Menu

Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

This matchup pits Firestone's budget-friendly Firehawk Sport against Michelin's benchmark Pilot Sport 5, both summer performance tires in 225/40 R18. Across four independent tests from 2023-2025, the PS5 consistently finished at or near the top, while the Firehawk Sport landed mid-to-lower table.

The headline differences show up in wet grip, longevity, and overall balance. Michelin repeatedly stopped shorter in both wet and dry, cornered faster, and lasted far longer. Firestone counters with lower rolling resistance, slightly lower noise, and a much lower purchase price-translating to strong efficiency and upfront value for light-use drivers.
Firehawk-Sport VS Pilot-Sport-5

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of five total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Michelin Pilot Sport 5five
five wins

While it might look like the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is better than the Firestone Firehawk Sport purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Lowest rolling resistance in tests, aiding fuel economy
  • Lower external noise than PS5
  • Significantly lower purchase price
  • Decent dry braking/handling with stable feedback
  • Consistently shorter wet and dry braking distances
  • Stronger wet handling and aquaplaning safety
  • Outstanding tread life and low abrasion
  • Balanced, precise dynamics with strong overall value

Dry Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 2.5% less distance than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
35.2M
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
34.32M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
35.1M (+0.4M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
34.7M
Firestone Firehawk Sport
34.6M (+1.1M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
33.5M
Firestone Firehawk Sport
35.9M (+0.4M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
35.5M
Firestone Firehawk Sport
34.6M (+1.1M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
33.5M
Firestone Firehawk Sport
35.8M (+1.4M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
34.4M

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 1.66% faster around a lap than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
115.6Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
117.55Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
114.3Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
114.6Km/H
Firestone Firehawk Sport
116.9Km/H (-3.6Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
120.5Km/H

Wet Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 8.7% less distance than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
36.56M
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
33.38M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
42.2M (+3.1M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
39.1M
Firestone Firehawk Sport
31.1M (+3.4M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
27.7M
Firestone Firehawk Sport
30.9M (+1.7M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
29.2M
Firestone Firehawk Sport
48.7M (+5.5M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
43.2M
Firestone Firehawk Sport
29.9M (+2.2M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
27.7M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 7.11% less distance than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
38M
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
35.3M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
38M (+2.7M)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
35.3M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 3.29% faster around a wet lap than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
76.45Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79.05Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
81.6Km/H (-3.2Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
84.8Km/H
Firestone Firehawk Sport
71.3Km/H (-2Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73.3Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 1.22% faster around a wet circle than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
13.14s
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
12.98s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
11.19s (+0.06s)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
11.13s
Firestone Firehawk Sport
15.08s (+0.25s)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
14.83s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 floated at a 2.72% higher speed than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
77.27Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79.43Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
74.6Km/H (-3.3Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
77.9Km/H
Firestone Firehawk Sport
77.5Km/H (-2.4Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79.9Km/H
Firestone Firehawk Sport
79.7Km/H (-0.8Km/H)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
80.5Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 slipped out at a 9.45% higher speed than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
2.78m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3.07m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
2.45m/sec2 (-0.51m/sec2)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
2.96m/sec2
Firestone Firehawk Sport
2.8m/sec2 (-0.2m/sec2)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3m/sec2
Firestone Firehawk Sport
3.1m/sec2 (-0.15m/sec2)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3.25m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scored 14% more points than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
4.3 Points
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
4.3 Points (-0.7 Points)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5 Points

Noise

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Firestone Firehawk Sport was better during three noise tests. On average the Firestone Firehawk Sport measured 1.29% quieter than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
70.97dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
71.9dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Firestone Firehawk Sport

Firestone Firehawk Sport
67dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
68.3dB (+1.3dB)
Firestone Firehawk Sport
72.3dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73.1dB (+0.8dB)
Firestone Firehawk Sport
73.6dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
74.3dB (+0.7dB)

Wear

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is predicted to cover 41.64% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
31680KM
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
54285KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
34500KM (-21900KM)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
56400KM
Firestone Firehawk Sport
28860KM (-23310KM)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
52170KM

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two value tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 proved to have a 21.72% better value based on price/1000km than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
12.2Price/1000
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
9.55Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
12.75Price/1000 (+2.4Price/1000)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
10.35Price/1000
Firestone Firehawk Sport
11.64Price/1000 (+2.9Price/1000)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8.74Price/1000

Price

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Firestone Firehawk Sport was better during one price tests. On average the Firestone Firehawk Sport cost 27% less than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
365
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
500
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Firestone Firehawk Sport

Firestone Firehawk Sport
365
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
500 (+135)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Firestone Firehawk Sport was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Firestone Firehawk Sport had a 16.4% lower rolling resistance than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
7.34kg / t
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8.78kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Firestone Firehawk Sport

Firestone Firehawk Sport
7.05kg / t
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8.62kg / t (+1.57kg / t)
Firestone Firehawk Sport
7.62kg / t
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8.94kg / t (+1.32kg / t)

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Firestone Firehawk Sport was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Firestone Firehawk Sport used 1.79% less fuel than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
5.5l/100km
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5.6l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Firestone Firehawk Sport

Firestone Firehawk Sport
5.5l/100km
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
5.6l/100km (+0.1l/100km)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 emitted 30.83% less particle wear matter than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
81.1mg/km/t
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
56.1mg/km/t
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Firestone Firehawk Sport
81.1mg/km/t (+25mg/km/t)
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
56.1mg/km/t

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Firestone Firehawk Sport and Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

In total the Firestone Firehawk Sport has been reviewed 6 times and drivers have given the tire 76% overall.

The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 has been reviewed 101 times and drivers have given the tire 85% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

Best Review for the Firestone Firehawk Sport
Given 90% 215/35 R18 on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Travelled around 7000km with these tires now, they are really great. Excellent properties in the wet while also quiet and grippy in dry. Good rim protection, appealing tread pattern. No negative aspects so far.
Helpful 1070 - tire reviewed on August 19, 2024
View all Firestone Firehawk Sport driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Given 89% 225/40 R18 on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I've bought the new Michelin Pilot Sport 5 for my Golf R as I previously had the Pilot Sport 4 tires. What a fantastic difference these new tire are. Theres far less noise, the grip in the wet is better and the dry grip is almost the same if not better as well. I would definitely be buying these again.
Helpful 1723 - tire reviewed on January 12, 2022
View all Michelin Pilot Sport 5 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Across every shared test, Michelin's Pilot Sport 5 is the more complete performer, with meaningful advantages in wet braking (often ~7-11% shorter), wet handling, aquaplaning safety, and mileage (roughly 56k vs. 29-35k km reported). It also delivers better overall cost performance despite a higher purchase price, thanks to longevity and balanced dynamics.

Firestone's Firehawk Sport makes sense for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing quietness, fuel efficiency, and acceptable dry manners. But its weaker wet grip and shorter tread life cap its appeal. If you drive in varied weather, value safety margins, or keep tires for several seasons, choose the PS5. If you want lower upfront cost and efficiency for mainly dry, urban use, the Firehawk Sport can fit the brief.
Key Differences
  • Overall ranking: PS5 wins all four shared tests (1/21, 3/18, 2/52, 3/13) vs. Firehawk (20/21, 7/18, 15/52, 9/13)
  • Wet braking gap is meaningful: often 7-11% shorter for PS5 (e.g., 48.7m vs. 43.2m; 31.1m vs. 27.7m)
  • Aquaplaning safety: PS5 leads in straight and curved tests across multiple rounds
  • Longevity: PS5 ~52-56k km vs. Firehawk ~29-35k km (≈60-80% advantage)
  • Economy/noise: Firehawk has lower rolling resistance (≈15-18% better) and slightly less noise
  • Value over life: Despite higher price, PS5's cost per 1,000 km is lower in tests
Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Overall Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Firestone Firehawk Sport Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.