Menu

Test source Auto Bild

2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

Joint test winnersContinental WinterContact TS 870 P Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Auto Bild has tested 20 winter tires in 245/45 R19, a size fitted to upper mid-size cars such as the BMW 5 Series, Audi A6 and A7, Mercedes E-Class and Volvo S90, V90 and XC60.

Tires tested
20
Tested size
245/45 R19
Test vehicle
BMW 5 Series
Disciplines
16

At a glance

Tire shortlist

20 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

Joint1st

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

+The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was the most consistent tire in the wet, with the second-shortest wet braking and the second-fastest laps of the winter tires on both the wet handling course and the wet circle. It shared the fastest dry handling of the winter tires, was rated the most comfortable in the test, and was in the top four for snow traction, snow handling and the slalom.

−The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was only mid-field for snow braking and dry braking, and its tread life and rolling resistance were both below average for this test. Combined with one of the highest prices, that makes it the most expensive tire here per kilometer.

Joint1st

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

+The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was among the best tires on snow, leading the slalom and finishing in the top three for snow braking, traction and handling. It had the second-shortest dry braking of the winter tires, was third in wet braking, and lasted longer than any other tire in the wear test.

−The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is the most expensive set in the test, and even with its long tread life it is among the costliest per kilometer. Its aquaplaning resistance was only average in a straight line and below average in curves.

Joint3rd

Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4

+The Hankook Winter i*cept evo 4 had the fourth-shortest wet braking and was in the top four for dry braking and dry handling. It was among the most comfortable tires, had the third-longest tread life and low rolling resistance, giving it the lowest running costs of the premium brands.

−The Hankook Winter i*cept evo 4 was only mid-field on the wet handling course and the wet circle. On snow it was upper mid-field for braking and traction, and below average for handling and the slalom.

Joint3rd

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

+The Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 had the shortest wet braking in the test, shorter even than the summer reference, and was the fastest winter tire on the wet handling course and the wet circle. On dry roads it shared the fastest handling of the winter tires and had the third-shortest braking.

−The Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 was weaker on snow, below average for braking and traction, and it was among the earliest to aquaplane in both the straight-line and curved tests. It is also one of the most expensive sets, and among the costliest per kilometer.

Joint5th

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

+The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was strong in the wet, in the top five of the winter tires for wet braking, wet handling and the wet circle, and among the better tires in curved aquaplaning. It was the fourth-fastest winter tire on the dry handling course, had the second-lowest rolling resistance, and is the lightest tire in the test.

−The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was below average for snow braking, snow handling and dry braking, and among the louder tires on the pass-by noise test. It is also one of the more expensive sets per kilometer.

Joint5th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

+The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was among the quickest winter tires on the wet handling course and the wet circle, and in the top five for snow handling. It had the second-longest tread life in the test, was jointly the quietest ranked tire on the pass-by noise test, and was among the most comfortable.

−The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was only mid-field for snow braking, snow traction and both aquaplaning tests, and among the slower tires on the dry handling course. It is one of the more expensive sets.

Joint5th

Kleber Krisalp HP3

+The Kleber Krisalp HP3 was the strongest tire on snow, with the most traction, a share of the fastest snow handling, the second-shortest snow braking and the third-best slalom. It was the best winter tire in straight-line aquaplaning, among the better ones in curved aquaplaning, and has reasonable running costs.

−The Kleber Krisalp HP3 was below average on the wet handling course, among the slower tires on the wet circle, and only mid-field for wet braking. Its dry handling was also below average.

Joint8th

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

+The Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ had the shortest dry braking of any winter tire and was in the top six for wet braking and dry handling. It was among the most comfortable tires and, at a comparatively low price, one of the cheaper tires to run per kilometer.

−The Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ was among the longer stoppers on snow and mid-field for snow traction and handling. It was among the first to aquaplane in a straight line and slightly louder than average on the pass-by noise test.

Joint8th

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

+The Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ had the shortest snow braking in the test and shared the fastest snow handling with the Kleber. It was in the top five of the winter tires for straight-line aquaplaning and was among the most comfortable.

−The Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ had the highest rolling resistance in the test and one of the shorter tread lives, making it expensive to run for its price. It was below average in the slalom and in curved aquaplaning, and mid-field on dry roads.

10th

Barum Polaris 6

+The Barum Polaris 6 stopped among the shortest on snow and was second-best in the slalom. It was one of the quieter tires on the pass-by noise test and mid-field for wet braking, and it is the lowest-placed tire in the test to avoid a safety penalty.

−The Barum Polaris 6 was below average for snow traction and handling, had the slowest lap of the ranked tires on the wet circle, and was slow on the wet handling course. It was among the longer stoppers on dry roads and had one of the highest rolling resistances.

11th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

+The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 was strong on snow, with almost the most traction, joint third-shortest braking and top-six handling. It was the second-best winter tire in curved aquaplaning and among the better ones in a straight line, and it has low rolling resistance.

−The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 was among the slowest on the dry handling course, which earned it a safety penalty, and it was below average on the wet handling course and the wet circle.

Joint12th

Giti GitiWinterW2

+The Giti GitiWinter W2 was third-best of the winter tires in curved aquaplaning and among the better ones in a straight line, and shared the fourth-shortest dry braking. It had the fourth-longest tread life, making it one of the cheaper tires to run.

−The Giti GitiWinter W2 was among the weakest tires on snow, near the bottom for braking, traction and handling, and below average in wet braking, which brought a safety penalty. It also has one of the highest rolling resistances.

Joint12th

Semperit Speed Grip 5

+The Semperit Speed-Grip 5 was the second-best winter tire in straight-line aquaplaning and shared fourth place in the slalom. It was mid-field for snow braking and snow handling.

−The Semperit Speed-Grip 5 shared the longest dry braking of the ranked tires with the Lassa, which brought a safety penalty. It had the second-lowest snow traction, was slow on the wet handling course and the wet circle, and was among the louder tires.

Joint12th

Viking WinTech NewGen

+The Viking WinTech NewGen had the lowest rolling resistance in the test, was jointly the quietest ranked tire on the pass-by noise test, and had good snow traction. It is also one of the cheapest sets.

−The Viking WinTech NewGen had the shortest tread life in the test, so its low price only gives mid-field running costs. It was among the slowest on the wet handling course and the wet circle, the weakest ranked tire in curved aquaplaning, and was rated the least comfortable.

15th

Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6

+The Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 was the best winter tire in curved aquaplaning and third-best in a straight line, and it shared the third-shortest snow braking. As one of the two cheapest sets with average tread life, it is the cheapest tire in the test to run per kilometer.

