The 2019 Auto Center winter tire test is both good and bad.

The positive is that out of ten 205/55 R16 patterns, it only includes two premium manufacturers. This means we get a much better look at the midrange bracket of winter tires, which is great for those of us who want to save a little money, and all ten patterns on test have been tested for ice braking and traction which is now usually omitted from central European tire testing.

Sadly, Auto Center decided not to provide any data from handling testing, instead giving an overall subjective score, which we assume combines lap time and handling. While this is a little odd, it's better than no test at all.

The final results might not make a buying decision any easier either, as nearly half the tires on test finished in fourth place. With everything so close in the midrange pack, make sure you drill into the test data to really help you understand which tire is best for your own driving needs.

Dry

During dry braking, the Nokian Snowproof had an unusually large braking advantage, stopping the car nearly two meters shorter than the next best tire.

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Nokian WR Snowproof	90 ft	Best
2Michelin Alpin 6	96 ft	+6 ft
3Toyo Snowprox S954	97 ft	+7 ft
4Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	97 ft	+7 ft
5Gislaved Euro Frost 6	99 ft	+9 ft
6Fulda Kristall Control HP2	100 ft	+10 ft
7Continental WinterContact TS 860	100 ft	+10 ft
8Barum Polaris 5	100 ft	+10 ft
9Debica Frigo HP2	102 ft	+12 ft
10Uniroyal MS Plus 77	104 ft	+14 ft

The difference between best and worst was 15.2% (14 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).

The Continental WinterContact TS860 finished joint top with the Gislaved Euro Frost 6.

Subj. Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental WinterContact TS 860	10 Points	Best
1Gislaved Euro Frost 6	10 Points	Best
3Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	9 Points	-1.00 Points
4Toyo Snowprox S954	8 Points	-2.00 Points
4Nokian WR Snowproof	8 Points	-2.00 Points
6Michelin Alpin 6	7 Points	-3.00 Points
7Debica Frigo HP2	6 Points	-4.00 Points
8Fulda Kristall Control HP2	5 Points	-5.00 Points
8Barum Polaris 5	5 Points	-5.00 Points
10Uniroyal MS Plus 77	4 Points	-6.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 60% (6 Points).

Wet

The premium tires from Michelin and Continental were the best in wet braking.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin Alpin 6	109 ft	Best
2Continental WinterContact TS 860	111 ft	+2 ft
3Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	111 ft	+2 ft
4Toyo Snowprox S954	114 ft	+5 ft
5Barum Polaris 5	116 ft	+7 ft
6Nokian WR Snowproof	116 ft	+7 ft
7Fulda Kristall Control HP2	119 ft	+10 ft
8Uniroyal MS Plus 77	119 ft	+10 ft
9Debica Frigo HP2	120 ft	+11 ft
10Gislaved Euro Frost 6	125 ft	+16 ft

The difference between best and worst was 14.5% (16 ft ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).

Yokohama had a strong result in the wet handling tests.

Subj. Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	10 Points	Best
2Barum Polaris 5	9 Points	-1.00 Points
3Continental WinterContact TS 860	8 Points	-2.00 Points
3Michelin Alpin 6	8 Points	-2.00 Points
3Nokian WR Snowproof	8 Points	-2.00 Points
6Toyo Snowprox S954	7 Points	-3.00 Points
7Uniroyal MS Plus 77	6 Points	-4.00 Points
7Fulda Kristall Control HP2	6 Points	-4.00 Points
7Gislaved Euro Frost 6	6 Points	-4.00 Points
10Debica Frigo HP2	5 Points	-5.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 50% (5 Points).

The Continental WinterContact TS860 had another strong result in the wet, winning the aquaplaning test.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental WinterContact TS 860	53.4 mph	Best
2Uniroyal MS Plus 77	51.9 mph	-1.5 mph
3Fulda Kristall Control HP2	51.3 mph	-2.1 mph
4Michelin Alpin 6	50.6 mph	-2.8 mph
5Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	50.2 mph	-3.2 mph
6Toyo Snowprox S954	50.1 mph	-3.3 mph
6Debica Frigo HP2	50.1 mph	-3.3 mph
8Barum Polaris 5	50.1 mph	-3.3 mph
9Nokian WR Snowproof	49.5 mph	-3.9 mph
10Gislaved Euro Frost 6	47.5 mph	-5.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.2% (5.9 mph).

