2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test

Following on from the 52 set braking shootout, the full Autobild summer tire test has taken the best twenty tires to the full set of testing, with some interesting highlights!

Test Publication:

225/40 R18 20 tires 4 categories

Similar Tests

Images courtesy of Auto Bild

Test Publication:

https://www.autobild.de/ratgeber/reifen/

Images courtesy of Auto Bild

Test Size: 225/40 R18

Tires Tested: 20 tires

Test Categories:
4 categories (12 tests)

Similar Tests

There are two interesting stories. Firstly, is the rise of the Chinese tires, with both Linglong and Sailun performing really well in the grip tests. Does this mean Chinese tires are now fighting with the premium manufacturers? Well, sort of.

In terms of grip, both the Chinese tires performed extremely well, performing above average in both the braking tests. However, it is quite clear they have traded grip for tread life, as both the Chinese brands finished at the bottom of the wear test. 

This means, despite their cheaper purchase price, their total cost of ownership, measured in euros per 1000km driven, was around double the test winning Goodyear. Yes, the Chinese companies can now make a tire that grips really well, but no, they can't yet seem to make one that also lasts.

The second story is regarding the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 AO. It was mentioned in the shootout, the Pirelli was the Audi specific version of the PZ4, which is unusual as OE tires are quite different from the aftermarket version. In this case it seems Audi focused on dry grip as the PZ4 under delivered in the wet.

The final surprise is the Bridgestone Potenza Sport performing very well in the wear test, which is unusual for the Japanese tire. They did still note in the full article that the tire had it's usual very high wear on track.

Dry

Bridgestone Potenza Sport achieved the shortest braking distance of 32.6 meters, followed closely by Falken ZIEX ZE320 and Michelin Pilot Sport 5, while the budget Autogreen tire trailed by nearly 6 meters.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and Hankook Ventus Evo shared the fastest lap speed at 120.9 km/h, with Bridgestone Potenza Sport and Michelin Pilot Sport 5 right behind, while Nexen N Fera Sport performed the worst.

Wet

Hankook Ventus Evo led with the shortest wet braking distance of 42.7 meters, with Kumho Ecsta PS71 and Linglong Sport Master just 0.1 meters behind, while the Autogreen tire showed dangerous performance, needing 25.4 meters more to stop.

Falken ZIEX ZE320 achieved the highest average speed in wet handling at 73.9 km/h, followed by Kumho Ecsta PS71 and Bridgestone/Hankook tied for third, demonstrating the Falken's exceptional wet grip despite its mid-tier price.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport recorded the fastest wet circle time at 14.55 seconds, with Hankook Ventus Evo and Linglong Sport Master completing the top three, while the Autogreen reference tire was over 2 seconds slower.

Giti GitiSportS2 surprisingly led the straight aquaplaning test with the highest float speed of 81.4 km/h, followed by Kumho Ecsta PS71 and Continental PremiumContact 7, showing strong water evacuation capabilities.

Dunlop SportMaxx RT2 achieved the best curved aquaplaning performance with 3.45 m/s² of lateral acceleration, followed by Continental PremiumContact 7 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro, demonstrating exceptional directional stability in standing water.

Comfort

Eight tires tied for top comfort rating with perfect 5-point scores, including Dunlop, Falken, Vredestein, Continental, Michelin, Hankook, Pirelli and Laufenn, while Yokohama and Maxxis scored lowest with 3.9 points.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was the quietest tire at 71.3 dB, with Falken and Nexen close behind, while Kumho Ecsta PS71 generated the most road noise at 75.4 dB despite its excellent wet performance.

Value

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 showed exceptional durability with a projected 54,020 km lifespan, followed by Michelin Pilot Sport 5 at 52,170 km, while the Chinese tires Linglong Sport Master and Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 wore out fastest.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 offered the best cost per 1,000 km at €6.66, followed by Kumho Ecsta PS71 and Toyo Proxes Comfort, while the premium-priced Pirelli P Zero PZ4 delivered the worst value at €15.93 per 1,000 km.

Firestone Firehawk Sport led with the lowest rolling resistance of 7.62 kg/t, potentially offering the best fuel economy, followed by Continental PremiumContact 7 and Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, while Yokohama Advan Sport V107 had the highest resistance at 10.62 kg/t.

