Menu

Firestone Firehawk SZ90

Replaced by the Firestone Firehawk Sport Replaces the Firestone firehawk S790

The Firestone Firehawk SZ90 is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

The quick answer

Owners say 67% from 25 owner reviews 48% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say 12th average finish across 6 independent tests Latest: P9 of 9 · 2017 See every test
Strengths & weaknesses Dry, Wet Comfort Relative to its rivals across every test we hold

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated March 2026.

  • 25owner reviews
  • 267,290miles driven
  • 6professional tests

Tire Reviews Score

Firestone Firehawk SZ90

4.7/10

Better than 13% of summer tires

  • Medium Confidence
  • 2 tests
  • 25 owner reviews
Scores of the 406 summer tires we have tested

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent tests2 tests · 1 publication · 2017 10% 90%
Owner reviews25 owner reviews · rated 67% 37% 10%
Combined 13% 4.7

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Category by category

How it compares with other summer tires in each area, and how much each area counts. 50 is the middle of the group.

Category Better than Weight Tests
WetBraking, handling and aquaplaning in the wet 15% 44% 2
DryBraking and handling on dry roads 32% 40% 2
ValueWear, efficiency and cost 8% 9% 1
ComfortNoise and ride comfort 0% 7% 1

Weights are shares of the test result. Owner reviews are blended in afterwards. Faded bars rest on one or two tests.

By discipline

The same results grouped by what the tire was doing. They are not counted a second time.

BrakingEvery braking test, on any surface 32% 2
HandlingEvery handling test, on any surface 12% 2

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Its own test results decide 89% of the test figure. The other 11% is the average for its group, and it shrinks as more tests arrive.

High needs at least 3 tests, with its own results deciding 90% or more. Medium needs 2 tests and 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as tests arrive.

The tests behind it

Only measured results count. A test that published its placings alone is listed, but not scored.

  1. 2017 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars · 245/40 R18 P9 / 9
  2. 2017 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars · 235/35 R19 P8 / 9
  3. 2016 2016 ADAC Tire Test - 225/45 R17 ADAC · 225/45 R17 P12 / 16 Placing only
  4. 2012 2012 Autobild 50 Tire Braking Test Auto Bild · 225/45 R17 P20 / 50 Placing only
  5. 2011 2011 Auto Zeitung Max Performance Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 225/45 R17 P14 / 14 Placing only
  6. 2010 2010 European Summer Tire Test ADAC · 225/45 r17 P11 / 17 Placing only

Tested 6 times by independent publications, the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 averages a finish of 12th.

6 Tests
0 Test Wins
12th Average
8th Best
20th Worst
Finishing position in each test1stLast20102017

Finishing position in each test

The latest test

2017 Auto Bild UHP Tire Test P9 of 9

Not recommended

Weak: Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Handling, Noise, Rolling Resistance Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Every independent test of the Firestone Firehawk SZ90, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20172017 Auto Bild UHP Tire TestAuto Bild Sportscars · 245/40 R18P9 / 9
20172017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tire TestAuto Bild Sportscars · 235/35 R19P8 / 9
20162016 ADAC Tire Test - 225/45 R17ADAC · 225/45 R17P12 / 16
20122012 Autobild 50 Tire Braking TestAuto Bild · 225/45 R17P20 / 50
20112011 Auto Zeitung Max Performance Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 225/45 R17P14 / 14
20102010 European Summer Tire TestADAC · 225/45 r17P11 / 17

