Test Publication:
AutoCentrum
205/55 R16
10 tires
6 categories
Images courtesy of AutoCentrum
Test Publication:
AutoCentrum
Images courtesy of AutoCentrum
Test Size:
205/55 R16
Tires Tested:
10 tires
The 2019 Auto Center winter tire test is both good and bad.
The positive is that out of ten 205/55 R16 patterns, it only includes two premium manufacturers. This means we get a much better look at the midrange bracket of winter tires, which is great for those of us who want to save a little money, and all ten patterns on test have been tested for ice braking and traction which is now usually omitted from central European tire testing.
Sadly, Auto Center decided not to provide any data from handling testing, instead giving an overall subjective score, which we assume combines lap time and handling. While this is a little odd, it's better than no test at all.
The final results might not make a buying decision any easier either, as nearly half the tires on test finished in fourth place. With everything so close in the midrange pack, make sure you drill into the test data to really help you understand which tire is best for your own driving needs.
Dry
During dry braking, the Nokian Snowproof had an unusually large braking advantage, stopping the car nearly two meters shorter than the next best tire.
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Barum Polaris 5
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
The Continental WinterContact TS860 finished joint top with the Gislaved Euro Frost 6.
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Barum Polaris 5
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
Wet
The premium tires from Michelin and Continental were the best in wet braking.
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Barum Polaris 5
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
Yokohama had a strong result in the wet handling tests.
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Barum Polaris 5
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Debica Frigo HP2
The Continental WinterContact TS860 had another strong result in the wet, winning the aquaplaning test.
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Barum Polaris 5
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
Snow
Continental proved to be excellent in snow braking too.
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
- Barum Polaris 5
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Toyo Snowprox S954
Strangely, the top two tires from snow braking were near the bottom of the pack in snow traction.
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Barum Polaris 5
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
- Michelin Alpin 6
Braking proved to be more important than traction for the snow handling tests, with Continental and Nokian back on top.
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Barum Polaris 5
- Toyo Snowprox S954
Ice
Nokian demonstrated its nordic routes, winning the ice braking and ice traction testing.
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Barum Polaris 5
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Barum Polaris 5
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
Other
The Barum had a very low rolling resistance.
- Barum Polaris 5
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
Michelin and Nokian finished the test with the highest subjective comfort scores.
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Debica Frigo HP2
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Barum Polaris 5
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Gislaved Euro Frost 6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
Results
High grip on ice, excellent snow handling, good dry braking.
None mentioned.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
27.43 M |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
4th |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
35.29 M |
33.35 M |
+1.94 M |
94.5% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
3rd |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
79.6 Km/H |
86 Km/H |
-6.4 Km/H |
92.56% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
2nd |
15.17 M |
15.06 M |
+0.11 M |
99.27% |
| Snow Traction |
7th |
5.21 N |
6.11 N |
-0.9 N |
85.27% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
1st |
10 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Ice Braking |
1st |
11.44 M |
|
|
100% |
| Ice Traction |
1st |
5.14 s |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
2nd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
8.543 kg / t |
8.148 kg / t |
+0.4 kg / t |
95.38% |
High aquaplaning resistance, very well balanced tire, excellent snow braking.
None mentioned.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
30.46 M |
27.43 M |
+3.03 M |
90.05% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
1st |
10 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
33.85 M |
33.35 M |
+0.5 M |
98.52% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
3rd |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
86 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
15.06 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Traction |
8th |
5.12 N |
6.11 N |
-0.99 N |
83.8% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
2nd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Ice Braking |
6th |
12.26 M |
11.44 M |
+0.82 M |
93.31% |
| Ice Traction |
8th |
6 s |
5.14 s |
+0.86 s |
85.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
8.618 kg / t |
8.148 kg / t |
+0.47 kg / t |
94.55% |
Excellent wet braking, low noise.
Average ice performance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
29.41 M |
27.43 M |
+1.98 M |
93.27% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
6th |
7 Points |
10 Points |
-3 Points |
70% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
33.35 M |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
3rd |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
81.5 Km/H |
86 Km/H |
-4.5 Km/H |
94.77% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
8th |
15.58 M |
15.06 M |
+0.52 M |
96.66% |
| Snow Traction |
10th |
5.06 N |
6.11 N |
-1.05 N |
82.82% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
5th |
7 Points |
10 Points |
-3 Points |
70% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Ice Braking |
5th |
11.96 M |
11.44 M |
+0.52 M |
95.65% |
| Ice Traction |
5th |
5.63 s |
5.14 s |
+0.49 s |
91.3% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
10 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
9.184 kg / t |
8.148 kg / t |
+1.04 kg / t |
88.72% |
Low price, good wet handling.
Poor snow handling.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
30.5 M |
27.43 M |
+3.07 M |
89.93% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
8th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
35.21 M |
33.35 M |
+1.86 M |
94.72% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
2nd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
80.6 Km/H |
86 Km/H |
-5.4 Km/H |
93.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
7th |
15.46 M |
15.06 M |
+0.4 M |
97.41% |
| Snow Traction |
6th |
5.22 N |
6.11 N |
-0.89 N |
85.43% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
9th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Ice Braking |
7th |
12.52 M |
11.44 M |
+1.08 M |
91.37% |
| Ice Traction |
7th |
5.77 s |
5.14 s |
+0.63 s |
89.08% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
8.148 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Short ice braking, good ice traction, low noise.
Poor wet handling.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
31.22 M |
27.43 M |
+3.79 M |
87.86% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
7th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
36.5 M |
33.35 M |
+3.15 M |
91.37% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
10th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
80.7 Km/H |
86 Km/H |
-5.3 Km/H |
93.84% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
3rd |
15.19 M |
15.06 M |
+0.13 M |
99.14% |
| Snow Traction |
4th |
5.32 N |
6.11 N |
-0.79 N |
87.07% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
5th |
7 Points |
10 Points |
-3 Points |
70% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Ice Braking |
3rd |
11.88 M |
11.44 M |
+0.44 M |
96.3% |
| Ice Traction |
4th |
5.55 s |
5.14 s |
+0.41 s |
92.61% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
2nd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
8.635 kg / t |
8.148 kg / t |
+0.49 kg / t |
94.36% |
Short snow and ice braking, good ice traction, high aquaplaning resistance.
Poor dry handling, average wet grip.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
30.43 M |
27.43 M |
+3 M |
90.14% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
8th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
36.15 M |
33.35 M |
+2.8 M |
92.25% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
7th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
82.5 Km/H |
86 Km/H |
-3.5 Km/H |
95.93% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
3rd |
15.19 M |
15.06 M |
+0.13 M |
99.14% |
| Snow Traction |
5th |
5.3 N |
6.11 N |
-0.81 N |
86.74% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
7th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Ice Braking |
4th |
11.95 M |
11.44 M |
+0.51 M |
95.73% |
| Ice Traction |
3rd |
5.43 s |
5.14 s |
+0.29 s |
94.66% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
9th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
8.672 kg / t |
8.148 kg / t |
+0.52 kg / t |
93.96% |
Good dry handling, short ice braking, good snow and ice traction.
Long wet braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
30.32 M |
27.43 M |
+2.89 M |
90.47% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
1st |
10 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
38.18 M |
33.35 M |
+4.83 M |
87.35% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
7th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
76.4 Km/H |
86 Km/H |
-9.6 Km/H |
88.84% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
6th |
15.36 M |
15.06 M |
+0.3 M |
98.05% |
| Snow Traction |
9th |
5.08 N |
6.11 N |
-1.03 N |
83.14% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
3rd |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Ice Braking |
2nd |
11.84 M |
11.44 M |
+0.4 M |
96.62% |
| Ice Traction |
2nd |
5.39 s |
5.14 s |
+0.25 s |
95.36% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
8th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
9.076 kg / t |
8.148 kg / t |
+0.93 kg / t |
89.78% |
Good wet and dry handling, short wet braking distances.
Poor ice braking and handling, high fuel use.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
29.5 M |
27.43 M |
+2.07 M |
92.98% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
3rd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
33.91 M |
33.35 M |
+0.56 M |
98.35% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
1st |
10 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
80.8 Km/H |
86 Km/H |
-5.2 Km/H |
93.95% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
9th |
15.91 M |
15.06 M |
+0.85 M |
94.66% |
| Snow Traction |
2nd |
5.6 N |
6.11 N |
-0.51 N |
91.65% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
7th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Ice Braking |
10th |
13.67 M |
11.44 M |
+2.23 M |
83.69% |
| Ice Traction |
9th |
6.17 s |
5.14 s |
+1.03 s |
83.31% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
9.426 kg / t |
8.148 kg / t |
+1.28 kg / t |
86.44% |
Good in the dry and wet.
Long snow braking, low ice grip.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
29.47 M |
27.43 M |
+2.04 M |
93.08% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
4th |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
34.74 M |
33.35 M |
+1.39 M |
96% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
6th |
7 Points |
10 Points |
-3 Points |
70% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
80.7 Km/H |
86 Km/H |
-5.3 Km/H |
93.84% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
10th |
17.53 M |
15.06 M |
+2.47 M |
85.91% |
| Snow Traction |
1st |
6.11 N |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
10th |
4 Points |
10 Points |
-6 Points |
40% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Ice Braking |
8th |
12.66 M |
11.44 M |
+1.22 M |
90.36% |
| Ice Traction |
6th |
5.67 s |
5.14 s |
+0.53 s |
90.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
7th |
7 Points |
10 Points |
-3 Points |
70% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
9.057 kg / t |
8.148 kg / t |
+0.91 kg / t |
89.96% |
High aquaplaning resistance, good ice handling.
Long braking distances on all surfaces, low ice traction, poor handling.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
31.61 M |
27.43 M |
+4.18 M |
86.78% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
10th |
4 Points |
10 Points |
-6 Points |
40% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
36.27 M |
33.35 M |
+2.92 M |
91.95% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
7th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
83.5 Km/H |
86 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
97.09% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
5th |
15.32 M |
15.06 M |
+0.26 M |
98.3% |
| Snow Traction |
3rd |
5.41 N |
6.11 N |
-0.7 N |
88.54% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
3rd |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Ice Braking |
9th |
13.4 M |
11.44 M |
+1.96 M |
85.37% |
| Ice Traction |
10th |
6.4 s |
5.14 s |
+1.26 s |
80.31% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
9th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
9.009 kg / t |
8.148 kg / t |
+0.86 kg / t |
90.44% |