Snow

Continental proved to be excellent in snow braking too.

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental WinterContact TS 860	49 ft	Best
2Nokian WR Snowproof	50 ft	+1 ft
3Fulda Kristall Control HP2	50 ft	+1 ft
3Debica Frigo HP2	50 ft	+1 ft
5Uniroyal MS Plus 77	50 ft	+1 ft
6Gislaved Euro Frost 6	50 ft	+1 ft
7Barum Polaris 5	51 ft	+2 ft
8Michelin Alpin 6	51 ft	+2 ft
9Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	52 ft	+3 ft
10Toyo Snowprox S954	58 ft	+9 ft

The difference between best and worst was 16.4% (9 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths).

Strangely, the top two tires from snow braking were near the bottom of the pack in snow traction.

Snow Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Toyo Snowprox S954	1 lbf	Best
2Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	1 lbf	0 lbf
3Uniroyal MS Plus 77	1 lbf	0 lbf
4Debica Frigo HP2	1 lbf	0 lbf
5Fulda Kristall Control HP2	1 lbf	0 lbf
6Barum Polaris 5	1 lbf	0 lbf
7Nokian WR Snowproof	1 lbf	0 lbf
8Continental WinterContact TS 860	1 lbf	0 lbf
9Gislaved Euro Frost 6	1 lbf	0 lbf
10Michelin Alpin 6	1 lbf	0 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 17.2% (0 lbf).

Braking proved to be more important than traction for the snow handling tests, with Continental and Nokian back on top.

Subj. Snow Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Nokian WR Snowproof	10 Points	Best
2Continental WinterContact TS 860	9 Points	-1.00 Points
3Uniroyal MS Plus 77	8 Points	-2.00 Points
3Gislaved Euro Frost 6	8 Points	-2.00 Points
5Debica Frigo HP2	7 Points	-3.00 Points
5Michelin Alpin 6	7 Points	-3.00 Points
7Fulda Kristall Control HP2	6 Points	-4.00 Points
7Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	6 Points	-4.00 Points
9Barum Polaris 5	5 Points	-5.00 Points
10Toyo Snowprox S954	4 Points	-6.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 60% (6 Points).

Ice

Nokian demonstrated its nordic routes, winning the ice braking and ice traction testing.

Ice Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Nokian WR Snowproof	38 ft	Best
2Gislaved Euro Frost 6	39 ft	+1 ft
3Debica Frigo HP2	39 ft	+1 ft
4Fulda Kristall Control HP2	39 ft	+1 ft
5Michelin Alpin 6	39 ft	+1 ft
6Continental WinterContact TS 860	40 ft	+2 ft
7Barum Polaris 5	41 ft	+3 ft
8Toyo Snowprox S954	42 ft	+4 ft
9Uniroyal MS Plus 77	44 ft	+6 ft
10Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	45 ft	+7 ft

The difference between best and worst was 19.5% (7 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths).

Ice Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Nokian WR Snowproof	5.14 s	Best
2Gislaved Euro Frost 6	5.39 s	+0.25 s
3Fulda Kristall Control HP2	5.43 s	+0.29 s
4Debica Frigo HP2	5.55 s	+0.41 s
5Michelin Alpin 6	5.63 s	+0.49 s
6Toyo Snowprox S954	5.67 s	+0.53 s
7Barum Polaris 5	5.77 s	+0.63 s
8Continental WinterContact TS 860	6 s	+0.86 s
9Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	6.17 s	+1.03 s
10Uniroyal MS Plus 77	6.4 s	+1.26 s

The difference between best and worst was 24.5% (1.26 s).

