Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Firestone Firehawk Sport and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 to find out which tire is best for your own driving.

The good news is that both the Firestone Firehawk Sport and Kumho Ecsta PS71 are Ultra High Performance Summer tires designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars, which means comparing the two tires is relatively simple.

Both tires are hugely popular in the market place with drivers, and both have been featured in independent tire tests.

Firehawk-Sport VS Ecsta-PS71

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tires directly!

Out of these three tests:

  • Firestone Firehawk Sport finished ahead of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 in one of the tests
  • Kumho Ecsta PS71 finished ahead of the Firestone Firehawk Sport in two of the tests

While it might look like the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is better than the Firestone Firehawk Sport purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 stopped the vehicle in 1.88% less distance than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
35.03M
Kumho Ecsta PS71
34.37M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:34.6M Kumho Ecsta PS71: 34.2M
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:35.9M Kumho Ecsta PS71: 34.8M
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:34.6M Kumho Ecsta PS71: 34.1M

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was 1.43% faster around a lap than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
116.9Km/H
Kumho Ecsta PS71
118.6Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:116.9Km/H Kumho Ecsta PS71: 118.6Km/H

Wet Braking

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 stopped the vehicle in 9.3% less distance than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
36.9M
Kumho Ecsta PS71
33.47M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:31.1M Kumho Ecsta PS71: 27.4M
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:30.9M Kumho Ecsta PS71: 30.2M
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:48.7M Kumho Ecsta PS71: 42.8M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 stopped the vehicle in 5.26% less distance than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
38M
Kumho Ecsta PS71
36M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:38M Kumho Ecsta PS71: 36M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was 3.39% faster around a wet lap than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
71.3Km/H
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73.8Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:71.3Km/H Kumho Ecsta PS71: 73.8Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was 2.32% faster around a wet circle than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
15.08s
Kumho Ecsta PS71
14.73s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:15.08s Kumho Ecsta PS71: 14.73s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 floated at a 4.73% higher speed than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
78.6Km/H
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82.5Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:77.5Km/H Kumho Ecsta PS71: 83.7Km/H
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:79.7Km/H Kumho Ecsta PS71: 81.3Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 slipped out at a 3.28% higher speed than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
2.95m/sec2
Kumho Ecsta PS71
3.05m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:2.8m/sec2 Kumho Ecsta PS71: 3m/sec2
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:3.1m/sec2 Kumho Ecsta PS71: 3.09m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 scored 8.51% more points than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
4.3 Points
Kumho Ecsta PS71
4.7 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:4.3 Points Kumho Ecsta PS71: 4.7 Points

Noise

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Firestone Firehawk Sport was better during two noise tests. On average the Firestone Firehawk Sport measured 2.08% quieter than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
72.95dB
Kumho Ecsta PS71
74.5dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Firestone Firehawk Sport

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:72.3dB Kumho Ecsta PS71: 73.6dB
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:73.6dB Kumho Ecsta PS71: 75.4dB

Wear

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during two wear tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is predicted to cover 20.28% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
31680KM
Kumho Ecsta PS71
39740KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:34500KM Kumho Ecsta PS71: 37300KM
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:28860KM Kumho Ecsta PS71: 42180KM

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during two value tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 proved to have a 24.02% better value based on price/1000km than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
12.2Price/1000
Kumho Ecsta PS71
9.27Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Kumho Ecsta PS71

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:12.75Price/1000 Kumho Ecsta PS71: 11.05Price/1000
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:11.64Price/1000 Kumho Ecsta PS71: 7.49Price/1000

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Firestone Firehawk Sport was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Firestone Firehawk Sport had a 17.08% lower rolling resistance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
7.62kg / t
Kumho Ecsta PS71
9.19kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Firestone Firehawk Sport

2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:7.62kg / t Kumho Ecsta PS71: 9.19kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Firestone Firehawk Sport was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Firestone Firehawk Sport used 3.51% less fuel than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
5.5l/100km
Kumho Ecsta PS71
5.7l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Firestone Firehawk Sport

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:5.5l/100km Kumho Ecsta PS71: 5.7l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Firestone Firehawk Sport was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Firestone Firehawk Sport emitted 5.37% less particle wear matter than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Firestone Firehawk Sport
81.1mg/km/t
Kumho Ecsta PS71
85.7mg/km/t
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Firestone Firehawk Sport

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Firestone Firehawk Sport:81.1mg/km/t Kumho Ecsta PS71: 85.7mg/km/t

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Firestone Firehawk Sport and Kumho Ecsta PS71.

In total the Firestone Firehawk Sport has been reviewed 5 times and drivers have given the tire 74% overall.

The Kumho Ecsta PS71 has been reviewed 79 times and drivers have given the tire 77% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Kumho Ecsta PS71.

Best Review for the Firestone Firehawk Sport
Given 90% 265/30 R20 on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
Excellent tires for wet roads - no slipping when accelerating / overtaking / cornering, or when hitting unseen standing water, or more generally, bouncing around on poorly-surfaced potholed roads - so well-suited to driving in England this Summer... Also grip well in the dry, and they're quiet at lower speeds - very important for a convertible which came with large, wide alloys and rubber-band tires. Am also achieving more miles per gallon - never seen 33 mpg previously (30 was the best) - so as nothing else has changed, the new tires' construction/composition must be responsible. Plus, they... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 220 - tire reviewed on July 12, 2024
View all Firestone Firehawk Sport driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Kumho Ecsta PS71
Given 83% 225/45 R17 on mostly motorways for 500 spirited miles
same kumho problem... balancing & egg shape. 245/45/18 100Y XL
I've always used kumho because the price well reflects in proformance if only they didn't need constant rebalencing.
I've had 4 duff pairs, ku31 x 2 pair, ku 39 x 2 pair that had to come off in the end they were so bad.
No amount of balencing can sort an egg shape tire.
These new ps71 are very soft, squishy, feel like running on 20psi with 30g wheel wobble even after twice rebalencing them & 1 of them is egg shape.
I am worn out with trying to get them right & think after years of kumho on... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 520 - tire reviewed on March 25, 2017
View all Kumho Ecsta PS71 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Firestone Firehawk Sport performed better in noise, rolling resistance, fuel consumption and abrasion, while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [km/h], wet circle, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, subj. comfort, wear and value.

Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in dry handling and wet handling, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.

Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Kumho Ecsta PS71 seems to be the best tire overall.

However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.

Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Overall Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.