As with this years Tire Reviews winter tire test, Auto Bild Sportscars conducted a winter tire test in the 235/35 R19 size.

While we had a slightly different test field, the good tires were still good, which is always nice. The cheap tires in this test, a Radar and Auto Green, again prove that you get what you pay for, with both tires doing well in one category (snow) but then being complete disasters in the dry and wet.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking: 62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking: 31.1 → 0.0 mph

Dry

In the dry braking test, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 performed best among winter tires, stopping in 136 feet from 62 mph. The worst-performing winter tire was the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08, which took 159 feet to stop - a difference of 23 feet or about 17% longer. Notably, the reference summer tire outperformed all winter tires, stopping in just 122 feet. This highlights the superior dry performance of summer tires, with even the best winter tire needing over 13 feet more to stop.

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
RefReference Summer	122 ft	-14 ft	0 mph
1Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	136 ft	Best	0 mph
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	137 ft	+1 ft	7 mph
3Ceat WinterDrive Sport	138 ft	+2 ft	10 mph
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	142 ft	+6 ft	16 mph
5Dunlop Winter Sport 5	142 ft	+6 ft	16 mph
6Radar Dimax Alpine	143 ft	+7 ft	17 mph
7Hankook Winter i cept evo3	144 ft	+8 ft	18 mph
8Vredestein Wintrac Pro	145 ft	+9 ft	20 mph
9Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	145 ft	+9 ft	20 mph
10Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08	159 ft	+23 ft	30 mph

The difference between best and worst was 30.4% (37 ft ≈ 2.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 achieved the highest average speed of 64.1 mph in the dry handling test among winter tires, while the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08 again performed worst at 58.1 mph - a significant 6.0 mph difference. The reference summer tire excelled here too, managing 65.8 mph, demonstrating its superior dry grip and handling characteristics. The gap between summer and winter performance is less pronounced in handling than in braking, but still noticeable.

Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	65.8 mph	+1.7 mph
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	64.1 mph	Best
2Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	63.8 mph	-0.3 mph
3Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	63.6 mph	-0.5 mph
4Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	63.5 mph	-0.6 mph
5Dunlop Winter Sport 5	62.8 mph	-1.3 mph
6Ceat WinterDrive Sport	62.3 mph	-1.8 mph
7Radar Dimax Alpine	62.1 mph	-2.0 mph
8Hankook Winter i cept evo3	62.0 mph	-2.1 mph
9Vredestein Wintrac Pro	61.4 mph	-2.7 mph
10Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08	58.1 mph	-6.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.7% (7.7 mph).

Wet

In wet conditions, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 stopped in the shortest distance of 158 feet among winter tires, while the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08 required a dangerous 266 feet - an alarming difference of 108 feet or about 68% longer. Interestingly, the reference summer tire's performance (161 feet) was very close to the best winter tires, showing that top winter tires can match or even exceed summer tires in wet braking.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	158 ft	Best	0 mph
2Dunlop Winter Sport 5	160 ft	+2 ft	9 mph
RefReference Summer	161 ft	+3 ft	11 mph
3Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	162 ft	+4 ft	12 mph
4Hankook Winter i cept evo3	167 ft	+9 ft	18 mph
5Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	168 ft	+10 ft	20 mph
6Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	169 ft	+11 ft	20 mph
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	175 ft	+17 ft	25 mph
8Ceat WinterDrive Sport	190 ft	+32 ft	33 mph
9Radar Dimax Alpine	204 ft	+46 ft	38 mph
10Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08	266 ft	+108 ft	51 mph

The difference between best and worst was 68.3% (108 ft ≈ 7.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08 would still be travelling at 51 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 again led the winter tires with an average speed of 52.0 mph in wet handling, while the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08 struggled at 44.4 mph - a difference of 7.6 mph. The reference summer tire achieved 50.8 mph, falling between the best and average winter tires. This suggests that while summer tires generally excel in dry conditions, specialized winter tires can outperform them in the wet.

Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	52.0 mph	Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	51.8 mph	-0.2 mph
3Dunlop Winter Sport 5	51.1 mph	-0.9 mph
RefReference Summer	50.8 mph	-1.2 mph
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	50.1 mph	-1.9 mph
5Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	50.1 mph	-1.9 mph
6Hankook Winter i cept evo3	50.0 mph	-2.0 mph
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	49.9 mph	-2.1 mph
8Ceat WinterDrive Sport	48.9 mph	-3.1 mph
9Radar Dimax Alpine	48.0 mph	-4.0 mph
10Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08	44.4 mph	-7.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 14.6% (7.6 mph).

In the straight aquaplaning test, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 performed best among winter tires, maintaining control up to 55.4 mph. The Radar Dimax Alpine fared worst, losing control at 49.4 mph - a 6.0 mph difference. The reference summer tire outperformed all winter tires at 56.9 mph, indicating superior water dispersion in straight-line aquaplaning situations.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	56.9 mph	+1.5 mph
1Dunlop Winter Sport 5	55.4 mph	Best
2Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	55.2 mph	-0.2 mph
3Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	54.1 mph	-1.3 mph
3Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	54.1 mph	-1.3 mph
5Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	53.9 mph	-1.5 mph
6Hankook Winter i cept evo3	53.3 mph	-2.1 mph
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	51.4 mph	-4.0 mph
8Ceat WinterDrive Sport	50.6 mph	-4.8 mph
9Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08	49.5 mph	-5.9 mph
10Radar Dimax Alpine	49.4 mph	-6.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.2% (7.5 mph).

Snow

In snow conditions, the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08, which struggled in dry and wet tests, excelled with the shortest braking distance of 97 feet. The Ceat WinterDrive Sport had the longest distance at 104 feet - a relatively small 2.1-meter difference among winter tires. The reference summer tire performed poorly, needing 197 feet to stop, more than double the distance of winter tires, highlighting the crucial need for winter tires in snowy conditions.

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08	97 ft	Best	0 mph
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	99 ft	+2 ft	10 mph
3Radar Dimax Alpine	100 ft	+3 ft	12 mph
4Vredestein Wintrac Pro	101 ft	+4 ft	14 mph
5Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	101 ft	+4 ft	15 mph
6Dunlop Winter Sport 5	102 ft	+5 ft	17 mph
7Hankook Winter i cept evo3	103 ft	+6 ft	19 mph
7Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	103 ft	+6 ft	19 mph
9Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	104 ft	+7 ft	20 mph
10Ceat WinterDrive Sport	104 ft	+7 ft	21 mph
RefReference Summer	197 ft	+100 ft	57 mph

The difference between best and worst was 101.7% (100 ft ≈ 6.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Ceat WinterDrive Sport would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 demonstrated the best snow traction with 2260 N of pulling force, while the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 produced the least at 2037 N - a difference of 223 N or about 11%. The reference summer tire was vastly outperformed, managing only 760 N, less than a third of the best winter tire's traction. This enormous difference underscores the importance of winter tires for acceleration and hill-climbing in snowy conditions.

Snow Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	508 lbf	Best
2Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08	501 lbf	-7 lbf
3Vredestein Wintrac Pro	495 lbf	-13 lbf
4Dunlop Winter Sport 5	488 lbf	-20 lbf
5Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	486 lbf	-22 lbf
6Ceat WinterDrive Sport	485 lbf	-23 lbf
7Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	482 lbf	-26 lbf
8Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	479 lbf	-29 lbf
9Radar Dimax Alpine	464 lbf	-44 lbf
10Hankook Winter i cept evo3	458 lbf	-50 lbf
RefReference Summer	171 lbf	-337 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 66.4% (337 lbf).

The Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08 continued its strong snow performance, achieving the highest average speed of 38.7 mph in snow handling. The Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was slowest at 36.7 mph - a relatively small 2.0 mph difference. The reference summer tire's performance was not reported, but based on other snow tests, it would likely be significantly worse than all winter tires.

Snow Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08	38.7 mph	Best
2Radar Dimax Alpine	38.6 mph	-0.1 mph
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	37.8 mph	-0.9 mph
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	37.8 mph	-0.9 mph
5Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	37.2 mph	-1.5 mph
6Dunlop Winter Sport 5	37.2 mph	-1.5 mph
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	37.2 mph	-1.5 mph
8Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	37.1 mph	-1.6 mph
8Ceat WinterDrive Sport	37.1 mph	-1.6 mph
10Hankook Winter i cept evo3	36.7 mph	-2.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.1% (2 mph).

