Tested 32 times by independent publications, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has taken 7 test wins with an average finish of 3rd. Its strongest discipline is Wet Handling, beating 90% of the field across 26 tests; its weakest is Rolling Resistance, at 15% across 27 tests.
Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers P6 of 7
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport finished sixth despite genuine handling and braking strengths, undone by poor comfort and high rolling resistance. It is a tire for keen drivers happy to trade refinement and running costs for sharper responses.
Where the Bridgestone Potenza Sport finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 29 | P2.8 of 11.7 | 80% | 11 |
| Dry Handling | 27 | P2.6 of 9.8 | 77% | 7 |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 8 | P2.6 of 7.6 | 74% | 2 |
| Subj. Road Score | 1 | P2 of 9 | 88% | - |
| Subj. Fun | 1 | P2 of 6 | 80% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 29 | P3.4 of 11.7 | 73% | 5 |
| Wet Braking - Cool | 1 | P5 of 6 | 20% | - |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | 1 | P2 of 18 | 94% | - |
| Wet Braking - Worn | 1 | P1 of 6 | 100% | 1 |
| Wet Handling Strong | 26 | P1.9 of 10 | 90% | 14 |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 8 | P2.1 of 7.6 | 82% | 3 |
| Wet Circle | 16 | P1.6 of 10.4 | 92% | 10 |
| Straight Aqua | 28 | P5.7 of 10.2 | 51% | 1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 21 | P5.2 of 10.8 | 56% | 3 |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 1 | P8 of 8 | 0% | - |
| Snow Handling | 1 | P8 of 8 | 0% | - |
| Snow Slalom | 1 | P8 of 8 | 0% | - |
| Off road | ||||
| Gravel Handling | 1 | P1 of 11 | 100% | 1 |
| Gravel Traction | 1 | P7 of 11 | 40% | - |
| Sand Traction | 1 | P5 of 11 | 60% | - |
| Grass Traction | 1 | P3 of 11 | 80% | - |
| Mud Traction | 1 | P1 of 11 | 100% | 1 |
| Comfort | ||||
| Subj. Comfort | 7 | P7.1 of 9.7 | 26% | 1 |
| Subj. Noise | 3 | P4.7 of 8 | 46% | - |
| Noise | 22 | P9.4 of 10.8 | 16% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 5 | P5.4 of 12.4 | 44% | - |
| Value | 5 | P7 of 12.4 | 32% | - |
| Rolling Resistance Weak | 27 | P8.6 of 9.9 | 15% | - |
| Fuel Consumption | 1 | P18 of 18 | 0% | - |
| Energy Consumption | 2 | P8.5 of 9 | 7% | - |
| Abrasion | 4 | P4.8 of 10.5 | 56% | - |
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Bridgestone Potenza Sport. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
15 shared: 6 ahead, 9 behind
Compare with Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
15 | 6 | 9 | - | 40% |
 Continental SportContact 7
15 shared: 3 ahead, 10 behind
Compare with SportContact 7 |
15 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 23% |
 Pirelli P Zero PZ4
12 shared: 9 ahead, 3 behind
Compare with P Zero PZ4 |
12 | 9 | 3 | - | 75% |
 Michelin Pilot Sport 5
11 shared: 7 ahead, 4 behind
Compare with Pilot Sport 5 |
11 | 7 | 4 | - | 64% |
 Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
11 shared: 7 ahead, 3 behind
Compare with Ventus S1 evo 3 |
11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 70% |
 Falken Azenis FK520
10 shared: 9 ahead, 1 behind
Compare with Azenis FK520 |
10 | 9 | 1 | - | 90% |
 Maxxis Victra Sport 5
10 shared: 9 ahead, 1 behind
Compare with Victra Sport 5 |
10 | 9 | 1 | - | 90% |
 Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
10 shared: 8 ahead, 1 behind
Compare with Eagle F1 SuperSport |
10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 89% |
 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
10 shared: 2 ahead, 8 behind
Compare with Pilot Sport 4 S |
10 | 2 | 8 | - | 20% |
 Yokohama Advan Sport V107
7 shared: 7 ahead, 0 behind
Compare with Advan Sport V107 |
7 | 7 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
7 shared: 7 ahead, 0 behind
Compare with N Fera Sport SU2 |
7 | 7 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Vredestein Ultrac Pro
7 shared: 6 ahead, 1 behind
Compare with Ultrac Pro |
7 | 6 | 1 | - | 86% |
 Continental PremiumContact 7
7 shared: 2 ahead, 4 behind
Compare with PremiumContact 7 |
7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 33% |
 Giti GitiSportS2
6 shared: 6 ahead, 0 behind
Compare with GitiSportS2 |
6 | 6 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
6 shared: 6 ahead, 0 behind
Compare with SportMaxx RT 2 |
6 | 6 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Falken Azenis FK510
6 shared: 5 ahead, 1 behind
|
6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% |
 Firestone Firehawk Sport
5 shared: 4 ahead, 1 behind
Compare with Firehawk Sport |
5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% |
 Toyo Proxes Sport 2
5 shared: 4 ahead, 1 behind
Compare with Proxes Sport 2 |
