Menu

Test source Auto Zeitung

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test

Overall test winnerGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

The 2025 Auto Zeitung summer tire test has tested ten ultra high performance 225/45 R18 patterns in the dry and wet, and this year included wear!The wear test has added some interesting highlights, which we'll discuss below.

Tires tested
10
Tested size
225/45 R18
Disciplines
12

At a glance

Tire shortlist

10 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

4th

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

5th

Pirelli P Zero PZ4

6th

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

7th

Toyo Proxes Sport 2

8th

Falken Azenis FK520

9th

Triangle EffeXSport

10th

Mastersteel Super Sport 2

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test · 225/45 R18

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

The 2025 Auto Zeitung summer tire test has tested ten ultra high performance 225/45 R18 patterns in the dry and wet, and this year included wear!

The wear test has added some interesting highlights, which we'll discuss below.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph

We're not sure why, but Auto Zeitung did not calculate value, ie the price per 1000km driven. This paints a really interesting picture as the test winning Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ALSO the best value tire. A set of 4 costs 665 euros and the calculated tread life is 31,069 miles giving a cost per 1000 km of 13.3 Euros. When you compare it to one of the budget tires, which only cost 300 euros for a set, and performed terribly in all the tests, the fact they only last 12,427 miles means they actually cost you more money!

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
13.3 Price/1000 Best €29.44
14.38 Price/1000 +1.08 Price/1000 €33.75
15 Price/1000 +1.70 Price/1000 €29.77
15.5 Price/1000 +2.20 Price/1000 €40.40
15.88 Price/1000 +2.58 Price/1000 €33.41
16.67 Price/1000 +3.37 Price/1000 €38.00
17.85 Price/1000 +4.55 Price/1000 €40.86
18 Price/1000 +4.70 Price/1000 €48.37
19 Price/1000 +5.70 Price/1000 €42.71
21.38 Price/1000 +8.08 Price/1000 €45.11

The difference between best and worst was 60.8% (8.08 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6) works out €473 cheaper than the most expensive (Bridgestone Potenza Sport).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2025 test; financing costs are excluded.

Other than the Goodyear having a near perfect results, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was great in wet handling, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was the sporty option, and the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was a solid all rounder, even though it was a little down in the wet.

Below is the full dataset.

Dry

In dry braking, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport delivered the shortest stopping distance at 108ft, while the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 needed 121ft - a 10.6% difference that could be crucial in emergency situations.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
108 ft Best 0 mph
109 ft +1 ft 8 mph
110 ft +2 ft 10 mph
110 ft +2 ft 11 mph
110 ft +2 ft 11 mph
111 ft +3 ft 13 mph
112 ft +4 ft 15 mph
115 ft +7 ft 19 mph
118 ft +10 ft 23 mph
121 ft +13 ft 26 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (13 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The dry handling test showed the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was quickest around the track at 68.7 seconds, with the Mastersteel trailing at 71.5 seconds - a 3.9% gap that demonstrates the handling limitations of budget options.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
68.7 s Best
68.8 s +0.10 s
69.1 s +0.40 s
69.3 s +0.60 s
69.4 s +0.70 s
69.5 s +0.80 s
69.6 s +0.90 s
69.6 s +0.90 s
70.9 s +2.20 s
71.5 s +2.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 4.1% (2.8 s).

Wet

In wet braking, the differences were dramatic. The Continental PremiumContact 7 stopped in just 137ft, while the Mastersteel required a concerning 173ft - a massive 20.7% difference that highlights significant safety implications in rainy conditions.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
137 ft Best 0 mph
139 ft +2 ft 10 mph
142 ft +5 ft 15 mph
146 ft +9 ft 19 mph
148 ft +11 ft 22 mph
153 ft +16 ft 26 mph
155 ft +18 ft 27 mph
158 ft +21 ft 29 mph
171 ft +34 ft 35 mph
173 ft +36 ft 36 mph

The difference between best and worst was 26.1% (36 ft ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The wet handling test saw the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 lead with 69.7 seconds, while the Mastersteel needed 77 seconds - a 9.5% gap.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
69.7 s Best
69.9 s +0.20 s
70.2 s +0.50 s
70.2 s +0.50 s
70.8 s +1.10 s
72.6 s +2.90 s
72.8 s +3.10 s
74 s +4.30 s
74.9 s +5.20 s
77 s +7.30 s

The difference between best and worst was 10.5% (7.3 s).

The Wet Circle test measured cornering ability on wet surfaces, with the Bridgestone Potenza Sport achieving the fastest time at 11.11 seconds while the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 required 12.58 seconds - an 11.7% difference showing how premium tires maintain grip in wet corners, which is larger than wet handling.

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
11.11 s Best
11.13 s +0.02 s
11.18 s +0.07 s
11.2 s +0.09 s
11.37 s +0.26 s
11.51 s +0.40 s
11.52 s +0.41 s
11.71 s +0.60 s
11.93 s +0.82 s
12.58 s +1.47 s

The difference between best and worst was 13.2% (1.47 s).

The Straight Aquaplaning test assessed resistance to aquaplaning, with the Vredestein Ultrac Pro remaining stable up to 47.6 mph while the Mastersteel lost grip at just 44.0 mph.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
47.6 mph Best
47.2 mph -0.4 mph
47.0 mph -0.6 mph
46.8 mph -0.8 mph
46.7 mph -0.9 mph
46.4 mph -1.2 mph
45.8 mph -1.8 mph
45.5 mph -2.1 mph
45.4 mph -2.2 mph
44.0 mph -3.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (3.6 mph).

Comfort

In the Subjective Comfort assessment, the Continental PremiumContact 7 led the way.

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
10 Points Best
8 Points -2.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 40% (4 Points).

The budget Mastersteel had the lowest external passby noise of the test.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
67 dB Best
68 dB +1.00 dB
68 dB +1.00 dB
69 dB +2.00 dB
69 dB +2.00 dB
69 dB +2.00 dB
70 dB +3.00 dB
70 dB +3.00 dB
70 dB +3.00 dB
71 dB +4.00 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6% (4 dB).

Value

Wear testing revealed the most surprising results, with the Goodyear projected to last 31,069 miles while budget options like Triangle and Mastersteel managed just 12,427 miles - a 150% difference that completely transforms the value equation despite lower purchase prices.

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
31,069 miles Best
27,962 miles -3,107 miles
26,408 miles -4,661 miles
24,855 miles -6,214 miles
21,748 miles -9,321 miles
20,195 miles -10,874 miles
20,195 miles -10,874 miles
18,641 miles -12,428 miles
12,427 miles -18,642 miles
12,427 miles -18,642 miles

The difference between best and worst was 60% (18,642 miles).

Rolling Resistance measurements showed the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 was most efficient at 7.35 kg/t while the Bridgestone Potenza Sport required 10.15 kg/t - a 27.6% difference that directly impacts fuel consumption and emissions.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.35 kg/t Best $0
8.25 kg/t +0.90 kg/t $36
8.35 kg/t +1.00 kg/t $40
8.6 kg/t +1.25 kg/t $50
8.7 kg/t +1.35 kg/t $54
8.8 kg/t +1.45 kg/t $58
8.85 kg/t +1.50 kg/t $60
8.85 kg/t +1.50 kg/t $60
9.05 kg/t +1.70 kg/t $68
10.15 kg/t +2.80 kg/t $112

The difference between best and worst was 38.1% (2.8 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport uses about 31 gal ($112) more fuel than the Mastersteel Super Sport 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

The Abrasion test measured tread wear per 1,000km, with the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 losing just 0.085mm while the Triangle EffeXSport lost 0.185mm - a 117.6% difference confirming Michelin's reputation for durability despite higher purchase price.

Abrasion

Millimeter of tread lost per 1000km driven

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TireResultGap to best
0.09 mm/1000km Best
0.09 mm/1000km Best
0.1 mm/1000km +0.01 mm/1000km
0.11 mm/1000km +0.02 mm/1000km
0.11 mm/1000km +0.02 mm/1000km
0.11 mm/1000km +0.02 mm/1000km
0.12 mm/1000km +0.03 mm/1000km
0.13 mm/1000km +0.04 mm/1000km
0.15 mm/1000km +0.06 mm/1000km
0.19 mm/1000km +0.10 mm/1000km

The difference between best and worst was 111.1% (0.1 mm/1000km).

