Menu
Sailun Atrezzo ZSR View Gallery (1)
195-275/30-55 R15-20 104 sizes 2016

Sailun Atrezzo ZSR

The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

2.9
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
80%
Wet Grip
69%
Road Feedback
71%
Handling
73%
Wear
66%
Comfort
72%
Buy again
72%
49 Reviews
72% Average
397,364 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 48th)
Sailun Atrezzo ZSR

Sailun Atrezzo ZSR

Summer Economy
BETA
2.9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Dry
54.7
1.8x / 1 test
Wet
46.7
2x / 1 test

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
50.4
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 49
Avg Rating: 71.9%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.74
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 Summer 53 Tire Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 48/45 2 metrics
1
Tests
48th
Average
48th
Best
48th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
48th/45

Questions and Answers for the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR

Ask a question
October 1, 2020

Wwe need 2 new tires for 2014 Mazda 6 saloon-auto. 2 need replacing are front 1 x Nexan and 1 x M fera sui other 2 on back are Bridgestone and ok Is the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR ok for this do you think. Tend to only do about 6 thousand miles a year and nolong drives for the most.

The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR was tested in 2019 and had very poor wet braking, so it is not a tire I can recommend.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 43 user reviews

Most drivers find the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR delivers strong value with solid dry grip, acceptable wet performance if not pushed, low-to-moderate noise, and decent comfort, often comparing it favorably to pricier brands. However, a notable minority report fast tread wear-especially on driven axles-and inconsistent or weak wet grip, with a few citing defects or pressure/steering issues. Considering the score mix, sentiment is moderately positive, with budget value and everyday usability leading, while wear and wet grip are the main drawbacks.

Strengths
  • Good dry grip
  • Good value for money
  • Acceptable/low noise
  • Comfortable ride
  • Handles well for daily use
Areas for Improvement
  • High/fast tread wear
  • Inconsistent/weak wet grip
  • Occasional noise increase with speed or age

Top 3 Sailun Atrezzo ZSR Reviews

Given 45% while driving a Land Rover Freelander 2 (235/60 R18) on mostly town for 3,000 average miles
Halfords fitted 2 new tires 9th July. 2,800 miles later in 9 weeks the tires have worn to 3mm all over and the wires are showing on some parts.
Both front tires, both completely worn out. Halfords refuse to consider the tires may be faulty
September 17, 2024
Given 63% while driving a Vauxhall Corsa D (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
I have a bit mixed impression relating to Sailun ZSR tires. They offer surprisingly good grip on dry tarmac, even if cornering hard, but can be inconsistent on wet roads, especially on smooth tarmac. They are acceptably noisy. Rolling resistance can be noticed at petrol station. But still within acceptance. It could be a cheap and good tire, unfortunately high wear level is pulling down overall impression because 20k miles does not impress at all - near legal limit already. But to be honest, I have seen worse results at much higher price. Would I buy these again? I would consider for just rolling wheels for sure, but not for the pulling wheels.
November 20, 2024
Given 70% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VII (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Honestly, out of many of these economy tires, the ZSR actually is quite good. On my 2nd set on one car and first on another. On an AWD car the grip is actually quite good. No sliding, no unreasonable understeer unless the car is setup badly alignment or pressure wise. In the wet, it handles quite good, but it's no high end performance.. if you plan to push hard on wet country roads, they'll complain, yet handle, but not for some speeds. Even in FWD, they handle quite well. And at this price point, it doesn't hurt if the tire needs replacing. They behave fairly well even as they age also. In 5 years the first set I had Lasted a couple Autocross events as well as the average drive, with no issues of losing control. Of course everyone will have different views, however I've found them to be great.
June 19, 2024

