Menu
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 View Gallery (10)
155-355/25-70 R14-22 346 sizes 2019 Winter rated
Tested by Tire Reviews 6 Tests
2023/24 Tire Reviews UHP Winter Tire Test 2023 Tire Reviews SUV Winter Tire Test 2023 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test 2022/23 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test 2021 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test The Best Winter Tires for 2020

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Previous Bridgestone Tires Premium Touring Winter Next

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is a premium touring winter tire best known for class-leading wet-weather security, delivering standout wet grip and braking that consistently shines in independent testing and is strongly echoed by owners. It feels stable and predictable with good comfort, making it particularly well suited to mixed and temperate winter conditions where cold, wet roads and slush are common. The main trade-off is longevity: both tests and real-world users frequently report fast wear, with some drivers also noticing that snow/ice traction tails off as tread depth drops.

9.1
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
77%
Wet Grip
84%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
73%
Wear
59%
Comfort
74%
Buy again
61%
Snow Grip
72%
Ice Grip
62%
110 Reviews
71% Average
1,079,358 miles driven
45 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Winter Premium
BETA
9.1 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Wet
92.6
1.93x / 138 tests
Snow
81.5
1.5x / 112 tests
Comfort
77.9
0.32x / 37 tests
Dry
70.1
1.13x / 64 tests
Value
68.9
0.42x / 71 tests
Ice
47.5
1.2x / 2 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
84.2
105 tests
Handling
82.7
102 tests
Traction
81.3
27 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 45
Publications: 10
Period: 2019 - 2024
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 110
Avg Rating: 70.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.44
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2024 235/35 R19 5/11 12 metrics
2024 All Season and Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2024 215/55 R17 1/10 13 metrics
2023/24 Tire Reviews UHP Winter Tire Test Tire Reviews 2023 255/40 R19 5/6 22 metrics
2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Allrad 2023 225/60 R18 8/11 14 metrics
2023 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test Sport Auto 2023 225/40 R18 1/9 14 metrics
2023 Sports Cars Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2023 225/40 R18 5/12 12 metrics
2023 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 10/22 15 metrics
2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 6/16 12 metrics
2023 Tire Reviews SUV Winter Tire Test Tire Reviews 2023 235/60 R18 3/9 17 metrics
2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 1/54 2 metrics
2023 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test Tire Reviews 2023 225/45 R18 1/13 14 metrics
2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tire Test ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 15/15 13 metrics
2023 AMS SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2023 255/45 R20 1/7 13 metrics
2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2022 245/40 R19 1/10 14 metrics
2022 Sport Auto All Season Tire Test Sport Auto 2022 235/35 R19 4/8 13 metrics
2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 6/22 16 metrics
2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Allrad 2022 225/45 R19 4/10 14 metrics
2022 Winter Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 1/57 2 metrics
2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/60 R16 ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 5/17 0 metrics
2022 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 7/15 0 metrics
2022/23 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test Tire Reviews 2022 225/45 R17 1/9 16 metrics
2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2022 225/45 R17 2/8 16 metrics
2022 AMS Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2022 245/45 R19 4/8 13 metrics
2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2021 245/40 R18 4/14 14 metrics
2021 Auto Express Winter Tire Test Auto Express 2021 225/45 R17 1/8 0 metrics
2021 AZ SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2021 235/55 R18 1/10 12 metrics
2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Allrad 2021 235/55 R18 3/11 14 metrics
2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 5/22 15 metrics
2021 AMS Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2021 195/55 R16 1/10 12 metrics
2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tire Test ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 7/16 0 metrics
2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tire Test ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 5/18 0 metrics
2021 Winter Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 1/49 2 metrics
2021 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test Tire Reviews 2021 225/40 R18 4/10 14 metrics
The Best Winter Tires for 2020 Tire Reviews 2020 205/55 R16 1/19 0 metrics
2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2020 205/55 R16 1/14 11 metrics
2020 Auto Express Winter Tire Test Auto Express 2020 205/55 R16 1/9 0 metrics
2020 ACE Winter Tire Test ACE 2020 225/50 R17 1/9 0 metrics
2020 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2020 225/55 R17 2/11 11 metrics
2020 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 235/55 R17 ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 7/13 0 metrics
2020 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2020 205/55 R16 1/15 0 metrics
2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 2/21 12 metrics
2020 Winter Tire Market Overview - 52 Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 1/49 2 metrics
2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 5/21 12 metrics
2019 Winter Tire Test Market Overview Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 1/47 2 metrics
2019 AMS Winter SUV Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2019 215/55 R17 2/11 14 metrics

Videos

The Best SUV Winter Tire? Nokian, Michelin, Continental, Bridgestone, Pirelli & More Tested!

The Best SUV Winter Tire? Nokian, Michelin, Continental, Bridgestone, Pirelli & More Tested!

Best 11 Winter Tires for 2023/24 - Tested and Rated

Best 11 Winter Tires for 2023/24 - Tested and Rated

The BEST 10 Winter Tires for 2022/23 Tested and Rated!

The BEST 10 Winter Tires for 2022/23 Tested and Rated!

In Depth Tire Comparisons
View More Comparisons
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Awards
2023 Tire Reviews SUV Winter Tire Test
2023/24 Tire Reviews UHP Winter Tire Test
2022/23 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test
All Tests
View Test Results
45
Tests
3rd
Average
1st
Best
15th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2024 All Season and Winter Tire Test
215/55 R17 • 2024
1st/10
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 excels in wet conditions with the shortest braking distance and responsive handling, while maintaining stability. It's easy to control even when pushed to its limits. On snow, it provides good traction and a balanced performance, although the steering feedback could be clearer. In dry conditions, it prioritizes comfort, providing the smoothest ride among the winter tires tested. However, it does have a slightly longer braking distance. It handles corners effectively but is not the most eager to turn. Overall, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 emerges as the top performer among winter tires, thanks to its exceptional wet grip. However, it delivers an average performance on dry surfaces.
2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tire Test
235/35 R19 • 2024
5th/11
The best in wet handling and wet braking. A reliable, precise performer in snow.
Loses the "Exemplary" seal due to poor dry braking performance.
2023 Tire Reviews SUV Winter Tire Test
235/60 R18 • 2023
3rd/9
Very good in the wet, excellent aquaplaning resistance, very good in the snow, very low rolling resistance.
Average in the dry.
The Bridgestone matched the Hankooks overall result, but was slightly better in the wet, and slightly worse in the dry and snow, but it was more comfortable and had an even lower rolling resistance. The LM005 once again proves it's one of the best winter tires on the market
View Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
175/65 R14 82 T C A 71
185/60 R14 82 T C A 70
165/70 R14 85 T XL C A 70
15 inch
185/65 R15 92 T XL C A 70
195/65 R15 95 T XL C A 71
195/65 R15 91 T C A 71
195/55 R15 85 H C A 71
195/65 R15 91 H C A 71
195/65R15 91 H C A 71
195/65R15 95 T XL C A 71
185/65 R15 88 T C A 71
185/65R15 88 T C A 71
16 inch
205/55 R16 91 H C A 71
215/70 R16 100 T C A 71
205/55 R16 91 T C A 71
205/55 R16 94 V XL C A 71
205/55 R16 94 H XL C A 71
205/60 R16 92 H C A 71
205/60 R16 96 H XL C A 71
205/60 R16 96 H XL A B 72
205/60 R16 96 H XL A B 72
215/70 R16 100 T C A 71
205/60R16 96 H XL C A 71
205/55R16 91 H C A 71
215/60 R16 99 H XL C A 71
215/60R16 99 H XL B A 71
17 inch
225/45 R17 91 H C A 71
225/60 R17 99 H C A 71
235/65 R17 108 H XL B A 72
235/65 R17 108 V XL B A 72
215/45 R17 91 V XL C A 71
205/50 R17 93 V XL C A 71
225/50 R17 98 H XL C A 71
225/50 R17 98 V XL C A 71
215/55 R17 98 V XL C A 71
225/60 R17 103 V XL C A 71
225/45 R17 94 H XL C A 71
215/55 R17 98 H XL C A 71
225/50 R17 98 H XL B A 70
225/50 R17 98 H XL B A 70
205/50 R17 93 H XL C A 72
205/50 R17 93 H XL C A 72
215/45 R17 91 H XL C A 71
215/45 R17 91 H XL C A 71
215/45 R17 91 H XL C A 71
225/50R17 98 V XL C A 71
225/45R17 94 V XL C A 72
225/45R17 94 V XL C A 72
265/65R17 116 H XL B A 72
215/55R17 98 V XL C A 72
215/55R17 98 V XL C A 72
225/60R17 99 H C A 71
235/65R17 108 V XL B A 72
225/45 R17 94 V XL C A 71
265/65 R17 116 H XL B A 73
215/55R17 94 V C B 71
215/55R17 94 V C B 71
18 inch
235/60 R18 107 H XL C A 72
255/35 R18 94 V XL C A 73
225/40 R18 92 V XL C A 72
245/45 R18 100 V XL C A 72
235/60 R18 107 V XL C A 72
245/40 R18 97 W XL C A 72
225/40 R18 92 V XL D A 72
225/40 R18 92 V XL D A 72
235/60 R18 107 H XL C A 71
225/40R18 92 V XL C A 72
225/40R18 92 V XL C A 72
245/40 R18 97 V XL C A 72
245/45R18 100 V XL C A 72
235/60R18 107 H XL C A 71
19 inch
235/35 R19 91 W XL C A 72
20 inch
245/35 R20 95 W XL C A 72
255/45 R20 105 V XL C B 73
255/45 R20 105 V XL C B 73
255/45 R20 105 V XL C A 73
255/45 R20 101 T C B 73
255/45 R20 101 T C B 73
255/45 R20 101 T C B 73
255/45 R20 101 T C B 73
255/45 R20 105 V XL C B 73
255/45R20 105 V XL C A 73
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 >>