On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict

Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 in the wet?
Across the 2 wet-braking tests it has featured in, the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 stops 15.5% longer than premium rivals, 18.8% longer than mid-range rivals and 1.4% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews wet score of 15/100, and owners rate it 6.7/10 in the wet from 25 reviews.
How good is the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 in the dry?
Across the 2 dry-braking tests it has featured in, the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 stops 5.3% longer than premium rivals, 4.5% longer than mid-range rivals and 1.5% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews dry score of 32/100, and owners rate it 7.6/10 in the dry from 25 reviews.
How fuel efficient is the Firestone Firehawk SZ90?
Across the 1 test measuring rolling resistance, the Firestone Firehawk SZ90's rolling resistance is 12.1% higher than premium rivals and 4.1% higher than mid-range rivals.
How many miles does the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 last?
Based on test and owner data, the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 is expected to last around 32,813 miles (52,807 km).
How comfortable and quiet are the Firestone Firehawk SZ90?
Owners rate the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 6 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 23 reviews.
More questions about the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 (7)
How well do the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 6.8 out of 10 for wear across 23 reviews. 12 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 10,000 miles.
Would owners buy the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 again?
48% of owners say they would buy the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 again, based on the 23 owner reviews that answered the question. 22% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Firestone Firehawk SZ90's road noise?
Of the 22 owner reviews analyzed for the Firestone Firehawk SZ90, 12 mention road noise: 3 praise it (quiet) and 9 criticise it (noisy). One owner wrote: "you can't hear anything inside car except noise of tires, this noise make you mad". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Firestone Firehawk SZ90's dry grip?
Of the 22 owner reviews analyzed for the Firestone Firehawk SZ90, 11 mention dry grip: 10 praise it (strong dry grip) and 1 criticise it (limited dry grip). One owner wrote: "Both dry and wet grip is progressive and strong". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Firestone Firehawk SZ90's tread life?
Of the 22 owner reviews analyzed for the Firestone Firehawk SZ90, 10 mention tread life: 6 praise it (long-lasting) and 4 criticise it (wears quickly). One owner wrote: "Wear is less than 1mm after 15000km". Read those reviews
What does the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 replace?
The Firestone Firehawk SZ90 is the successor to the Firestone firehawk S790 in Firestone's range.
Has the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 been replaced?
The Firestone Firehawk SZ90 has been replaced by the Firestone Firehawk Sport.
Owner Questions (1)
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Firestone Firehawk SZ90

Hi
Are Firestone SZ90 directional tires
October 11, 2018
No, the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 is an asymmetric tire.

Firestone Firehawk SZ90 Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say

Across 25 owner ratings the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 averages 67%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 7.6 out of 10 and Comfort lowest at 6. 12 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 45% of owners score it 70% or better.

Owner ratings averaged from 25 ratings

  • Owner score 67%
  • Dry Grip 76%
  • Road Feedback 73%
  • Handling 69%
  • Wear 68%
  • Wet Grip 67%
  • Comfort 60%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 54%

“Bought the tires just over a year ago. Noticed from the get go on wet roads the water displacement was very good. Quite noisy but you can get over that. Around 25,000km later, the outside of the tires are below the...”

  • Audi 2.0tdi 177 sline sportback
  • 15 miles
Read full review → 974 found this helpful
Most critical 20%

“These tires are hard, noisy and slippery compared with Pirelli Cinturato P1 and Fulda carat Progresso. Car is unstable on korners, not good handling on dry & wet surfaces and not safe feeling when driving faster on...”

  • Mitsubishi Lancer GLXi
  • 27,000 miles
Read full review → 670 found this helpful
Longest term 92%

“Really great Tires. I had them on my new Seat. Lasted 80.000 km. They were used in all seasons. Great handling in every conditions. Hever had a problem with them. Great eaven on snow. Very recommandable tire. I would...”

  • SEAT 1.4 TSI
  • 80,000 miles
Read full review → 721 found this helpful

All 23 Firestone Firehawk SZ90 reviews

Score spread across 22 written reviews
81%
Sebastian S Contributor
Initial Impressions
Braking, grip, handling good on dry and wet. Comfort kinda poor, tire is a little noisy, wear below average.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 7
Helpful 75
54%
Member
Bought the tires just over a year ago. Noticed from the get go on wet roads the water displacement was very good. Quite noisy but you can get over that.

Around 25,000km later, the outside of the tires are below the legal limit while the inside have 3mm left (must be a recurring thing as an alignment was done on them when they were put on and other drivers have experienced this). This can also be seen in the back two tires but not as prominent. There’s probably another 15,000km-20,000km ish to get out of them.

Grand set of tires. Probably wouldn’t buy again. The next set going on the front are a pair of Goodyear eagle f1 asymmetric 6’s.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 5
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 2
Helpful 974
46%
Member
These tires were solely on the rear of the car.

Wore out on the shoulder of the near side tire after approx. 26,000 km. The rest of the tire is about 2.5 mm, and about 3 mm left on the offside tire shoulder.

