Test Publication:
Auto Bild Sportscars
225/45 R18
11 tires
4 categories
Test Size:
225/45 R18
Tires Tested:
11 tires
Auto Bild Sportscars is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tire Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
The 2022 Autobild Sportscars summer tire test has tested eleven 225/45 R18 sizes using a BMW 3 Series, but has also tested four of the SAME sets in a staggered 225/45 R18 front and 255/4 R18 rear size to compare the two different options.
First up, the main test. Sadly the test was missing Goodyear and Pirelli, and interestingly the testers found the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 not only to be the best, but also to have the sportiest handling, something we're don't see often.
Even more surprising was that the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ finished joint first, beating every tire in the wet handling test and ending up with enough points to match the Pilot Sport 4.
It was the test of ties, with the Falken FK510 and Toyo Proxes Sport A finishing joint third and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 finishing joint fifth.
Square vs Staggered Setup
The most interesting part of the test was the square vs staggered setup. Unfortunately the Tire Reviews database can't list both results, just the square, so we'll have to explain the differences below referencing the square data we have already.
The tires tested in both square and staggered were the Michelin Pilot Sport 4, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+, Falken FK510 and Nexen N'Fera Sport.
In the dry, the staggered setup with the wider rear tire stopped 0.1 meters worse for the Falken and 0.2m behind for Michelin and Vredestein which is certainly counter intuitive, but the Nexen was 0.3 meters better with the wider rear tire.
Dry handling made no more sense with the Michelin finishing 0.8 km/h faster with the wider rear tire, 1.3 km/h faster for the Vredestein, 1.5 km/h faster for the Nexen, but 1.3 km/h slower for the Falken.
Wet braking had the Michelin stopping the BMW 0.5 meters shorter with the wider rear, 1.3 meters shorter for Nexen but exactly the same for Vredestein and 0.5 longer for the Falken!
Finally, every set of tires was significantly slower in the wet with the wider rear tire.
What can we conclude regarding square vs staggered tires? The data shows that there's not a huge amount of difference with the extra 20 mm of rear tire width, and whether you get better or worse performance varies between what test is being tested, and the tire brand used!
There's more information in the full Auto Bild test, so we suggest you check that out if you're interested in further information.
Below is all the data from the 225/45 R18 square test.
Dry
Bridgestone, Hankook and Toyo had an impressive lead in dry braking.
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
- Tomket Sport 3 Series 3
- GT Radial SportActive 2
- Fulda SportControl 2
Michelin aced the dry handling test with the quickest lap time and the sportiest handling.
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- GT Radial SportActive 2
- Tomket Sport 3 Series 3
Wet
Bridgestone again led the way in wet braking.
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- GT Radial SportActive 2
- Tomket Sport 3 Series 3
But couldn't quite beat Vredestein for the top place in wet handling.
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- GT Radial SportActive 2
- Tomket Sport 3 Series 3
GT Radial and Toyo led the way in the aquaplaning testing.
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- GT Radial SportActive 2
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Tomket Sport 3 Series 3
- GT Radial SportActive 2
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Tomket Sport 3 Series 3
Environment
The budget Tomket had the lowest external noise on test.
- Tomket Sport 3 Series 3
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- GT Radial SportActive 2
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
And the lowest rolling resistance.
And the lowest price.
- Tomket Sport 3 Series 3
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
- GT Radial SportActive 2
- Fulda SportControl 2
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Falken Azenis FK510
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Results
Premium summer tires with the best dynamic driving characteristics in the dry (direct steering with good feedback), safe wet handling, short wet and dry braking, low rolling resistance.
High price level.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
37.1 M |
36 M |
+1.1 M |
97.04% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
104.1 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
47.6 M |
45.7 M |
+1.9 M |
96.01% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
86.9 Km/H |
88.9 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
97.75% |
| Wet Circle |
7th |
12.01 s |
11.47 s |
+0.54 s |
95.5% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
98.2 Km/H |
99.4 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
98.79% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
6th |
3.27 m/sec2 |
3.69 m/sec2 |
-0.42 m/sec2 |
88.62% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
72.8 dB |
70.8 dB |
+2 dB |
97.25% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
11th |
660 |
335 |
+325 |
50.76% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
8.42 kg / t |
8.18 kg / t |
+0.24 kg / t |
97.15% |
Sporty balanced summer tire, good wet grip, good aquaplaning resistance, sporty dry handling with precise steering, short wet and dry braking distances.
High rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
37.5 M |
36 M |
+1.5 M |
96% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
103.2 Km/H |
104.1 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
99.14% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
49.5 M |
45.7 M |
+3.8 M |
92.32% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
88.9 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Circle |
4th |
11.82 s |
11.47 s |
+0.35 s |
97.04% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
97.9 Km/H |
99.4 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98.49% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
5th |
3.34 m/sec2 |
3.69 m/sec2 |
-0.35 m/sec2 |
90.51% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
73.3 dB |
70.8 dB |
+2.5 dB |
96.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
3rd |
485 |
335 |
+150 |
69.07% |
| Rolling Resistance |
11th |
10 kg / t |
8.18 kg / t |
+1.82 kg / t |
81.8% |
Good performance potential, excellent aquaplaning resistance, stable handling the wet, sporty dry dynamics.
High price level.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
37 M |
36 M |
+1 M |
97.3% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
102.9 Km/H |
104.1 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
98.85% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
47.9 M |
45.7 M |
+2.2 M |
95.41% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
86.4 Km/H |
88.9 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
97.19% |
| Wet Circle |
6th |
11.95 s |
11.47 s |
+0.48 s |
95.98% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
98 Km/H |
99.4 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.59% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
4th |
3.54 m/sec2 |
3.69 m/sec2 |
-0.15 m/sec2 |
95.93% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
73.2 dB |
70.8 dB |
+2.4 dB |
96.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
9th |
570 |
335 |
+235 |
58.77% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
9.01 kg / t |
8.18 kg / t |
+0.83 kg / t |
90.79% |
Exemplary driving characteristics, very good aquaplaning resistance, sporty handling in the wet and dry, short wet and dry braking, fair price.
Reduced ride comfort, high rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
36.1 M |
36 M |
+0.1 M |
99.72% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
104 Km/H |
104.1 Km/H |
-0.1 Km/H |
99.9% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
48.8 M |
45.7 M |
+3.1 M |
93.65% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
87.5 Km/H |
88.9 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.43% |
| Wet Circle |
2nd |
11.73 s |
11.47 s |
+0.26 s |
97.78% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
99.4 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
2nd |
3.6 m/sec2 |
3.69 m/sec2 |
-0.09 m/sec2 |
97.56% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
9th |
73.5 dB |
70.8 dB |
+2.7 dB |
96.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
495 |
335 |
+160 |
67.68% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
9.47 kg / t |
8.18 kg / t |
+1.29 kg / t |
86.38% |
Impressive grip with sporty handling in the wet, direct steering response and stable handling in the dry, short wet and dry braking, good comfort.
High rolling resistance, high noise.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
36 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
102.2 Km/H |
104.1 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
98.17% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
45.7 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
88.8 Km/H |
88.9 Km/H |
-0.1 Km/H |
99.89% |
| Wet Circle |
1st |
11.47 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
95.7 Km/H |
99.4 Km/H |
-3.7 Km/H |
96.28% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
8th |
3.06 m/sec2 |
3.69 m/sec2 |
-0.63 m/sec2 |
82.93% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
10th |
74.1 dB |
70.8 dB |
+3.3 dB |
95.55% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
8th |
560 |
335 |
+225 |
59.82% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
9.7 kg / t |
8.18 kg / t |
+1.52 kg / t |
84.33% |
Balanced tire with good driving characteristics in the dry and wet, short braking distances, low noise, low rolling resistance, low price.
Limited curved aquaplaning resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
36.1 M |
36 M |
+0.1 M |
99.72% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
103.5 Km/H |
104.1 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
99.42% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
49.5 M |
45.7 M |
+3.8 M |
92.32% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
87.6 Km/H |
88.9 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.54% |
| Wet Circle |
3rd |
11.76 s |
11.47 s |
+0.29 s |
97.53% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
95.6 Km/H |
99.4 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
96.18% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
10th |
2.85 m/sec2 |
3.69 m/sec2 |
-0.84 m/sec2 |
77.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
72.2 dB |
70.8 dB |
+1.4 dB |
98.06% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
520 |
335 |
+185 |
64.42% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
8.76 kg / t |
8.18 kg / t |
+0.58 kg / t |
93.38% |
Premium comfort tires with stable driving on dry roads, short dry braking, fuel saving rolling resistance, good comfort.
Low aquaplaning resistance, longer wet braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
36.7 M |
36 M |
+0.7 M |
98.09% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
102.7 Km/H |
104.1 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.66% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
52.5 M |
45.7 M |
+6.8 M |
87.05% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
85.8 Km/H |
88.9 Km/H |
-3.1 Km/H |
96.51% |
| Wet Circle |
9th |
12.2 s |
11.47 s |
+0.73 s |
94.02% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
95 Km/H |
99.4 Km/H |
-4.4 Km/H |
95.57% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
9th |
2.91 m/sec2 |
3.69 m/sec2 |
-0.78 m/sec2 |
78.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
10th |
74.1 dB |
70.8 dB |
+3.3 dB |
95.55% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
10th |
590 |
335 |
+255 |
56.78% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
8.71 kg / t |
8.18 kg / t |
+0.53 kg / t |
93.92% |
Safe driving characteristics in the wet and dry, good aquaplaning resistance, short dry braking, low rolling resistance, good comfort.
Long wet braking, limited dry cornering grip.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
37.8 M |
36 M |
+1.8 M |
95.24% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
102.1 Km/H |
104.1 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
98.08% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
52.4 M |
45.7 M |
+6.7 M |
87.21% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
85.1 Km/H |
88.9 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
95.73% |
| Wet Circle |
5th |
11.9 s |
11.47 s |
+0.43 s |
96.39% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
97 Km/H |
99.4 Km/H |
-2.4 Km/H |
97.59% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
2nd |
3.6 m/sec2 |
3.69 m/sec2 |
-0.09 m/sec2 |
97.56% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
72.8 dB |
70.8 dB |
+2 dB |
97.25% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
495 |
335 |
+160 |
67.68% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.77 kg / t |
8.18 kg / t |
+0.59 kg / t |
93.27% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, short dry braking, low price.
Limited handling in the dry and wet, weak cornering, slow steering, high rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
37.4 M |
36 M |
+1.4 M |
96.26% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
101 Km/H |
104.1 Km/H |
-3.1 Km/H |
97.02% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
50.6 M |
45.7 M |
+4.9 M |
90.32% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
82.9 Km/H |
88.9 Km/H |
-6 Km/H |
93.25% |
| Wet Circle |
8th |
12.02 s |
11.47 s |
+0.55 s |
95.42% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
96.4 Km/H |
99.4 Km/H |
-3 Km/H |
96.98% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
7th |
3.18 m/sec2 |
3.69 m/sec2 |
-0.51 m/sec2 |
86.18% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
72.9 dB |
70.8 dB |
+2.1 dB |
97.12% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
410 |
335 |
+75 |
81.71% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
9.85 kg / t |
8.18 kg / t |
+1.67 kg / t |
83.05% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, short dry braking, low rolling resistance.
Low levels of grip in the wet with understeer balance, significantly longer wet braking distances, average ride comfort.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
37.7 M |
36 M |
+1.7 M |
95.49% |
| Dry Handling |
10th |
99.2 Km/H |
104.1 Km/H |
-4.9 Km/H |
95.29% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
57 M |
45.7 M |
+11.3 M |
80.18% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
78.2 Km/H |
88.9 Km/H |
-10.7 Km/H |
87.96% |
| Wet Circle |
10th |
12.34 s |
11.47 s |
+0.87 s |
92.95% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
98.8 Km/H |
99.4 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
99.4% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
1st |
3.69 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
72.3 dB |
70.8 dB |
+1.5 dB |
97.93% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
4th |
490 |
335 |
+155 |
68.37% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
8.62 kg / t |
8.18 kg / t |
+0.44 kg / t |
94.9% |
Short dry braking, low rolling resistance.
Very poor grip in the wet with severe understeer, dangerously long wet braking distances, poor aquaplaning resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
37.7 M |
36 M |
+1.7 M |
95.49% |
| Dry Handling |
11th |
99 Km/H |
104.1 Km/H |
-5.1 Km/H |
95.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
11th |
65.6 M |
45.7 M |
+19.9 M |
69.66% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
75.2 Km/H |
88.9 Km/H |
-13.7 Km/H |
84.59% |
| Wet Circle |
11th |
12.78 s |
11.47 s |
+1.31 s |
89.75% |
| Straight Aqua |
11th |
94.6 Km/H |
99.4 Km/H |
-4.8 Km/H |
95.17% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
11th |
2.82 m/sec2 |
3.69 m/sec2 |
-0.87 m/sec2 |
76.42% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
70.8 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
1st |
335 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
8.18 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Sadly missing weight :( Most important factor for me.
Out of interest, why? We have weights listed on our UHP test.
The square vs staggered setup results leaves my thinking that tire technology is still a literal black art and no one can produce consistent results. It's like getting a TV with resolution between 1820and1990 x 1000and1160. It must make your job 20% frustrating and 80% fascinating.
The differences between the sizes was definitely too small to be meaningful in this test, it would have more affected balance rather than grip.
Unfortunately, all the old models except Vredestsein and Bridgestone ... and yes, there is no GY!
This will have been tested back in September / October last year, hence last years models. It's difficult to do summer tests in the same year for publication around this time.