The 2023 Auto Bild winter tire test has started by testing fifty-four performance winter tires in wet braking, and then put the best thirty-one tires through to a snow braking test, to find out the best fifteen tires for their full winter testing program!

This is an impressive, and massive undertaking, and we applaud them for it. This test shows exactly which tires perform well in the key safety braking tests, and where the cheap winter tires can lose out.

Interesting notes, well Michelin was the best in snow braking three times (Michelin own BFGoodrich and Kleber) and Bridgestone had its usual massive lead in the wet. We'll let the data do the rest of the talking, and look forward to the full test being published next week.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Wet Braking: 49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking: 31.1 → 0.0 mph

Wet

As always, the Bridgestone was outstanding in wet braking.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	103 ft	Best	0 mph
2Firestone Winterhawk 4	111 ft	+8 ft	22 mph
2Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	111 ft	+8 ft	22 mph
4Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	113 ft	+10 ft	23 mph
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	115 ft	+12 ft	25 mph
5Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	115 ft	+12 ft	25 mph
7Uniroyal WinterExpert	115 ft	+12 ft	26 mph
8Laufenn I Fit+	115 ft	+12 ft	26 mph
8Kleber Krisalp HP3	115 ft	+12 ft	26 mph
10BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2	115 ft	+12 ft	26 mph
10Hankook Winter i cept evo3	115 ft	+12 ft	26 mph
12Barum Polaris 5	117 ft	+14 ft	27 mph
13Toyo Observe S 944	117 ft	+14 ft	28 mph
14Paxaro Inverno	117 ft	+14 ft	28 mph
15Semperit Speed Grip 5	118 ft	+15 ft	28 mph
16Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	118 ft	+15 ft	29 mph
16Viking Wintech	118 ft	+15 ft	29 mph
18Dunlop Winter Sport 5	118 ft	+15 ft	29 mph
19GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP	119 ft	+16 ft	29 mph
20Vredestein Wintrac Pro	119 ft	+16 ft	30 mph
21Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906	120 ft	+17 ft	30 mph
22Radar Dimax Alpine	121 ft	+18 ft	31 mph
23Lassa Snoways 4	121 ft	+18 ft	31 mph
23Kumho Winter Craft WP52	121 ft	+18 ft	31 mph
25Debica Frigo HP2	121 ft	+18 ft	31 mph
26Apollo Aspire XP Winter	122 ft	+19 ft	32 mph
27Fulda Kristall Control HP2	123 ft	+20 ft	32 mph
28Austone SP 901	123 ft	+20 ft	32 mph
29Sumitomo WT200	124 ft	+21 ft	33 mph
30Nexen WinGuard Sport 2	124 ft	+21 ft	33 mph
30Giti GitiWinterW2	124 ft	+21 ft	33 mph
32Kormoran Snow XL	125 ft	+22 ft	33 mph
32Petlas Snow Master W651	125 ft	+22 ft	33 mph
34Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	126 ft	+23 ft	34 mph
34Nankang SV3	126 ft	+23 ft	34 mph
34Tigar Winter 1	126 ft	+23 ft	34 mph
37Superia Bluewin UHP2	126 ft	+23 ft	34 mph
38Matador MP93 Nordicca	127 ft	+24 ft	35 mph
39CST Medallion Winter WCP1	128 ft	+25 ft	35 mph
40Riken Riken Snow	128 ft	+25 ft	36 mph
41Triangle Snowlink PL02	129 ft	+26 ft	36 mph
42Goodride ZuperSnow Z507	129 ft	+26 ft	36 mph
43Westlake ZuperSnow Z 507	132 ft	+29 ft	38 mph
44Tourador WinterPro TSU2	133 ft	+30 ft	38 mph
44Rotalla Setula W Race S330	133 ft	+30 ft	38 mph
46Gripmax SureGrip Pro Winter	133 ft	+30 ft	38 mph
47Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501	134 ft	+31 ft	39 mph
48Nexen Winguard Sport	135 ft	+32 ft	39 mph
49Minerva IcePlus S210	137 ft	+34 ft	40 mph
50Imperial Snowdragon 3	139 ft	+36 ft	41 mph
50Tomket Snowroad Pro 3	139 ft	+36 ft	41 mph
52Double Coin DW300	140 ft	+37 ft	41 mph
53Momo North Pole W2	140 ft	+37 ft	41 mph
54Tracmax S210 Ice Plus	141 ft	+38 ft	41 mph

The difference between best and worst was 36.6% (38 ft ≈ 2.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Tracmax S210 Ice Plus would still be travelling at 41 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow

The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was once again one of the best in the snow, just beating the Michelin owned Kleber brand, but being narrowly beaten by the Michelin owned BFGoodrich brand!

