Auto Bild has opened its 2026 winter tire test with its usual braking qualifier. Fifty winter tires in 245/45 R19, a size fitted to cars such as the BMW 5 Series, Mercedes E-Class and Audi A6, were braked on a wet surface and on snow, and the two stopping distances were added together. Only the 20 tires with the shortest combined distance go through to the full test.

The Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 tops the qualifier, with the shortest wet stop in the field. The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is second, ahead of the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 and the Hankook Winter i*cept evo 4. At the other end, the bottom 20 tires were not run on snow at all, and Auto Bild marks the twelve slowest wet stoppers, from the Tourador WinterPro TSU2 down, as not recommended.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Wet Braking: 49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking: 31.1 → 0.0 mph

The test car was a BMW 5 Series. The full test results for the 20 qualifiers will follow, and the complete qualifying table is in Auto Bild's original article.

Wet

Wet braking from 50 mph split the field widely. The P Zero Winter 2 stopped in 108 feet and the WinterContact TS 870 P in 111 feet, the only two tires to stop in under 115 feet. The Michelin and Hankook followed, and the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ was sixth on wet, just ahead of the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3. The Triangle Snowlink PL02 needed 166 feet, 58 feet further than the Pirelli.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Pirelli P Zero Winter 2	108 ft	Best	0 mph
2Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	111 ft	+3 ft	13 mph
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	118 ft	+10 ft	23 mph
4Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4	119 ft	+11 ft	24 mph
5Bridgestone Blizzak 6	123 ft	+15 ft	27 mph
6Kumho WinterCraft WP52+	123 ft	+15 ft	28 mph
7Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	124 ft	+16 ft	29 mph
8Vredestein Wintrac Pro+	125 ft	+17 ft	29 mph
8Barum Polaris 6	125 ft	+17 ft	29 mph
10Viking WinTech NewGen	126 ft	+18 ft	30 mph
10Kleber Krisalp HP3	126 ft	+18 ft	30 mph
10BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2	126 ft	+18 ft	30 mph
10Semperit Speed Grip 5	126 ft	+18 ft	30 mph
14Lassa Competus Winter 2+	128 ft	+20 ft	31 mph
15Landsail Winter Lander	129 ft	+21 ft	32 mph
15GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport	129 ft	+21 ft	32 mph
17Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport	129 ft	+21 ft	32 mph
18Giti GitiWinterW2	130 ft	+22 ft	33 mph
19Matador MP93 Nordicca	131 ft	+23 ft	33 mph
20Firestone Winterhawk 4	133 ft	+25 ft	34 mph
21Crosswind Grip Peak Winter	133 ft	+25 ft	34 mph
22Linglong Sport Master Winter	133 ft	+25 ft	35 mph
23Wanli Winter Max A1 SW211	134 ft	+26 ft	35 mph
23Gripmax SureGrip Pro Winter	134 ft	+26 ft	35 mph
25Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	135 ft	+27 ft	35 mph
25Fulda Kristall Control HP2	135 ft	+27 ft	35 mph
27Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	139 ft	+31 ft	38 mph
28Ceat WinterDrive Sport	139 ft	+31 ft	38 mph
29Nankang SV3	140 ft	+32 ft	38 mph
30Superia Bluewin UHP2	140 ft	+32 ft	38 mph
31Radar Dimax Winter	141 ft	+33 ft	39 mph
32Milever Winter maX A1 MW255	143 ft	+35 ft	39 mph
33Fortuna Gowin UHP 2	144 ft	+36 ft	40 mph
34Marshal MW51	145 ft	+37 ft	40 mph
35Goodride ZuperSnow Z507	146 ft	+38 ft	41 mph
36Sunny Wintermax NW 211	147 ft	+39 ft	41 mph
37Westlake ZuperSnow Z 507	148 ft	+40 ft	41 mph
37Davanti Wintoura+	148 ft	+40 ft	41 mph
39Tourador WinterPro TSU2	150 ft	+42 ft	42 mph
40Star Performer Stratos UHP	151 ft	+43 ft	43 mph
41Starmaxx PolarMaxx Sport	151 ft	+43 ft	43 mph
42Tracmax S210 Ice Plus	153 ft	+45 ft	43 mph
43Minerva IcePlus S210	155 ft	+47 ft	44 mph
44Leao Winter Defender UHP	156 ft	+48 ft	44 mph
45Tristar SnowPower 2	156 ft	+48 ft	44 mph
46Rotalla S210	157 ft	+49 ft	45 mph
46Imperial Snowdragon 3	157 ft	+49 ft	45 mph
48Windforce Snowblazer UHP	162 ft	+54 ft	46 mph
49Royal Black Royal Winter UHP	163 ft	+55 ft	46 mph
50Triangle Snowlink PL02	166 ft	+58 ft	47 mph

The difference between best and worst was 53.3% (58 ft ≈ 3.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Triangle Snowlink PL02 would still be travelling at 47 mph when the Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow

Snow braking from 31 mph was much closer. Of the 30 tires that were tested on snow, 29 stopped between 95 feet and 99 feet, with only the Landsail Winter Lander falling outside that at 102 feet. The Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ was the shortest snow stopper, ahead of the Kleber Krisalp HP3, while the qualifier-winning P Zero Winter 2 was only joint 14th on snow. With the snow distances this close, the wet result decided most of the order.

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Vredestein Wintrac Pro+	95 ft	Best	0 mph
2Kleber Krisalp HP3	95 ft	0 ft	5 mph
3BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2	95 ft	0 ft	7 mph
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	95 ft	0 ft	7 mph
3Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	95 ft	0 ft	7 mph
3Barum Polaris 6	95 ft	0 ft	7 mph
7Viking WinTech NewGen	96 ft	+1 ft	8 mph
7Firestone Winterhawk 4	96 ft	+1 ft	8 mph
7Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4	96 ft	+1 ft	8 mph
10Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	96 ft	+1 ft	9 mph
10Semperit Speed Grip 5	96 ft	+1 ft	9 mph
12Bridgestone Blizzak 6	96 ft	+1 ft	10 mph
12Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	96 ft	+1 ft	10 mph
14Pirelli P Zero Winter 2	97 ft	+2 ft	11 mph
14Matador MP93 Nordicca	97 ft	+2 ft	11 mph
14Wanli Winter Max A1 SW211	97 ft	+2 ft	11 mph
17Ceat WinterDrive Sport	97 ft	+2 ft	12 mph
17Linglong Sport Master Winter	97 ft	+2 ft	12 mph
17GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport	97 ft	+2 ft	12 mph
20Gripmax SureGrip Pro Winter	98 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
20Superia Bluewin UHP2	98 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
20Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport	98 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
20Kumho WinterCraft WP52+	98 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
20Fulda Kristall Control HP2	98 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
25Crosswind Grip Peak Winter	98 ft	+3 ft	15 mph
25Giti GitiWinterW2	98 ft	+3 ft	15 mph
27Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	98 ft	+3 ft	15 mph
27Nankang SV3	98 ft	+3 ft	15 mph
29Lassa Competus Winter 2+	99 ft	+4 ft	16 mph
30Landsail Winter Lander	102 ft	+7 ft	21 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (7 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Landsail Winter Lander would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Results

The cut-off for the full test fell at 20th, where the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 just made it in. The Linglong Sport Master Winter missed out by a tenth of a meter on the combined distance.

Wet100%

Snow98%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 50	108 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	14^th / 30	97 ft	+2 ft

Wet97.4%

Snow98.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 50	111 ft	+3 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 30	96 ft	+1 ft

Wet91.9%

Snow99.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 50	118 ft	+10 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 30	95 ft	0 ft

Wet90.9%

Snow99%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 50	119 ft	+11 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 30	96 ft	+1 ft

Wet88.2%

Snow98.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 50	123 ft	+15 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	12^th / 30	96 ft	+1 ft

Wet86.8%

Snow100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 50	125 ft	+17 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 30	95 ft	Best in this discipline

Wet86.8%

Snow99.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 50	125 ft	+17 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 30	95 ft	0 ft

Wet86.2%

Snow99.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 50	126 ft	+18 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 30	95 ft	0 ft

Wet87.1%

Snow98.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 50	124 ft	+16 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	12^th / 30	96 ft	+1 ft

Wet86.2%

Snow99.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 50	126 ft	+18 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 30	95 ft	0 ft

Wet88%

Snow97%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 50	123 ft	+15 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	20^th / 30	98 ft	+3 ft

Wet86.2%

Snow99%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 50	126 ft	+18 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 30	96 ft	+1 ft

Wet86.2%

Snow98.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 50	126 ft	+18 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 30	96 ft	+1 ft

Wet84.2%

Snow97.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	15^th / 50	129 ft	+21 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	17^th / 30	97 ft	+2 ft

Wet84.8%

Snow96%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	14^th / 50	128 ft	+20 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	29^th / 30	99 ft	+4 ft

Wet83.8%

Snow97%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	17^th / 50	129 ft	+21 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	20^th / 30	98 ft	+3 ft

Wet82.5%

Snow98%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 50	131 ft	+23 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	14^th / 30	97 ft	+2 ft

Wet83.1%

Snow96.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	18^th / 50	130 ft	+22 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	25^th / 30	98 ft	+3 ft

Wet81.7%

Snow99%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	20^th / 50	133 ft	+25 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 30	96 ft	+1 ft

Wet80.5%

Snow99.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	25^th / 50	135 ft	+27 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 30	95 ft	0 ft

Wet81.3%

Snow97.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 50	133 ft	+25 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	17^th / 30	97 ft	+2 ft

Wet84.2%

Snow92.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	15^th / 50	129 ft	+21 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	30^th / 30	102 ft	+7 ft

Wet80.9%

Snow98%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	23^rd / 50	134 ft	+26 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	14^th / 30	97 ft	+2 ft

Wet81.5%

Snow96.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	21^st / 50	133 ft	+25 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	25^th / 30	98 ft	+3 ft

Wet80.9%

Snow97%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	23^rd / 50	134 ft	+26 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	20^th / 30	98 ft	+3 ft

Wet80.5%

Snow97%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	25^th / 50	135 ft	+27 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	20^th / 30	98 ft	+3 ft

Wet77.7%

Snow97.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	28^th / 50	139 ft	+31 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	17^th / 30	97 ft	+2 ft

Wet77.8%

Snow96.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	27^th / 50	139 ft	+31 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	27^th / 30	98 ft	+3 ft

Wet77.3%

Snow97%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	30^th / 50	140 ft	+32 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	20^th / 30	98 ft	+3 ft

Wet77.5%

Snow96.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	29^th / 50	140 ft	+32 ft
Snow BrakingLower is better	27^th / 30	98 ft	+3 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	31^st / 50	141 ft	+33 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	32^nd / 50	143 ft	+35 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	33^rd / 50	144 ft	+36 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	34^th / 50	145 ft	+37 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	35^th / 50	146 ft	+38 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	36^th / 50	147 ft	+39 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	37^th / 50	148 ft	+40 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	37^th / 50	148 ft	+40 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	39^th / 50	150 ft	+42 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	40^th / 50	151 ft	+43 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	41^st / 50	151 ft	+43 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	42^nd / 50	153 ft	+45 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	43^rd / 50	155 ft	+47 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	44^th / 50	156 ft	+48 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	45^th / 50	156 ft	+48 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	46^th / 50	157 ft	+49 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	46^th / 50	157 ft	+49 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	48^th / 50	162 ft	+54 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	49^th / 50	163 ft	+55 ft

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	50^th / 50	166 ft	+58 ft

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Wet

Snow

Results

Cross-check this test