Menu

Test source Tire Rack

2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tire Test

Overall test winnerBridgestone Blizzak IcePeak

Tire Rack's latest winter test puts three new studless winter tires head to head on a 2025 Toyota Camry in 215/55 R17: the Bridgestone Blizzak IcePeak, the Continental VikingContact 8 and the Michelin X-Ice Snow+.

Test data in partnership withTire Rack

Tires tested
3
Tested size
215/55 R17
Test vehicle
2025 Toyota Camry
Disciplines
12

At a glance

Tire shortlist

3 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Bridgestone Blizzak IcePeak

+The Bridgestone Blizzak IcePeak was the strongest tire on snow and ice, with the shortest braking on both surfaces, the fastest snow lap and the highest snow handling score. It was also the best of the three in the dry, leading on both braking and cornering grip, and it was the quietest on the road.

−On-road steering was the weakest of the three: slow to respond at town speeds and short of on-center feel on the highway. It was also third in the wet for both braking and cornering grip, although the three tires were closely matched there, and small sharp bumps came through a little more than on the VikingContact 8.

2nd

Continental VikingContact 8

+The Continental VikingContact 8 had the most comfortable ride of the three, with noise and steering close to the best, so on clear roads it drives more like a touring tire than a winter tire. It was second on the snow lap, ahead of the X-Ice Snow+, and second for both wet braking and wet cornering grip.

−The VikingContact 8 had the longest braking on both snow and ice and was the slowest to accelerate on ice. On the snow track the front did not turn in as readily as the other two, and the rear could step out on the exit of corners.

3rd

Michelin X Ice Snow+

+The Michelin X-Ice Snow+ was the best of the three in the wet, leading on both braking and cornering grip, and it was the quickest to accelerate on ice. Its steering was the most precise and responsive in the test, and it was second for braking on both snow and ice.

−The X-Ice Snow+ was the slowest round the snow handling track, where it needed a delicate touch near the limit and was slow to recover once it began to slide. It was also the noisiest of the three and last in the dry for both braking and cornering grip.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2026 Tire Rack New Winter Tire Test · 215/55 R17

TireBridgestone Blizzak IcePeakContinental VikingContact 8Michelin X Ice Snow+
Position1st2nd3rd
Category scores (% of best)
Dry99.8%94.8%93.5%
Wet97.1%98.7%100%
Snow100%93.7%93.2%
Ice99.7%89.5%97.7%
Comfort98.4%98.4%92.2%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Tire Rack's latest winter test puts three new studless winter tires head to head on a 2025 Toyota Camry in 215/55 R17: the Bridgestone Blizzak IcePeak, the Continental VikingContact 8 and the Michelin X-Ice Snow+. The Blizzak IcePeak, which replaces both the Blizzak WS90 and the Blizzak DM-V2, came out on top with the shortest braking on snow and ice, the fastest snow lap and the best dry grip.

The other two each have their own strengths. The Michelin X-Ice Snow+ was the best in the wet on both braking and cornering grip, was the quickest to accelerate on ice and had the sharpest steering, but it was the slowest round the snow handling track. The Continental VikingContact 8 had the most comfortable ride and was second on the snow lap, though it had the longest braking on both snow and ice.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
24.9 → 0.0 mph
Ice Braking
11.8 → 0.0 mph

Tire Rack publish both their measured results and their drivers' subjective scores, which is what makes a close three-tire test like this one easy to read. They don't give an overall ranking, so the order here follows their verdicts, with the IcePeak named best overall, and their own road and snow overall ratings. For the driver commentary, the full set of subjective scores and the snow acceleration figures we haven't reproduced here, read Tire Rack's original test.

Snow

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (25 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
52 ft Best 0 mph
57 ft +5 ft 23 mph
57 ft +5 ft 25 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.5% (5 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Continental VikingContact 8 would still be travelling at 25 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak IcePeak had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Test data in partnership with

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
51.47 s Best
52.3 s +0.83 s
53.41 s +1.94 s

The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (1.94 s).

Test data in partnership with

Subj. Snow Handling

Subjective Snow Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
9.25 Points Best
8 Points -1.25 Points
8 Points -1.25 Points

The difference between best and worst was 13.5% (1.25 Points).

Test data in partnership with

Ice

Ice Braking

Ice braking in feet (12 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
36 ft Best 0 mph
37 ft +1 ft 17 mph
41 ft +5 ft 29 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (5 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Continental VikingContact 8 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak IcePeak had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Test data in partnership with

Ice Traction

Ice acceleration time

Lower is better ↓
Ice Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
4.91 s Best
4.94 s +0.03 s
5.31 s +0.40 s

The difference between best and worst was 8.1% (0.4 s).

Test data in partnership with

Wet

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
116 ft Best 0 mph
118 ft +2 ft 9 mph
120 ft +4 ft 14 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.1% (4 ft). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Blizzak IcePeak would still be travelling at 14 mph when the Michelin X Ice Snow+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Test data in partnership with

Wet Circle

Average cornering G force in the wet

Higher is better ↑
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
0.71 g Best
0.7 g -0.01 g
0.69 g -0.02 g

All the tires in the Wet Circle test finished less than 3% apart.

Test data in partnership with

Dry

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
94 ft Best 0 mph
99 ft +5 ft 18 mph
100 ft +6 ft 21 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.1% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Michelin X Ice Snow+ would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak IcePeak had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Test data in partnership with

Dry Circle

Average cornering G force in the dry

Higher is better ↓
Dry Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
0.83 g Best
0.82 g -0.01 g
0.81 g -0.02 g

All the tires in the Dry Circle test finished less than 3% apart.

Test data in partnership with

On the Road

Subj. Road Score

Subjective Real World Driving Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Road Score
Position / TireResultGap to best
8 Points Best
7.5 Points -0.50 Points
6 Points -2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 25% (2 Points).

Test data in partnership with

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
8 Points Best
7.75 Points -0.25 Points
7.75 Points -0.25 Points

The difference between best and worst was 3.1% (0.25 Points).

Test data in partnership with

Subj. Noise

Subjective in car noise levels

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
8 Points Best
7.75 Points -0.25 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 12.5% (1 Points).

Test data in partnership with

Results

1st

Bridgestone Blizzak IcePeak

215/55 R17 98H XL
Bridgestone Blizzak IcePeak
Tire Rack Test Winner / Best Overall Winter Performance
The Blizzak IcePeak is the overall winner and Bridgestone's single replacement for both the Blizzak WS90 and the Blizzak DM-V2. Its grip on snow and ice set it apart from two strong rivals, and the trade-offs are vaguer steering on clear roads and slightly weaker wet grip. It is the pick for drivers who regularly face real snow and ice.
Dry99.8%
Wet97.1%
Snow100%
Ice99.7%
Comfort98.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 394 ftBest in this discipline
Dry CircleHigher is better1st / 30.83 gBest in this discipline
Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better3rd / 36 Points-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 3120 ft+4 ft
Wet CircleHigher is better3rd / 30.69 g-0.02 g
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 352 ftBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingLower is better1st / 351.47 sBest in this discipline
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 39.25 PointsBest in this discipline
Ice BrakingLower is better1st / 336 ftBest in this discipline
Ice TractionLower is better2nd / 34.94 s+0.03 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 37.75 Points-0.25 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better1st / 38 PointsBest in this discipline
2nd

Continental VikingContact 8

215/55 R17 98H XL
Continental VikingContact 8
The VikingContact 8 finishes second and is the best all-rounder here, picked out for its balance. It gives up some snow and ice braking to the other two but is the nicest of the three to live with on cleared roads, which suits drivers whose winters mix dry commutes with the occasional storm.
Dry94.8%
Wet98.7%
Snow93.7%
Ice89.5%
Comfort98.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 399 ft+5 ft
Dry CircleHigher is better2nd / 30.82 g-0.01 g
Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better2nd / 37.5 Points-0.50 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 3118 ft+2 ft
Wet CircleHigher is better2nd / 30.7 g-0.01 g
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 357 ft+5 ft
Snow HandlingLower is better2nd / 352.3 s+0.83 s
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 38 Points-1.25 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better3rd / 341 ft+5 ft
Ice TractionLower is better3rd / 35.31 s+0.40 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 38 PointsBest in this discipline
Subj. NoiseHigher is better2nd / 37.75 Points-0.25 Points
3rd

Michelin X Ice Snow+

215/55 R17 98H XL
Michelin X Ice Snow+
The X-Ice Snow+ finishes third in a close test. As an update of the X-Ice Snow it brings the sharpest steering and the best wet grip in the group, which makes it a strong choice where winter brings more cold rain than deep snow, as long as a little more road noise is acceptable.
Dry93.5%
Wet100%
Snow93.2%
Ice97.7%
Comfort92.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 3100 ft+6 ft
Dry CircleHigher is better3rd / 30.81 g-0.02 g
Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better1st / 38 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 3116 ftBest in this discipline
Wet CircleHigher is better1st / 30.71 gBest in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 357 ft+5 ft
Snow HandlingLower is better3rd / 353.41 s+1.94 s
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 38 Points-1.25 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better2nd / 337 ft+1 ft
Ice TractionLower is better1st / 34.91 sBest in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 37.75 Points-0.25 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better3rd / 37 Points-1.00 Points

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.