Results

1^st

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/70
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 360.00

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 demonstrated excellent safety reserves with impressive lateral grip and consistently short braking distances in wet conditions. Its handling on dry surfaces was equally impressive with dynamic characteristics and responsive steering. The standout feature was its outstanding mileage of over 54,000 kilometers, the best in the test, making it the "Eco-Master" with the best cost performance at €6.66 per 1000 kilometers. It also scored well for comfort with relatively quiet operation, creating a well-rounded premium tire that excelled across all test categories and earned an "exemplary" rating.

Dry

97.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	6th	34 M	32.6 M	+1.4 M	95.88%
Dry Handling	1st	120.9 Km/H			100%

Wet

97%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	6th	44.2 M	42.7 M	+1.5 M	96.61%
Wet Handling	8th	73 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-0.9 Km/H	98.78%
Wet Circle	4th	14.72 s	14.55 s	+0.17 s	98.85%
Straight Aqua	11th	80.3 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-1.1 Km/H	98.65%
Curved Aquaplaning	7th	3.17 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.28 m/sec2	91.88%

Comfort

97%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	10th	4.7 Points	5 Points	-0.3 Points	94%
Noise	1st	71.3 dB			100%

Value

95%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	1st	54020 KM			100%
Value	1st	6.66 Price/1000			100%
Rolling Resistance	11th	8.97 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.35 kg / t	84.95%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

1^st

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/72
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 456.00

The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 offered excellent dynamic handling characteristics and consistently short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces. Despite being the most expensive tire in the test at €456, it justified its premium price with very good mileage of over 52,000 kilometers and excellent overall cost performance. The Michelin delivered balanced performance across all test categories with particularly strong results in wet performance tests. Its precise steering feedback and stable cornering behavior added to driver confidence in all conditions, earning it an "exemplary" rating.

Dry

98.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	3rd	33.5 M	32.6 M	+0.9 M	97.31%
Dry Handling	4th	120.5 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-0.4 Km/H	99.67%

Wet

97.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	5th	43.2 M	42.7 M	+0.5 M	98.84%
Wet Handling	5th	73.3 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-0.6 Km/H	99.19%
Wet Circle	6th	14.83 s	14.55 s	+0.28 s	98.11%
Straight Aqua	8th	80.5 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-0.9 Km/H	98.89%
Curved Aquaplaning	6th	3.25 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.2 m/sec2	94.2%

Comfort

98%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	5 Points			100%
Noise	17th	74.3 dB	71.3 dB	+3 dB	95.96%

Value

86%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	2nd	52170 KM	54020 KM	-1850 KM	96.58%
Value	6th	8.74 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+2.08 Price/1000	76.2%
Rolling Resistance	10th	8.94 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.32 kg / t	85.23%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

3^rd

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: D/A/72
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 384.00

The Bridgestone Potenza Sport convinced testers with excellent grip, notably short braking distances (best in dry conditions at 32.6 meters from 100 km/h), and dynamic handling characteristics. It performed exceptionally well in the wet circle test with the fastest time and showed excellent stability during aquaplaning. Its only weakness was showing some shoulder wear after fast cornering sessions. The tire performed strongly in both wet and dry conditions with superb safety reserves, offering drivers a sporty yet secure experience that earned an "exemplary" rating.

Dry

99.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	1st	32.6 M			100%
Dry Handling	3rd	120.6 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-0.3 Km/H	99.75%

Wet

96.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	4th	43.1 M	42.7 M	+0.4 M	99.07%
Wet Handling	3rd	73.5 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-0.4 Km/H	99.46%
Wet Circle	1st	14.55 s			100%
Straight Aqua	19th	79.1 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-2.3 Km/H	97.17%
Curved Aquaplaning	12th	3.04 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.41 m/sec2	88.12%

Comfort

90.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	12th	4.3 Points	5 Points	-0.7 Points	86%
Noise	18th	74.6 dB	71.3 dB	+3.3 dB	95.58%

Value

82.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	4th	45880 KM	54020 KM	-8140 KM	84.93%
Value	5th	8.37 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+1.71 Price/1000	79.57%
Rolling Resistance	16th	9.24 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.62 kg / t	82.47%

Read Reviews Test Results Buy from £229.99 Results Table Test Charts

4^th

Continental PremiumContact 7

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/72
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 380.00

The Continental PremiumContact 7 offered very good aquaplaning reserves and short braking distances in all conditions. It delivered dynamic handling characteristics with responsive steering and excellent stability at high speeds. The tire achieved impressive mileage of over 46,000 kilometers, resulting in very good cost performance at €8.22 per 1000 kilometers. Continental's balanced performance across all test categories with no significant weaknesses demonstrated the brand's consistent quality, earning an "exemplary" rating for this well-engineered product.