5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% |
 Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+
5 shared: 4 ahead, 1 behind
|
5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% |
 Michelin Pilot Sport 4
5 shared: 2 ahead, 3 behind
|
5 | 2 | 3 | - | 40% |
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Predecessor | 28 | 1 | 6th | 45% |
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport This tire | 32 | 7 | 3rd | 68% |
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Successor | 7 | 1 | 5th | 78% |
Drawn from 33 tests. Updated July 7, 2026.
Across 33 comparative tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport shows a clear, repeatable pattern as a driver-focused UUHP tire: it is consistently among the quickest tires for lap-time-style disciplines (especially wet handling) and frequently delivers class-leading braking in the dry (and often strong wet braking too). This is reflected in multiple overall wins (e.g., 1st/9 in Evo 2026, 1st/10 in Auto Zeitung 2023, 1st/9 in Auto Bild UUHP 2021) and a strong average overall position of 3.2.
The trade-offs are also consistent: comfort/refinement and especially efficiency are recurring weaknesses, with repeated bottom-tier rolling resistance / fuel/energy consumption results and often poor noise/comfort rankings. Aquaplaning resistance is mixed (occasionally excellent, but often mid-pack to poor), and wear results vary by test/vehicle-ranging from surprisingly good (e.g., 4th/18 ADAC 2025 wear) to last (e.g., 6th/6 Tire Reviews 2023 wear) and very poor in EV-focused testing.
In the dry, it felt fast, confident and precise - a reassuringly capable and rewarding tire with excellent steering feel- 2025 EVO Summer Tire Test (2026)
exceptional feedback and precision on dry roads with high grip and short braking distances- 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test (2025)
dynamic handling characteristics- 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test (2025)
highest slalom speed, demonstrating its sporty character- 2025 AZ Summer Tire Test (2025)
matched Pirelli for the fastest lap, showing strong grip, precise transitions- 2025 Auto Express Summer Tire Test (2025)
a reassuringly capable and rewarding tire with excellent steering feel- 2025 EVO Summer Tire Test (2026)
scored highly for wet steering feel- Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers (2026)
outstanding front-end precision- 2025 AZ Summer Tire Test (2025)
exceptional feedback and precision on dry roads- 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test (2025)
it steers so nicely- Best Performance Tires For 2025 (2025)
In wet conditions, it provides exceptional grip with mild transitions during weight shifts and outstanding front-end precision- 2025 AZ Summer Tire Test (2025)
impressive grip on wet tracks- 2024 Sports Car Tire Test (2024)
high grip level in wet and dry conditions- 2024 Motorhome Summer Tire Test (2024)
good balance and traction in wet conditions- 2024 EVO Summer Tire Test (2024)
Outstanding on wet roads- 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tire Test (2023)
Within the first couple of hundred meters on the wet handling circuit, the grip was immediately apparent, encouraging early commitment and early throttle in corners- 2025 EVO Summer Tire Test (2026)
set the fastest wet handling lap- Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers (2026)
Incredible in wet handling- Best Performance Tires For 2025 (2025)
easy handling- 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test (2025)
performed exceptionally well in the wet circle test with the fastest time- 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test (2025)
carried near the highest rolling resistance- Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers (2026)
Rolling resistance so high it can no longer be produced in the EU- Best Performance Tires For 2025 (2025)
higher rolling resistance that affects efficiency- 2025 AZ Summer Tire Test (2025)
its main drawback is high rolling resistance- 2025 Auto Express Summer Tire Test (2025)
its rolling‑resistance figure is comparatively high- 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tire Test (2025)
rated the least comfortable- Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers (2026)
lower levels of comfort than the best in test- Best Performance Tires For 2025 (2025)
firmer ride quality- 2025 AZ Summer Tire Test (2025)
a less comfortable ride- 2024 EV Tire Test (2024)
noisiest tire in the test- Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers (2026)
Slightly increased rolling noise- 2024 Motorhome Summer Tire Test (2024)
louder pass-by noise, somewhat rumbling in the cabin- 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tires VS UHP Tires (2023)
high levels of noise- 2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test (2022)
high noise- 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tire Test (2022)
the outer shoulder of this tire did not hold up well to track work- Best Performance Tires For 2025 (2025)
showing some shoulder wear after fast cornering sessions- 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test (2025)
significant wear and tear (leading to downgrading)- 2024 Sports Car Tire Test (2024)
only tire that showed visible wear after testing- 2024 Auto Express Summer Tire Test (2024)
limited mileage- 2024 EV Tire Test (2024)
Every tester write-up on the Bridgestone Potenza Sport (32 tests) and 132 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport finished sixth despite genuine handling and braking strengths, undone by poor comfort and high rolling resistance. It is a tire for keen drivers happy to trade refinement and running costs for sharper responses.
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport delivered an emphatic victory in this year's test, with six table-topping performances. Within the first couple of hundred meters on the wet handling circuit, the grip was immediately apparent, encouraging early commitment and early throttle in corners. The BMW exited turns with the perfect attitude, just a hint of oversteer, following the ideal line precisely. The way it pivoted into the best balance quickly for each turn without overshooting gave the sensation of gaining lap time, and it remained very stable despite carrying more speed than most others. In the dry, it felt fast, confident and precise – a reassuringly capable and rewarding tire with excellent steering feel. It also proved pretty refined on the road. This represents a major turnaround since the last test of this size, which saw the Bridgestone finish last in wet braking.
Bridgestone earned its spot on the podium with best‑in‑test dry and wet braking scores. It also impressed in dry handling and provides comfortable, quiet running, but its rolling‑resistance figure is comparatively high. Overall it is a very balanced all‑rounder that can be warmly recommended.
The Bridgestone, last year’s winner in this size, takes second place this time but delivers a dramatic turnaround in wet braking, topping the field at 90ft—nearly a meter ahead of its nearest rival. It added third in wet handling and solid aquaplaning results, though felt less confident in standing water. In the dry, it matched Pirelli for the fastest lap, showing strong grip, precise transitions, and excellent traction, with joint-second braking just under a meter off the best. Quiet and consistent, its main drawback is high rolling resistance, but its balanced performance secures a strong overall result.
The Bridgestone potenza sport might have been amazing in the wet, and as always a nice handling tire, but the rolling resistance level of this tire was not just awkwardly high, but it is now being legislated out of production in the EU thanks to new label targets, making this test of it a little redundant. Also as we've seen plenty before, the outer shoulder of this tire did not hold up well to track work, so I hope any update they make to improve the rolling resistance will address this issue too. I really like the Potenza Sport as a fast road tire as it steers so nicely. If they can fix the rolling resistance and track wear without changing the sporty nature of the tire it could easily end up as one of my favorite tires.
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport convinced testers with excellent grip, notably short braking distances (best in dry conditions at 107 feet from 62 mph), and dynamic handling characteristics. It performed exceptionally well in the wet circle test with the fastest time and showed excellent stability during aquaplaning. Its only weakness was showing some shoulder wear after fast cornering sessions. The tire performed strongly in both wet and dry conditions with superb safety reserves, offering drivers a sporty yet secure experience that earned an "exemplary" rating.
The Bridgestone delivers the shortest dry braking distance and highest slalom speed, demonstrating its sporty character. This comes with firmer ride quality and higher rolling resistance that affects efficiency. In wet conditions, it provides exceptional grip with mild transitions during weight shifts and outstanding front-end precision. The Bridgestone's Japanese engineering emphasizes maximum performance and feedback at the expense of comfort and efficiency, making it the driver's choice. Despite being slightly less balanced than the top two finishers, it delivers the best price-performance ratio for enthusiasts seeking maximum driving engagement.
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport earns a "good" overall rating, setting the standard for driving safety with a "very good" score. While it falls slightly short of a "good" rating in environmental performance due to above-average weight and fuel consumption, it excels in driving safety. It delivers exceptional feedback and precision on dry roads with high grip and short braking distances, earning a "very good" rating. It also shines on wet surfaces, achieving top marks for short braking distances and easy handling, making it one of the best tires tested in wet conditions. However, its environmental impact is hindered by average efficiency, despite good scores for projected mileage and abrasion.
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport, last year's winner, delivered another strong performance but missed out on the overall win as competitors stepped up their game. It set the pace in wet handling, being a second faster than the next best tire and matching that with strong subjective scores. The tire showed good balance and traction in wet conditions, though it was less progressive than some rivals. In the dry, it ranked third in both lap times and subjective scores, demonstrating good response at medium to high speeds. Its only real weaknesses were high rolling resistance and somewhat disappointing wet braking results, but it remained an impressive performer overall.
Summary The Bridgestone Potenza Sport demonstrated a contradictory performance across various tests. It excelled in handling, ranking first in wet handling and second in dry handling, showcasing good feel, feedback, and balance. However, it struggled in other key areas. In wet conditions, it ranked last in braking and curved aquaplaning, despite its top performance in handling. Dry performance was similarly mixed, with excellent handling but middling braking results. The tire showed good noise and ride refinement. However, its most significant drawback was its rolling resistance, ranking last and significantly behind the top performer in this category. Additionally, it was the only tire that showed visible wear after testing. Results The Bridgestone Potenza Sport achieved an overall score of 99%, priced at £113.02. It ranked 1st in wet handling (100.00%) and 2nd in dry handling (99.80%). However, it struggled in wet braking (8th, 91.90%), curved aquaplaning (8th, 85.00%), and wet cornering (tied for 6th, 98.50%). Dry performance was mixed, with 5th in dry braking (95.60%). The tire ranked 5th in cabin noise (94.80%) but performed poorly in rolling resistance, ranking 8th (79.00%). .
The Potenza Sport works best as a pure road tire. It offers quick steering response and strong wet grip, matched with good comfort and low noise levels. Its main drawback is track performance, where lap times drop off as the tire gets hot and wear increases. This shouldn't be a problem for road users, but those planning regular track days should look elsewhere.
The Potenza Sport is an impressive sports tire with excellent grip in the wet and dry. The tire certainly does better when it's warm, which could be an issue for cooler wet running on the road, and it has high rolling resistance, but as a sports tire for the road, its steering feel and speed is excellent. It is a costly tire to run, but the tradeoff in driving enjoyment will be worth it for many driving enthusiasts
The Potenza Sport is the sportiest tire in the field - the tire to buy when efficiency isn't a priority.
When the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is warm, it has very good grip in all directions.
Outstanding on wet roads, great performance in the dry - this is how the Bridgestone Potenza Sport brought the test win. Slightly more expensive than the Conti with the same points and worse in terms of rolling resistance.
Exemplary.
Very good in the dry and wet grip tests however could improve aquaplaning, comfort and rolling resistance.Good+.
The Potenza Sport lead in the dry and wet with the sharpest handling and shortest braking distances.
Precise and uncompromisingly sporty – only safe to drive when the tires are warm.
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport continues to be an exciting tire to drive, with sporty handling and excellent dynamic properties in the dry and wet. This does compromise the aquaplaning ability, comfort levels and rolling resistance of the tire, and as the only tire with the starting tread depth below 7mm, this is a tire for the enthusiast that prioritizes driving enjoyment.
The Potenza Sport finished in the top 3 places in most grip tests and was solid in the wet and dry. The ride quality was firm and there was higher levels of noise in the cabin.
The new Bridgestone Potenza Sport at times feels like a track tire for the road. The grip levels are extremely high and when the tire is warm, the grip incredible. The low starting tread depth makes it difficult in the wet due to high levels of aquaplaning, however the grip is impressive when in contact with the road.
Highly Recommended.
The new Potenza Sport excels in the dry, with a slight aquaplaning weakness.
Test Winner.
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Bridgestone tires