−The Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 had the longest wet braking of the ranked tires, which earned a safety penalty, and was below average for snow handling and ride comfort.

Joint16th

Firestone Winterhawk 4

+The Firestone Winterhawk 4 shared fourth place in the slalom, was upper mid-field for snow braking and traction, and had low rolling resistance.

−The Firestone Winterhawk 4 had the slowest dry handling of the ranked tires and the second-longest wet braking, both of which drew a safety penalty. It was also the earliest of the ranked tires to aquaplane in a straight line and below average in curves.

Joint16th

GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport

+The GT Radial WinterPro 2 Sport shared the sixth-shortest dry braking and was upper mid-field on the wet circle. As one of the two cheapest sets, it is the second-cheapest tire in the test to run per kilometer.

−The GT Radial WinterPro 2 Sport had the slowest snow handling of the ranked tires and below-average wet braking, which drew a safety penalty, and it was below average for snow braking and traction. It also had one of the shorter tread lives and was rated among the least comfortable.

Joint16th

Matador MP93 Nordicca

+The Matador MP93 Nordicca had the fifth-longest tread life and, at a low price, is the fourth-cheapest tire to run per kilometer. It was among the quieter tires on the pass-by noise test.

−The Matador MP93 Nordicca had the least snow traction of the ranked tires and was among the weakest on wet roads, with long wet braking and slow laps on the wet handling course and the wet circle, which earned it a safety penalty.

Joint16th

Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport

+The Petlas Snowmaster 2 Sport had the third-lowest rolling resistance, and as one of the cheapest sets it is the third-cheapest tire to run per kilometer. It was upper mid-field on the wet circle and in dry handling.

−The Petlas Snowmaster 2 Sport was the slowest ranked tire on the wet handling course and below average for wet braking, which earned a safety penalty. It was last of the ranked tires in the slalom, below average in the other snow tests, and among the louder tires.

20th

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

+The Lassa Competus Winter 2+ was upper mid-field for dry handling and mid-field in the wet, with average results for wet handling, the wet circle and both aquaplaning tests.

−The Lassa Competus Winter 2+ had the longest snow braking of the ranked tires and shared the longest dry braking with the Semperit, both of which earned a safety penalty. It was also the loudest ranked tire on the pass-by noise test and one of the shortest-lasting.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test · 245/45 R19

TireContinental WinterContact TS 870 PMichelin Pilot Alpin 5Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Bridgestone Blizzak 6Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3Kleber Krisalp HP3Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Vredestein Wintrac Pro+Barum Polaris 6BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2Giti GitiWinterW2Semperit Speed Grip 5Viking WinTech NewGenMaxxis Premitra Snow WP6Firestone Winterhawk 4GT Radial WinterPro2 SportMatador MP93 NordiccaPetlas SnowMaster 2 SportLassa Competus Winter 2+
PositionJoint 1stJoint 1stJoint 3rdJoint 3rdJoint 5thJoint 5thJoint 5thJoint 8thJoint 8th10th11thJoint 12thJoint 12thJoint 12th15thJoint 16thJoint 16thJoint 16thJoint 16th20th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry97.7%99.3%98.2%99.3%96.7%97.1%96.7%99.6%96.6%94%95.7%97.6%94.2%94.9%95.4%94.5%97%95%96.7%94.3%
Wet98.5%95.3%94.7%98.3%95.1%94.4%93%92.7%93.6%91.4%92.8%93%92.3%90.6%91.5%89.9%92.2%90.5%90.6%92.3%
Snow98.8%99.5%97.8%97.5%97.6%98.4%99.7%97.1%98.6%97.6%99.1%95.1%97%97.9%96.6%98.1%94.9%95.1%95%94.8%
Comfort99.2%97.5%98.2%97.5%92.2%99%90.8%97.8%97.9%92.8%90.9%90.5%89.2%86.7%87.8%89.2%86.8%89.2%89.9%86.4%
Value78.2%85.2%90.8%81.5%85.6%87.7%89.4%90%76.8%84%89%88.7%83.5%83.9%93%85.5%89.6%90.7%91.1%81.4%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Auto Bild has tested 20 winter tires in 245/45 R19, a size fitted to upper mid-size cars such as the BMW 5 Series, Audi A6 and A7, Mercedes E-Class and Volvo S90, V90 and XC60. The 20 finalists came through a 50-tire braking qualifier on wet and snowy roads, then went on to snow tests in Arvidsjaur, Sweden, wet and dry tests at the Contidrom in Wietze, Germany, and a wear test on a drum rig. Set prices run from 530 to 1,030 euros, and a premium summer tire and an unnamed budget tire were run alongside outside the classification.

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 share the win on identical overall grades. The Continental was Auto Bild's best tire in the wet and the most comfortable, while the Michelin led the snow slalom and lasted longest in the wear test. The Hankook Winter i*cept evo 4 and Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 share third, and all four earn Auto Bild's top "exemplary" verdict. The best tire on snow was not one of them: the Kleber Krisalp HP3, from Michelin's second brand, found the most traction and shared the fastest snow handling. Further down, every tire from 11th place on was marked down for a weak result in at least one safety-relevant test.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

Auto Bild weights snow and wet at 30 per cent each, and dry and costs at 20 per cent each. When a tire grades 2.5 or worse in a safety-relevant test, a quarter of its worst such grade is added to its overall result, and that penalty is what separates the top ten from the rest. The snow braking figures below are the same measurements as in our report on the 50-tire qualifier, but the wet braking here was measured from 62 mph rather than the qualifier's 50 mph, so those distances are new. Auto Bild does not name either reference tire. The summer tire is described only as a typical summer tire from a major brand, run for comparison in most tests. The budget tire was taken into the main test outside the classification to back up Auto Bild's advice to avoid the weakest tires from the qualifier, which were already poor in the wet, and it appears in our charts as the budget reference. This is our summary of the headline results; for every grade, the full weighting and Auto Bild's methodology, see the original test.

Several of these tires also appear in Auto Bild's other 2026 winter tests. The Michelin also won the Sportscars test in 225/45 R18, where the Continental was fourth, and the Hankook won the Allrad SUV test in 225/55 R18, with the Michelin second. The Bridgestone and Goodyear, second and third in the Sportscars test and both in the top five of the SUV test, share fifth place here with the Kleber.