Dry

96.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	12th	34.6 M	32.6 M	+2 M	94.22%
Dry Handling	6th	119.8 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-1.1 Km/H	99.09%

Wet

98.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	6th	44.2 M	42.7 M	+1.5 M	96.61%
Wet Handling	7th	73.2 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-0.7 Km/H	99.05%
Wet Circle	11th	14.94 s	14.55 s	+0.39 s	97.39%
Straight Aqua	3rd	81.1 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-0.3 Km/H	99.63%
Curved Aquaplaning	2nd	3.37 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.08 m/sec2	97.68%

Comfort

98.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	5 Points			100%
Noise	8th	73 dB	71.3 dB	+1.7 dB	97.67%

Value

85.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	3rd	46250 KM	54020 KM	-7770 KM	85.62%
Value	4th	8.22 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+1.56 Price/1000	81.02%
Rolling Resistance	2nd	8.41 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+0.79 kg / t	90.61%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

4^th

Hankook Ventus Evo

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/72
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 380.00

The Hankook Ventus Evo K137 delivered convincing driving dynamics with secure handling and the shortest braking distances in wet conditions at 42.7 meters from 100 km/h. It performed excellently in dry handling tests with the highest average speed of 120.9 km/h around the test track. The tire showed good mileage at over 41,000 kilometers and reasonable rolling resistance, offering good all-round cost performance. This consistent performance across all test criteria, particularly its outstanding wet and dry handling, earned it an "exemplary" rating.

Dry

97.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	6th	34 M	32.6 M	+1.4 M	95.88%
Dry Handling	1st	120.9 Km/H			100%

Wet

97.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	1st	42.7 M			100%
Wet Handling	3rd	73.5 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-0.4 Km/H	99.46%
Wet Circle	2nd	14.61 s	14.55 s	+0.06 s	99.59%
Straight Aqua	5th	80.7 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-0.7 Km/H	99.14%
Curved Aquaplaning	8th	3.15 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.3 m/sec2	91.3%

Comfort

98.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	5 Points			100%
Noise	9th	73.1 dB	71.3 dB	+1.8 dB	97.54%

Value

79%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	6th	41440 KM	54020 KM	-12580 KM	76.71%
Value	8th	9.17 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+2.51 Price/1000	72.63%
Rolling Resistance	5th	8.68 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.06 kg / t	87.79%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

4^th

Kumho Ecsta PS71

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: D/A/72
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 316.00

The Kumho Ecsta PS71 impressed with excellent aquaplaning reserves (scoring best in the straight aquaplaning test), convincing driving dynamics, secure handling and short braking distances in all conditions. Its wet handling performance was particularly noteworthy, achieving some of the best times in the wet handling course. The tire offered good mileage of over 42,000 kilometers and excellent cost performance at just €7.49 per 1000 kilometers, making it a value choice among the premium performers. Its balanced abilities and excellent price-performance ratio earned it an "exemplary" rating.

Dry

96.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	9th	34.1 M	32.6 M	+1.5 M	95.6%
Dry Handling	12th	118.6 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-2.3 Km/H	98.1%

Wet

97.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	2nd	42.8 M	42.7 M	+0.1 M	99.77%
Wet Handling	2nd	73.8 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-0.1 Km/H	99.86%
Wet Circle	5th	14.73 s	14.55 s	+0.18 s	98.78%
Straight Aqua	2nd	81.3 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-0.1 Km/H	99.88%
Curved Aquaplaning	11th	3.09 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.36 m/sec2	89.57%

Comfort

94.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	10th	4.7 Points	5 Points	-0.3 Points	94%
Noise	20th	75.4 dB	71.3 dB	+4.1 dB	94.56%

