Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Test Results
Tested 28 times by independent publications, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 averages a finish of 13th. Its strongest discipline is Snow Braking, beating 73% of the field across 22 tests; its weakest is Dry Braking, at 18% across 14 tests.
- 28Independent tests
- 0Test wins
- 1Podium finishes
- 13thAverage finish
- 49%Field beaten on average
- 6Publications
28 tests, 2017 to 2026
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 49%
Record by discipline
Where the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking Weak | 14 | P15.6 of 18.8 | 18% | - |
| Dry Handling | 10 | P12.4 of 19.3 | 35% | - |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 3 | P9.3 of 10.7 | 13% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 22 | P18 of 30.6 | 34% | - |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | 2 | P14.5 of 23.5 | 33% | - |
| Wet Handling | 10 | P16.5 of 19.2 | 16% | - |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 3 | P8.3 of 10.7 | 26% | - |
| Wet Circle | 5 | P17.6 of 23.8 | 23% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 14 | P8.6 of 18.7 | 57% | 1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 6 | P4 of 18.8 | 84% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking Strong | 22 | P7.4 of 23.4 | 73% | 1 |
| Snow Traction | 10 | P8 of 18.9 | 60% | - |
| Snow Handling | 10 | P9.7 of 18.6 | 55% | - |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 3 | P5.7 of 10.7 | 55% | - |
| Snow Slalom | 3 | P8.7 of 22.3 | 64% | - |
| Ice | ||||
| Ice Braking | 3 | P9.3 of 19 | 59% | - |
| Ice Traction | 1 | P3 of 10 | 78% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Subj. Comfort | 4 | P6.8 of 13 | 37% | 1 |
| Noise | 12 | P16.3 of 19.9 | 21% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 10 | P8.6 of 20.8 | 63% | 1 |
| Value | 8 | P6.6 of 20.1 | 71% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 12 | P7.2 of 17.7 | 63% | 1 |
| Fuel Consumption | 2 | P9 of 23.5 | 72% | - |
| Abrasion | 2 | P11.5 of 23.5 | 58% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Fulda Kristall Control HP2. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 4 | 18 | - | 18% | |
| 22 | 2 | 20 | - | 9% | |
| 19 | 0 | 19 | - | 0% | |
| 14 | 0 | 14 | - | 0% | |
| 14 | 0 | 14 | - | 0% | |
| 13 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 17% | |
| 12 | 8 | 4 | - | 67% | |
| 12 | 7 | 5 | - | 58% | |
| 11 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 40% | |
| 11 | 0 | 11 | - | 0% | |
| 10 | 6 | 4 | - | 60% | |
| 10 | 6 | 4 | - | 60% | |
| 10 | 3 | 7 | - | 30% | |
| 10 | 1 | 9 | - | 10% | |
| 9 | 4 | 5 | - | 44% | |
| 9 | 1 | 8 | - | 11% | |
| 9 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 13% | |
| 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 86% | |
| 8 | 5 | 3 | - | 63% | |
| 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 71% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fulda Kristall Control HP Predecessor | 16 | 0 | 11th | 42% |
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 This tire | 28 | 0 | 13th | 49% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 28 tests. Updated October 13, 2026.
Across 28 independent winter tests, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 most consistently shows itself as a “winter-road” specialist: strong in snow braking/traction and frequently strong for aquaplaning safety, but repeatedly dragged down by weak wet braking and generally lacklustre wet handling, with dry braking also a recurring concern. The tagged write-ups reflect this split clearly (snow braking praised 8 times with zero criticisms; aquaplaning praised 7 times vs 1 criticism; wet braking criticised 6 times with zero praise; wet handling criticised 5 times vs 1 praise; dry braking criticised 5 times vs 1 praise). In the data this appears as regular top-3 snow results (e.g. 1st of 14 in snow braking in the 2020 Auto Zeitung test; 2nd of 21 snow braking in the 2020 Auto Bild Performance test; 2nd of 8 across snow braking/traction/handling in 2022 Auto Zeitung) and very competitive aquaplaning (e.g. 1st of 10 in straight aquaplaning in the 2017 AMS test; 2nd of 16 in curved aquaplaning in the 2023 ADAC 16" test; 2nd of 21 straight aquaplaning in 2020 Auto Bild Performance).
The exceptions are important: when testers place a heavy emphasis on wet-road safety, the tire often collapses to the back of the class, explaining its mediocre average overall position (12.9). In the 2025 Auto Bild winter test it finished 18th of 20 with the write-up calling wet roads its “weak point”, noting it “shares the longest wet stop” and is second slowest in wet handling (wet braking 20/22, +20.7% from best; wet handling 20/22; wet circle 21/22). ADAC also highlights control/precision limitations: the 2025 ADAC test (13/31 overall) reports the tire lacks dry-road precision and can oversteer in avoidance maneuvers, alongside very poor dry braking (29/31) and bottom-third wet braking on asphalt (22/31). There are occasional brighter moments in the wet (notably 3rd of 22 in wet braking in the 2018 Auto Bild full test), but the larger multi-year picture is of a tire that can be reassuring on snow and resistant to aquaplaning, yet too often gives away crucial stopping distance and confidence on wet tarmac.
Performance Strengths
-
Snow braking
Strong
in 8 of 16 tests
Details
- 1st of 14 in snow braking (25.7 m), 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test
- 2nd of 21 in snow braking (+0.8% from best), 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (245/45 R18)
- 2nd of 10 in snow braking (+0.4% from best), 2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test
good scores for both snow braking distances and snow traction compared to the test field
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)strong braking performance on snow and ice
- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)Short snow braking distances
- 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2022)Good traction and short braking in the snow
- 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2021)Good braking and traction on snow
- 2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tire Test (2021)
-
Aquaplaning resistance
Strong
in 7 of 16 tests
Details
- 1st of 10 in straight aquaplaning, 2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test
- 2nd of 16 in curved aquaplaning (+2.6% from best), 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test
- 2nd of 21 in straight aquaplaning (+2.6% from best), 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test
it scores well in aquaplaning
- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)good aquaplaning resistance
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (2020)Good ride comfort, good aquaplaning resistance, low price, low rolling resistance
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)high aquaplaning resistance
- 2019 Auto Center Winter Tire Test (2019)High aquaplaning safety
- 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2018)
-
Tread life
Strong
in 6 of 16 tests
Details
- 1st of 16 for wear (highest projected lifespan), 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test
- 2nd of 20 for wear (+1.6% from best), 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
- 3rd of 20 for wear (+12.6% from best), 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
good mileage, low tire wear, and good efficiency thanks to low weight and fuel consumption
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)offering the highest projected lifespan in the test
- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)good economy with high mileage
- 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2022)very low wear
- 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2021)low wear
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (2020)
-
Snow traction
Moderate
in 7 of 16 tests
Details
- 2nd of 8 in snow traction (+1.2% from best), 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test
- 6th of 31 in snow traction (+4.3% from best), 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test
- 7th of 22 in snow traction (+3.1% from best), 2025 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
good scores for both snow braking distances and snow traction compared to the test field
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)very strong on snow
- 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test (2022)Good traction and short braking in the snow
- 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2021)Good braking and traction on snow
- 2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tire Test (2021)Good snow grip, good aquaplaning resistance, good levels of comfort, low wear
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (2020)
-
Rolling resistance
Moderate
in 5 of 16 tests
Details
- 1st of 14 for rolling resistance (8.06 kg/t), 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test
- 2nd of 16 for fuel consumption (+1.8% from best), 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test
- 4th of 21 for rolling resistance (+5.0% from best), 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test
good mileage, low tire wear, and good efficiency thanks to low weight and fuel consumption
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)low fuel consumption
- 2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tire Test (2021)Good ride comfort, good aquaplaning resistance, low price, low rolling resistance
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)low fuel use
- 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2018)Very good in the dry and wet, low fuel consumption and low wear
- 2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/65 R16 (2017)
-
Dry grip
Strong
in 3 of 16 tests
Details
demonstrates respectable dry road performance with decent handling characteristics
- 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test (2025)Good and safe driving characteristics on wet and dry roads
- 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2024)Very good in the dry and wet, low fuel consumption and low wear
- 2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/65 R16 (2017)
-
Ride comfort
Strong
in 3 of 16 tests
Details
good levels of comfort
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (2020)Good ride comfort, good aquaplaning resistance, low price, low rolling resistance
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)good ride comfort
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Dry handling
Moderate
in 2 of 16 tests
Details
demonstrates respectable dry road performance with decent handling characteristics
- 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test (2025)good handling in the dry
- 2020 ACE Winter Tire Test (2020)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet braking
Strong
in 6 of 16 tests
Details
- 20th of 22 in wet braking (57.7 m, +20.7% from best), 2025 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
- 21st of 22 in wet braking (57.5 m, +14.5% from best), 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
- 15th of 16 in wet braking (41.2 m, +17.0% from best), 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test
performance across handling, braking, and aquaplaning resistance falls short of acceptable standards
- 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test (2025)narrowly misses good scores for braking distances
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)longer wet and dry braking distances
- 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2022)Understeer and long wet and dry braking
- 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2021)very long wet braking
- 2020 ACE Winter Tire Test (2020)
-
Wet handling
Strong
in 5 of 16 tests
Details
- 21st of 22 in wet handling (+5.5% from best), 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
- 22nd of 23 in wet handling (+7.6% from best), 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (205/55 R16)
- Second slowest wet handling: 20th of 22 (+5.1% from best), 2025 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
performance across handling, braking, and aquaplaning resistance falls short of acceptable standards
- 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test (2025)handling behavior is clearly rated as satisfactory due to moderate grip levels and the need to better combine longitudinal and lateral forces
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)inadequate in handling due to low grip levels and imprecise steering
- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)poor wet handling
- 2020 ACE Winter Tire Test (2020)understeer in the wet
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Dry braking
Strong
in 5 of 16 tests
Details
- 29th of 31 in dry braking (+9.4% from best), 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test
- 22nd of 22 in dry braking (49.6 m, +30.9% from best), 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
- 21st of 21 in dry braking (+25.0% from best), 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test
dry braking distances are also rated as only satisfactory compared to the test field
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)it has long dry braking distances
- 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test (2022)longer wet and dry braking distances
- 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2022)Understeer and long wet and dry braking
- 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2021)Weakness in the dry with long braking distances
- 2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tire Test (2021)
-
Steering feel
Moderate
in 3 of 16 tests
Details
- 2025 ADAC: steering on dry roads lacks precision; frequent corrections needed; oversteer in evasive maneuvers (rated only adequate at the limit)
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test: tester notes “slow steering” and understeer in the wet
- 2017 AMS Performance test: “slow reactions to steering movements on dry and wet surfaces”
lacking the accuracy and directness expected during steering input and cornering - frequent steering corrections are needed to maintain the desired path
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)slow reactions to steering movements on dry and wet surfaces
- 2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test (2017)Slow steering
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Road noise
Moderate
in 1 of 16 tests
Details
- 16th of 16 for noise, 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (74.1 dB)
- 29th of 31 for noise (+5.7% from best), 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test
- 22nd of 22 for noise (+5.5% from best), 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
high noise levels
- 2020 ACE Winter Tire Test (2020)
-
Wet grip
Strong
in 4 of 16 tests
Details
inadequate in handling due to low grip levels and imprecise steering
- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)in the wet the tire struggles
- 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test (2022)weakness in the wet
- 2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tire Test (2021)- 2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Behavior at the limit
Strong
in 3 of 16 tests
Details
Significantly understeering handling in all weather conditions
- 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2022)Understeer and long wet and dry braking
- 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2021)Understeer in the wet and dry
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (2020)
-
Snow handling
Moderate
in 2 of 16 tests
Details
falls short in traction and handling
- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)Poor lateral stability in the snow
- 2020 ACE Winter Tire Test (2020)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 (16 tests) and 11 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Dry grip strength in 3 of 16 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 11 reviews · Read those reviews
Every test, newest first 28
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test
The Fulda Kristall Control HP 2, as another Continental budget brand alongside Barum, demonstrates respectable dry road performance with decent handling characteristics that feel more car-like than many winter tires. However, this dry-biased behavior creates an unbalanced package with particular weaknesses on wet roads, where performance across handling, braking, and aquaplaning resistance falls short of acceptable standards for safe winter driving. The snow performance is adequate but unremarkable. At approximately €440 per set, it sits in a challenging price position—more expensive than the better-balanced Barum sibling but lacking the performance to justify the premium over that proven budget option. The tire struggles to find a clear identity or target customer, as drivers seeking dry performance would choose sportier options while those prioritizing winter safety would select better wet and snow performers. It represents a compromise that doesn't particularly excel at anything.
2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test
The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 fails to achieve good ratings on dry and wet roads and therefore misses a good driving safety score, and despite earning a good environmental rating, this isn't sufficient to improve the overall judgment to "good." For driving safety, the tire shows weaknesses in precision and steering feedback on dry roads, lacking the accuracy and directness expected during steering input and cornering - frequent steering corrections are needed to maintain the desired path, and during sudden evasive maneuvers the Kristall Control HP2 doesn't convince as the test vehicle tends to oversteer, especially when counter-steering, with sliding phases that could be shorter, resulting in overall limit behavior that isn't at a high level and is rated as adequate, while dry braking distances are also rated as only satisfactory compared to the test field. On wet surfaces, the Fulda also only manages satisfactory ratings - while it narrowly misses good scores for braking distances, its handling behavior is clearly rated as satisfactory due to moderate grip levels and the need to better combine longitudinal and lateral forces, which would positively impact limit behavior and precision, and while its longitudinal aquaplaning behavior is still rated as good, it doesn't achieve good ratings for lateral aquaplaning. In winter conditions, the Kristall Control HP2 just manages to secure good ratings overall, achieving good scores for both snow braking distances and snow traction compared to the test field, but narrowly missing good ratings for ice braking distances and snow handling, where it would need to better combine longitudinal and lateral forces for good scores, offering moderate grip levels and satisfactory limit reserves. Regarding environmental performance, this German-manufactured tire receives good ratings with good mileage, low tire wear, and good efficiency thanks to low weight and fuel consumption.
2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
The Fulda Kristall Control HP 2 offers good performance on both wet and dry roads, providing safe driving characteristics. However, its limited suitability for winter conditions is a significant drawback for a winter tire. Combined with low mileage and high rolling resistance, this tire may not offer the best value or performance for true winter conditions. It might be more suitable for areas with mild winters where severe snow and ice are rare.
2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test
The KRISTALL CONTROL HP 2 provides good steering feedback and precision on dry roads, along with good safety margins at the limit. Its braking is also rated as good. On wet roads, the tire receives an overall satisfactory rating; it scores well in aquaplaning but only satisfactory in braking and inadequate in handling due to low grip levels and imprecise steering. On winter roads, it earns a good overall rating due to its strong braking performance on snow and ice, although it falls short in traction and handling. Environmentally, the tire excels across the board, offering the highest projected lifespan in the test, low wear, and above-average performance in fuel efficiency and weight.
2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test
The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 is very strong on snow, but in the wet the tire struggles and it has long dry braking distances.
2020 ACE Winter Tire Test
Recommended.
2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test
Recommended with restrictions
Back to the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Fulda tires