Results

1st

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
On dry roads, the Goodyear builds tremendous grip with precise steering response and remains completely manageable even at the limit. It stops quickly and handles transitions smoothly while offering decent comfort. In wet conditions, it truly excels with the quickest handling time, strong braking, and a sporty yet neutral balance that inspires confidence. The Goodyear's remarkable environmental credentials with minimal wear, long life expectancy, and good efficiency make it a complete package. It masters both performance and sustainability better than any competitor, justifying its premium price by offering the best value in the long run.
Dry99.5%
Wet98.8%
Comfort84.3%
Value95.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 10109 ft+1 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better2nd / 1068.8 s+0.10 s
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 10142 ft+5 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better1st / 1069.7 sBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 1011.13 s+0.02 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1047.2 mph-0.4 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 107 Points-3.00 Points
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1068 dB+1.00 dB
WearHigher is better1st / 1031,069 milesBest in this discipline
ValueLower is better1st / 1013.3 Price/1000Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 108.35 kg/t+1.00 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better2nd / 100.088 mm/1000km0.00 mm/1000km
EU Label
C/A/70
Weight
10 kgs
Tread
6.9 mm
Price
665.00
2nd

Continental PremiumContact 7

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Continental PremiumContact 7
In dry conditions, the Continental delivers performance nearly matching dedicated sports tires while providing the best ride comfort in the test. It offers high safety reserves and excellent road feel despite its touring tire designation. On wet roads, it truly shines with the shortest braking distance and predictable, secure handling even in extreme situations. Its consistent grip inspires confidence in all conditions. The Continental achieves an impressive balance between outstanding wet safety, good handling dynamics, and excellent comfort, proving that a touring tire can compete with UHP models while excelling in everyday usability.
Dry98.7%
Wet98.2%
Comfort97.9%
Value84.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 10110 ft+2 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better4th / 1069.3 s+0.60 s
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 10137 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better3rd / 1070.2 s+0.50 s
Wet CircleLower is better7th / 1011.52 s+0.41 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1045.5 mph-2.1 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 1010 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better7th / 1070 dB+3.00 dB
WearHigher is better3rd / 1026,408 miles-4,661 miles
ValueLower is better5th / 1015.88 Price/1000+2.58 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 108.25 kg/t+0.90 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better5th / 100.107 mm/1000km+0.02 mm/1000km
EU Label
C/A/72
Weight
9.6 kgs
Tread
7.2 mm
Price
675.00
3rd

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
The Bridgestone delivers the shortest dry braking distance and highest slalom speed, demonstrating its sporty character. This comes with firmer ride quality and higher rolling resistance that affects efficiency. In wet conditions, it provides exceptional grip with mild transitions during weight shifts and outstanding front-end precision. The Bridgestone's Japanese engineering emphasizes maximum performance and feedback at the expense of comfort and efficiency, making it the driver's choice. Despite being slightly less balanced than the top two finishers, it delivers the best price-performance ratio for enthusiasts seeking maximum driving engagement.
Dry99.7%
Wet98.9%
Comfort77.9%
Value73.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 10108 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better3rd / 1069.1 s+0.40 s
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 10139 ft+2 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better2nd / 1069.9 s+0.20 s
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 1011.11 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1045.8 mph-1.8 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 106 Points-4.00 Points
NoiseLower is better7th / 1070 dB+3.00 dB
WearHigher is better5th / 1021,748 miles-9,321 miles
ValueLower is better8th / 1018 Price/1000+4.70 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 1010.15 kg/t+2.80 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better4th / 100.106 mm/1000km+0.02 mm/1000km
EU Label
D/A/70
Weight
10.6 kgs
Tread
6.6 mm
Price
630.00
4th

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
On dry pavement, the Michelin feels secure and stable but not as dynamic as the top performers. It delivers good grip in fast corners but understeers earlier than the sportiest contenders. Wet performance is characterized by balanced, predictable behavior and strong resistance to aquaplaning, though braking distances are merely good rather than exceptional. The Michelin follows brand tradition with minimal wear and excellent longevity, but its higher noise levels and average efficiency hold it back slightly. It prioritizes consistent performance throughout a long service life over maximum initial grip, appealing to high-mileage drivers seeking reliability and durability.
Dry98.6%
Wet97.5%
Comfort82.2%
Value87.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 10110 ft+2 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better7th / 1069.6 s+0.90 s
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 10146 ft+9 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better5th / 1070.8 s+1.10 s
Wet CircleLower is better4th / 1011.2 s+0.09 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 1047.0 mph-0.6 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 107 Points-3.00 Points
NoiseLower is better10th / 1071 dB+4.00 dB
WearHigher is better2nd / 1027,962 miles-3,107 miles
ValueLower is better6th / 1016.67 Price/1000+3.37 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 108.85 kg/t+1.50 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better1st / 100.085 mm/1000kmBest in this discipline
EU Label
C/A/72
Weight
10.2 kgs
Tread
7.4 mm
Price
750.00
5th