Value

83.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	5th	42180 KM	54020 KM	-11840 KM	78.08%
Value	2nd	7.49 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+0.83 Price/1000	88.92%
Rolling Resistance	14th	9.19 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.57 kg / t	82.92%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

7^th

Falken ZIEX ZE320

225/40 R18 92W

• EU Label: C/A/67
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 372.00

The Falken Ziex ZE320 delivered outstanding driving dynamics and the shortest braking distances on dry surfaces besides Bridgestone. It performed exceptionally well in wet conditions with excellent agility and good grip, achieving the fastest speed in the wet handling test at 73.9 km/h. Its quiet rolling noise (72.1 dB) added to overall comfort, though its more limited mileage of 35,520 kilometers was the main weakness holding it back from the top tier. Still, the Falken impressed with its balanced performance and sporty character, earning a solid "good" rating.

Dry

98.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	2nd	33 M	32.6 M	+0.4 M	98.79%
Dry Handling	8th	119.4 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-1.5 Km/H	98.76%

Wet

94.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	10th	46.1 M	42.7 M	+3.4 M	92.62%
Wet Handling	1st	73.9 Km/H			100%
Wet Circle	8th	14.89 s	14.55 s	+0.34 s	97.72%
Straight Aqua	13th	79.9 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-1.5 Km/H	98.16%
Curved Aquaplaning	16th	2.94 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.51 m/sec2	85.22%

Comfort

99.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	5 Points			100%
Noise	2nd	72.1 dB	71.3 dB	+0.8 dB	98.89%

Value

71.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	10th	35520 KM	54020 KM	-18500 KM	65.75%
Value	13th	10.47 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+3.81 Price/1000	63.61%
Rolling Resistance	13th	9.04 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.42 kg / t	84.29%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

8^th

Toyo Proxes Comfort

225/40 R18 92W

• EU Label: D/A/70
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 304.00

The Toyo Proxes Comfort offered solid aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances, and good value at €304 per set. It performed respectably in wet conditions despite slightly limited lateral grip on wet surfaces. With a decent mileage of over 38,000 kilometers and good rolling resistance, it achieved excellent cost performance at just €7.98 per 1000 kilometers. The tire was also one of the quieter options in the test, living up to its "Comfort" name. Its good all-round performance without any major weaknesses earned it a "good" rating.

Dry

97.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	6th	34 M	32.6 M	+1.4 M	95.88%
Dry Handling	10th	119 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-1.9 Km/H	98.43%

Wet

94%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	12th	47.5 M	42.7 M	+4.8 M	89.89%
Wet Handling	12th	71.9 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-2 Km/H	97.29%
Wet Circle	12th	14.98 s	14.55 s	+0.43 s	97.13%
Straight Aqua	13th	79.9 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-1.5 Km/H	98.16%
Curved Aquaplaning	14th	3.02 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.43 m/sec2	87.54%

Comfort

92.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	12th	4.3 Points	5 Points	-0.7 Points	86%
Noise	5th	72.4 dB	71.3 dB	+1.1 dB	98.48%

Value

80.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	8th	38110 KM	54020 KM	-15910 KM	70.55%
Value	3rd	7.98 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+1.32 Price/1000	83.46%
Rolling Resistance	4th	8.59 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+0.97 kg / t	88.71%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

9^th

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/71
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 360.00

The Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2 achieved the best aquaplaning reserves in the test, particularly excelling in the curved aquaplaning test with 3.45 m/s² lateral acceleration. It offered decent mileage of nearly 40,000 kilometers and good comfort with reasonable noise levels. Its main weakness was slight understeer behavior on wet surfaces, though it maintained good overall stability. The tire performed well in dry conditions with responsive handling and secure braking, offering a balanced performance that earned a "good" rating for this sportier-oriented option.

