The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is an economy summer touring/UHP-style tire that consistently delivers strong value, pairing good everyday refinement with capable grip for the money. Drivers commonly praise its dry traction, low noise and comfortable ride, while independent tests back up respectable wet performance and particularly strong aquaplaning resistance. Where it falls short is longevity: both users and tests repeatedly flag fast wear. Performance can also be a little inconsistent at the limit, especially in wet cornering and in some braking scenarios versus premium rivals.
The quick answer
Owners say73%from 15 owner reviews64% would buy againRead the reviews
Strengths & weaknessesWet, DryValueRelative to its rivals across every test we hold
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated October 2026.
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is a genuine budget surprise, finishing third overall. It earns that place through efficiency, aquaplaning and comfort rather than outright grip, and suits drivers who value running costs and wet safety over sporting feel.
Strong: Straight Aqua, Rolling Resistance ·Weak: Dry Braking, Subj. Dry Handling, Subj. Wet Handling ·Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Every independent test of the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2, newest first
In 225/40 R18, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is projected to cost €28.78 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €720 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test.
Tire purchase + fittingExtra fuel vs the most efficient tirecost per 1,000 miles
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2025 test; financing costs are excluded.
Across the 4 wet-braking tests it has featured in, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 stops 1.2% longer than premium rivals, 1.7% shorter than mid-range rivals and 8.2% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews wet score of 90/100, and owners rate it 7.8/10 in the wet from 15 reviews.
How good is the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 in the dry?
Across the 4 dry-braking tests it has featured in, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 stops 1.6% longer than premium rivals, 0.8% shorter than mid-range rivals and 4.3% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews dry score of 87/100, and owners rate it 8.7/10 in the dry from 15 reviews.
How fuel efficient is the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2?
Across the 2 tests measuring rolling resistance, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2's rolling resistance is 7% lower than premium rivals, 8.3% lower than mid-range rivals and 5.5% lower than budget rivals.
How many miles does the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 last?
Based on test and owner data, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is expected to last around 19,729 miles (31,751 km).
What do owners say about the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2?
Across 15 owner ratings the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 averages 73%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 8.7 out of 10 and Wear lowest at 5.8. 3 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 64% of owners score it 70% or better.
More questions about the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2(8)
How much does the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 cost to run?
In 225/40 R18, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is projected to cost €28.78 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €720 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test. The cheapest to run in that test is the Continental PremiumContact 7, at €20.06.
What is the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2's EU tire label rating?
Across its range, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 most commonly carries EU label ratings of B for fuel efficiency, A for wet grip and 69 dB for noise.
How comfortable and quiet are the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2?
Owners rate the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 7.7 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 14 reviews.
How well do the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 5.8 out of 10 for wear across 14 reviews. 3 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 5,000 miles.
Would owners buy the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 again?
64% of owners say they would buy the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 again, based on the 14 owner reviews that answered the question. 36% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2's wet grip?
Of the 12 owner reviews analyzed for the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2, 8 mention wet grip: 5 praise it (confident wet grip) and 3 criticise it (weak wet grip). One owner wrote: "The tires feel stable and grippy on both wet and dry conditions". Read those reviews
What does the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 replace?
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is the successor to the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR in Sailun's range.
What sizes does the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 come in?
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is available in 175 sizes, ranging from 205-315/30-55 R16-20.
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Drivers generally describe the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 as a strong "bang for the buck" summer/UHP tire, often praising its dry grip and overall daily-driving refinement (quiet ride and decent comfort) for the price. Many also report capable wet performance in braking and general driving, though confidence can drop in wet cornering when pushed. The most consistent downside is fast tread wear/longevity, and several users also note a softer, less precise steering/handling feel compared with more premium alternatives.
What owners mention most counted across 12 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 15 ratings
Owner score73%
Dry Grip87%
Wet Grip78%
Comfort77%
Road Feedback71%
Handling71%
Wear58%
Featured reviews
Most helpful 78%
“Visually well-made, with no balancing issues and no shaking at highway speeds. The tires perform well on both dry and wet surfaces. The only downside is that they are quite stiff—there was noticeable bumping when new...”
“Running ZSR2 on my Tesla Model 3 Performance. On paper, the specs are great (EU label B/A/69dB), and they are honestly quiet and comfy for daily driving. However, wet grip is a weak point—I find the ESC kicking in too...”
“I bought a used Skoda Octavia MK4 last summer. The car came with seemingly brand new Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 tires in 225/50/17 size and XL load rating. I have now reached the end of useful life for those tires and review...”
It has already been one full summer season for these tires on my 2004 525i RWD with staggered setup of 245/35R19 front and 275/30R19 rear on Style 172 wheels. So far travelled around 12’000km and I’m really happy with the tire. Around 70-80% of the mileage was done on highway speeds at 130-150kmh. The tires feel stable and grippy on both wet and dry conditions. What I really liked is that the sidewall is on the softer side (which could be a negative aspect for some), which gives lot more comfort for a low profile tire, as well as no tramlining which was an issue with the old tires (Marshal MU12, Falken Azenis FK510). They are also really quiet tires. The wear is really good, only 15g of balance needed in the front after 10k km, and no balance needed in the back. They wear even, no vibrations or other degradations developed over those 12k km. I was rather sceptical before buying them, but I am really happy I went with Sailun ZSR2. Amazing tire for the low price, will definintely buy again.
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 tires are decent budget summer tires, but they have some noticeable weaknesses. On a car with a well-tuned chassis like the BMW G21, they lack steering precision and overall handling compared to better-quality tires. Despite being properly balanced, they also developed vibrations that were most likely caused by temporary flat spots after standing. Noise levels are acceptable—they are moderately quiet, but nothing exceptional. Overall, they offer reasonable value for the price, but I would not buy them again.
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Running ZSR2 on my Tesla Model 3 Performance. On paper, the specs are great (EU label B/A/69dB), and they are honestly quiet and comfy for daily driving. However, wet grip is a weak point—I find the ESC kicking in too easy on wet corners.
The wear rate is the real dealbreaker: 1.6mm (rear) and 1.0mm (front) gone in just 2,500 miles. At this rate, even with frequent rotations, they’ll hit the wear bars by 12,300 miles. They might be cheap to buy, but the poor longevity makes them a bad value in the long run.
Tires wore out rather quickly, got one season out of them, lasted more like 20K Km if even that, otherwise good enough grip on dry and wet tarmac, kind of squirrelly/ not very confidence inspiring on gravel, although thats to be expected.
Moved from worn out PZero pz4 (the rears were had 4mm left so stored in case new fronts wear out earlier) and have to say mpg is 22.2 for a L320 4.2 SC RRS which is a wee bit better than the Pirelli’s with road hum reduced at 70+mph. Great alternative although I only expect them to last maybe 10-13K miles whereas the previous lasted 18-20 but at just half the price. Bodes well.
I bought a used Skoda Octavia MK4 last summer. The car came with seemingly brand new Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 tires in 225/50/17 size and XL load rating.
I have now reached the end of useful life for those tires and review my experience with them.
The tires have excellent grip in braking and handling on dry surfaces. I rarely managed to lose traction and if that happened I really needed to thrash on them.
I also rate wet grip as excellent.
The tires were also comfortable and absorbed bumps quite nicely. Noise was not noticeable until the end of the tire life, the worn down rear tires started humming a little of smooth road surfaces. Comfort was ok, but I rated comfort down due to the next paragraph.
Handling wise the tires are not that good. The fact that they don't lose grip is great but they do not give good confidence since the sidewalls are absolutely too soft. The car acted in such a way I was already considering upgrading shocks and springs since it handled like a boat. Bumpy roads and corners felt downrights scary. So I adjusted my speeds and took everything nice and slow, like a grandpa going to church on Sunday.
Luckily the tires wore out and I replaced them with Kumho Ecsta PS72 tires. Wow, what a difference. I do not need to change suspension after all, but that's a story for a different review.
Wear... I have never seen tires wear out so quickly. I mention buying a used car with seemingly brand new tires. I do not know the mileage these tires travelled before me but I only got 16 353 kilometers out of these tires over 2 summer seasons. They can not have had travelled more than few thousand miles, they did look absolutely brand new. After the first summer season tires were rotated to allow for more even wear. This spring as summer tires were installed they had evenly 4.5-5mm of tread left. This got worn down to legal limit in 8622 km of calm easy driving. The ones that were more worn were REARs. Front tires still had some mileage left but I never unmatch my tires. Due to the quick wear and scary wallowy handling I did not want to purchase these tires again.
So there we go. Decent tires, somewhat okay price ( new Kumhos were acutally same price as Sailuns in my area ) but they wear out very quickly.
This is my last review on these tires. I drove these tires quite a lot recently, had some trackdays and a roadtrip around some very nice mountain roads, with dry and wet weather aswell.
Tires are still performing very well, especially on dry weather. I had a trackday session at the local karting track (1.2 km total lap length), and I've absolutely tortured the front tires. I didn't manage the tire pressure prior so I had about 2.3 bars cold which was way too much, it was my first time on the track. Track was hot and ambient temperature was hot aswell.
On the karting track, the tires got way too hot, and felt very greasy after 2-3 laps, with non existent feedback, understeer and visible tire graining. I've also driven some laps on a proper car circuit and they behaved a lot better, as the tires didn't get as hot. When they are at the proper temperature, they have very good grip, and the feedback is quite good. My car is a Fiat Grande Punto T-Jet with over 180 hp and 300 N/m torque, without an LSD (which is understeer heaven).
On wet weather however, lateral grip is not great. Braking is very good, aquaplaning decent, but lateral grip it's not really great. I've tested this prior to going to the trackdays, so the tires were not grained in any way. The tires do not inspire confidence when turning in wet. They give the feeling that they'll snap out of traction very sudden. But this is if you push them, and try to drive them a bit faster in wet. If you're conservative, they are very good.
Sailun is the only chinese tire manufacturer from what I know, that's FIA certified and provided tires for F4 Chinese and TCR Asia. It seems that the motorsport R&D is put to very good use on the road tires. These are the absolute best budget UHP tires that you can get. If you're looking for a best bang for the buck, this is the tire for you.
For me personally, I would buy them again, for sure. The next set however it's going to be Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, can't wait for Jon's review on those.
Visually well-made, with no balancing issues and no shaking at highway speeds. The tires perform well on both dry and wet surfaces. The only downside is that they are quite stiff—there was noticeable bumping when new, but it reduced after the break-in period. Overall, these are excellent tires for the price, offering great value for money. I'm quite pleased with them.