Comfort

The Radar Dimax Alpine was the quietest tire, producing 69.7 dB of external noise, while the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was loudest at 73.2 dB - a 3.5 dB difference that would be noticeable to most people. The reference summer tire measured 70.9 dB, placing it in the middle of the range for winter tires, suggesting that winter tread patterns don't necessarily result in increased noise.

Noise
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Radar Dimax Alpine	69.7 dB	Best
2Ceat WinterDrive Sport	70.3 dB	+0.60 dB
3Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08	70.7 dB	+1.00 dB
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	70.8 dB	+1.10 dB
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	70.8 dB	+1.10 dB
RefReference Summer	70.9 dB	+1.20 dB
6Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	70.9 dB	+1.20 dB
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	71.2 dB	+1.50 dB
8Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	71.3 dB	+1.60 dB
9Dunlop Winter Sport 5	72.4 dB	+2.70 dB
10Hankook Winter i cept evo3	73.2 dB	+3.50 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5% (3.5 dB).

Value

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P had the lowest rolling resistance at 8.19 kg/t, potentially offering the best fuel efficiency. The Radar Dimax Alpine had the highest at 9.92 kg/t - a significant 21% difference that could impact fuel consumption. Interestingly, the reference summer tire had a very low rolling resistance of 8.15 kg/t, slightly better than the best winter tire, indicating that the specialized winter tread compounds and patterns generally increase rolling resistance compared to summer tires.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
RefReference Summer	8.15 kg/t	-0.04 kg/t	$0
1Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	8.19 kg/t	Best	$0
2Hankook Winter i cept evo3	8.33 kg/t	+0.14 kg/t	$5
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	8.41 kg/t	+0.22 kg/t	$8
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	8.47 kg/t	+0.28 kg/t	$10
5Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	8.79 kg/t	+0.60 kg/t	$22
6Dunlop Winter Sport 5	8.89 kg/t	+0.70 kg/t	$25
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	9.1 kg/t	+0.91 kg/t	$33
8Ceat WinterDrive Sport	9.32 kg/t	+1.13 kg/t	$41
9Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08	9.45 kg/t	+1.26 kg/t	$45
10Radar Dimax Alpine	9.92 kg/t	+1.73 kg/t	$62

The difference between best and worst was 21.7% (1.77 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Radar Dimax Alpine uses about 17 gal ($62) more fuel than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Gas/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

12,000 mi

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

$3.60/gal

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

Dry99.6%

Wet94.3%

Snow98.7%

Comfort97.8%

Rolling Resistance97.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	137 ft	+1 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	64.1 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	168 ft	+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	50.1 mph	-1.9 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 10	53.9 mph	-1.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6^th / 10	10.3 ft/s²	-1.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	99 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 10	508 lbf	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	37.8 mph	-0.9 mph
Snow CircleHigher is better	2^nd / 10	9.8 ft/s²	-0.1 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	8^th / 10	71.3 dB	+1.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 10	8.41 kg/t	+0.22 kg/t

EU Label: D/B/70
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 1100.00

Dry99.7%

Wet97.3%

Snow95.3%

Comfort98.5%

Rolling Resistance96.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	136 ft	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	63.6 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	162 ft	+4 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	51.8 mph	-0.2 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 10	54.1 mph	-1.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 10	10.3 ft/s²	-1.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	104 ft	+7 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	8^th / 10	479 lbf	-29 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	37.2 mph	-1.5 mph
Snow CircleHigher is better	4^th / 10	9.6 ft/s²	-0.3 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 10	70.8 dB	+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 10	8.47 kg/t	+0.28 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 1000.00

Dry97.8%

Wet95.1%

Snow95.7%

Comfort98.5%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	142 ft	+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	63.8 mph	-0.3 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	169 ft	+11 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	50.1 mph	-1.9 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 10	55.2 mph	-0.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 10	11.0 ft/s²	-1.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	103 ft	+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 10	482 lbf	-26 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	37.8 mph	-0.9 mph
Snow CircleHigher is better	7^th / 10	9.5 ft/s²	-0.4 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 10	70.8 dB	+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 10	8.19 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: C/B/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 1030.00

