EVO · 235/35 R19 P7 / 7
  5. 2024 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport · 235/55 R18 P7 / 8
  6. 2023 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tires VS UHP Tires Auto Motor Und Sport · 255/45 R20 P7 / 10
  7. 2023 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tire Test Sport Auto · 225/40 R18 P7 / 11
  8. 2023 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test Auto Bild · 225/45 R18 P8 / 20
  9. 2023 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 235/35 R19 P6 / 10
  10. 2023 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars · 225/40 R18 P7 / 13
  11. 2023 2023 Summer Tire Market Overview Auto Bild · 225/45 R18 P8 / 50
  12. 2023 2023 ACE / Gute Fahrt UHP Summer Tire Test ACE · 235/35 R19 P7 / 7 Placing only
  13. 2022 2022 Auto Express Summer Tire Test Auto Express · 225/40 R18 P5 / 7 Placing only

Tested 19 times by independent publications, the Falken Azenis FK520 averages a finish of 7th.

19 Tests
0 Test Wins
7th Average
2nd Best
14th Worst
Finishing position in each test1stLast20222026

Finishing position in each test

The latest test

2026 Summer SUV Tire Test P8 of 9

The Falken Azenis FK520 finishes eighth and is referred to in the article as the braking specialist of the test. It posted the shortest dry braking distance of all candidates and was also strong in wet braking. Sand traction was the best in the field, and rolling resistance is low. However, the testers describe delayed steering response and weak side guidance in dry handling, which dropped it to last place on the dry handling course. Gravel traction is also the weakest in the test.

Strong: Dry Braking, Wet Braking, Sand Traction Weak: Dry Handling, Wet Handling, Curved Aquaplaning, Gravel Traction Winner: Hankook Ventus Evo

Every independent test of the Falken Azenis FK520, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20262026 Summer SUV Tire TestAuto Bild Allrad · 255/45 R19P8 / 9
20262026 Sport Auto Summer Tire TestSport Auto · 205/45 R17P3 / 7Preis-Leistungs-Tipp / sehr gut (Best Value Tip / Very Good)
20262026 Autobild Summer Tire TestAuto Bild · 245/45 R19P13 / 20gut (Good)
20262026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?Auto Bild · 245/45 R19P14 / 50
20262026 ACE Summer Tire TestACE · 225/40 R18P4 / 10
20252025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tire TestAuto Bild Allrad · 255/55 R18P2 / 10
2025Best Performance Tires For 2025Tire Reviews · 225/40 R18P5 / 7Tested by Tire Reviews Recommended
20252025 AZ Summer Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 225/45 R18P8 / 10
20252025 ADAC Summer Tire TestADAC · 225/40 R18P8 / 18
20242024 EVO Summer Tire TestEVO · 235/35 R19P7 / 7
20242024 AMS Summer SUV Tire TestAuto Motor Und Sport · 235/55 R18P7 / 8
20232023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tires VS UHP TiresAuto Motor Und Sport · 255/45 R20P7 / 10
20232023 Sport Auto UHP Tire TestSport Auto · 225/40 R18P7 / 11
20232023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire TestAuto Bild · 225/45 R18P8 / 20
20232023 AZ UHP Summer Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 235/35 R19P6 / 10
20232023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tire TestAuto Bild Sportscars · 225/40 R18P7 / 13
20232023 Summer Tire Market OverviewAuto Bild · 225/45 R18P8 / 50
20232023 ACE / Gute Fahrt UHP Summer Tire TestACE · 235/35 R19P7 / 7
20222022 Auto Express Summer Tire TestAuto Express · 225/40 R18P5 / 7

On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict

Videos

The BEST UHP Tire for 2025! Michelin, Pirelli, Continental, Goodyear and Bridgestone Tested

The BEST UHP Tire for 2025! Michelin, Pirelli, Continental, Goodyear and Bridgestone Tested

Running Costs
View Test

In 245/45 R19, the Falken Azenis FK520 is projected to cost €29.49 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €737 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test.

Tire purchase + fittingExtra fuel vs the most efficient tirecost per 1,000 miles
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2026 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rim Protection
Large

A pronounced protective rib that stands well clear of the rim and takes most kerb contact before the wheel does.