As they were only on the rear I can’t comment on steering feel, however, the rear was liable to stepping out on very wet roads. Not something I’d expect from a front wheel drive daily. Above 90 km/h the risk of aqauplaning the rear was high.

Comfort wasn’t the worst, they handled bumps relatively well. Noise was above average but not unbearable for long motorway journeys.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 4
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 4
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 976

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Firestone Firehawk SZ90? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Firestone Firehawk SZ90?
53%
Member
I don't even care how this tires are on dry or wet road because you can't hear anything inside car except noise of tires, this noise make you mad, no chance to handle it, never again firestone
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 1
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 1,129
74%
Member
Decent tires for the price. Wet grip good, dry grip good only negative is that they have started to crack at 3mm and 18000 miles.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 7
Helpful 680
92%
Member
Really great Tires. I had them on my new Seat. Lasted 80.000 km. They were used in all seasons. Great handling in every conditions. Hever had a problem with them. Great eaven on snow.
Very recommandable tire. I would buy it again for sure.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 721
86%
Member
I'm really impressed by these tires. Had a quick look at the reviews here before buying and there were several negative ones, which almost turn my decision on buying them. But actually the tires are great in dry, wet, wet & cold handling and braking... They grip in turns with high speed and road feedback is good.
I can say they are a bit noisy, but it's not something bothering. Wear is less than 1mm after 15000km. Will buy again and recommend for sure!
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 756
69%
Member
  • Rover 75
  • 225/45 R17
  • 100 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Spirited
I have recently bought a set of these tires for my car having been informed that they had a new tread pattern. I have found that they have good cornering and braking characteristics in wet or dry conditions on all road surfaces.

I recently took a friend who races street cars as a hobby for a drive on dual carriageways and motorway and he even remarked how quiet they were regarding road noise over other comparable makes.

I would definitely recommend these tires to anyone.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 3
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 648
20%
Member
These tires are hard, noisy and slippery compared with Pirelli Cinturato P1 and Fulda carat Progresso. Car is unstable on korners, not good handling on dry & wet surfaces and not safe feeling when driving faster on corners at all.
I recommend from my experience Fulda and Pirelli summer and winter tires.
These tires are not sport tires at all, I wouldn't buy again and don't recommend them to anyone.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 3
  • Wet Grip 2
  • Road Feedback 2
  • Handling 1
  • Wear 2
  • Comfort 2
Helpful 670
43%
Member
Very noisy after 90mph and feeling insecure eve tho I have sport suspension. Wouldnt buy again.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 4
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 1
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 660
61%
Member
  • SEAT Exeo
  • 225/40 R18 W
  • 13,000 miles
  • Mostly Town
  • Spirited
I replaced my Goodyear Eagle F1s, which I'd had on since the car was new, with the Firestone Firehawk SZ90u to try and save a few quid. But as soon as I drove away from the garage I could tell the difference. The car seemed more bouncier as I steered (not in a good way) and felt unstable. It felt like the car was swaying. I beared with it to see if it was just psychological but when I took some corners at what I deemed to be my usual way, the traction control would come on and the car didn't handle anything like it did with the Goodyears. I had never really noticed much difference in handling over the years when I've changed my tires but maybe as I'm driving a faster, sportier car that I enjoy driving well maybe this is the difference. I was that concerned I took my car back to the garage to ask them if they could check that nothing had been disturbed or fiddled with when changing the tires! A technician came out with me and drove the car but he couldn't notice anything wrong with the way it handled. I can only put it down to the difference in tires and when they showed me the difference in the side wall firmness between the Goodyear and the Firestone, the Goodyear are reinforced and solid, preventing rolling and improving stability. The Firestones have now worn on the outside circumference (fronts only) after approx. 13,000 miles, requiring replacement. The rest of the tire and the rears have plenty of tread left on them but I am putting Goodyear Eagle F1s back on the fronts for now and the rears when they're also worn. Hopefully I will get the trusty road holding and handling I was accustomed to again..
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 5
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 4
Helpful 676
Member
My worse tires, very noisy- this noise make you crazy, after 15000 km I've decided bined them as couldn't use them any more, wear quite quick so in this tires is huge advantage, positive is good grip on wet and dry, fuel consumption was increased too. After this tires I won't buy any Firestone again
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.