Dry

95.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	19th	35.2 M	32.6 M	+2.6 M	92.61%
Dry Handling	13th	118.2 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-2.7 Km/H	97.77%

Wet

96.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	18th	49.1 M	42.7 M	+6.4 M	86.97%
Wet Handling	15th	71.7 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-2.2 Km/H	97.02%
Wet Circle	12th	14.98 s	14.55 s	+0.43 s	97.13%
Straight Aqua	3rd	81.1 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-0.3 Km/H	99.63%
Curved Aquaplaning	1st	3.45 m/sec2			100%

Comfort

98.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	5 Points			100%
Noise	13th	73.6 dB	71.3 dB	+2.3 dB	96.88%

Value

75.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	7th	39590 KM	54020 KM	-14430 KM	73.29%
Value	7th	9.09 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+2.43 Price/1000	73.27%
Rolling Resistance	17th	9.41 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.79 kg / t	80.98%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

10^th

Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: B/A/69
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 288.00

The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 from China surprised testers with good aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances, secure handling, and pleasantly quiet rolling noise. It performed admirably in the wet handling test, achieving better times than some established premium brands. The main drawback was significantly restricted mileage of just 25,500 kilometers, which impacted its overall cost-effectiveness despite the low purchase price of €288. Despite this limitation, its surprisingly good performance in safety-related tests earned it a "satisfactory" rating.

Dry

96.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	11th	34.2 M	32.6 M	+1.6 M	95.32%
Dry Handling	9th	119.1 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-1.8 Km/H	98.51%

Wet

96.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	8th	44.8 M	42.7 M	+2.1 M	95.31%
Wet Handling	5th	73.3 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-0.6 Km/H	99.19%
Wet Circle	7th	14.85 s	14.55 s	+0.3 s	97.98%
Straight Aqua	10th	80.4 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-1 Km/H	98.77%
Curved Aquaplaning	9th	3.12 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.33 m/sec2	90.43%

Comfort

91.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	12th	4.3 Points	5 Points	-0.7 Points	86%
Noise	11th	73.3 dB	71.3 dB	+2 dB	97.27%

Value

64.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	19th	25500 KM	54020 KM	-28520 KM	47.2%
Value	16th	11.29 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+4.63 Price/1000	58.99%
Rolling Resistance	7th	8.73 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.11 kg / t	87.29%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

11^th

Linglong Sport Master

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/69
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 296.00

The Linglong Sport Master, another Chinese brand, performed well with short braking distances, dynamic and secure handling characteristics in all weather conditions, and good lateral grip. It achieved commendable results in wet braking tests and showed good stability during aquaplaning tests. Like other Chinese tires, its major weakness was severely limited mileage of just 22,570 kilometers and higher rolling resistance, resulting in poorer long-term economy despite the low initial cost of €296. Its balanced performance in handling and braking earned a "satisfactory" rating.

Dry

97%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	9th	34.1 M	32.6 M	+1.5 M	95.6%
Dry Handling	11th	118.9 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-2 Km/H	98.35%

Wet

95.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	2nd	42.8 M	42.7 M	+0.1 M	99.77%
Wet Handling	9th	72.8 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-1.1 Km/H	98.51%
Wet Circle	3rd	14.68 s	14.55 s	+0.13 s	99.11%
Straight Aqua	12th	80 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-1.4 Km/H	98.28%
Curved Aquaplaning	18th	2.87 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.58 m/sec2	83.19%

Comfort

91.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	12th	4.3 Points	5 Points	-0.7 Points	86%
Noise	9th	73.1 dB	71.3 dB	+1.8 dB	97.54%

Value

56.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	20th	22570 KM	54020 KM	-31450 KM	41.78%
Value	19th	13.11 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+6.45 Price/1000	50.8%
Rolling Resistance	19th	9.77 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+2.15 kg / t	77.99%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

12^th

Maxxis Victra Sport 5

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/72
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 304.00

The Maxxis Victra Sport 5 delivered short braking distances with secure handling behavior on both wet and dry surfaces. It performed particularly well in the wet braking test and offered a quiet operation at just 72.2 dB during the pass-by noise test. The tire suffered from restricted mileage of around 28,490 kilometers which affected its overall cost performance despite the reasonable purchase price of €304. While not outstanding in any particular area, its balanced performance without major weaknesses earned a "satisfactory" rating.