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!

Review Summary

Based on 99 user reviews

Drivers generally describe the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 as a strong winter tire, especially praised for outstanding wet-road grip and braking, with many also noting stable, predictable handling and good comfort. Snow performance is often reported as good when new and in mild/central-European winter conditions, but a sizable group reports that traction on snow/ice drops markedly as the tire ages or tread depth falls. The most consistent downside is short or inconsistent tread life (sometimes uneven/abnormal wear), with noise also becoming more noticeable for some owners over time.

Strengths
  • Excellent wet grip and wet braking (strong confidence in rain/aquaplaning resistance)
  • Predictable
  • Progressive handling and stability (good control at the limit for a winter tire)
  • Good overall winter performance for mild/continental climates (slush/cold wet roads)
  • Comfortable ride with generally low-to-moderate noise when new
  • Good dry-road competence for a winter tire
  • Good value/price versus other premium winter tires (mentioned by many high scorers)
Areas for Improvement
  • Fast treadwear/short lifespan (often needing replacement after ~10
  • 000-20
  • 000 km for some drivers)
  • Uneven/abnormal wear
  • Tread block deformation or missing chunks reported by multiple users
  • Performance degradation with age/tread depth (snow/ice grip drops notably after 2-3 seasons or near ~4-5 mm)
  • Noise increases over time (humming/whining/droning at certain speeds)

Top 3 Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Reviews

Given 91% while driving a BMW 3 series (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
best winter tires, for winter. Proper one, with a lot of snow, and ice or melted snow, mushy one, here are extraordinary. I was clinbing on snow covered road many times on a step hills witha rear wheel BMW, didnt hasitate. I pass AWD cars, SUVs and saw them struggeling, spinning wheels etc. Blizzaks are unbeateable. Thats why are option OEM #1 on premium cars (not performance cars).

On dry or hot period with rain are very good, but michellin or goodyear are here bit better.
Helpful 1169
December 20, 2024
Given 86% while driving a Kia Motors ceed (195/65 R15) on mostly town for 2,000 average miles
I had these tires for approximately 2000 miles (3200 km) and I love them.
The dry grip is exceptional for these kind of dimensions on the tire.
The wet grip is pretty good.
I've found that when braking on a thin layer of snow, in -7 degrees, the tires felt mushy, but I guess it is expected, since it is a softer composite vs summer tires.
I'd buy them anytime for any car, especially if the needed dimensions are lower I'd rather spend money on these premium tires than on something budget.

It is a moderately dry climate in which I am in, so no snow or ice grip experiences with this one.
Helpful 1021
March 3, 2025
Given 87% while driving a Mazda cx5 (225/55 R19) on mostly town for 2,000 spirited miles
I like this tire comfort. With this tire my Mazda CX-5 received in improvement in noise level, like I performed a noise isolation.
It is so soft and quite, I really like it.

In terms of car handling, it still very good, not as good as my previous Blizzak DM-V2. The feedback after wheel turning is a bit slower. I would not recommend it for a track day )
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 image
Helpful 1019
March 3, 2025

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005? Rate the tires you actually drive — and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005?
I drive something else — review any tire →
103 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 86% while driving a Volkswagen Tiguan (215/65 R17) on for 20,000 miles
I usually drove the car with these tires in snow, the snow performance was excellent. The tires were quiet, very comfortable nad low rolling resistance every time. I highly recommend LM005 for your car in the winter conditions.
Helpful 19
May 4, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 13% while driving a Hyundai Tucson (215/65 R17) on for 15,000 miles
Honestly, these tires are a complete disaster. The Blizzak LM005 turned out to be one of the worst purchases I’ve made. After a relatively short period of use, they wore down ridiculously fast — like they’re made of soap instead of rubber.

And the worst part: the tread became visibly deformed, almost warped. Because of that, the car started vibrating and feels unstable, especially at higher speeds. The driving feel? Like you’re riding on something that barely has proper contact with the road.

For a ‘premium’ product, this is a joke. Quality control is clearly nonexistent or they simply don’t care. I paid serious money for these and ended up with tires that feel ready for the trash after one season. Completely unacceptable.

I’m not someone who usually leaves reviews — in fact, this is the first time I’ve ever felt the need to write one. The only reason I’m posting this is to warn anyone considering these tires: think twice. I’m genuinely frustrated that I spent money on something this bad.

I wouldn’t recommend them to my worst enemy
Helpful 26
April 29, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 73% while driving a Mercedes Benz E Class (265/35 R18) on for 15,000 miles
I’ve put many miles on them but only in 2 seasons… i run staggered, 245 40 18 amd 265 35 18 on a E400. On the front they were amazing but on back they had a lot of wear… Buut, i would definitely buy them again, they are very good.
Helpful 32
April 14, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 86% while driving a Smart Forfour EQ drive 2019 (185/60 R15) on for 10,000 miles
well, they last only for 2 winters, around 15000 km. what a shame. In a smart forfour, probably with misaligned wheels (totally slicks outside, ok inside) but it was a bad surprise. But they do grip wonderfull on wet, that's for sure
Helpful 47
March 9, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 69% while driving a BMW 330D Touring (225/50 R17) on for 8,000 miles
Positive:
The tires work well on wet and dry roads, they offer enough traction to not spin the wheels even under strong acceleration.
In the corners they offer good grip, you can clearly feel the car starting to understeer when getting to the grip limit in corners, there is no sudden loss of traction or snap-oversteer.
The tires seems to wear slowly and evenly.

Neutral:
Snow traction, mainly on a few cm of fresh snow and snow slush, seems good, but is also limited by the car being rear-wheel-drive without a locking differential.

Negative:
With the tires being the Runflat "Driveguard" variant, the ride can be harsh and the noiselevels are subjectively high. There is a loud humming sound between roughly 80 and 90 kmh (50-55 mph) which can be quite annoying. The noise is most noticable at city speeds, on the highway at over 100 kmh (60mph) the noise starts to reduce and is not intrusive anymore.
Helpful 41
March 7, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 38% while driving a Ford Focus ST250 (215/50 R17) on for 9,500 miles
I've used these tires for about 3 winters and around 9500 miles and a 250hp FWD car.
Let's start with the first winter, they were great, good snow grip, good wet and dry grip. Felt I've made a good choice to handle my limited winter driving for the next couple of years. The second winter they had lost some of their snow grip but nothing too serious and I half expected it so everything was fine. Now we come to this winter which would be their last. No snow grip what so ever. I had trouble taking off in a couple inches of snow and would get constant wheel spin. When they had to do both acceleration and cornering at they same time they were borderline dangerous. Wet and dry grip is still okay.
Considering how little they have been driven on and have been stored correctly in the summer I half expected them to last one more winter. They still have a lot of tread left but the compound has become really hard.
For the price I paid for them I could have spend a little bit more and tried Michelin Alpin 6/7 since they get better reviews for longevity.
Helpful 60
February 27, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 50% while driving a Nissan LEAF Tekna (215/50 R17) on for 40,000 miles
Performs bad on ice and snow, even new tires noticeably bad on ice and snow, feels like suer tires. I would never ever buy them again.
Helpful 197
January 9, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 52% while driving a BMW i4 e40 (225/45 R17) on for 20,000 miles
Got these tires for my Bmw i4 e40 (RWD). They were test winners and supposedly very good.