Other

The Barum had a very low rolling resistance.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Barum Polaris 5	8.15 kg/t	Best	$0
2Nokian WR Snowproof	8.54 kg/t	+0.39 kg/t	$14
3Continental WinterContact TS 860	8.62 kg/t	+0.47 kg/t	$17
4Debica Frigo HP2	8.64 kg/t	+0.49 kg/t	$18
5Fulda Kristall Control HP2	8.67 kg/t	+0.52 kg/t	$19
6Uniroyal MS Plus 77	9.01 kg/t	+0.86 kg/t	$31
7Toyo Snowprox S954	9.06 kg/t	+0.91 kg/t	$33
8Gislaved Euro Frost 6	9.08 kg/t	+0.93 kg/t	$34
9Michelin Alpin 6	9.18 kg/t	+1.03 kg/t	$37
10Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	9.43 kg/t	+1.28 kg/t	$46

The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (1.28 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 uses about 13 gal ($46) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Gas/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

12,000 mi

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

$3.60/gal

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Michelin and Nokian finished the test with the highest subjective comfort scores.

Subj. Comfort
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin Alpin 6	10 Points	Best
2Debica Frigo HP2	9 Points	-1.00 Points
2Nokian WR Snowproof	9 Points	-1.00 Points
4Continental WinterContact TS 860	8 Points	-2.00 Points
4Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	8 Points	-2.00 Points
4Barum Polaris 5	8 Points	-2.00 Points
7Toyo Snowprox S954	7 Points	-3.00 Points
8Gislaved Euro Frost 6	6 Points	-4.00 Points
9Uniroyal MS Plus 77	5 Points	-5.00 Points
9Fulda Kristall Control HP2	5 Points	-5.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 50% (5 Points).

Results

Dry96.6%

Wet91.7%

Snow92.8%

Ice100%

Comfort90%

Rolling Resistance95.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	90 ft	Best in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	8 Points	-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	116 ft	+7 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	8 Points	-2.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better	9^th / 10	49.5 mph	-3.9 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	50 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 10	1 lbf	0 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	10 Points	Best in this discipline
Ice BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	38 ft	Best in this discipline
Ice TractionLower is better	1^st / 10	5.14 s	Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	2^nd / 10	9 Points	-1.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 10	8.543 kg/t	+0.40 kg/t

Dry91.7%

Wet95.6%

Snow91.1%

Ice89.5%

Comfort80%

Rolling Resistance94.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	100 ft	+10 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	10 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	111 ft	+2 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	8 Points	-2.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 10	53.4 mph	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	49 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	8^th / 10	1 lbf	0 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	9 Points	-1.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	40 ft	+2 ft
Ice TractionLower is better	8^th / 10	6 s	+0.86 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	4^th / 10	8 Points	-2.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 10	8.618 kg/t	+0.47 kg/t

Dry89.3%

Wet95.7%

Snow86.7%

Ice93.5%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance88.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	96 ft	+6 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	7 Points	-3.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	109 ft	Best in this discipline
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	8 Points	-2.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 10	50.6 mph	-2.8 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	51 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	10^th / 10	1 lbf	0 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	7 Points	-3.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	39 ft	+1 ft
Ice TractionLower is better	5^th / 10	5.63 s	+0.49 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	1^st / 10	10 Points	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 10	9.184 kg/t	+1.04 kg/t

Dry83.1%

Wet93.7%

Snow85.6%

Ice90.2%

Comfort80%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	100 ft	+10 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	5 Points	-5.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	116 ft	+7 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	9 Points	-1.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 10	50.1 mph	-3.3 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	51 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	6^th / 10	1 lbf	0 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	5 Points	-5.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	41 ft	+3 ft
Ice TractionLower is better	7^th / 10	5.77 s	+0.63 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	4^th / 10	8 Points	-2.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 10	8.148 kg/t	Best in this discipline

Dry83.1%

Wet84.8%

Snow89.7%

Ice94.5%

Comfort90%

Rolling Resistance94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	102 ft	+12 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	6 Points	-4.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	120 ft	+11 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	5 Points	-5.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 10	50.1 mph	-3.3 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	50 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 10	1 lbf	0 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	7 Points	-3.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	39 ft	+1 ft
Ice TractionLower is better	4^th / 10	5.55 s	+0.41 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	2^nd / 10	9 Points	-1.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 10	8.635 kg/t	+0.49 kg/t