Snow

Snow braking was very close. The Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ stopped shortest, ahead of the Kleber, and the 20 ranked tires were spread by just over a meter, with the Lassa Competus Winter 2+ needing the most room. The summer reference needed 51 feet more than the Vredestein. The budget tire stopped level with the GT Radial and ahead of four of the ranked tires.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
95 ft Best 0 mph
95 ft 0 ft 5 mph
95 ft 0 ft 7 mph
95 ft 0 ft 7 mph
95 ft 0 ft 7 mph
95 ft 0 ft 7 mph
96 ft +1 ft 8 mph
96 ft +1 ft 8 mph
96 ft +1 ft 8 mph
96 ft +1 ft 9 mph
96 ft +1 ft 9 mph
96 ft +1 ft 10 mph
96 ft +1 ft 10 mph
97 ft +2 ft 11 mph
97 ft +2 ft 11 mph
RefReference Budget
97 ft +2 ft 12 mph
97 ft +2 ft 12 mph
98 ft +3 ft 14 mph
98 ft +3 ft 14 mph
98 ft +3 ft 15 mph
99 ft +4 ft 16 mph
RefReference Summer
146 ft +51 ft 47 mph

The difference between best and worst was 53.6% (51 ft ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Lassa Competus Winter 2+ would still be travelling at 16 mph when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Kleber found the most traction, almost level with the BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, with the Michelin third. The Matador MP93 Nordicca had the least of the ranked tires, and the summer reference managed barely half the traction of the winter tires. The budget tire found more traction than ten of the ranked tires, the Pirelli among them.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
1,209 lbf Best
1,209 lbf 0 lbf
1,195 lbf -14 lbf
1,187 lbf -22 lbf
1,182 lbf -27 lbf
1,181 lbf -28 lbf
1,179 lbf -30 lbf
1,177 lbf -32 lbf
1,176 lbf -33 lbf
1,174 lbf -35 lbf
RefReference Budget
1,164 lbf -45 lbf
1,162 lbf -47 lbf
1,158 lbf -51 lbf
1,152 lbf -57 lbf
1,151 lbf -58 lbf
1,143 lbf -66 lbf
1,139 lbf -70 lbf
1,139 lbf -70 lbf
1,138 lbf -71 lbf
1,132 lbf -77 lbf
1,120 lbf -89 lbf
RefReference Summer
567 lbf -642 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 53.1% (642 lbf).

The Kleber and Vredestein shared the fastest time on the snow handling course, with the Michelin and Continental close behind, and the GT Radial WinterPro 2 Sport was the slowest ranked tire. The budget tire matched the Pirelli here and lapped faster than 13 of the ranked tires, while the summer reference could only manage half the winter tires' speed.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
36.0 mph Best
36.0 mph Best
35.9 mph -0.1 mph
35.9 mph -0.1 mph
35.7 mph -0.3 mph
35.5 mph -0.5 mph
RefReference Budget
35.4 mph -0.6 mph
35.4 mph -0.6 mph
35.3 mph -0.7 mph
35.2 mph -0.8 mph
35.0 mph -1.0 mph
35.0 mph -1.0 mph
34.9 mph -1.1 mph
34.9 mph -1.1 mph
34.9 mph -1.1 mph
34.0 mph -2.0 mph
34.0 mph -2.0 mph
33.7 mph -2.3 mph
33.7 mph -2.3 mph
33.7 mph -2.3 mph
33.4 mph -2.6 mph
RefReference Summer
17.8 mph -18.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 50.6% (18.2 mph).

In the slalom the Michelin held the most lateral grip, ahead of the Barum Polaris 6 and the Kleber, though the winter tires were tightly grouped. The Petlas Snowmaster 2 Sport was last of the ranked tires, and the summer reference was far behind everything.

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
11.5 ft/s² Best
11.4 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
11.4 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
RefReference Budget
11.1 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
11.1 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
11.1 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
11.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
11.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
10.9 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
6.5 ft/s² -5.0 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 43.3% (5 ft/s²).

Wet

Four winter tires stopped shorter in the wet than the summer reference. The Pirelli was best, ahead of the Continental, Michelin and Hankook, the same four that had the shortest wet stops in the qualifier. The ranked tires were spread by 41 feet, with the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 needing the most room, and the budget tire needed a further 49 feet beyond that, 90 feet more than the Pirelli.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
169 ft Best 0 mph
174 ft +5 ft 13 mph
184 ft +15 ft 23 mph
186 ft +17 ft 24 mph
RefReference Summer
188 ft +19 ft 25 mph
192 ft +23 ft 27 mph
193 ft +24 ft 28 mph
195 ft +26 ft 29 mph
195 ft +26 ft 29 mph
195 ft +26 ft 29 mph
196 ft +27 ft 30 mph
197 ft +28 ft 30 mph
197 ft +28 ft 30 mph
197 ft +28 ft 30 mph
199 ft +30 ft 31 mph
201 ft +32 ft 32 mph
201 ft +32 ft 32 mph
202 ft +33 ft 32 mph
205 ft +36 ft 33 mph
207 ft +38 ft 34 mph
210 ft +41 ft 35 mph
RefReference Budget
260 ft +91 ft 47 mph

The difference between best and worst was 53.3% (91 ft ≈ 6.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 would still be travelling at 35 mph when the Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The summer reference was quickest on the wet handling course, but the Pirelli and Continental were close behind it, ahead of the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 and Bridgestone Blizzak 6. The Petlas was the slowest ranked tire, and the budget tire was a long way off the pace.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
51.8 mph +0.4 mph
51.4 mph Best
51.4 mph 0.0 mph
51.0 mph -0.4 mph
51.0 mph -0.4 mph
50.8 mph -0.6 mph
50.3 mph -1.1 mph
49.5 mph -1.9 mph
49.4 mph -2.0 mph
49.0 mph -2.4 mph
48.8 mph -2.6 mph
48.8 mph -2.6 mph
48.8 mph -2.6 mph
48.7 mph -2.7 mph
48.7 mph -2.7 mph
48.5 mph -2.9 mph
48.3 mph -3.1 mph
48.2 mph -3.2 mph
47.9 mph -3.5 mph
47.7 mph -3.7 mph
47.5 mph -3.9 mph
RefReference Budget
42.2 mph -9.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 18.6% (9.6 mph).

The wet circle followed the same pattern, with the summer reference fastest and the Pirelli, Continental and Goodyear the best of the winter tires. The Barum had the slowest lap of the ranked tires, and the budget tire was slower again by a wide margin.