Dry

96.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	5th	33.9 M	32.6 M	+1.3 M	96.17%
Dry Handling	19th	116.7 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-4.2 Km/H	96.53%

Wet

95.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	9th	45.5 M	42.7 M	+2.8 M	93.85%
Wet Handling	11th	72 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-1.9 Km/H	97.43%
Wet Circle	9th	14.9 s	14.55 s	+0.35 s	97.65%
Straight Aqua	7th	80.6 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-0.8 Km/H	99.02%
Curved Aquaplaning	12th	3.04 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.41 m/sec2	88.12%

Comfort

88.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	19th	3.9 Points	5 Points	-1.1 Points	78%
Noise	4th	72.2 dB	71.3 dB	+0.9 dB	98.75%

Value

65.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	17th	28490 KM	54020 KM	-25530 KM	52.74%
Value	14th	10.67 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+4.01 Price/1000	62.42%
Rolling Resistance	17th	9.41 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.79 kg / t	80.98%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

13^th

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: D/A/72
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 368.00

The Vredestein Ultrac Pro showed secure driving characteristics with short braking distances on wet and dry surfaces, and quiet rolling noise for good comfort. It performed well in the aquaplaning tests with good resistance to hydroplaning. Its main limitations were delayed turn-in response during handling tests and restricted mileage of about 32,930 kilometers, which combined with its higher price point of €368 limited its cost-effectiveness. Despite these drawbacks, the tire's overall balanced performance earned it a "satisfactory" rating.

Dry

95.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	17th	35 M	32.6 M	+2.4 M	93.14%
Dry Handling	15th	117.4 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-3.5 Km/H	97.11%

Wet

95.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	17th	48.8 M	42.7 M	+6.1 M	87.5%
Wet Handling	18th	71.3 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-2.6 Km/H	96.48%
Wet Circle	19th	15.24 s	14.55 s	+0.69 s	95.47%
Straight Aqua	5th	80.7 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-0.7 Km/H	99.14%
Curved Aquaplaning	3rd	3.35 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.1 m/sec2	97.1%

Comfort

98.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	5 Points			100%
Noise	12th	73.5 dB	71.3 dB	+2.2 dB	97.01%

Value

67.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	12th	32930 KM	54020 KM	-21090 KM	60.96%
Value	15th	11.18 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+4.52 Price/1000	59.57%
Rolling Resistance	14th	9.19 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.57 kg / t	82.92%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

14^th

Laufenn S Fit EQ+

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/B/71
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 288.00

The Laufenn S Fit EQ+ offered good aquaplaning reserves, balanced handling behavior, quiet rolling noise at 74.0 dB, and good overall comfort. With one of the lowest purchase prices in the test at €288, it represents good value for budget-conscious drivers. Its slightly restricted mileage of 31,080 kilometers was its main drawback, though its low purchase price helped maintain reasonable cost performance at €9.27 per 1000 kilometers. The tire delivered particularly good dry handling for its price point, achieving a "satisfactory" rating.

Dry

95.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	16th	34.9 M	32.6 M	+2.3 M	93.41%
Dry Handling	16th	117.1 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-3.8 Km/H	96.86%

Wet

91.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	11th	46.4 M	42.7 M	+3.7 M	92.03%
Wet Handling	12th	71.9 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-2 Km/H	97.29%
Wet Circle	18th	15.2 s	14.55 s	+0.65 s	95.72%
Straight Aqua	18th	79.5 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-1.9 Km/H	97.67%
Curved Aquaplaning	20th	2.65 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.8 m/sec2	76.81%

Comfort

98.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	5 Points			100%
Noise	15th	74 dB	71.3 dB	+2.7 dB	96.35%

Value

72.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	14th	31080 KM	54020 KM	-22940 KM	57.53%
Value	10th	9.27 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+2.61 Price/1000	71.84%
Rolling Resistance	6th	8.7 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.08 kg / t	87.59%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

14^th

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: D/A/71
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 320.00

The Nexen N'Fera Sport provided good aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances, and very low rolling resistance which helps with fuel economy. Its main weaknesses were delayed turn-in response during wet handling tests and slightly limited mileage of 34,780 kilometers. The tire performed better in dry conditions than wet, though it maintained acceptable safety margins in all situations. With a purchase price of €320, it offered reasonable cost performance at €9.20 per 1000 kilometers, delivering solid performance for its price point and earning a "satisfactory" rating.

