Menu
Firestone Firehawk Sport View Gallery (3)
215-275/30-45 R18-20 35 sizes 2023

Firestone Firehawk Sport

The Firestone Firehawk Sport is designed to meet the expectations and needs of sporty drivers, allowing them to rediscover the thrill of driving. Compared to its predecessor, the Firehawk SZ90mu, the Firestone Firehawk Sport also gives drivers excellent dry braking with a 9% shorter stopping distance.

The new Firestone Firehawk Sport will be available in 36 sizes from 18” to 20” to cover a wide range of everyday vehicles and sports cars.

7.9
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
85%
Road Feedback
78%
Handling
84%
Wear
50%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
67%
6 Reviews
76% Average
18,510 miles driven
7 Tests (avg: 12th)
Firestone Firehawk Sport

Firestone Firehawk Sport

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7.9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Dry
76
1.8x / 11 tests
Wet
74.4
2x / 25 tests
Value
73.4
0.42x / 12 tests
Comfort
72.9
0.32x / 7 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
79.4
15 tests
Handling
70.8
8 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 7
Publications: 4
Period: 2023 - 2026
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 76%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.3
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? Auto Bild 2026 245/45 R19 23/50 2 metrics
2025 Sports Cars Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2025 245/35 R19 6/8 9 metrics
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 20/21 12 metrics
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 7/18 10 metrics
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 15/52 2 metrics
2023 Sport Auto UHP Tire Test Sport Auto 2023 225/40 R18 4/11 10 metrics
2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2023 225/40 R18 9/13 10 metrics
7
Tests
12th
Average
4th
Best
23rd
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
15th/52
2025 Sports Cars Tire Test
245/35 R19 • 2025
6th/8
This tire showed precise steering response with good feedback on dry surfaces. It offers good comfort and low rolling resistance, which helps with fuel economy. However, it demonstrated limited performance in wet handling and wet braking, with significantly longer stopping distances in the wet compared to the top performers.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
18 inch
225/40 R18 92 Y XL B A 70
245/40 R18 97 Y XL B A 70
245/45 R18 100 Y XL B A 70
255/35 R18 94 Y XL B A 70
19 inch
235/35 R19 91 Y XL B A 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Firestone Firehawk Sport >>

Questions and Answers for the Firestone Firehawk Sport

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Firestone Firehawk Sport. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Firestone Firehawk Sport Reviews

Given 51% while driving a Mazda 6 (235/40 R19) on mostly country roads for 6,000 spirited miles
They handle well, have good wet grip and excellent dry grip for my slow car however the wear was quite fast.
Although they are very reliable all the way to the wear limits, would only buy again if fitting to a car I don't drive much.
June 28, 2025
Given 90% while driving a Fiat 500 Abarth (215/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Travelled around 7000km with these tires now, they are really great. Excellent properties in the wet while also quiet and grippy in dry. Good rim protection, appealing tread pattern. No negative aspects so far.
August 19, 2024
Given 64% while driving a Audi S5 (265/30 R20) on mostly country roads for 4,000 average miles
Good whilst they lasted....5 months from purchase, and less than 4,000 miles later, one nearside tire is damaged / leaking (plus a chunk has delaminated and a crack appeared without any sign of alloy contact), and the rear nearside tire's rim protection has cracked. I'm very annoyed; the previous Toyos I had fitted - identical specification and a similar soft rubber - experienced exactly the same local roads / potholes for over 4 years without issue, plus the tires on our other cars haven't suffered either (running Toyo and Nexen tires for 5 years and 7 years respectively, the latter on a very heavy 4x4).

I can only conclude that whatever material used is far too soft to deal with the state of English roads - which is not much help if you live here. Needless to say, I avoid potholes whenever possible or driving in the gutter, keep tires at the correct pressures etc. The picture uploaded is the most concerning as there is no damage to the alloy / sign of impact to the tire, so quite what has caused the cracking here is a mystery.

This has turned out to be the most expensive set of tires for the mileage that I've purchased in 40 years, and I'm disappointed as these tires seemed great at the outset in respect of handling/grip in the wet and lack of noise - my two chief criteria. I can only assume that these tires are simply not up to the job for whatever reason, and I will be contacting the supplier to complain.
December 5, 2024

How would you rate the Firestone Firehawk Sport?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Firestone Firehawk Sport Reviews

Given 81% while driving a Opel insignia (245/35 R20) on a combination of roads for 10 average miles
I came from a hankook ventus s1 evo3 . But they had pretty bad dry cracks even before the tire ran out of life . I have 245/35/20 tires . the comfort on the firestones are a little bit worse then the hankooks . i could run the hankooks on 2.5 bar , these on 2.3 for the same comfort . i think the firestones are a bit more fuel efficient , even when they are on a lower tire pressure . Dry grip is very good , never lost any traction , even in the rain . aquaplanning is also very good , never had any feel of losing controle .
So far i ran the tires around 15.000 km and lost 1.5mm out of the 5.5mm tread on the front , and only lost 0.5 on the back . so i think ill get aroud 60.000km out of it if i switch them every year . Found out they have like 0 traction on snow , keep that in mind .
December 16, 2025
Given 96% while driving a BMW bmw (245/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I bought these to replace Avon tires that had cracked too much after 18 months and I'm impressed so much I went the next week and got same but in 275/35 fitted to the rear, wet grip is excellent, pretty much feels dry.
I live in Scotland so wet grip is the most important performance to myself as in the dry most tires perform similar, I certainly don't have the ability to explore the limits safely.
Very quite tire and my mpg increased.
They don't tramline nowhere near as much as my last tires did.
I've not had them long enough to review wear but so far highly recommended.
October 16, 2024
Given 90% while driving a Audi S5 (265/30 R20) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
Excellent tires for wet roads - no slipping when accelerating / overtaking / cornering, or when hitting unseen standing water, or more generally, bouncing around on poorly-surfaced potholed roads - so well-suited to driving in England this Summer... Also grip well in the dry, and they're quiet at lower speeds - very important for a convertible which came with large, wide alloys and rubber-band tires. Am also achieving more miles per gallon - never seen 33 mpg previously (30 was the best) - so as nothing else has changed, the new tires' construction/composition must be responsible. Plus, they were attractively priced.

Have only driven 1,500 miles so far, but pleased that I took a gamble on tires with barely any reviews available. These are certainly better than previous Toyo Proxes or Falkens, and seem to be more in line with the parent Bridgestone's tire designs (mine are made in Poland, not Italy as the website suggests). I've long preferred Japanese tire designs for their combination of grip, comfort and quietness, although they tend to wear down faster, after disappointing experiences with the main Italian and German offerings.
July 12, 2024
Rate the Firestone Firehawk Sport