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
11.59 s -0.55 s
12.14 s Best
12.29 s +0.15 s
12.38 s +0.24 s
12.5 s +0.36 s
12.51 s +0.37 s
12.53 s +0.39 s
12.54 s +0.40 s
12.56 s +0.42 s
12.56 s +0.42 s
12.62 s +0.48 s
12.63 s +0.49 s
12.63 s +0.49 s
12.68 s +0.54 s
12.69 s +0.55 s
12.7 s +0.56 s
12.78 s +0.64 s
12.81 s +0.67 s
12.83 s +0.69 s
12.85 s +0.71 s
12.89 s +0.75 s
RefReference Budget
14.54 s +2.40 s

The difference between best and worst was 25.5% (2.95 s).

The summer reference also resisted straight-line aquaplaning longest, with the Kleber and the Semperit Speed-Grip 5 the best of the winter tires. The Pirelli, so strong elsewhere in the wet, floated earlier than every ranked tire except the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
58.3 mph +0.1 mph
58.2 mph Best
58.1 mph -0.1 mph
57.6 mph -0.6 mph
57.5 mph -0.7 mph
57.5 mph -0.7 mph
57.2 mph -1.0 mph
56.9 mph -1.3 mph
56.8 mph -1.4 mph
56.4 mph -1.8 mph
56.4 mph -1.8 mph
56.2 mph -2.0 mph
56.0 mph -2.2 mph
55.9 mph -2.3 mph
55.9 mph -2.3 mph
55.6 mph -2.6 mph
55.6 mph -2.6 mph
55.4 mph -2.8 mph
55.4 mph -2.8 mph
55.3 mph -2.9 mph
54.7 mph -3.5 mph
RefReference Budget
50.4 mph -7.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.6% (7.9 mph).

In curved aquaplaning the Maxxis kept the most lateral grip of the winter tires, ahead of the BFGoodrich and the Giti GitiWinter W2, with the summer reference better again. The Viking WinTech NewGen was the weakest ranked tire, and the budget tire was last, as it was in every wet test.

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
10.7 ft/s² +1.3 ft/s²
9.4 ft/s² Best
9.3 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
9.2 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
9.1 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
9.1 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
9.0 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
9.0 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
8.8 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
8.7 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
8.7 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
8.6 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
8.3 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
8.1 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
8.1 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
8.0 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
7.7 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²
7.6 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
7.6 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
7.5 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
7.3 ft/s² -2.1 ft/s²
RefReference Budget
5.1 ft/s² -4.3 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 52.3% (5.6 ft/s²).

Dry

On dry roads the summer reference stopped 24 feet shorter than the best winter tire, the comparatively inexpensive Kumho WinterCraft WP52+, with the Michelin and Pirelli next. The Lassa and Semperit shared the longest distance of the ranked tires, with the budget tire just behind them.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
115 ft -23 ft 0 mph
138 ft Best 0 mph
139 ft +1 ft 7 mph
140 ft +2 ft 9 mph
143 ft +5 ft 15 mph
143 ft +5 ft 15 mph
144 ft +6 ft 16 mph
144 ft +6 ft 16 mph
145 ft +7 ft 17 mph
146 ft +8 ft 18 mph
147 ft +9 ft 19 mph
147 ft +9 ft 19 mph
147 ft +9 ft 19 mph
148 ft +10 ft 20 mph
150 ft +12 ft 22 mph
151 ft +13 ft 23 mph
152 ft +14 ft 24 mph
152 ft +14 ft 24 mph
154 ft +16 ft 25 mph
155 ft +17 ft 26 mph
155 ft +17 ft 26 mph
RefReference Budget
156 ft +18 ft 27 mph

The difference between best and worst was 36% (41 ft ≈ 2.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Semperit Speed Grip 5 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The summer reference was also fastest on the dry handling course. The Continental and Pirelli shared the best winter tire speed, with the Hankook a fraction behind, while the Firestone and BFGoodrich were the slowest ranked tires and the budget tire was slowest of all.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
70.6 mph +1.2 mph
69.4 mph Best
69.4 mph Best
69.3 mph -0.1 mph
69.2 mph -0.2 mph
68.9 mph -0.5 mph
68.8 mph -0.6 mph
68.8 mph -0.6 mph
68.7 mph -0.7 mph
68.7 mph -0.7 mph
68.7 mph -0.7 mph
68.6 mph -0.8 mph
68.5 mph -0.9 mph
68.5 mph -0.9 mph
68.5 mph -0.9 mph
68.4 mph -1.0 mph
68.2 mph -1.2 mph
68.0 mph -1.4 mph
67.9 mph -1.5 mph
67.5 mph -1.9 mph
67.3 mph -2.1 mph
RefReference Budget
66.4 mph -3.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6% (4.2 mph).

Comfort

The budget tire was the quietest in the pass-by noise measurement at 50 mph, the only test it won. Of the ranked tires the Goodyear and Viking were the quietest, and the Lassa was the loudest.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Budget
69.8 dB -1.20 dB
71 dB Best
71 dB Best
71.1 dB +0.10 dB
71.6 dB +0.60 dB
71.7 dB +0.70 dB
71.8 dB +0.80 dB
71.9 dB +0.90 dB
72.1 dB +1.10 dB
72.1 dB +1.10 dB
72.3 dB +1.30 dB
72.4 dB +1.40 dB
72.4 dB +1.40 dB
72.5 dB +1.50 dB
72.6 dB +1.60 dB
72.7 dB +1.70 dB
72.9 dB +1.90 dB
RefReference Summer
73 dB +2.00 dB
73.4 dB +2.40 dB
73.5 dB +2.50 dB
73.8 dB +2.80 dB
74.6 dB +3.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.9% (4.8 dB).

Ride comfort is the one dry-road score Auto Bild rates by feel rather than by measurement. The Continental was judged the most comfortable, followed by the Hankook, Goodyear, Kumho and Vredestein, and the Viking was rated the least comfortable.

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
9.8 Points Best
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
8.6 Points -1.20 Points
8.4 Points -1.40 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8 Points -1.80 Points
7.8 Points -2.00 Points
7.8 Points -2.00 Points
7.6 Points -2.20 Points
7.6 Points -2.20 Points
7.4 Points -2.40 Points
7.2 Points -2.60 Points

The difference between best and worst was 26.5% (2.6 Points).

Value

The Michelin lasted longest in the wear test, with the Goodyear and Hankook also beyond 34,175 miles. The Viking, one of the cheapest sets, wore fastest.