Pirelli P Zero PZ4

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
The Pirelli demonstrates excellent dry handling with sharp steering response and good braking performance. It feels balanced and neutral but with slightly less comfort than ideal. In wet conditions, it delivers good overall grip despite falling somewhat behind the class leaders in braking. The tire provides fine feedback and neutral balance even in challenging wet conditions. While Pirelli has improved the P Zero's efficiency, its higher wear rate and shorter lifespan make it less economical over time. This fourth-generation model shows its age against newer designs but still delivers engaging handling for enthusiasts willing to accept its shorter life and higher long-term costs.
Dry98.1%
Wet96.8%
Comfort78.6%
Value68.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 10111 ft+3 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better6th / 1069.5 s+0.80 s
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 10148 ft+11 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better3rd / 1070.2 s+0.50 s
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 1011.18 s+0.07 s
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1045.4 mph-2.2 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 106 Points-4.00 Points
NoiseLower is better4th / 1069 dB+2.00 dB
WearHigher is better6th / 1020,195 miles-10,874 miles
ValueLower is better10th / 1021.38 Price/1000+8.08 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 108.6 kg/t+1.25 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better9th / 100.147 mm/1000km+0.06 mm/1000km
EU Label
C/A/67
Weight
9.8 kgs
Tread
7.3 mm
Price
695.00
6th

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
On dry surfaces, the Vredestein delivers average performance across all metrics without any standout strengths or notable weaknesses. Its wet weather behavior is mixed – while offering class-leading aquaplaning resistance, it struggles with braking performance on wet roads. The Vredestein handles predictably but without the precision or feedback of premium competitors. It runs quietly and provides good comfort, making it pleasant for everyday use. The Dutch tire represents solid middle-ground value with reasonable wear characteristics and efficiency, best suited for drivers seeking balanced all-weather capability at a more affordable price point than premium brands.
Dry96.5%
Wet94%
Comfort84.3%
Value74.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 10115 ft+7 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better7th / 1069.6 s+0.90 s
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 10155 ft+18 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better6th / 1072.6 s+2.90 s
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 1011.71 s+0.60 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1047.6 mphBest in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 107 Points-3.00 Points
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1068 dB+1.00 dB
WearHigher is better6th / 1020,195 miles-10,874 miles
ValueLower is better7th / 1017.85 Price/1000+4.55 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 108.85 kg/t+1.50 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better6th / 100.11 mm/1000km+0.03 mm/1000km
EU Label
C/A/72
Weight
10.1 kgs
Tread
7.4 mm
Price
580.00
7th

Toyo Proxes Sport 2

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
The Toyo excels in dry conditions with the fastest handling time and impressive agility. It brakes well and provides good feedback to the driver, matching premium tires for dynamic handling. However, wet performance reveals its limitations – while braking is acceptable, it reacts nervously to load changes, reducing confidence in challenging conditions. This Japanese offering presents a specialized character: exceptional dry-weather dynamics at a competitive price point, but with compromises in wet safety and longevity. It's well-suited for enthusiasts in drier climates who prioritize handling response over all-weather versatility.
Dry99.1%
Wet94.9%
Comfort82.9%
Value70.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 10110 ft+2 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 1068.7 sBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 10153 ft+16 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better7th / 1072.8 s+3.10 s
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 1011.37 s+0.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1046.7 mph-0.9 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 107 Points-3.00 Points
NoiseLower is better7th / 1070 dB+3.00 dB
WearHigher is better8th / 1018,641 miles-12,428 miles
ValueLower is better9th / 1019 Price/1000+5.70 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 108.8 kg/t+1.45 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better7th / 100.123 mm/1000km+0.04 mm/1000km
EU Label
D/A/72
Weight
10 kgs
Tread
7.2 mm
Price
570.00
8th