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2	95 ft	Best	0 mph
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	96 ft	+1 ft	7 mph
3Kleber Krisalp HP3	96 ft	+1 ft	8 mph
4Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	98 ft	+3 ft	15 mph
5Debica Frigo HP2	99 ft	+4 ft	15 mph
5Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	99 ft	+4 ft	15 mph
7Hankook Winter i cept evo3	99 ft	+4 ft	17 mph
8Paxaro Inverno	100 ft	+5 ft	17 mph
9Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	100 ft	+5 ft	18 mph
10Laufenn I Fit+	100 ft	+5 ft	18 mph
10Vredestein Wintrac Pro	100 ft	+5 ft	18 mph
10Radar Dimax Alpine	100 ft	+5 ft	18 mph
13Dunlop Winter Sport 5	101 ft	+6 ft	19 mph
13Austone SP 901	101 ft	+6 ft	19 mph
13Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	101 ft	+6 ft	19 mph
13Uniroyal WinterExpert	101 ft	+6 ft	19 mph
13Fulda Kristall Control HP2	101 ft	+6 ft	19 mph
18Toyo Observe S 944	101 ft	+6 ft	19 mph
19Firestone Winterhawk 4	102 ft	+7 ft	20 mph
19Viking Wintech	102 ft	+7 ft	20 mph
19Barum Polaris 5	102 ft	+7 ft	20 mph
19Nexen WinGuard Sport 2	102 ft	+7 ft	20 mph
23Giti GitiWinterW2	102 ft	+7 ft	21 mph
24Semperit Speed Grip 5	103 ft	+8 ft	22 mph
24Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	103 ft	+8 ft	22 mph
26Kumho Winter Craft WP52	103 ft	+8 ft	22 mph
27GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP	104 ft	+9 ft	23 mph
28Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906	104 ft	+9 ft	24 mph
29Lassa Snoways 4	107 ft	+12 ft	26 mph
29Sumitomo WT200	107 ft	+12 ft	26 mph
31Apollo Aspire XP Winter	108 ft	+13 ft	28 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.8% (13 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Apollo Aspire XP Winter would still be travelling at 28 mph when the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Results

Wet100%

Snow96.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 54	103 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 31	98 ft	+3 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet91.6%

Snow99.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 54	113 ft	+10 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 31	96 ft	+1 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet92.6%

Snow96.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 54	111 ft	+8 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 31	99 ft	+4 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet89.5%

Snow99%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 54	115 ft	+12 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 31	96 ft	+1 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet89.2%

Snow100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 54	115 ft	+12 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 31	95 ft	Best in this discipline

3PMSF: Yes

Wet92.6%

Snow93.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 54	111 ft	+8 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	102 ft	+7 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet90%

Snow95.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 54	115 ft	+12 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	9^th / 31	100 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet89.2%

Snow95.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 54	115 ft	+12 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 31	99 ft	+4 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet90%

Snow94.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 54	115 ft	+12 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	13^th / 31	101 ft	+6 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet89.5%

Snow94.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 54	115 ft	+12 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 31	100 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet89.7%

Snow94.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 54	115 ft	+12 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	13^th / 31	101 ft	+6 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet87.7%

Snow95.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	14^th / 54	117 ft	+14 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 31	100 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet88%

Snow94.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	13^th / 54	117 ft	+14 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	18^th / 31	101 ft	+6 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet88.2%

Snow93.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	12^th / 54	117 ft	+14 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	102 ft	+7 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet87%

Snow94.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	18^th / 54	118 ft	+15 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	13^th / 31	101 ft	+6 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet87.2%

Snow93.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	16^th / 54	118 ft	+15 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	102 ft	+7 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet86.3%

Snow94.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	20^th / 54	119 ft	+16 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 31	100 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet84.9%

Snow96.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	25^th / 54	121 ft	+18 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 31	99 ft	+4 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet87.5%

Snow92.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	15^th / 54	118 ft	+15 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	24^th / 31	103 ft	+8 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet87.2%

Snow92.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	16^th / 54	118 ft	+15 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	24^th / 31	103 ft	+8 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet85.3%

Snow94.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 54	121 ft	+18 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 31	100 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet86.7%

Snow91.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 54	119 ft	+16 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	27^th / 31	104 ft	+9 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet84%

Snow94.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	27^th / 54	123 ft	+20 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	13^th / 31	101 ft	+6 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet83.5%

Snow94.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	28^th / 54	123 ft	+20 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	13^th / 31	101 ft	+6 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet85.1%

Snow92.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	23^rd / 54	121 ft	+18 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	26^th / 31	103 ft	+8 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet85.6%

Snow91.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	21^st / 54	120 ft	+17 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	28^th / 31	104 ft	+9 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet82.9%

Snow93.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	30^th / 54	124 ft	+21 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	102 ft	+7 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet82.9%

Snow93%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	30^th / 54	124 ft	+21 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	23^rd / 31	102 ft	+7 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet85.1%

Snow89.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	23^rd / 54	121 ft	+18 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	29^th / 31	107 ft	+12 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet84.4%

Snow87.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	26^th / 54	122 ft	+19 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	31^st / 31	108 ft	+13 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet83.3%

Snow89.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	29^th / 54	124 ft	+21 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	29^th / 31	107 ft	+12 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	32^nd / 54	125 ft	+22 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	32^nd / 54	125 ft	+22 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	34^th / 54	126 ft	+23 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	34^th / 54	126 ft	+23 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	34^th / 54	126 ft	+23 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	37^th / 54	126 ft	+23 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	38^th / 54	127 ft	+24 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	39^th / 54	128 ft	+25 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	40^th / 54	128 ft	+25 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	41^st / 54	129 ft	+26 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	42^nd / 54	129 ft	+26 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	43^rd / 54	132 ft	+29 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	44^th / 54	133 ft	+30 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	44^th / 54	133 ft	+30 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	46^th / 54	133 ft	+30 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	47^th / 54	134 ft	+31 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	48^th / 54	135 ft	+32 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	49^th / 54	137 ft	+34 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	50^th / 54	139 ft	+36 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	50^th / 54	139 ft	+36 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	52^nd / 54	140 ft	+37 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	53^rd / 54	140 ft	+37 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	54^th / 54	141 ft	+38 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Wet

Snow

Results

Cross-check this test