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
35,107 miles Best
34,983 miles -124 miles
34,517 miles -590 miles
33,989 miles -1,118 miles
33,834 miles -1,273 miles
33,740 miles -1,367 miles
33,461 miles -1,646 miles
32,529 miles -2,578 miles
32,405 miles -2,702 miles
32,063 miles -3,044 miles
31,876 miles -3,231 miles
31,690 miles -3,417 miles
30,323 miles -4,784 miles
30,261 miles -4,846 miles
30,199 miles -4,908 miles
29,919 miles -5,188 miles
29,515 miles -5,592 miles
28,738 miles -6,369 miles
28,707 miles -6,400 miles
27,030 miles -8,077 miles

The difference between best and worst was 23% (8,077 miles).

The Viking did have the lowest rolling resistance, ahead of the Bridgestone and Petlas, while the Vredestein had the highest.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.46 kg/t Best $0
7.55 kg/t +0.09 kg/t $4
7.62 kg/t +0.16 kg/t $6
7.64 kg/t +0.18 kg/t $7
7.66 kg/t +0.20 kg/t $8
7.74 kg/t +0.28 kg/t $11
7.76 kg/t +0.30 kg/t $12
7.77 kg/t +0.31 kg/t $12
7.95 kg/t +0.49 kg/t $19
7.99 kg/t +0.53 kg/t $21
8 kg/t +0.54 kg/t $21
8.06 kg/t +0.60 kg/t $24
8.14 kg/t +0.68 kg/t $27
8.2 kg/t +0.74 kg/t $29
8.34 kg/t +0.88 kg/t $35
8.35 kg/t +0.89 kg/t $35
8.38 kg/t +0.92 kg/t $36
8.59 kg/t +1.13 kg/t $45
8.67 kg/t +1.21 kg/t $48
8.8 kg/t +1.34 kg/t $53

The difference between best and worst was 18% (1.34 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ uses about 15 gal ($53) more fuel than the Viking WinTech NewGen.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Putting price and wear together, the Maxxis is the cheapest to run per kilometer, ahead of the GT Radial and Petlas, the three least expensive sets in the test. The joint-winning Continental is the most expensive per kilometer, with the Pirelli and Michelin next.

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
10.27 Price/1000 Best €23.73
11.16 Price/1000 +0.89 Price/1000 €23.35
11.42 Price/1000 +1.15 Price/1000 €21.63
12.12 Price/1000 +1.85 Price/1000 €26.64
12.8 Price/1000 +2.53 Price/1000 €29.09
13.04 Price/1000 +2.77 Price/1000 €24.91
13.81 Price/1000 +3.54 Price/1000 €27.09
14.12 Price/1000 +3.85 Price/1000 €31.82
14.25 Price/1000 +3.98 Price/1000 €25.53
14.4 Price/1000 +4.13 Price/1000 €26.23
14.5 Price/1000 +4.23 Price/1000 €31.02
14.61 Price/1000 +4.34 Price/1000 €27.42
14.86 Price/1000 +4.59 Price/1000 €27.14
15.2 Price/1000 +4.93 Price/1000 €30.18
17.05 Price/1000 +6.78 Price/1000 €31.15
17.3 Price/1000 +7.03 Price/1000 €37.90
17.57 Price/1000 +7.30 Price/1000 €30.95
18.23 Price/1000 +7.96 Price/1000 €35.21
19.3 Price/1000 +9.03 Price/1000 €36.33
20.49 Price/1000 +10.22 Price/1000 €39.50

The difference between best and worst was 99.5% (10.22 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport) works out €447 cheaper than the most expensive (Continental WinterContact TS 870 P).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2026 test; financing costs are excluded.

Results

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 share the win by different routes: the Continental through its wet results, dry handling and comfort, the Michelin through its snow grip, dry braking and the longest tread life. They are also the two most expensive sets. The Hankook and Pirelli complete the exemplary group, the Pirelli with the shortest wet braking and the fastest wet handling of any winter tire. Auto Bild points to the Kumho, Barum and Kleber as good-value choices among the tires rated good, and the Kleber is the best tire here on snow. Every tire from the BFGoodrich in 11th downwards carries a safety penalty, and the budget tire, close to the field on snow, was last in every wet test. For the full grades and Auto Bild's scoring, read the original test.

Joint 1st

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

245/45 R19 102V XL
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Auto Bild Test Winner / Exemplary Testsieger / vorbildlich
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 shares the test win with the Continental and earns an 'exemplary' verdict. It is the more snow-focused of the two winners and the longest-lasting tire here, and its main drawback is the highest price in the test.
Dry99.3%
Wet95.3%
Snow99.5%
Comfort97.5%
Value85.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 20139 ft+1 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 2068.9 mph-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 20184 ft+15 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 2050.8 mph-0.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better4th / 2012.5 s+0.36 s
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 2056.4 mph-1.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better13th / 208.1 ft/s²-1.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 2095 ft0 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 201,195 lbf-14 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 2035.9 mph-0.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better1st / 2011.5 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 209.4 Points-0.40 Points
NoiseLower is better5th / 2071.7 dB+0.70 dB
WearHigher is better1st / 2035,107 milesBest in this discipline
ValueLower is better18th / 2018.23 Price/1000+7.96 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better13th / 208.14 kg/t+0.68 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/72
Weight
11.49 kgs
Price
1030.00
Joint 1st

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

245/45 R19 102V XL
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Auto Bild Test Winner / Exemplary Testsieger / vorbildlich
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P shares the test win and the top 'exemplary' verdict with the Michelin. It earned its place mainly in the wet, where Auto Bild rated it the best tire, backed by sharp dry handling and the best ride comfort. The main drawback is cost.
Dry97.7%
Wet98.5%
Snow98.8%
Comfort99.2%
Value78.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 20145 ft+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 2069.4 mphBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 20174 ft+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 2051.4 mph0.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 2012.29 s+0.15 s
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 2057.5 mph-0.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 209.0 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better10th / 2096 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better4th / 201,187 lbf-22 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 2035.9 mph-0.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 2011.3 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 209.8 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better8th / 2072.1 dB+1.10 dB
WearHigher is better13th / 2030,323 miles-4,784 miles
ValueLower is better20th / 2020.49 Price/1000+10.22 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better14th / 208.2 kg/t+0.74 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/71
Weight
11.32 kgs
Price
1000.00
Joint 3rd

Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4

245/45 R19 102V XL
Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4
The Hankook Winter i*cept evo 4, new to the market this season, shares third place and an 'exemplary' verdict. It is a strong all-rounder with especially good dry-road manners and low running costs, without leading on snow.
Dry98.2%
Wet94.7%
Snow97.8%
Comfort98.2%
Value90.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 20143 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 2069.3 mph-0.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 20186 ft+17 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 2049.4 mph-2.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 2012.56 s+0.42 s
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 2056.4 mph-1.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 209.0 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 2096 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better7th / 201,179 lbf-30 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better12th / 2034.9 mph-1.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better11th / 2011.2 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 209.6 Points-0.20 Points
NoiseLower is better8th / 2072.1 dB+1.10 dB
WearHigher is better3rd / 2034,517 miles-590 miles
ValueLower is better10th / 2014.4 Price/1000+4.13 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 207.64 kg/t+0.18 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/72
Weight
12.26 kgs
Price
800.00
Joint 3rd

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

245/45 R19 102V XL
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
The Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 shares third place and an 'exemplary' verdict. It is the strongest tire here for wet and dry grip, with snow performance a step behind the leaders.
Dry99.3%
Wet98.3%
Snow97.5%
Comfort97.5%
Value81.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 20140 ft+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 2069.4 mphBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 20169 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 2051.4 mphBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 2012.14 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better19th / 2055.3 mph-2.9 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better17th / 207.6 ft/s²-1.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better14th / 2097 ft+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better13th / 201,152 lbf-57 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 2035.4 mph-0.6 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 2011.3 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 209.4 Points-0.40 Points
NoiseLower is better4th / 2071.6 dB+0.60 dB
WearHigher is better11th / 2031,876 miles-3,231 miles
ValueLower is better19th / 2019.3 Price/1000+9.03 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better11th / 208 kg/t+0.54 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/70
Weight
11.47 kgs
Price
990.00
Joint 5th

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

245/45 R19 102W XL
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 shares fifth place with a 'good' verdict. It is a well-balanced tire in the wet and dry with low rolling resistance, held back by middling snow results and a high price.
Dry96.7%
Wet95.1%
Snow97.6%
Comfort92.2%
Value85.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better13th / 20148 ft+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 2069.2 mph-0.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 20192 ft+23 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 2051.0 mph-0.4 mph
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 2012.51 s+0.37 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 2056.8 mph-1.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 209.1 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better12th / 2096 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 201,181 lbf-28 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better13th / 2034.9 mph-1.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better11th / 2011.2 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 208.6 Points-1.20 Points
NoiseLower is better18th / 2073.5 dB+2.50 dB
WearHigher is better8th / 2032,529 miles-2,578 miles
ValueLower is better17th / 2017.57 Price/1000+7.30 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 207.55 kg/t+0.09 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/72
Weight
10.93 kgs
Price
920.00
Joint 5th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

245/45 R19 102V XL
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 shares fifth place with a 'good' verdict. It is a long-lasting, quiet and comfortable tire with good wet handling, but it does not lead any of the snow, wet or dry driving tests.
Dry97.1%
Wet94.4%
Snow98.4%
Comfort99%
Value87.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 20144 ft+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better16th / 2068.2 mph-1.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 20195 ft+26 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 2051.0 mph-0.4 mph
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 2012.38 s+0.24 s
Straight AquaHigher is better12th / 2056.0 mph-2.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 208.3 ft/s²-1.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better12th / 2096 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better10th / 201,174 lbf-35 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 2035.7 mph-0.3 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 2011.3 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 209.6 Points-0.20 Points
NoiseLower is better1st / 2071 dBBest in this discipline
WearHigher is better2nd / 2034,983 miles-124 miles
ValueLower is better15th / 2017.05 Price/1000+6.78 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 207.76 kg/t+0.30 kg/t
EU Label
C/C/70
Weight
11.19 kgs
Price
960.00
Joint 5th

Kleber Krisalp HP3

245/45 R19 102V XL
Kleber Krisalp HP3
The Kleber Krisalp HP3, from Michelin's second brand, shares fifth place with a 'good' verdict. It is the best snow tire in the test and one of Auto Bild's good-value picks, with some ground given away on wet roads.
Dry96.7%
Wet93%
Snow99.7%
Comfort90.8%
Value89.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 20146 ft+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 2068.5 mph-0.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 20196 ft+27 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better12th / 2048.8 mph-2.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better15th / 2012.7 s+0.56 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 2058.2 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 209.1 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 2095 ft0 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 201,209 lbfBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 2036.0 mphBest in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better3rd / 2011.4 ft/s²-0.1 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better10th / 208.2 Points-1.60 Points
NoiseLower is better13th / 2072.5 dB+1.50 dB
WearHigher is better6th / 2033,740 miles-1,367 miles
ValueLower is better7th / 2013.81 Price/1000+3.54 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 207.95 kg/t+0.49 kg/t
EU Label
B/B/70
Weight
11.22 kgs
Price
750.00
Joint 8th

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

245/45 R19 102V XL
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
The Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ shares eighth place with a 'good' verdict. Its dry braking and wet braking make it a strong lower-cost option, and Auto Bild names it as a good-value pick, with snow braking its main weakness.
Dry99.6%
Wet92.7%
Snow97.1%
Comfort97.8%
Value90%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 20138 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 2068.8 mph-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 20193 ft+24 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better9th / 2049.0 mph-2.4 mph
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 2012.63 s+0.49 s
Straight AquaHigher is better18th / 2055.4 mph-2.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better13th / 208.1 ft/s²-1.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better17th / 2098 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better12th / 201,158 lbf-51 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better8th / 2035.3 mph-0.7 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better11th / 2011.2 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 209.6 Points-0.20 Points
NoiseLower is better15th / 2072.7 dB+1.70 dB
WearHigher is better9th / 2032,405 miles-2,702 miles
ValueLower is better6th / 2013.04 Price/1000+2.77 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 207.77 kg/t+0.31 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/71
Weight
11.19 kgs
Price
680.00
Joint 8th

Vredestein Wintrac Pro+

245/45 R19 102W XL
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ shares eighth place with a 'good' verdict. It is one of the best tires for snow braking and handling, with competitive wet results, but its running costs let it down.
Dry96.6%
Wet93.6%
Snow98.6%
Comfort97.9%
Value76.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 20147 ft+9 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better11th / 2068.6 mph-0.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 20195 ft+26 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 2050.3 mph-1.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better7th / 2012.54 s+0.40 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 2057.5 mph-0.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better15th / 208.0 ft/s²-1.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 2095 ftBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 201,177 lbf-32 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 2036.0 mphBest in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better15th / 2011.1 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 209.6 Points-0.20 Points
NoiseLower is better14th / 2072.6 dB+1.60 dB
WearHigher is better18th / 2028,738 miles-6,369 miles
ValueLower is better16th / 2017.3 Price/1000+7.03 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better20th / 208.8 kg/t+1.34 kg/t
EU Label
C/C/72
Weight
12.91 kgs
Price
800.00
10th