Dry83.3%

Wet87.4%

Snow88.2%

Ice95.2%

Comfort50%

Rolling Resistance94%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	100 ft	+10 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	5 Points	-5.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	119 ft	+10 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	6 Points	-4.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 10	51.3 mph	-2.1 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	50 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 10	1 lbf	0 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	6 Points	-4.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	39 ft	+1 ft
Ice TractionLower is better	3^rd / 10	5.43 s	+0.29 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	9^th / 10	5 Points	-5.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 10	8.672 kg/t	+0.52 kg/t

Dry92.1%

Wet83%

Snow88.7%

Ice96%

Comfort60%

Rolling Resistance89.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	99 ft	+9 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	10 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	125 ft	+16 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	6 Points	-4.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 10	47.5 mph	-5.9 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	50 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	9^th / 10	1 lbf	0 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	8 Points	-2.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	39 ft	+1 ft
Ice TractionLower is better	2^nd / 10	5.39 s	+0.25 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	8^th / 10	6 Points	-4.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 10	9.076 kg/t	+0.93 kg/t

Dry92.5%

Wet97.9%

Snow88.7%

Ice83.5%

Comfort80%

Rolling Resistance86.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	97 ft	+7 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	9 Points	-1.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	111 ft	+2 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	10 Points	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 10	50.2 mph	-3.2 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	52 ft	+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 10	1 lbf	0 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	6 Points	-4.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	45 ft	+7 ft
Ice TractionLower is better	9^th / 10	6.17 s	+1.03 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	4^th / 10	8 Points	-2.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 10	9.426 kg/t	+1.28 kg/t

Dry90.9%

Wet91.2%

Snow86.6%

Ice90.5%

Comfort70%

Rolling Resistance90%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	97 ft	+7 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	8 Points	-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	114 ft	+5 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	7 Points	-3.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 10	50.1 mph	-3.3 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	58 ft	+9 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 10	1 lbf	Best in this discipline
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	4 Points	-6.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	42 ft	+4 ft
Ice TractionLower is better	6^th / 10	5.67 s	+0.53 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	7^th / 10	7 Points	-3.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 10	9.057 kg/t	+0.91 kg/t

Dry78.8%

Wet87.4%

Snow91.3%

Ice82.8%

Comfort50%

Rolling Resistance90.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	104 ft	+14 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	4 Points	-6.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	119 ft	+10 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	6 Points	-4.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 10	51.9 mph	-1.5 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	50 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 10	1 lbf	0 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	8 Points	-2.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	44 ft	+6 ft
Ice TractionLower is better	10^th / 10	6.4 s	+1.26 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	9^th / 10	5 Points	-5.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 10	9.009 kg/t	+0.86 kg/t

Tire	Nokian WR Snowproof	Continental WinterContact TS 860	Michelin Alpin 6	Barum Polaris 5	Debica Frigo HP2	Fulda Kristall Control HP2	Gislaved Euro Frost 6	Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905	Toyo Snowprox S954	Uniroyal MS Plus 77
Position	1^st	2^nd	3^rd	Joint 4^th	Joint 4^th	Joint 4^th	Joint 4^th	8^th	9^th	10^th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry	96.6%	91.7%	89.3%	83.1%	83.1%	83.3%	92.1%	92.5%	90.9%	78.8%
Wet	91.7%	95.6%	95.7%	93.7%	84.8%	87.4%	83%	97.9%	91.2%	87.4%
Snow	92.8%	91.1%	86.7%	85.6%	89.7%	88.2%	88.7%	88.7%	86.6%	91.3%
Ice	100%	89.5%	93.5%	90.2%	94.5%	95.2%	96%	83.5%	90.5%	82.8%
Comfort	90%	80%	100%	80%	90%	50%	60%	80%	70%	50%
Rolling Resistance	95.4%	94.6%	88.7%	100%	94.4%	94%	89.8%	86.4%	90%	90.4%
Keep researching	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Dry

Wet

Snow

Ice

Other

Results

Cross-check this test