Dry96.9%

Wet98.8%

Snow95.8%

Comfort96.3%

Rolling Resistance92.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	142 ft	+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	62.8 mph	-1.3 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	160 ft	+2 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	51.1 mph	-0.9 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 10	55.4 mph	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1^st / 10	12.1 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	102 ft	+5 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 10	488 lbf	-20 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	37.2 mph	-1.5 mph
Snow CircleHigher is better	8^th / 10	9.4 ft/s²	-0.5 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	9^th / 10	72.4 dB	+2.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 10	8.89 kg/t	+0.70 kg/t

EU Label: D/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 845.00

Dry96.4%

Wet98.3%

Snow96%

Comfort98.3%

Rolling Resistance93.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	145 ft	+9 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	63.5 mph	-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	158 ft	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	52.0 mph	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 10	54.1 mph	-1.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3^rd / 10	10.4 ft/s²	-1.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	101 ft	+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 10	486 lbf	-22 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	37.1 mph	-1.6 mph
Snow CircleHigher is better	6^th / 10	9.5 ft/s²	-0.4 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 10	70.9 dB	+1.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 10	8.79 kg/t	+0.60 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/72
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 920.00

Dry95.7%

Wet94.5%

Snow93.3%

Comfort95.2%

Rolling Resistance98.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	144 ft	+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	62.0 mph	-2.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	167 ft	+9 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	50.0 mph	-2.0 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 10	53.3 mph	-2.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	7^th / 10	10.3 ft/s²	-1.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	103 ft	+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	10^th / 10	458 lbf	-50 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	36.7 mph	-2.0 mph
Snow CircleHigher is better	10^th / 10	9.4 ft/s²	-0.5 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	10^th / 10	73.2 dB	+3.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 10	8.33 kg/t	+0.14 kg/t

EU Label: D/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 775.00

Dry94.9%

Wet92.3%

Snow96.6%

Comfort97.9%

Rolling Resistance90%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	145 ft	+9 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	61.4 mph	-2.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	175 ft	+17 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	49.9 mph	-2.1 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 10	51.4 mph	-4.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 10	10.3 ft/s²	-1.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	101 ft	+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 10	495 lbf	-13 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	37.2 mph	-1.5 mph
Snow CircleHigher is better	5^th / 10	9.5 ft/s²	-0.4 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 10	71.2 dB	+1.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 10	9.1 kg/t	+0.91 kg/t

EU Label: E/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 835.00

Dry97.9%

Wet86.4%

Snow94.9%

Comfort99.2%

Rolling Resistance87.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	138 ft	+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	62.3 mph	-1.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	190 ft	+32 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	48.9 mph	-3.1 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 10	50.6 mph	-4.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	8^th / 10	7.6 ft/s²	-4.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	104 ft	+7 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	6^th / 10	485 lbf	-23 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	37.1 mph	-1.6 mph
Snow CircleHigher is better	9^th / 10	9.4 ft/s²	-0.5 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 10	70.3 dB	+0.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 10	9.32 kg/t	+1.13 kg/t

EU Label: D/B/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 320.00

Dry96.2%

Wet82.1%

Snow96.6%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance82.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	143 ft	+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	62.1 mph	-2.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	204 ft	+46 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	48.0 mph	-4.0 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 10	49.4 mph	-6.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	9^th / 10	6.3 ft/s²	-5.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	100 ft	+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	9^th / 10	464 lbf	-44 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	38.6 mph	-0.1 mph
Snow CircleHigher is better	3^rd / 10	9.7 ft/s²	-0.2 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 10	69.7 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 10	9.92 kg/t	+1.73 kg/t

EU Label: D/C/69
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 450.00

Dry88.1%

Wet70.7%

Snow99.6%

Comfort98.6%

Rolling Resistance86.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	159 ft	+23 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	58.1 mph	-6.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	266 ft	+108 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	44.4 mph	-7.6 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	9^th / 10	49.5 mph	-5.9 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	10^th / 10	4.7 ft/s²	-7.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	97 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 10	501 lbf	-7 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	38.7 mph	Best in this discipline
Snow CircleHigher is better	1^st / 10	9.9 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 10	70.7 dB	+1.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 10	9.45 kg/t	+1.26 kg/t

EU Label: D/C/72
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 450.00

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Value

Results

Cross-check this test