Firestone Firehawk Sport - Test Results
Test Statistics
7
Tests Completed12th
Average Position4th
Best Result23rd
Worst ResultPerformance Analysis
Across 7 summer tire tests, the Firestone Firehawk Sport shows a clear pattern: it is consistently class-leading for rolling resistance/fuel efficiency, but tends to trail premium UHP competitors in wet safety margins and long-term economics (wear/value). Overall results swing widely from competitive mid-pack (e.g., 4/11 and 7/18) to near-bottom outcomes in larger group tests (20/21 and 23/50), suggesting the tire's efficiency-focused tuning comes with performance trade-offs in demanding dynamic categories.
On dry roads, braking is generally mid-pack (typically ~+5-6% from best) and handling ranges from genuinely strong in one UHP test to mid-to-lower tier elsewhere. In wet conditions, braking and handling are inconsistent but frequently off the pace (often double-digit % behind the best), with curved aquaplaning repeatedly weak. Wear and value metrics are a recurring issue, with low mileage rankings and very poor “value” positions in the tests that measure them.
Performance Strengths
-
Fuel Efficiency / Rolling Resistance
Strong
Details
• 1st place rolling resistance in 2025 Sports Cars test: 7.2 kg/t (1/8)
• 1st place rolling resistance in 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance test: 7.62 kg/t (1/20)
• 1st place rolling resistance in 2023 Sport Auto UHP test: 7.1 kg/t (1/11)
• 1st place rolling resistance in 2023 AutoBild Sports Car test: 7.05 kg/t (1/13)
• 3rd place fuel consumption in 2025 ADAC test: 5.5 l/100km (3/18, +3.8% from best)
-
Dry Grip / Handling Potential (situational)
Minor
Details
• 3rd place dry handling in 2023 Sport Auto UHP test: 100.7 km/h (3/11, +1.1% from best)
• Dry handling close to best in 2023 AutoBild Sports Car test: 114.3 km/h (7/13, +1.0% from best)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wear / Value (Running Costs)
Strong
Details
• Wear only 28,860 km in 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance test (16/20, +46.6% from best)
• Wear 34,500 km in 2025 ADAC test (16/18, +53.6% from best)
• Very poor value ranking in 2025 ADAC test (16/18, +211.7% from best)
• Poor value ranking in 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance test (18/20, +74.8% from best)
-
Wet Weather Performance (Braking & Handling consistency)
Moderate
Details
• Wet braking deficit in 2025 Sports Cars test: 49.4 m (6/8, +23.2% from best)
• Wet braking in 2026 AutoBild braking mega test: 29.9 m (20/50, +18.7% from best)
• Wet handling low ranking in 2025 Sports Cars test: 74.9 km/h (6/8, +11.4% from best)
• Wet handling near bottom in 2023 AutoBild Sports Car test: 81.6 km/h (11/13, +6.1% from best)
-
Aquaplaning Resistance (especially curved)
Moderate
Details
• Curved aquaplaning weak in 2025 ADAC test: 2.8 m/s² (15/18, +20% from best)
• Curved aquaplaning weak in 2023 Sport Auto UHP test: 3.19 m/s² (9/11, +12.1% from best)
• Curved aquaplaning weak in 2023 AutoBild Sports Car test: 2.45 m/s² (9/13, +17.2% from best)
Performance Over Time
Test History
2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
2026
Winner: Linglong Sport Master
2025 Sports Cars Tire Test
2025
Winner: Continental SportContact 7
Rolling Resistance, Straight Aqua
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test
2025
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Rolling Resistance
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
2025
Winner: Continental SportContact 7
2023 Sport Auto UHP Tire Test
2023
Winner: Continental SportContact 7
Rolling Resistance
Rolling Resistance