We look forward to the big Autobild braking tests in every season, and this year Autobild have tested 51 winter tires in wet braking (plus a summer tire), with the best 31 moving onto a snow braking test.

The top 20 combined distances from the wet and snow braking tests will feature in the full AutoBild winter tire test, on the site next week.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Wet Braking: 49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking: 31.1 → 0.0 mph

Wet

The summer tire demonstrated the performance gap that winter tires must overcome in wet conditions, stopping from 50 mph in just 100 feet - significantly shorter than any winter tire. Among the winter tires, Goodyear led the wet braking performance at 107 feet, followed closely by Michelin at 109 feet and both Dunlop and Toyo at 109 feet. The spread in performance was substantial, with the top performers managing stops around 33-115 feet, while the poorest winter tires required over 148 feet - a difference that could prove critical in emergency situations.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
RefReference Summer	100 ft	-7 ft	0 mph
1Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	107 ft	Best	0 mph
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	109 ft	+2 ft	11 mph
3Dunlop Winter Response 2	109 ft	+2 ft	12 mph
3Toyo Observe EWS1	109 ft	+2 ft	12 mph
5Kumho Winter Craft WP52	110 ft	+3 ft	13 mph
6Uniroyal WinterExpert	112 ft	+5 ft	17 mph
7Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	113 ft	+6 ft	19 mph
8Firestone Winterhawk 4	114 ft	+7 ft	20 mph
9Semperit Speed Grip 5	115 ft	+8 ft	21 mph
10Bridgestone Blizzak 6	115 ft	+8 ft	21 mph
11Barum Polaris 6	115 ft	+8 ft	21 mph
12Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	117 ft	+10 ft	23 mph
12Hankook Winter i cept evo3	117 ft	+10 ft	23 mph
14Linglong Sport Master Winter	117 ft	+10 ft	24 mph
15Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	117 ft	+10 ft	24 mph
16BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2	118 ft	+11 ft	25 mph
16Vredestein Wintrac Pro+	118 ft	+11 ft	25 mph
18Kleber Krisalp HP3	119 ft	+12 ft	25 mph
19Sportiva Snow Win 3	120 ft	+13 ft	26 mph
19Landsail Winter Lander	120 ft	+13 ft	26 mph
19Paxaro Paxaro Winter	120 ft	+13 ft	26 mph
22Ceat WinterDrive	121 ft	+14 ft	27 mph
22Fulda Kristall Control HP2	121 ft	+14 ft	27 mph
24Apollo Aspire XP Winter	122 ft	+15 ft	28 mph
25Giti GitiWinterW2	124 ft	+17 ft	29 mph
26Sava Eskimo HP2	124 ft	+17 ft	30 mph
26Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906	124 ft	+17 ft	30 mph
28Platin RP 70 Winter	125 ft	+18 ft	30 mph
29Debica Frigo HP2	125 ft	+18 ft	30 mph
30Lassa Snoways 4	126 ft	+19 ft	31 mph
31Rotalla S210	127 ft	+20 ft	32 mph
32Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501	127 ft	+20 ft	32 mph
32Tracmax S210 Ice Plus	127 ft	+20 ft	32 mph
34Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow	128 ft	+21 ft	32 mph
35GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport	129 ft	+22 ft	33 mph
36Sumitomo WT200	129 ft	+22 ft	33 mph
36Royal Black Royal Winter UHP	129 ft	+22 ft	33 mph
38Tigar Winter 1	130 ft	+23 ft	34 mph
39Nankang Winter Activa SV 4	131 ft	+24 ft	34 mph
39Davanti Wintoura+	131 ft	+24 ft	34 mph
41Goodride ZuperSnow Z507	132 ft	+25 ft	35 mph
42Imperial Snowdragon UHP	133 ft	+26 ft	35 mph
43Westlake SW 608	134 ft	+27 ft	36 mph
44Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	135 ft	+28 ft	36 mph
45Star Performer Stratos UHP	135 ft	+28 ft	37 mph
46Tomket Snowroad Pro 3	135 ft	+28 ft	37 mph
47Atlas Polarbear UHP	138 ft	+31 ft	38 mph
48Sunny Wintermax NW 211	139 ft	+32 ft	39 mph
49Milever Winter maX A1 MW255	140 ft	+33 ft	39 mph
50Infinity Ecozen	142 ft	+35 ft	40 mph
51Windforce Snowblazer UHP	148 ft	+41 ft	42 mph

The difference between best and worst was 47.4% (48 ft ≈ 3.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Windforce Snowblazer UHP would still be travelling at 42 mph when the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow

In snow braking from 31 mph, the winter tires demonstrated their purpose-built advantage over the summer reference, which required 168 feet to stop. Kleber achieved the shortest snow braking distance at 89 feet, with BF Goodrich close behind at 90 feet. Dunlop and Michelin followed at 27.5 and 91 feet respectively. The top performing tires clustered tightly between 27-95 feet, while the weakest performers extended beyond 105 feet, highlighting significant differences in snow compound and tread design effectiveness across the market.

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Kleber Krisalp HP3	89 ft	Best	0 mph
2BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2	90 ft	+1 ft	7 mph
3Dunlop Winter Response 2	90 ft	+1 ft	10 mph
4Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	91 ft	+2 ft	13 mph
5Fulda Kristall Control HP2	92 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
5Bridgestone Blizzak 6	92 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	92 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
8Sava Eskimo HP2	92 ft	+3 ft	15 mph
8Hankook Winter i cept evo3	92 ft	+3 ft	15 mph
10Ceat WinterDrive	93 ft	+4 ft	16 mph
10Barum Polaris 6	93 ft	+4 ft	16 mph
10Firestone Winterhawk 4	93 ft	+4 ft	16 mph
13Kumho Winter Craft WP52	93 ft	+4 ft	16 mph
14Giti GitiWinterW2	93 ft	+4 ft	17 mph
15Platin RP 70 Winter	94 ft	+5 ft	18 mph
15Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	94 ft	+5 ft	18 mph
17Debica Frigo HP2	94 ft	+5 ft	18 mph
17Uniroyal WinterExpert	94 ft	+5 ft	18 mph
19Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	94 ft	+5 ft	19 mph
19Linglong Sport Master Winter	94 ft	+5 ft	19 mph
19Vredestein Wintrac Pro+	94 ft	+5 ft	19 mph
19Apollo Aspire XP Winter	94 ft	+5 ft	19 mph
23Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906	95 ft	+6 ft	20 mph
23Semperit Speed Grip 5	95 ft	+6 ft	20 mph
25Sportiva Snow Win 3	96 ft	+7 ft	21 mph
26Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	97 ft	+8 ft	23 mph
27Paxaro Paxaro Winter	97 ft	+8 ft	24 mph
27Toyo Observe EWS1	97 ft	+8 ft	24 mph
29Lassa Snoways 4	100 ft	+11 ft	27 mph
30Landsail Winter Lander	107 ft	+18 ft	33 mph
31Rotalla S210	107 ft	+18 ft	33 mph
RefReference Summer	168 ft	+79 ft	55 mph

The difference between best and worst was 88.6% (79 ft ≈ 5.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Rotalla S210 would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Results

Wet97.9%

Snow98.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 51	109 ft	+2 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 31	90 ft	+1 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 510.00

Wet98.2%

Snow97.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 51	109 ft	+2 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 31	91 ft	+2 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 630.00

Wet100%

Snow95.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 51	107 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	15^th / 31	94 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 580.00

Wet97.3%

Snow95.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 51	110 ft	+3 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	13^th / 31	93 ft	+4 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 430.00

Wet95.6%

Snow94.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 51	112 ft	+5 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	17^th / 31	94 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 460.00

Wet93.1%

Snow96.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 51	115 ft	+8 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 31	92 ft	+3 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 600.00

Wet93.7%

Snow96.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 51	114 ft	+7 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 31	93 ft	+4 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 450.00

Wet97.9%

Snow91.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 51	109 ft	+2 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	27^th / 31	97 ft	+8 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 480.00

Wet94.5%

Snow94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 51	113 ft	+6 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	94 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 620.00

Wet92.9%

Snow96.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	11^th / 51	115 ft	+8 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 31	93 ft	+4 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 380.00

Wet90.6%

Snow99.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	16^th / 51	118 ft	+11 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 31	90 ft	+1 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 510.00

Wet90.1%

Snow100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	18^th / 51	119 ft	+12 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 31	89 ft	Best in this discipline

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 500.00

Wet91.6%

Snow96.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	12^th / 51	117 ft	+10 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 31	92 ft	+3 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 610.00

Wet91.6%

Snow96.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	12^th / 51	117 ft	+10 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 31	92 ft	+3 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 480.00

Wet93.4%

Snow93.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 51	115 ft	+8 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	23^rd / 31	95 ft	+6 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 490.00

Wet91.3%

Snow94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	14^th / 51	117 ft	+10 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	94 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 360.00

Wet90.6%

Snow94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	16^th / 51	118 ft	+11 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	94 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 500.00

Wet88.4%

Snow96.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 51	121 ft	+14 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 31	92 ft	+3 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 440.00

Wet88.4%

Snow96.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 51	121 ft	+14 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 31	93 ft	+4 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 380.00

Wet91.1%

Snow91.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	15^th / 51	117 ft	+10 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	26^th / 31	97 ft	+8 ft

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 510.00

Wet89.3%

Snow92.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 51	120 ft	+13 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	25^th / 31	96 ft	+7 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet87.4%

Snow94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	24^th / 51	122 ft	+15 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	94 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet86%

Snow96.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	26^th / 51	124 ft	+17 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 31	92 ft	+3 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet86.5%

Snow95.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	25^th / 51	124 ft	+17 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	14^th / 31	93 ft	+4 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet89.3%

Snow91.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 51	120 ft	+13 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	27^th / 31	97 ft	+8 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet85.8%

Snow95.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	28^th / 51	125 ft	+18 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	15^th / 31	94 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet85.6%

Snow94.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	29^th / 51	125 ft	+18 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	17^th / 31	94 ft	+5 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet86%

Snow93.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	26^th / 51	124 ft	+17 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	23^rd / 31	95 ft	+6 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet84.9%

Snow88.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	30^th / 51	126 ft	+19 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	29^th / 31	100 ft	+11 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet89.3%

Snow83.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 51	120 ft	+13 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	30^th / 31	107 ft	+18 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Wet84.2%

Snow83.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	31^st / 51	127 ft	+20 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	31^st / 31	107 ft	+18 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	32^nd / 51	127 ft	+20 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	32^nd / 51	127 ft	+20 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	34^th / 51	128 ft	+21 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	35^th / 51	129 ft	+22 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	36^th / 51	129 ft	+22 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	36^th / 51	129 ft	+22 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	38^th / 51	130 ft	+23 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	39^th / 51	131 ft	+24 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	39^th / 51	131 ft	+24 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	41^st / 51	132 ft	+25 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	42^nd / 51	133 ft	+26 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	43^rd / 51	134 ft	+27 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	44^th / 51	135 ft	+28 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	45^th / 51	135 ft	+28 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	46^th / 51	135 ft	+28 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	47^th / 51	138 ft	+31 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	48^th / 51	139 ft	+32 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	49^th / 51	140 ft	+33 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	50^th / 51	142 ft	+35 ft

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	51^st / 51	148 ft	+41 ft

3PMSF: Yes

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Wet

Snow

Results

Cross-check this test