Menu
Linglong Sport Master View Gallery (1)
185-315/30-55 R16-22 68 sizes 2020

Linglong Sport Master

The Linglong Sport Master is an economy-tier summer high-performance tire that can deliver surprisingly strong wet braking and reassuring wet grip in some situations, while keeping road noise low for everyday driving. In dry conditions it generally feels acceptable rather than truly sporty, offering usable grip but not the sharpest steering precision. Where it falls down is consistency: some drivers report vague wet handling or even balancing-related vibration, and professional testing highlights clear weaknesses in aquaplaning safety margins and tread life.

7.8
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
67%
Wet Grip
62%
Road Feedback
52%
Handling
62%
Wear
73%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
60%
6 Reviews
64% Average
61,803 miles driven
8 Tests (avg: 9th)
Linglong Sport Master

Linglong Sport Master

Summer Economy
BETA
7.8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
82.4
0.32x / 5 tests
Dry
79.2
1.8x / 10 tests
Wet
76.4
2x / 21 tests
Value
62
0.42x / 14 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
84.1
15 tests
Handling
73.9
6 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 8
Publications: 4
Period: 2023 - 2026
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 64.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.33
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? Auto Bild 2026 245/45 R19 1/50 2 metrics
2026 ACE Summer Tire Test ACE 2026 225/40 R18 8/10 0 metrics
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 11/21 12 metrics
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 5/52 2 metrics
2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 15/16 11 metrics
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 16/21 11 metrics
2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2023 225/40 R18 12/13 10 metrics
2023 Summer Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 7/48 2 metrics
8
Tests
9th
Average
1st
Best
16th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2026 ACE Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18 • 2026
8th/10
Linglong Sport Master tied for eighth on 129 points with a "recommended" rating, and at €68 was the cheapest tire in the test. It presented one of the most polarised profiles in the field. Its dry safety score of just 44 was second-worst, driven by a handling score of only 12 out of 20 — joint lowest with Nexen. Yet it completely reversed its fortunes in the wet, scoring 68 out of 80 in wet safety — tied for second-best with Michelin. It topped the wet handling course outright with 18 out of 20 and scored a strong 27 out of 30 in wet braking. The subjective assessment credited it with good traction out of corners on the wet circuit. Its economy score of 17 tied with Bridgestone as the worst. A tire whose compound and tread design appear heavily tilted toward wet-surface performance at the expense of dry-road precision.
5th/52
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/55R16 94 Y XL C A 69
205/55R16 94 W XL C A 69
205/55R16 91 V C A 68
17 inch
215/45R17 91 Y XL C A 69
205/50R17 93 Y XL C A 69
215/55R17 98 Y XL C A 69
225/45R17 94 Y XL C A 69
225/50R17 98 Y XL C A 69
225/50R17 94 V B C 68
18 inch
225/40R18 92 Y XL C A 69
245/40R18 97 Y XL C A 69
245/45R18 100 Y XL C A 69
255/35R18 94 Y XL C A 70
19 inch
235/35R19 91 Y XL C A 69
20 inch
245/35R20 95 Y XL C A 69
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Linglong Sport Master >>

Questions and Answers for the Linglong Sport Master

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Linglong Sport Master. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 5 user reviews

Drivers report mixed results for the Linglong Sport Master. Positives center on good value with acceptable dry grip and adequate wet performance for daily use, plus notably low noise and comfort per some mid/high-scoring reviews. However, several low-scoring reviews cite poor handling confidence-especially in the wet-and one severe case of balance/vibration issues. Overall, it suits budget-focused, non-sporty driving but lacks consistent performance confidence.

Strengths
  • Good value for price
  • Decent dry grip for daily use
  • Acceptable wet grip at moderate speeds
  • Low noise and comfortable ride
Areas for Improvement
  • Lack of confidence in wet handling
  • Understeer and vague steering feel
  • Potential vibration/balancing issues

Top 3 Linglong Sport Master Reviews

Given 41% while driving a BMW 325i (235/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 100 easy going miles
Absolute junk! Traded down from Pirelli because of the 'good' reviews but it seems like these reviews were fake.
They are just as uncomfortable as the previous Pirellis which were run-flats. And just as noisy.
But worst of all, they cannot be properly balanced! Had the shop try a number of times, the machine says they're balanced but above 80km/h they shaking of the steering wheel starts. This is a good tire shop which I've used before.
DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY!
July 24, 2025
Given 28% while driving a Holden Vf (245/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 3 easy going miles
Bad bad bad tires trying to pull me off road it's awful
September 7, 2024
Given 80% while driving a Volvo S90 R Design (245/40 R20) on a combination of roads for 700 average miles
Very good tires for that range of price. Dry and wet grip performance are quite good for a budget tire. The wear i will see, only have 1000 km with them. Volvo S90 T8 Plug-in R-Design with a weight of 2150kg, 245/40R20.
April 18, 2023

How would you rate the Linglong Sport Master?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Linglong Sport Master Reviews

Given 60% while driving a Kia Motors Rio (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
I'm driving a Kia Rio 1.4 Hatchback in Brunei. The roads are quite bad, very uneven with occasional potholes. Bought a used car and it came with almost worn-out Bridgestone Turanzas. Unsurprisingly, the Linglongs perform worse than the worn-out bridgestones. The purpose was to fit cheap tires for daily duties so it serves the purpose.

Dry Grip - Decent but not confidence inspiring. Turn in is slow and it's not progressive, no warning it could just under steer but mind you this is under very hard cornering that one shouldn't be doing in a Kia Rio anyway. Steering feel is a bit vague and doesn't communicate well when you load up the tires. For daily running and occasional heroics around a roundabout or back roads, it's fine. But it's definitely not a sports tire.

Wet Grip - Average and definitely not confidence inspiring. Straight line aquaplaning risk is moderate. Can comfortably cruise at 80 to 100kmph on rainy highways. It does get a bit sketchy when you hit patches of standing water, you do tend to feel like you lost steering. Currently do not possess enough courage or suicidal thoughts to push any harder. I would take it easy on these tires in the rain.

Comfort - Recommended 100%. These tires are brilliant is this aspect. It's very low road noise compared to bridgestones and they round off potholes and undulations very nicely. It says sport master but it's definitely a comfort master.

Overall - it's fine for a daily runner who's objective is to just drive comfortably for cheap. Do not expect any sort of sporty driving characteristics from the tire. I cannot tell how it will wear yet but probably won't last long. But it's so cheap, wear doesn't matter anyway. If you prioritize driving fun and wet driving safety, it's better to upgrade to a better brand. But if you are tired of life, your car and just want to spend less as possible for you to get from Point A to Point B, this is the tire for you.

Why didn't I buy some other tire.. honestly :\
October 23, 2023
Given 77% while driving a Audi A4 2.0 TDI 140 SLine (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 4,000 miles
Ling long sport master Very good tire for it's price. Easy can compare with Sava uhp, matador, kumho. Very good grip on dry, ok on wet road, a little bit understeering on high speed in corner. Overall you easy can drive on them for 3 season if you drive less than 15tkm per season
April 23, 2023
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Rate the Linglong Sport Master