Falken Azenis FK520

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Falken Azenis FK520
The Falken struggles with precision on dry roads, requiring larger steering inputs and feeling less stable than competitors during dynamic maneuvers. In wet conditions, deficiencies become more apparent with longer braking distances and understeer, though it does offer excellent lateral aquaplaning resistance. The tire's saving grace is its good durability and relatively low wear rate. The aging design shows its limitations against newer competitors, particularly in handling precision and wet grip. While offering reasonable value through longevity, its performance compromises are too significant to recommend for drivers who frequently encounter wet conditions.
Dry97.7%
Wet93.2%
Comfort88.6%
Value85.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 10112 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better5th / 1069.4 s+0.70 s
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 10158 ft+21 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better8th / 1074 s+4.30 s
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 1011.51 s+0.40 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1046.8 mph-0.8 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 108 Points-2.00 Points
NoiseLower is better4th / 1069 dB+2.00 dB
WearHigher is better4th / 1024,855 miles-6,214 miles
ValueLower is better2nd / 1014.38 Price/1000+1.08 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 108.7 kg/t+1.35 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better3rd / 100.098 mm/1000km+0.01 mm/1000km
EU Label
C/A/70
Weight
10.1 kgs
Tread
7 mm
Price
575.00
9th

Triangle EffeXSport

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Triangle EffeXSport
On dry roads, the Triangle exhibits low grip levels with vague steering feel and significantly longer braking distances. Wet performance is concerning, with poor braking, uncertain handling, and nervous response to load changes. Despite offering acceptable aquaplaning resistance, overall wet safety is compromised. The Chinese budget tire suffers from rapid wear and short life expectancy, negating much of its price advantage over time. The Triangle demonstrates why focusing solely on purchase price can be misleading – its safety compromises and poor longevity make it difficult to recommend even at its lower price point.
Dry94.2%
Wet90%
Comfort78.6%
Value62.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 10118 ft+10 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better9th / 1070.9 s+2.20 s
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 10171 ft+34 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better9th / 1074.9 s+5.20 s
Wet CircleLower is better9th / 1011.93 s+0.82 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 1046.4 mph-1.2 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 106 Points-4.00 Points
NoiseLower is better4th / 1069 dB+2.00 dB
WearHigher is better9th / 1012,427 miles-18,642 miles
ValueLower is better4th / 1015.5 Price/1000+2.20 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 109.05 kg/t+1.70 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better10th / 100.185 mm/1000km+0.10 mm/1000km
EU Label
C/B/72
Weight
10.2 kgs
Tread
7 mm
Price
310.00
10th

Mastersteel Super Sport 2

225/45 R18 95Y XL
Mastersteel Super Sport 2
The Mastersteel shows substantial limitations on dry roads with the longest braking distances and least precise handling in the test. Wet performance is critically deficient across all metrics, scoring poorly in every wet test and presenting potential safety concerns. Its only genuine advantages are low rolling resistance for better fuel economy and quiet operation. This budget option illustrates the significant trade-offs at the lowest price point – while initially inexpensive, its extremely short lifespan, poor grip, and compromised safety characteristics make it the least economical choice over time and difficult to recommend for any regular use case.
Dry92.8%
Wet86.9%
Comfort90%
Value72.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 10121 ft+13 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better10th / 1071.5 s+2.80 s
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 10173 ft+36 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better10th / 1077 s+7.30 s
Wet CircleLower is better10th / 1012.58 s+1.47 s
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 1044.0 mph-3.6 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 108 Points-2.00 Points
NoiseLower is better1st / 1067 dBBest in this discipline
WearHigher is better9th / 1012,427 miles-18,642 miles
ValueLower is better3rd / 1015 Price/1000+1.70 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 107.35 kg/tBest in this discipline
AbrasionLower is better8th / 100.133 mm/1000km+0.05 mm/1000km
EU Label
B/B/70
Weight
9.6 kgs
Tread
7.3 mm
Price
300.00

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

4 comments
  1. Bobbi archived

    Why do They test the pz4 and not the pz5….

    #10214
    1. TireReviews Bobbi archived

      Probably timing, the test will have likely been started end of last year.

      #10215
  2. Lukica Stipetić archived

    I don't believe in the durability of GY asy 6.
    Practice has shown the exact opposite of this test.

    #9985
    1. TireReviews Lukica Stipetić archived

      I'm not sure I've seen a bad wear test of an Asym 6, whether it be machine or road convoy

      #9988
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.