Barum Polaris 6

245/45 R19 102V XL
Barum Polaris 6
The Barum Polaris 6 finishes tenth with a 'good' verdict and no safety penalty. Auto Bild names it as one of the good-value choices, with strong snow braking offset by weaker wet and dry handling.
Dry94%
Wet91.4%
Snow97.6%
Comfort92.8%
Value84%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better18th / 20154 ft+16 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better18th / 2067.9 mph-1.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 20195 ft+26 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better15th / 2048.5 mph-2.9 mph
Wet CircleLower is better20th / 2012.89 s+0.75 s
Straight AquaHigher is better16th / 2055.6 mph-2.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better16th / 207.7 ft/s²-1.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 2095 ft0 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better14th / 201,151 lbf-58 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better13th / 2034.9 mph-1.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better2nd / 2011.4 ft/s²-0.1 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better9th / 208.4 Points-1.40 Points
NoiseLower is better3rd / 2071.1 dB+0.10 dB
WearHigher is better12th / 2031,690 miles-3,417 miles
ValueLower is better8th / 2014.12 Price/1000+3.85 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better19th / 208.67 kg/t+1.21 kg/t
EU Label
D/C/72
Weight
12.84 kgs
Price
720.00
11th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

245/45 R19 102V XL
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 finishes 11th with a 'good' verdict. It is one of the better tires on snow, but imprecise dry handling cost it a safety penalty and a place in the top ten.
Dry95.7%
Wet92.8%
Snow99.1%
Comfort90.9%
Value89%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better12th / 20147 ft+9 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better19th / 2067.5 mph-1.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 20197 ft+28 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better13th / 2048.7 mph-2.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better17th / 2012.81 s+0.67 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 2057.2 mph-1.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 209.3 ft/s²-0.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 2095 ft0 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 201,209 lbf0 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better6th / 2035.5 mph-0.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better9th / 2011.3 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better10th / 208.2 Points-1.60 Points
NoiseLower is better10th / 2072.3 dB+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better7th / 2033,461 miles-1,646 miles
ValueLower is better13th / 2014.86 Price/1000+4.59 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 207.66 kg/t+0.20 kg/t
EU Label
B/B/70
Weight
11.41 kgs
Price
800.00
Joint 12th

Giti GitiWinterW2

245/45 R19 102W XL
Giti GitiWinterW2
The Giti GitiWinter W2 shares 12th place with a 'good' verdict. It wears well and resists aquaplaning, but weak snow results and a safety penalty keep it in the lower half.
Dry97.6%
Wet93%
Snow95.1%
Comfort90.5%
Value88.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 20143 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better15th / 2068.4 mph-1.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better15th / 20201 ft+32 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 2049.5 mph-1.9 mph
Wet CircleLower is better10th / 2012.62 s+0.48 s
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 2056.9 mph-1.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 209.2 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better19th / 2098 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better18th / 201,138 lbf-71 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better19th / 2033.7 mph-2.3 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better16th / 2011.1 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better10th / 208.2 Points-1.60 Points
NoiseLower is better16th / 2072.9 dB+1.90 dB
WearHigher is better4th / 2033,989 miles-1,118 miles
ValueLower is better5th / 2012.8 Price/1000+2.53 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better18th / 208.59 kg/t+1.13 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
Weight
12.40 kgs
Price
700.00
Joint 12th

Viking WinTech NewGen

245/45 R19 102V XL
Viking WinTech NewGen
The Viking WinTech NewGen shares 12th place with a 'good' verdict. It is efficient, quiet and decent on snow, but short tread life and weak wet handling, which brought a safety penalty, hold it back.
Dry94.9%
Wet90.6%
Snow97.9%
Comfort86.7%
Value83.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better16th / 20152 ft+14 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better12th / 2068.5 mph-0.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 20197 ft+28 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better18th / 2047.9 mph-3.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better19th / 2012.85 s+0.71 s
Straight AquaHigher is better15th / 2055.6 mph-2.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better20th / 207.3 ft/s²-2.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 2096 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 201,182 lbf-27 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better9th / 2035.2 mph-0.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better14th / 2011.2 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better20th / 207.2 Points-2.60 Points
NoiseLower is better1st / 2071 dBBest in this discipline
WearHigher is better20th / 2027,030 miles-8,077 miles
ValueLower is better9th / 2014.25 Price/1000+3.98 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 207.46 kg/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
C/C/72
Weight
12.15 kgs
Price
620.00
Joint 12th

Semperit Speed Grip 5

245/45 R19 102V XL
Semperit Speed Grip 5
The Semperit Speed-Grip 5 shares 12th place with a 'good' verdict. Good aquaplaning resistance is offset by long dry braking and modest wet grip.
Dry94.2%
Wet92.3%
Snow97%
Comfort89.2%
Value83.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better19th / 20155 ft+17 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 2068.7 mph-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 20197 ft+28 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better17th / 2048.2 mph-3.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better16th / 2012.78 s+0.64 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 2058.1 mph-0.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 208.8 ft/s²-0.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better10th / 2096 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better19th / 201,132 lbf-77 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better11th / 2035.0 mph-1.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 2011.3 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better14th / 208 Points-1.80 Points
NoiseLower is better17th / 2073.4 dB+2.40 dB
WearHigher is better14th / 2030,261 miles-4,846 miles
ValueLower is better14th / 2015.2 Price/1000+4.93 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better12th / 208.06 kg/t+0.60 kg/t
EU Label
C/C/72
Weight
12.70 kgs
Price
740.00
15th

Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6

245/45 R19 102W XL
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
The Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 finishes 15th with a 'satisfactory' verdict. It is excellent value and resists aquaplaning well, but its long wet braking is a clear safety drawback.
Dry95.4%
Wet91.5%
Snow96.6%
Comfort87.8%
Value93%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better14th / 20150 ft+12 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 2068.5 mph-0.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better20th / 20210 ft+41 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better14th / 2048.7 mph-2.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better13th / 2012.68 s+0.54 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 2057.6 mph-0.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 209.4 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 2095 ft0 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better11th / 201,162 lbf-47 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better17th / 2033.7 mph-2.3 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better10th / 2011.2 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better17th / 207.6 Points-2.20 Points
NoiseLower is better11th / 2072.4 dB+1.40 dB
WearHigher is better10th / 2032,063 miles-3,044 miles
ValueLower is better1st / 2010.27 Price/1000Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better15th / 208.34 kg/t+0.88 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/69
Weight
12.09 kgs
Price
530.00
Joint 16th