My experience is the opposite. For snowy, icy nordic winters. They are horrendous. I initially didn't think they were too bad. When new, they were decent. But having now switched to Conti VikingContacts (7 rear, 8 front, due to supply limitations in my dimensions). I got some awakening perspective.

It felt similar to what I believe F1 drivers feel like when switching to intermediates/wets after staying out for too long in the rain on slicks.
I now had traction, throttle, braking, turning. I could actually drive the car.

Before I could provoke oversteer with the lightest of throttle application, now I really have to do it with intent to get some action.

The Blizzaks were never unpredictable with oversteer or understeer. They were predictably horrible in snow and ice.

Wear was also a big problem. Chewed through a set of rears in about 10000km/6000miles. Twice.

Would not recommend, if you only se slight snow once or twice a year. Maybe, but then you'd be better off with a great all season tire I think.
Helpful 232
January 9, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 93% while driving a Toyota GT86 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
I have driven this tire in continental winter conditions - everything except pure ice. Dry grip was excellent, and pushing it was particularly enjoyable as the tire is very predictable and progressive at the limit. In moist and greasy my confidence is limited, but the tire was still predictable, although the grip level gets quite low. I don't recall having any issues in the wet, including standing water.
In the snow (and they have seen proper snow) lateral load in the corners is excellent and grip under braking was good as well, proportionally in all types of snow (dry, wet, compact, slush). Traction is somewhat limited, although still quite good once moving, however setting off from standstill is by far the biggest challenge, without doubt influenced by the lightweight RWD configuration.
Finally, I decided to change them at the age of 5 as performance in the snow dropped off slightly, but still noticeably, with still plenty of tread (5 mm). When the time came I took 1 h at deserted dry tarmac with the goal to finish them off, yet there was barely any sign of wear.
Overall a very rewarding tire in the snow, and solid, although not particularly sporty in other conditions.
P.S. I drove about 30,000 km over 3 seasons. The tires came with the car when I bought it from the previous owner and were used the previous 2 seasons.
Helpful 199
December 28, 2025
Given 59% while driving a Mitsubishi Outlander (215/70 R16) on a combination of roads for 13,000 easy going miles
I bought 4 Bridgestone LM005 winter tires at the end of 2020. They have been used for 4 winter seasons since then. The pattern is missing in many places on the outer tread. If it were natural wear, the entire outer tread would have been worn, but here only one is missing. I think they are defective in production. I do not recommend them for this reason. Otherwise, there are no other problems.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image
Helpful 260
November 20, 2025
Tyre reviews and ratingsTire Reviews Replies
While this looks troubling, I believe it is by design. It is advantageous for handling to put non full depth siping on the shoulders, which is why you are seeing the siping disappearing before the full depth siping elsewhere on the tire. They should still be perfectly fine to use, but I suggest sending a photo to Bridgestone just to be safe.
Given 40% while driving a Volkswagen Taigo (205/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
Horrible tire. Dont buy it. I used them 2 winter seasons. They have aprox 20.000 km. Worn out after 2 seasons only. See the photos below how they look like. They have several spots with flat surface. I dont understand how they could reach also the best performance in the wet condition as wet handling was average. If I compare this tires with Polaris 6 (used on 2nd car), this tire is piece of...
They are winner in the shortest lifetime. How this can be a premium tire for such money? Disaster.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image
Helpful 275
November 11, 2025
Tyre reviews and ratingsTire Reviews Replies
It looks like the flat spots are part of non-full depth sipes, which would be by design, however I suggest you double check with Bridgestone and report back.
Given 68% while driving a Mazda MX5 ND2 RF 2.0 (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 4,500 spirited miles
Excellent snow and ice tire but a rather bad dry and wet performance. Additionally I expected a longer life but I accept the fact that I usually drive harder than this tire is meant to be driven.
Must buy if expecting heavy snow or ice roads.
I would look somewhere else if expecting dry or mostly wet winter roads.
Helpful 303
November 4, 2025
Which tires do you drive?
Driving the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005?
No — review a different tire →
Rate your tires