Dry

94%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	17th	35 M	32.6 M	+2.4 M	93.14%
Dry Handling	20th	114.7 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-6.2 Km/H	94.87%

Wet

93%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	14th	48.3 M	42.7 M	+5.6 M	88.41%
Wet Handling	15th	71.7 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-2.2 Km/H	97.02%
Wet Circle	15th	15.05 s	14.55 s	+0.5 s	96.68%
Straight Aqua	17th	79.6 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-1.8 Km/H	97.79%
Curved Aquaplaning	16th	2.94 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.51 m/sec2	85.22%

Comfort

99.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	5 Points			100%
Noise	2nd	72.1 dB	71.3 dB	+0.8 dB	98.89%

Value

75.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	11th	34780 KM	54020 KM	-19240 KM	64.38%
Value	9th	9.2 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+2.54 Price/1000	72.39%
Rolling Resistance	2nd	8.41 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+0.79 kg / t	90.61%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

14^th

Pirelli P Zero PZ4

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/70
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 448.00

The Pirelli P Zero PZ4 AO (Audi OE version which means it shouldn't have really been in this test) offered good driving dynamics with short braking distances and secure handling on dry surfaces, showing its sporty heritage. However, it disappointed somewhat in wet conditions with less grip and weaker aquaplaning performance than expected from a premium tire, especially considering its high price of €448. Its significantly restricted mileage of just 28,120 kilometers and high purchase price resulted in the poorest cost performance in the test at €15.93 per 1000 kilometers. Despite these limitations, its dry performance and brand reputation earned it a "satisfactory" rating.

Dry

96.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	12th	34.6 M	32.6 M	+2 M	94.22%
Dry Handling	5th	120.2 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-0.7 Km/H	99.42%

Wet

93%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	20th	50.5 M	42.7 M	+7.8 M	84.55%
Wet Handling	10th	72.6 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-1.3 Km/H	98.24%
Wet Circle	10th	14.91 s	14.55 s	+0.36 s	97.59%
Straight Aqua	13th	79.9 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-1.5 Km/H	98.16%
Curved Aquaplaning	15th	2.99 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.46 m/sec2	86.67%

Comfort

98.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	5 Points			100%
Noise	15th	74 dB	71.3 dB	+2.7 dB	96.35%

Value

59.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	18th	28120 KM	54020 KM	-25900 KM	52.05%
Value	20th	15.93 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+9.27 Price/1000	41.81%
Rolling Resistance	8th	8.88 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.26 kg / t	85.81%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

17^th

Giti GitiSportS2

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: D/A/70
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 352.00

The Giti Sport S2 delivered good aquaplaning reserves and balanced driving dynamics with a low rolling resistance that helps with fuel efficiency. It performed adequately in most test categories without excelling in any particular area. Its downsides included mediocre lateral grip in wet conditions and restricted mileage of 31,080 kilometers, which affected its long-term value despite a mid-range price of €352. The tire's reasonable all-round performance without any dangerous weaknesses secured it a "satisfactory" overall rating.

Dry

94.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	20th	35.4 M	32.6 M	+2.8 M	92.09%
Dry Handling	14th	117.7 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-3.2 Km/H	97.35%

Wet

95.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	14th	48.3 M	42.7 M	+5.6 M	88.41%
Wet Handling	20th	70.7 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-3.2 Km/H	95.67%
Wet Circle	17th	15.19 s	14.55 s	+0.64 s	95.79%
Straight Aqua	1st	81.4 Km/H			100%
Curved Aquaplaning	4th	3.32 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.13 m/sec2	96.23%

Comfort

92.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	12th	4.3 Points	5 Points	-0.7 Points	86%
Noise	6th	72.6 dB	71.3 dB	+1.3 dB	98.21%

Value

66.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	14th	31080 KM	54020 KM	-22940 KM	57.53%
Value	17th	11.33 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+4.67 Price/1000	58.78%
Rolling Resistance	12th	9.02 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.4 kg / t	84.48%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

17^th

Nokian Powerproof 1

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/69
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 296.00

The Nokian Powerproof 1 offered good aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances, and quiet rolling noise of 72.7 dB combined with low rolling resistance of 8.93 kg/t. It performed well in straight-line aquaplaning tests though less impressively in curved aquaplaning situations. Its major limitations were restricted mileage of 31,820 kilometers and strong understeer tendencies in wet conditions, making it less predictable at the limit. With a reasonable price of €296, it achieved acceptable cost performance at €9.30 per 1000 kilometers, earning a "satisfactory" rating.