Firestone Winterhawk 4

245/45 R19 102V XL
Firestone Winterhawk 4
The Firestone Winterhawk 4 shares 16th place with a 'satisfactory' verdict. It is dependable on snow but weak in the wet and on dry roads.
Dry94.5%
Wet89.9%
Snow98.1%
Comfort89.2%
Value85.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better15th / 20151 ft+13 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better20th / 2067.3 mph-2.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better19th / 20207 ft+38 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better16th / 2048.3 mph-3.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better14th / 2012.69 s+0.55 s
Straight AquaHigher is better20th / 2054.7 mph-3.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better19th / 207.5 ft/s²-1.9 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 2096 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better9th / 201,176 lbf-33 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better10th / 2035.0 mph-1.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 2011.3 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better15th / 207.8 Points-2.00 Points
NoiseLower is better7th / 2071.9 dB+0.90 dB
WearHigher is better15th / 2030,199 miles-4,908 miles
ValueLower is better12th / 2014.61 Price/1000+4.34 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 207.74 kg/t+0.28 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/71
Weight
11.19 kgs
Price
710.00
Joint 16th

GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport

245/45 R19 102V XL
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport
The GT Radial WinterPro 2 Sport shares 16th place with a 'satisfactory' verdict. It is cheap to buy and to run, but weak snow handling counts against it in a winter tire test.
Dry97%
Wet92.2%
Snow94.9%
Comfort86.8%
Value89.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 20144 ft+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better17th / 2068.0 mph-1.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better15th / 20201 ft+32 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 2048.8 mph-2.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 2012.56 s+0.42 s
Straight AquaHigher is better17th / 2055.4 mph-2.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 208.7 ft/s²-0.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better16th / 2097 ft+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better16th / 201,139 lbf-70 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better20th / 2033.4 mph-2.6 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better17th / 2011.0 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better19th / 207.4 Points-2.40 Points
NoiseLower is better11th / 2072.4 dB+1.40 dB
WearHigher is better17th / 2029,515 miles-5,592 miles
ValueLower is better2nd / 2011.16 Price/1000+0.89 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 207.99 kg/t+0.53 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/72
Weight
12.06 kgs
Price
530.00
Joint 16th

Matador MP93 Nordicca

245/45 R19 102V XL
Matador MP93 Nordicca
The Matador MP93 Nordicca shares 16th place with a 'satisfactory' verdict. It is long-lasting and cheap to run, but weak in the wet.
Dry95%
Wet90.5%
Snow95.1%
Comfort89.2%
Value90.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better16th / 20152 ft+14 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 2068.7 mph-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better18th / 20205 ft+36 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better19th / 2047.7 mph-3.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better18th / 2012.83 s+0.69 s
Straight AquaHigher is better14th / 2055.9 mph-2.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 208.7 ft/s²-0.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better14th / 2097 ft+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better20th / 201,120 lbf-89 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better15th / 2034.0 mph-2.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better17th / 2011.0 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better15th / 207.8 Points-2.00 Points
NoiseLower is better6th / 2071.8 dB+0.80 dB
WearHigher is better5th / 2033,834 miles-1,273 miles
ValueLower is better4th / 2012.12 Price/1000+1.85 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better16th / 208.35 kg/t+0.89 kg/t
EU Label
D/C/72
Weight
12.86 kgs
Price
660.00
Joint 16th

Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport

245/45 R19 102V XL
Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport
The Petlas Snowmaster 2 Sport shares 16th place with a 'satisfactory' verdict. It is a low-cost option with good efficiency, but its wet and snow grip trail the field.
Dry96.7%
Wet90.6%
Snow95%
Comfort89.9%
Value91.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 20147 ft+9 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 2068.7 mph-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better17th / 20202 ft+33 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better20th / 2047.5 mph-3.9 mph
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 2012.53 s+0.39 s
Straight AquaHigher is better13th / 2055.9 mph-2.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better17th / 207.6 ft/s²-1.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better17th / 2098 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better17th / 201,139 lbf-70 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better15th / 2034.0 mph-2.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better20th / 2010.8 ft/s²-0.7 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better10th / 208.2 Points-1.60 Points
NoiseLower is better19th / 2073.8 dB+2.80 dB
WearHigher is better16th / 2029,919 miles-5,188 miles
ValueLower is better3rd / 2011.42 Price/1000+1.15 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 207.62 kg/t+0.16 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/72
Weight
12.04 kgs
Price
550.00
20th

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

245/45 R19 102V XL
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
The Lassa Competus Winter 2+ finishes last of the 20 ranked tires with a 'satisfactory' verdict. Its wet results are respectable, but long braking on snow and dry roads puts it at the bottom of the order.
Dry94.3%
Wet92.3%
Snow94.8%
Comfort86.4%
Value81.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (16)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better19th / 20155 ft+17 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 2068.8 mph-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better14th / 20199 ft+30 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 2048.8 mph-2.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 2012.63 s+0.49 s
Straight AquaHigher is better11th / 2056.2 mph-2.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11th / 208.6 ft/s²-0.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better20th / 2099 ft+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better15th / 201,143 lbf-66 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better17th / 2033.7 mph-2.3 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better19th / 2010.9 ft/s²-0.6 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better17th / 207.6 Points-2.20 Points
NoiseLower is better20th / 2074.6 dB+3.60 dB
WearHigher is better19th / 2028,707 miles-6,400 miles
ValueLower is better11th / 2014.5 Price/1000+4.23 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better17th / 208.38 kg/t+0.92 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/71
Weight
12.16 kgs
Price
670.00
Reference Tire

Reference Summer

245/45 R19
Reference Summer
The summer reference is an unnamed summer tire from a major brand, run outside the classification as a benchmark. It shows how much dry and wet grip a winter tire gives up, and why it is worth switching back to summer or all-season tires once winter is over.
All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestResult
Dry BrakingLower is better115 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better70.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better188 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better51.8 mph
Wet CircleLower is better11.59 s
Straight AquaHigher is better58.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better146 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better567 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better17.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better6.5 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better73 dB
Reference Tire

Reference Budget

245/45 R19
Reference Budget
The budget tire is not named by Auto Bild. It ran outside the classification, as an example of the weakest tires from the qualifier, and has no grade. Its snow results are close to the ranked field, but its wet grip is far below every other tire in the test.
All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestResult
Dry BrakingLower is better156 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better66.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better260 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better42.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better14.54 s
Straight AquaHigher is better50.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better97 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better1,164 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better35.4 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better11.1 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better69.8 dB

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.