Assessed by eye on the tires we tested, in the sizes listed. No manufacturer publishes rim protection as a specification, so treat this as a guide rather than a measurement.
Dimensions & Label Scores
View All

Size Range144 sizes available

205-325Width30-65Profile17-22Rim84-116 V-YLoad/Speed Index

EU LabelAcross 144 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.

Noise

68-72dB A/B

Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Falken Azenis FK520 in the wet?
Across the 16 wet-braking tests it has featured in, the Falken Azenis FK520 stops 1.3% longer than premium rivals, 3.1% shorter than mid-range rivals and 11.9% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews wet score of 83/100, and owners rate it 8.3/10 in the wet from 55 reviews.
How good is the Falken Azenis FK520 in the dry?
Across the 16 dry-braking tests it has featured in, the Falken Azenis FK520 stops 0.2% shorter than premium rivals, 2.5% shorter than mid-range rivals and 6.7% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews dry score of 90/100, and owners rate it 8.8/10 in the dry from 55 reviews.
How fuel efficient is the Falken Azenis FK520?
Across the 13 tests measuring rolling resistance, the Falken Azenis FK520's rolling resistance is 1.5% lower than premium rivals, 1.3% lower than mid-range rivals and 2% lower than budget rivals.
How many miles does the Falken Azenis FK520 last?
Based on test and owner data, the Falken Azenis FK520 is expected to last around 25,263 miles (40,657 km).
What do owners say about the Falken Azenis FK520?
Across 55 owner ratings the Falken Azenis FK520 averages 81%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 8.8 out of 10 and Wear lowest at 7.7. 14 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 83% of owners score it 70% or better.
More questions about the Falken Azenis FK520 (11)
How much does the Falken Azenis FK520 cost to run?
In 245/45 R19, the Falken Azenis FK520 is projected to cost €29.49 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €737 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test. Of the tires compared in that test, that makes it the cheapest to run.
What is the Falken Azenis FK520's EU tire label rating?
Across its range, the Falken Azenis FK520 most commonly carries EU label ratings of C for fuel efficiency, A for wet grip and 70 dB for noise.
How comfortable and quiet are the Falken Azenis FK520?
Owners rate the Falken Azenis FK520 8.1 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 47 reviews.
How well do the Falken Azenis FK520 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Falken Azenis FK520 7.7 out of 10 for wear across 47 reviews. 14 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 5,000 miles.
Would owners buy the Falken Azenis FK520 again?
76% of owners say they would buy the Falken Azenis FK520 again, based on the 55 owner reviews that answered the question. 51% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Falken Azenis FK520's dry grip?
Of the 48 owner reviews analyzed for the Falken Azenis FK520, 25 mention dry grip: 23 praise it (strong dry grip) and 2 criticise it (limited dry grip). One owner wrote: "Excellent dry grip, as good as the Premium brands". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Falken Azenis FK520's wet grip?
Of the 48 owner reviews analyzed for the Falken Azenis FK520, 22 mention wet grip: 17 praise it (confident wet grip) and 5 criticise it (weak wet grip). Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Falken Azenis FK520's ride comfort?
Of the 48 owner reviews analyzed for the Falken Azenis FK520, 18 mention ride comfort: 14 praise it (comfortable ride) and 4 criticise it (harsh ride). One owner wrote: "Also they seem to be very comfortable despite the low profile". Read those reviews
Does the Falken Azenis FK520 have a rim protector?
Yes. Rim protection on the Falken Azenis FK520 is large, measured in 225/40 R18. No manufacturer publishes rim protection as a specification; this is assessed by eye when the tires are mounted for our own testing. Best Performance Tires For 2025
What does the Falken Azenis FK520 replace?
The Falken Azenis FK520 is the successor to the Falken Azenis FK510 in Falken's range.
What sizes does the Falken Azenis FK520 come in?
The Falken Azenis FK520 is available in 179 sizes, ranging from 205-325/30-65 R17-22.
Owner Questions (1)
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Falken Azenis FK520

Just purchased and ordered 4 Falken Azenis FK520 for my 2015 7 series BMW, and I am fitting them next week. Show more Just purchased and ordered 4 Falken Azenis FK520 for my 2015 7 series BMW, and I am fitting them next week. They are replacing my Goodyear asymmetric 2 that handle well but have worn quite badly. My car is a heavy high speed and I go quite fast on the motorway and I cover huge miles.<br>
There are very few reviews on your 520 tire as it is new, and unlike the FK510, the reviews are not as encouraging. Your Azenis older FK510 has much better reviews fantastic grip in wet and dry and a seemingly better and more confident looking tread pattern than this new FK520 tire, and I am wondering whether I have made the right decision. I have read all the advanced tech on the FK520 being stiffer and lighter but I am disappointed that wet braking and handling of the FK520 is lower than the FK510. I always expect that a new developed tire should always be a significant improvement over the old one. <br>
You have extensively tested your FK520 on the race track so please kindly let me know the how performance characteristics of this tire over the FK510.to your reply. Show less
August 29, 2022
Here at Tire Reviews we've yet to test the new FK520 but we have every confidence in Falken delivering a tire that performs better than its predecessor the FK510. The FK520 has only been in one proper test so far where it still finished ahead of a Pirelli tire so we expect the tire to perform at least as well as the FK510 did when it's tested more in 2023.

Falken Azenis FK520 Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say summarised from 49 reviews

Owners generally rate the Falken Azenis FK520 highly (average 79.6%), most often praising its strong dry grip and capable wet grip for the money. Comfort and refinement also come through well, with many describing it as quiet and compliant for a UHP-style tire, and around one in five explicitly calling it great value. The main recurring drawbacks are mixed steering feel (some find it sharp, others a bit numb) and a smaller but notable group reporting vibration/balance issues; wet handling is also more divided than outright wet grip.

What owners mention most counted across 48 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 55 ratings

  • Owner score 81%
  • Dry Grip 88%
  • Handling 84%
  • Wet Grip 83%
  • Comfort 81%
  • Road Feedback 79%
  • Wear 77%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 77%

“OEM Fitment Tire on the FL5 Type R is Michelin PS4S (superb tire , i got 25,000km out of a set inclusive of 3 track days. i would of been able to do another 5000km on regular roads had i not copped an unfixable puncture...”

  • Honda Civic Type R
  • 2,500 miles
Read full review → 1,183 found this helpful
Most critical 56%

“I got these tires with the car I purchased. They weren't my choice — I wanted Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, but there was no option to choose the tires when ordering the car.At first, I thought they weren't that bad...”

  • Audi A3 Sportback
  • 12,094 miles
Read full review → 15 found this helpful
Longest term 63%

“In the dry these are good tires, in the wet they are mediocre. This makes sense as they are classed as summer tires however everywhere that lists these tires has them rated as A for wet weather. In the wet they grip...”

  • Volkswagen Mk4 Golf Estate TDi 130
  • 62,000 miles
Read full review → 132 found this helpful

All 47 Falken Azenis FK520 reviews

Score spread across 46 written reviews
91%
Member
Initial Impressions

Falken Azenis fk520 have been a great tire, noise level is not intrusive and they give a good return on fuel economy. These tires are very progressive and give good feed back. Having watched a back to back comparison with the Michelin PS4, the Falkens are punching way above their price range. If you want near PS4 performance at kumho prices, you won't go far wrong...will definitely try out the latest incarnation, Falken azenis R820 when the fk520's are done.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 0
59%
Member
Initial Impressions

A very good Tire overall

as Tire worn Wet performance Has Faded a lot even at 5mm tread depth
under load Performance is noticeably Reduced

will be Changing to continental Tires when they come Due for replacement

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 4
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 3
81%
Member
Initial Impressions

Excellent tires cheaper than PS4's with better grip. Did get a puncture in one but repaired and still good 👍🏾

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 3

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Falken Azenis FK520? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Falken Azenis FK520?
69%
Member
Mid-Life

After the 2nd season the dry grip deteriorated a lot, you should be very careful when accelerating from a corner, otherwise the ESP will intervene. I am considering to throw it away after this 3rd season, despite the low mileage (15 000 km) and wear.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 5
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 3
Helpful 13
  1. Initial Impressions83% 4,000 miles
    First season on my MX-5 ND. Dry grip is pretty good, comparable to the Michelin PS5 I am using on my other car. Wet grip is not bad, but there is room for improvement. It's easy to control the car. My overall experience is very good. Wear is really good on this light roadster. Will buy them again.
56%
MatN90
Initial Impressions

I got these tires with the car I purchased. They weren't my choice — I wanted Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, but there was no option to choose the tires when ordering the car.

At first, I thought they weren't that bad. It could have been worse — I could have ended up with Nexens. I read some reviews and test results and thought, "Okay, these seem like pretty decent tires, it shouldn't be too bad."

Unfortunately, the trouble-free period lasted only about 900 km in 2024, after I picked up the car from the dealership in the autumn.

In spring 2025, after switching back to these tires, I went to have the wheel alignment checked. The technician actually told me he felt sorry for me because I had to drive on these tires — that's how noisy they were.

I thought, okay, I'll have them road-force balanced and properly set up, and everything should be fine.

Well, it wasn't.

I measured 60–75 N of radial force variation. The noise starts becoming noticeable at around 110 km/h and gets progressively worse up to 140 km/h. The wheels themselves are perfectly fine, and there is simply no way to eliminate this level of radial force variation through balancing.

I filed a warranty claim with Audi. They performed a test drive, but only around town. Despite my requests to take the car onto the highway, they rejected the claim.

I then filed a complaint with Audi Poland, but that didn't help either. They sided with the dealership, saying that the dealership has the means to verify the tires and that they trust their authorized partners.

But the noise isn't the only problem.

These tires are definitely not what I would call UHP tires. They provide absolutely no feedback through the steering wheel. Zero.

But that's still not the worst part. They really don't cope with standing water.

When there is standing water on the road, I wouldn't feel comfortable driving faster than around 80 km/h, even on a highway. The tires also spin easily when pulling away from a standstill. Interestingly, they don't have the same problem in the rain when there isn't standing water.

On dry pavement, the grip is actually okay — I'd even say quite good. However, I cannot recommend these tires because, for me, their behavior in standing water completely disqualifies them. I've driven on many other tires (Michelin Primacy HP, Michelin Primacy HP, Avon ZV5, Hankook Ventus Prime 3, Uniroyal Rainexpert) and have never experienced similar issues.

As for progression when losing grip, they do give you some warning before they start to let go, at least in wet conditions. But having to stay below around 70 km/h to feel comfortable in those conditions is simply not good enough for a UHP tire in the 21st century.

As for wear, it's acceptable and I have no major complaints. However, after the first 5,000 km, the tread depth dropped by as much as 2 mm, which is quite a lot. After that, though, the rate of wear seems to have slowed down.

One more positive thing I forgot to mention: after two years, the tires have shown no signs of cracking or dry rot.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 1
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 15
83%
Member
Mid-Life

Prior to these Falken FK520, I had Michelin primacy3, and they where always loud. God but loud. These are still quiet, normaly tires get louder when older, Will see how they turn out.
These tires perform very well in basically every condition, higway/autobahn from Sweden to Italy, through the Austrian alps, on Italian dirt roads in Sarteano, as well as in 40c on aoutobahn, impressed.
Drivning a heavy w213, the wear has been very ok, the rear is wearing faster than the front, wich is normal on a rwd. Tire sides a strong enough for a heavy car.
I can recomend these tires for everyone, who dares to be diffrent and not buy tires that makes the most commercial. These are realy good value for money, I tried them up to 175km/h, steady as a rock.
So if you have a Merc,w213, these will be a perfect match.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 14
  1. Initial Impressions81% 1,500 miles
    Good tires, strong sidewalls, good grip in Wet and dry.
90%
Member
Initial Impressions

Good strong grip in the dry with predictable breakaway at the very limit. Safe handling, stopping and corning when driving normally in the wet. Progressive feedback and controllable at the limit, no major dramas. Comfortable, quiet and a well balanced tire. Not expected to match Goodyear Eagle F1 Asym 6 for longevity. This is not a track day tire.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 14
76%
Member
Initial Impressions

Solid tires. Had some geometry problems so the shoulders have taken a bit of a beating and it's evident getting into the wetter months. Would always recommend however as prior to this I've never had any problems with wear. Very progressive at the limit. You can feel the slip before it truly gives way.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 16
86%
Member
End of Life

Tires didn’t quite last as long as I would have liked. Slightly numb on the steering. I changed to Eagle F1s and they are much better in the wet and feedback. But they were a lot more money. So if I’m looking to save again. Falkens will be more than fine

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 15
  1. Initial Impressions81% 12,500 miles
    The 205/40/18 Tire size is notorious for being very rare and lower in demand. This means that the michelin/continental options are pushing nearly £200 a corner fitted and balanced. At £117 through ATS the FK520 was a great alternative at a much lower price. My fiesta ST came with Michelin Super Sports and I'd had a set of PS4s subsequent to that and have had a set of Nankangs AS rubbish rubbers as well. Having done a couple track days and lots of miles, I've been very impressed with the FK520s.

    after 12,500 miles.

    Dry Grip - Exceptional - Couple track days and hill climbs during the summer and in the warmth these tires were great! Even managing to get a better time than another fiesta friend rocking the wider and higher profile 225/40/18 Michelin cups on a different set up with more un-sprung mass. (That was very likely just due to bravery/stupidity on the day though). The reason these have only gotten a 9/10 is because 10/10 in my humble opinion is reserved for slicks.

    Wet Grip - Exceptional - The aquaplaning recovery is the FK520s key strength. Wet handling is not as well levelled as the PS4s. So, if you wanted to drift in the wet then go ahead. However, for the price point. You absolutely MUST purchase the FK520. Blows the nankang sportnex out the water. The next tire I'm keen to try in this category is the Nexen NFera sport. But for wet weather driving and some considerably treacherous motorway monsoon type conditions the FK520 has felt incredibly safe and dependable.

    Wear - As expected - 12,500 miles and the tires have gone from 7.5mm to 4mm on the front 7.5mm to 6mm on the rear. So, on course for a set of fronts to last approx 20-25k miles if I replace at 3mm and maybe up to 30k miles if I ran them all the way down to 1.6mm. But incredibly impressed with wear overall. These are on a level with michelin PS4 and based on Falken's quality and manufacturing I would expect this.

    Buy Again - Maybe - The reason I was so impressed and keen on these tires is because they were £117 fitted at ATS last year. That's a bargain in the fiesta tire size. However, now with them creeping up to £140-150. It make sense to spend a bit more per corner and get the continental or michelin options. If the tire is less than 120. Absolutely will buy again.
57%
Member
Initial Impressions

Nothing to complain except the groove cracks after just 10.000 Km and almost 2 years, with the correct pressure and storage temperatures during the winter. Really dissapointed.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 3
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 46

Tyre reviews and ratingsTire Reviews Replies

This look unsightly but are generally not structural and happen to a lot of brands. If you're at all worried get them inspected.
93%
Member
Initial Impressions
I recently switched to Falken Azenis FK520, 225/45R17 94 W XL FSL tires, and they've been one of the best tire choices I've made. I previously had Dunlop BluResponse tires, but the Falkens are noticeably quieter and much more comfortable. They feel great on the road and provide excellent grip in both wet and dry conditions. I honestly think Falken is an underrated brand—you get outstanding performance and quality for a very reasonable price. I would definitely recommend them.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 48
70%
TheSadAcademic
Initial Impressions
  • 245/45 R20
  • 10,000 miles
I used the Falken Azenis FK520L on my EV before switching tires, and while there were some positives, overall I wasn’t fully satisfied with the experience.

The biggest issue for me was road noise. The tires were noticeably noisy, even after I had soundproofing done on the car. Ride comfort also felt quite harsh, which made daily driving less refined than I expected, especially for an EV where cabin quietness is important.

Another downside was efficiency. Compared to my current tires, I noticed a drop in EV range and higher energy consumption with the FK520L. Wet handling also wasn’t the best, and as the tires started to wear, I could occasionally feel them losing traction in wet conditions, which affected my confidence.

To be fair, dry handling was good. The tire felt stable and sporty in dry conditions, with decent grip when cornering or changing lanes. However, braking performance did not feel as strong as I would have liked, especially when considering the weight and instant torque of an EV.

Overall, the Falken Azenis FK520L may suit drivers who prioritize dry grip and a sportier feel, but for my EV and daily driving needs, the road noise, comfort, range impact, wet handling, and braking distance made it less ideal for me.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 3
Helpful 49
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.