Dry

95.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	15th	34.8 M	32.6 M	+2.2 M	93.68%
Dry Handling	16th	117.1 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-3.8 Km/H	96.86%

Wet

93.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	12th	47.5 M	42.7 M	+4.8 M	89.89%
Wet Handling	14th	71.8 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-2.1 Km/H	97.16%
Wet Circle	14th	14.99 s	14.55 s	+0.44 s	97.06%
Straight Aqua	8th	80.5 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-0.9 Km/H	98.89%
Curved Aquaplaning	19th	2.84 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.61 m/sec2	82.32%

Comfort

92%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	12th	4.3 Points	5 Points	-0.7 Points	86%
Noise	7th	72.7 dB	71.3 dB	+1.4 dB	98.07%

Value

71.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	13th	31820 KM	54020 KM	-22200 KM	58.9%
Value	11th	9.3 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+2.64 Price/1000	71.61%
Rolling Resistance	9th	8.93 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+1.31 kg / t	85.33%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

19^th

Yokohama Advan Sport V107

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: D/A/71
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 356.00

The Yokohama Advan Sport V107 showed good driving dynamics and short braking distances on dry surfaces, with particularly good dry braking performance at 33.8 meters from 100 km/h. It struggled with grip in wet conditions, showing weaker performance in wet handling tests and aquaplaning resistance than many competitors. Its limited mileage of 35,890 kilometers and high rolling resistance of 10.62 kg/t (the highest in the test) further impacted its overall performance. Despite a decent price of €356, its mixed results earned it a "satisfactory" rating overall.

Dry

97.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	4th	33.8 M	32.6 M	+1.2 M	96.45%
Dry Handling	7th	119.7 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-1.2 Km/H	99.01%

Wet

93.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	19th	49.6 M	42.7 M	+6.9 M	86.09%
Wet Handling	17th	71.4 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-2.5 Km/H	96.62%
Wet Circle	20th	15.41 s	14.55 s	+0.86 s	94.42%
Straight Aqua	20th	78.8 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-2.6 Km/H	96.81%
Curved Aquaplaning	5th	3.3 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.15 m/sec2	95.65%

Comfort

86.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	19th	3.9 Points	5 Points	-1.1 Points	78%
Noise	19th	74.8 dB	71.3 dB	+3.5 dB	95.32%

Value

68.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	9th	35890 KM	54020 KM	-18130 KM	66.44%
Value	12th	9.92 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+3.26 Price/1000	67.14%
Rolling Resistance	20th	10.62 kg / t	7.62 kg / t	+3 kg / t	71.75%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

20^th

Firestone Firehawk Sport

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: B/A/70
• 3PMSF: no
• Price: 336.00

The Firestone Firehawk Sport provided good aquaplaning safety reserves and the lowest rolling resistance in the test at just 7.62 kg/t, helping optimize fuel economy. It performed reasonably well in dry conditions with acceptable braking and handling characteristics. However, it struggled with grip on wet surfaces, showing limited lateral grip in wet handling tests. The tire's significantly restricted mileage of 28,860 kilometers impacted its long-term value despite the moderate purchase price of €336. These mixed results placed it at the lower end of the "satisfactory" rated tires in the final assessment.

Dry

95.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	12th	34.6 M	32.6 M	+2 M	94.22%
Dry Handling	18th	116.9 Km/H	120.9 Km/H	-4 Km/H	96.69%

Wet

93.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	16th	48.7 M	42.7 M	+6 M	87.68%
Wet Handling	18th	71.3 Km/H	73.9 Km/H	-2.6 Km/H	96.48%
Wet Circle	16th	15.08 s	14.55 s	+0.53 s	96.49%
Straight Aqua	16th	79.7 Km/H	81.4 Km/H	-1.7 Km/H	97.91%
Curved Aquaplaning	10th	3.1 m/sec2	3.45 m/sec2	-0.35 m/sec2	89.86%

Comfort

91.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	12th	4.3 Points	5 Points	-0.7 Points	86%
Noise	13th	73.6 dB	71.3 dB	+2.3 dB	96.88%

Value

70.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	16th	28860 KM	54020 KM	-25160 KM	53.42%
Value	18th	11.64 Price/1000	6.66 Price/1000	+4.98 Price/1000	57.22%
Rolling Resistance	1st	7.62 kg / t			100%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts