The 2025 Auto Zeitung summer tire test has tested ten ultra high performance 225/45 R18 patterns in the dry and wet, and this year included wear!
The wear test has added some interesting highlights, which we'll discuss below.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
We're not sure why, but Auto Zeitung did not calculate value, ie the price per 1000km driven. This paints a really interesting picture as the test winning Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ALSO the best value tire. A set of 4 costs 665 euros and the calculated tread life is 31,069 miles giving a cost per 1000 km of 13.3 Euros. When you compare it to one of the budget tires, which only cost 300 euros for a set, and performed terribly in all the tests, the fact they only last 12,427 miles means they actually cost you more money!
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.3 Price/1000 | Best | €29.44 | |
| 14.38 Price/1000 | +1.08 Price/1000 | €33.75 | |
| 15 Price/1000 | +1.70 Price/1000 | €29.77 | |
| 15.5 Price/1000 | +2.20 Price/1000 | €40.40 | |
| 15.88 Price/1000 | +2.58 Price/1000 | €33.41 | |
| 16.67 Price/1000 | +3.37 Price/1000 | €38.00 | |
| 17.85 Price/1000 | +4.55 Price/1000 | €40.86 | |
| 18 Price/1000 | +4.70 Price/1000 | €48.37 | |
| 19 Price/1000 | +5.70 Price/1000 | €42.71 | |
| 21.38 Price/1000 | +8.08 Price/1000 | €45.11 |
The difference between best and worst was 60.8% (8.08 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6) works out €473 cheaper than the most expensive (Bridgestone Potenza Sport).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2025 test; financing costs are excluded.
Other than the Goodyear having a near perfect results, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was great in wet handling, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was the sporty option, and the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was a solid all rounder, even though it was a little down in the wet.
Below is the full dataset.
Dry
In dry braking, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport delivered the shortest stopping distance at 108ft, while the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 needed 121ft - a 10.6% difference that could be crucial in emergency situations.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 108 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 109 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 110 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 110 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 110 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 111 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 112 ft | +4 ft | 15 mph | |
| 115 ft | +7 ft | 19 mph | |
| 118 ft | +10 ft | 23 mph | |
| 121 ft | +13 ft | 26 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (13 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The dry handling test showed the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was quickest around the track at 68.7 seconds, with the Mastersteel trailing at 71.5 seconds - a 3.9% gap that demonstrates the handling limitations of budget options.
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 68.7 s | Best | |
| 68.8 s | +0.10 s | |
| 69.1 s | +0.40 s | |
| 69.3 s | +0.60 s | |
| 69.4 s | +0.70 s | |
| 69.5 s | +0.80 s | |
| 69.6 s | +0.90 s | |
| 69.6 s | +0.90 s | |
| 70.9 s | +2.20 s | |
| 71.5 s | +2.80 s |
The difference between best and worst was 4.1% (2.8 s).
Wet
In wet braking, the differences were dramatic. The Continental PremiumContact 7 stopped in just 137ft, while the Mastersteel required a concerning 173ft - a massive 20.7% difference that highlights significant safety implications in rainy conditions.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 137 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 139 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 142 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 146 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 148 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 153 ft | +16 ft | 26 mph | |
| 155 ft | +18 ft | 27 mph | |
| 158 ft | +21 ft | 29 mph | |
| 171 ft | +34 ft | 35 mph | |
| 173 ft | +36 ft | 36 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 26.1% (36 ft ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The wet handling test saw the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 lead with 69.7 seconds, while the Mastersteel needed 77 seconds - a 9.5% gap.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.7 s | Best | |
| 69.9 s | +0.20 s | |
| 70.2 s | +0.50 s | |
| 70.2 s | +0.50 s | |
| 70.8 s | +1.10 s | |
| 72.6 s | +2.90 s | |
| 72.8 s | +3.10 s | |
| 74 s | +4.30 s | |
| 74.9 s | +5.20 s | |
| 77 s | +7.30 s |
The difference between best and worst was 10.5% (7.3 s).
The Wet Circle test measured cornering ability on wet surfaces, with the Bridgestone Potenza Sport achieving the fastest time at 11.11 seconds while the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 required 12.58 seconds - an 11.7% difference showing how premium tires maintain grip in wet corners, which is larger than wet handling.
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 11.11 s | Best | |
| 11.13 s | +0.02 s | |
| 11.18 s | +0.07 s | |
| 11.2 s | +0.09 s | |
| 11.37 s | +0.26 s | |
| 11.51 s | +0.40 s | |
| 11.52 s | +0.41 s | |
| 11.71 s | +0.60 s | |
| 11.93 s | +0.82 s | |
| 12.58 s | +1.47 s |
The difference between best and worst was 13.2% (1.47 s).
The Straight Aquaplaning test assessed resistance to aquaplaning, with the Vredestein Ultrac Pro remaining stable up to 47.6 mph while the Mastersteel lost grip at just 44.0 mph.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 47.6 mph | Best | |
| 47.2 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 47.0 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 46.8 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 46.7 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 46.4 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 45.8 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 45.5 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 45.4 mph | -2.2 mph | |
| 44.0 mph | -3.6 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (3.6 mph).
Comfort
In the Subjective Comfort assessment, the Continental PremiumContact 7 led the way.
Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -4.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 40% (4 Points).
The budget Mastersteel had the lowest external passby noise of the test.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 67 dB | Best | |
| 68 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 68 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 69 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 69 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 69 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 70 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 70 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 70 dB | +3.00 dB | |
| 71 dB | +4.00 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 6% (4 dB).
Value
Wear testing revealed the most surprising results, with the Goodyear projected to last 31,069 miles while budget options like Triangle and Mastersteel managed just 12,427 miles - a 150% difference that completely transforms the value equation despite lower purchase prices.
Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 31,069 miles | Best | |
| 27,962 miles | -3,107 miles | |
| 26,408 miles | -4,661 miles | |
| 24,855 miles | -6,214 miles | |
| 21,748 miles | -9,321 miles | |
| 20,195 miles | -10,874 miles | |
| 20,195 miles | -10,874 miles | |
| 18,641 miles | -12,428 miles | |
| 12,427 miles | -18,642 miles | |
| 12,427 miles | -18,642 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 60% (18,642 miles).
Rolling Resistance measurements showed the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 was most efficient at 7.35 kg/t while the Bridgestone Potenza Sport required 10.15 kg/t - a 27.6% difference that directly impacts fuel consumption and emissions.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.35 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 8.25 kg/t | +0.90 kg/t | $36 | |
| 8.35 kg/t | +1.00 kg/t | $40 | |
| 8.6 kg/t | +1.25 kg/t | $50 | |
| 8.7 kg/t | +1.35 kg/t | $54 | |
| 8.8 kg/t | +1.45 kg/t | $58 | |
| 8.85 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t | $60 | |
| 8.85 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t | $60 | |
| 9.05 kg/t | +1.70 kg/t | $68 | |
| 10.15 kg/t | +2.80 kg/t | $112 |
The difference between best and worst was 38.1% (2.8 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport uses about 31 gal ($112) more fuel than the Mastersteel Super Sport 2.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
The Abrasion test measured tread wear per 1,000km, with the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 losing just 0.085mm while the Triangle EffeXSport lost 0.185mm - a 117.6% difference confirming Michelin's reputation for durability despite higher purchase price.
Abrasion
Millimeter of tread lost per 1000km driven
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 0.09 mm/1000km | Best | |
| 0.09 mm/1000km | Best | |
| 0.1 mm/1000km | +0.01 mm/1000km | |
| 0.11 mm/1000km | +0.02 mm/1000km | |
| 0.11 mm/1000km | +0.02 mm/1000km | |
| 0.11 mm/1000km | +0.02 mm/1000km | |
| 0.12 mm/1000km | +0.03 mm/1000km | |
| 0.13 mm/1000km | +0.04 mm/1000km | |
| 0.15 mm/1000km | +0.06 mm/1000km | |
| 0.19 mm/1000km | +0.10 mm/1000km |
The difference between best and worst was 111.1% (0.1 mm/1000km).
Results
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
225/45 R18 95Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 10 | 109 ft | +1 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 10 | 68.8 s | +0.10 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 10 | 142 ft | +5 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 1st / 10 | 69.7 s | Best in this discipline |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 2nd / 10 | 11.13 s | +0.02 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 2nd / 10 | 47.2 mph | -0.4 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 4th / 10 | 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 10 | 68 dB | +1.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 1st / 10 | 31,069 miles | Best in this discipline |
| ValueLower is better | 1st / 10 | 13.3 Price/1000 | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 10 | 8.35 kg/t | +1.00 kg/t |
| AbrasionLower is better | 2nd / 10 | 0.088 mm/1000km | 0.00 mm/1000km |
- EU Label
- C/A/70
- Weight
- 10 kgs
- Tread
- 6.9 mm
- Price
- 665.00
Continental PremiumContact 7
225/45 R18 95Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 10 | 110 ft | +2 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 4th / 10 | 69.3 s | +0.60 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 10 | 137 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 10 | 70.2 s | +0.50 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 7th / 10 | 11.52 s | +0.41 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 8th / 10 | 45.5 mph | -2.1 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 1st / 10 | 10 Points | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 10 | 70 dB | +3.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 3rd / 10 | 26,408 miles | -4,661 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 5th / 10 | 15.88 Price/1000 | +2.58 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 10 | 8.25 kg/t | +0.90 kg/t |
| AbrasionLower is better | 5th / 10 | 0.107 mm/1000km | +0.02 mm/1000km |
- EU Label
- C/A/72
- Weight
- 9.6 kgs
- Tread
- 7.2 mm
- Price
- 675.00
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
225/45 R18 95Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 10 | 108 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 10 | 69.1 s | +0.40 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 10 | 139 ft | +2 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 10 | 69.9 s | +0.20 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 1st / 10 | 11.11 s | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 10 | 45.8 mph | -1.8 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 8th / 10 | 6 Points | -4.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 10 | 70 dB | +3.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 5th / 10 | 21,748 miles | -9,321 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 8th / 10 | 18 Price/1000 | +4.70 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 10th / 10 | 10.15 kg/t | +2.80 kg/t |
| AbrasionLower is better | 4th / 10 | 0.106 mm/1000km | +0.02 mm/1000km |
- EU Label
- D/A/70
- Weight
- 10.6 kgs
- Tread
- 6.6 mm
- Price
- 630.00
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
225/45 R18 95Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 10 | 110 ft | +2 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 7th / 10 | 69.6 s | +0.90 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 10 | 146 ft | +9 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 5th / 10 | 70.8 s | +1.10 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 4th / 10 | 11.2 s | +0.09 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 10 | 47.0 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 4th / 10 | 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 10th / 10 | 71 dB | +4.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 2nd / 10 | 27,962 miles | -3,107 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 6th / 10 | 16.67 Price/1000 | +3.37 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 10 | 8.85 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t |
| AbrasionLower is better | 1st / 10 | 0.085 mm/1000km | Best in this discipline |
- EU Label
- C/A/72
- Weight
- 10.2 kgs
- Tread
- 7.4 mm
- Price
- 750.00
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
225/45 R18 95Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 10 | 111 ft | +3 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 6th / 10 | 69.5 s | +0.80 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 10 | 148 ft | +11 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 10 | 70.2 s | +0.50 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 3rd / 10 | 11.18 s | +0.07 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 9th / 10 | 45.4 mph | -2.2 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 8th / 10 | 6 Points | -4.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 10 | 69 dB | +2.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 6th / 10 | 20,195 miles | -10,874 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 10th / 10 | 21.38 Price/1000 | +8.08 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 4th / 10 | 8.6 kg/t | +1.25 kg/t |
| AbrasionLower is better | 9th / 10 | 0.147 mm/1000km | +0.06 mm/1000km |
- EU Label
- C/A/67
- Weight
- 9.8 kgs
- Tread
- 7.3 mm
- Price
- 695.00
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
225/45 R18 95Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 10 | 115 ft | +7 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 7th / 10 | 69.6 s | +0.90 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 7th / 10 | 155 ft | +18 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 6th / 10 | 72.6 s | +2.90 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 8th / 10 | 11.71 s | +0.60 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 10 | 47.6 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 4th / 10 | 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 10 | 68 dB | +1.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 6th / 10 | 20,195 miles | -10,874 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 7th / 10 | 17.85 Price/1000 | +4.55 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 10 | 8.85 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t |
| AbrasionLower is better | 6th / 10 | 0.11 mm/1000km | +0.03 mm/1000km |
- EU Label
- C/A/72
- Weight
- 10.1 kgs
- Tread
- 7.4 mm
- Price
- 580.00
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
225/45 R18 95Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 10 | 110 ft | +2 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 1st / 10 | 68.7 s | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 10 | 153 ft | +16 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 7th / 10 | 72.8 s | +3.10 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 5th / 10 | 11.37 s | +0.26 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 5th / 10 | 46.7 mph | -0.9 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 4th / 10 | 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 10 | 70 dB | +3.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 8th / 10 | 18,641 miles | -12,428 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 9th / 10 | 19 Price/1000 | +5.70 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 6th / 10 | 8.8 kg/t | +1.45 kg/t |
| AbrasionLower is better | 7th / 10 | 0.123 mm/1000km | +0.04 mm/1000km |
- EU Label
- D/A/72
- Weight
- 10 kgs
- Tread
- 7.2 mm
- Price
- 570.00
Falken Azenis FK520
225/45 R18 95Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 10 | 112 ft | +4 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 5th / 10 | 69.4 s | +0.70 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 10 | 158 ft | +21 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 8th / 10 | 74 s | +4.30 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 6th / 10 | 11.51 s | +0.40 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 10 | 46.8 mph | -0.8 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 10 | 8 Points | -2.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 10 | 69 dB | +2.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 4th / 10 | 24,855 miles | -6,214 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 2nd / 10 | 14.38 Price/1000 | +1.08 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 5th / 10 | 8.7 kg/t | +1.35 kg/t |
| AbrasionLower is better | 3rd / 10 | 0.098 mm/1000km | +0.01 mm/1000km |
- EU Label
- C/A/70
- Weight
- 10.1 kgs
- Tread
- 7 mm
- Price
- 575.00
Triangle EffeXSport
225/45 R18 95Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 9th / 10 | 118 ft | +10 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 9th / 10 | 70.9 s | +2.20 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 9th / 10 | 171 ft | +34 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 9th / 10 | 74.9 s | +5.20 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 9th / 10 | 11.93 s | +0.82 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 6th / 10 | 46.4 mph | -1.2 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 8th / 10 | 6 Points | -4.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 10 | 69 dB | +2.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 9th / 10 | 12,427 miles | -18,642 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 4th / 10 | 15.5 Price/1000 | +2.20 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 9th / 10 | 9.05 kg/t | +1.70 kg/t |
| AbrasionLower is better | 10th / 10 | 0.185 mm/1000km | +0.10 mm/1000km |
- EU Label
- C/B/72
- Weight
- 10.2 kgs
- Tread
- 7 mm
- Price
- 310.00
Mastersteel Super Sport 2
225/45 R18 95Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 10th / 10 | 121 ft | +13 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 10th / 10 | 71.5 s | +2.80 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 10th / 10 | 173 ft | +36 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 10th / 10 | 77 s | +7.30 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 10th / 10 | 12.58 s | +1.47 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 10th / 10 | 44.0 mph | -3.6 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 10 | 8 Points | -2.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 10 | 67 dB | Best in this discipline |
| WearHigher is better | 9th / 10 | 12,427 miles | -18,642 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 3rd / 10 | 15 Price/1000 | +1.70 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 10 | 7.35 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
| AbrasionLower is better | 8th / 10 | 0.133 mm/1000km | +0.05 mm/1000km |
- EU Label
- B/B/70
- Weight
- 9.6 kgs
- Tread
- 7.3 mm
- Price
- 300.00


Why do They test the pz4 and not the pz5….
Probably timing, the test will have likely been started end of last year.
I don't believe in the durability of GY asy 6.
Practice has shown the exact opposite of this test.
I'm not sure I've seen a bad wear test of an Asym 6, whether it be machine or road convoy