How would you rate the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Sailun Atrezzo ZSR Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 86% while driving a Volkswagen Golf 7 GTD (225/45 R17) on for 23,785 miles
Took a chsnce on these Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 tires, after listening to a good mate who is normally a bit of a tire snob (named brands). Fitted a full set on a Volkswagen Golf Mk7 Estate 2tdi, Driven just over 20'000+ miles so far, and in some very atrocious weather, rain, snow, frost, ice, and the occasional dry day.
Overall impressions are great in bad weather, even at speed on back country roads, motorway in an absolute nightmare of a downpour, but these tires handled the excess water, very impressed, especially compared to the previous Bridgestone Touranza tires. Two fronts are now at 3mm, rears around 4mm. Tempted to change them soon, but will wait until a few more miles. One added bonus, is they are quieter than the Bridgestone Touranza's.
I'm now considering fitting a set to my VW-EOS 2Tdi, which I rarely drive (2nd) car, average around 3k a year, so a new set should last a few years.
Previously I've stuck with names such as Michelin, Avon, and Bridgestone, overall I'm glad I've given these Sailun tires a try... Recommend.
March 14, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 54% while driving a SEAT ALhambra TDi (225/50 R17) on for 4,000 miles
Bought for a seat alhambra. Light driving, about 3-4000 miles over 7 months. Had completely worn through to the metal treads.
I know these are budget, but they should not have worn away that quickly. Learnt my lesson, avoiding this brand going forwards.
March 14, 2026
Given 53% while driving a Opel Astra J GTC (235/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Excellent braking on both dry and wet roads. Quiet driving. This is a big plus.

Unfortunately, the steering response is pathetic. Also, the steering is very poor in corners. Also, the tires do not hold air pressure. It's good that I got a few defective 2025 tires and I returned them, changed them to another manufacturer.
September 26, 2025
Given 34% while driving a Vauxhall INSIGNIA 1.8 PETROL (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
Terrible! unless you are thinking about fitting these to a go-cart then think again. Terrible grip in wet, poor handling and have worn to their limit in less than 10,000 miles.
June 15, 2024
Given 71% while driving a Holden 2000 VT Berlina Supercharged (245/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Great performance for the price, never had an issue wet or dry. Excellent budget choice, however the wear was on the higher side. I can’t imagine how these other people are driving…
April 27, 2023
Given 74% while driving a Kia Motors Stinger GTS (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 30 average miles
I'm really positively surprised with this Tires. I got them for a really good price with 2 years warranty which encouraged me to try them as I was on tight budget. Now after 16 months and approximately 31,000 miles (50,000 KM) I can say it's over perform it's price. I live in a very Hot area and this last year was a mixture of extreme hot ( 50°) and a heavy rains in some occasions and I became confident in the Tires and the grip I get from. I would buy again for sure and my advice is if you are budget sensitive or you just want something for specific situation just get these Tires.
October 10, 2022
Given 56% while driving a Mercedes Benz E430 (265/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 13,000 average miles
MB W210 E430 V8. Driven approx. 20,000km in normal driving style and already have rear tires with a 3mm tread. Considering the width of the tire, wear is very fast. Rolling noise starts to increase significantly at 100 kmh on the highway and is quite audible. Definitely not suitable for sporty driving. Suitable for a calm driving enthusiast. Considering the price of the tire, you get exactly what you paid for (a little more). I decided to try Falken Azensis FK510 tires. Let's see if it lasts longer (about 2 times more expensive too)
June 9, 2022
Given 78% while driving a BMW 330d (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Comparably they have feedback like my older tires Toyo Proxes Sport from 2020. A lot quieter in lower speeds though and also ride comfort is better. Dry grip and braking distance is alright, I get lose tail in the wet on RWD E91 330D, which is alright too :D. Hope they keep feeling like that after few thousand miles.
March 24, 2022
Given 53% while driving a Ford BA GT Falcon (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 2,000 average miles
The tires seemed ok cheap enough except one delaminated pretty bad, luckily it didn't blow. Was able to get a new one under warranty on pro rata. I think i'll try another brand next time.
March 18, 2022
Given 70% while driving a BMW 325ci M Sport convertible (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30 spirited miles
For the price offered it is a decent tire. I was abit sceptical because fhese are made in China. Road holding is ok, breaking disfance also as long as you dont push them. Lasted quite alot too.
February 21, 2022
Given 64% while driving a BMW 520i (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Very good tires for money with some troubles in wet. High wear...
November 22, 2021
Given 70% while driving a BMW 520i (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Not bad tire but wars very fast
November 14, 2021
Rate the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR