Tested 4 times by independent publications, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 averages a finish of 9th.
Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers P3 of 7
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is a genuine budget surprise, finishing third overall. It earns that place through efficiency, aquaplaning and comfort rather than outright grip, and suits drivers who value running costs and wet safety over sporting feel.
Where the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 4 | P8.5 of 24 | 51% | - |
| Dry Handling | 2 | P7 of 14 | 47% | - |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 1 | P7 of 7 | 0% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 4 | P6.3 of 24 | 66% | - |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | 1 | P15 of 16 | 7% | - |
| Wet Handling | 2 | P4.5 of 14 | 65% | - |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 1 | P7 of 7 | 0% | - |
| Wet Circle | 1 | P7 of 21 | 70% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 3 | P7 of 14.3 | 61% | - |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 2 | P9 of 18 | 52% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Subj. Comfort | 2 | P7.5 of 13.5 | 54% | - |
| Noise | 2 | P6 of 18 | 74% | 1 |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 2 | P16 of 18 | 13% | - |
| Value | 2 | P11.5 of 18 | 41% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 2 | P4 of 13.5 | 84% | 1 |
| Fuel Consumption | 1 | P1 of 16 | 100% | 1 |
| Abrasion | 1 | P13 of 16 | 20% | - |
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Yokohama Advan Sport V107
3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind
|
3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Linglong Sport Master
3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind
|
3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% |
 Bridgestone Potenza Sport
3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind
|
3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% |
 Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind
|
3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% |
 Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Continental PremiumContact 7
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR Predecessor | 1 | 0 | 48th | 5% |
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 This tire | 4 | 0 | 9th | 56% |
Drawn from 4 tests. Updated July 7, 2026.
Across four summer tests, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 shows a clear pattern of being a competent grip performer for the price, with frequent upper-midpack results in wet metrics and occasional standout results in efficiency-related measures. It even achieved a headline podium (3/7) in the 2026 UHP test, largely attributed to class-leading rolling resistance and strong aquaplaning resistance, indicating a tire that can compete on key safety metrics in certain test sets.
Its recurring limitations are consistency and endurance-related attributes: wear/longevity repeatedly ranks near the bottom, and several subjective/comfort measures are only average. Braking can be mixed-often midpack, but with notable weak spots (e.g., very poor dry braking in one UHP test and very poor wet braking on concrete in ADAC), suggesting performance can be surface- and test-dependent rather than uniformly strong.
performed admirably in the wet handling test- 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test (2025)
its wet handling performance being rated as just good- 2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test (2024)
comfortably the lowest rolling resistance of the seven- Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers (2026)
scores a good rating in efficiency due to low fuel consumption and a relatively low weight- 2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test (2024)
resisted aquaplaning strongly- Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers (2026)
good aquaplaning reserves- 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test (2025)
recorded the weakest subjective wet and dry handling of the field- Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers (2026)
the longest dry braking- Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tire Test: Big Brands vs Challengers (2026)
significantly restricted mileage of just 15,845 miles- 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test (2025)
Every tester write-up on the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 (3 tests) and 12 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is a genuine budget surprise, finishing third overall. It earns that place through efficiency, aquaplaning and comfort rather than outright grip, and suits drivers who value running costs and wet safety over sporting feel.
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 from China surprised testers with good aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances, secure handling, and pleasantly quiet rolling noise. It performed admirably in the wet handling test, achieving better times than some established premium brands. The main drawback was significantly restricted mileage of just 15,845 miles, which impacted its overall cost-effectiveness despite the low purchase price of €288. Despite this limitation, its surprisingly good performance in safety-related tests earned it a "satisfactory" rating.
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 achieves only a satisfactory rating in driving safety, providing just adequate steering feedback on dry roads and not exceeding a satisfactory rating in handling at the limit. The insufficient feedback affects the ability to accurately adjust the steering for curves, leading to a tendency for the vehicle to oversteer during sudden maneuvers. However, it does receive a clearly good rating in braking distance. Overall, its performance on dry roads is rated as satisfactory. On wet surfaces, the Sailun narrowly misses a good rating in both braking and aquaplaning, with only its wet handling performance being rated as just good. Thus, it achieves an overall satisfactory rating on wet roads. Environmentally, the Sailun also receives a satisfactory rating, with both its projected mileage and wear deemed satisfactory, albeit the latter just barely. It scores a good rating in efficiency due to low fuel consumption and a relatively low weight. However, the sustainability of this tire, produced in China, is rated as adequate.
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Sailun tires