Menu
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro View Gallery (5)
225-295/35-55 R17-20 22 sizes 2022 Winter rated
Tested by Tire Reviews View Test »

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

Falken Tires Ultra High Performance Winter

The Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro is a high performance winter tire intended for car and SUV drivers with the highest dynamic requirements: 87 sizes are available with wheel sizes from 16 to 21 inches.

7.3
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
98%
Wet Grip
95%
Road Feedback
65%
Handling
90%
Wear
80%
Comfort
90%
Buy again
100%
Snow Grip
95%
Ice Grip
90%
4 Reviews
89% Average
18,000 miles driven
14 Tests (avg: 11th)
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
7.3 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Comfort
80.1
0.32x / 13 tests
Dry
73.6
1.13x / 23 tests
Wet
71.1
1.93x / 56 tests
Ice
70
1.2x / 1 test
Snow
57.6
1.5x / 43 tests
Value
52.2
0.42x / 19 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
69.6
39 tests
Braking
67.2
37 tests
Traction
61.7
11 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 14
Publications: 8
Period: 2023 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 4
Avg Rating: 89.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.3
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tire Test Teknikens Varld 2025 235/45 R18 4/20 6 metrics
2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2025 235/50 R19 9/13 12 metrics
2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 20/22 16 metrics
2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets! Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 20/52 2 metrics
2025 Auto Express Winter Tire Test Auto Express 2025 225/45 R17 7/8 11 metrics
2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Allrad 2024 245/45 R18 10/13 12 metrics
2024 AS SUV Winter Tire Test 2024 235/55 R18 8/10 12 metrics
2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Allrad 2023 225/60 R18 7/11 14 metrics
2023 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test Sport Auto 2023 225/40 R18 9/9 14 metrics
2023 Sports Cars Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2023 225/40 R18 9/12 12 metrics
2023 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 17/22 15 metrics
2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 20/54 2 metrics
2023 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test Tire Reviews 2023 225/45 R18 10/13 14 metrics
2023 AMS SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2023 255/45 R20 7/7 13 metrics

Videos

Best 11 Winter Tires for 2023/24 - Tested and Rated

Best 11 Winter Tires for 2023/24 - Tested and Rated

In Depth Tire Comparisons
View More Comparisons
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
All Tests
View Test Results
14
Tests
11th
Average
4th
Best
20th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tire Test
235/50 R19 • 2025
9th/13
The FALKEN Eurowinter HS02 Pro is presented as a "snow talent" that also manages to provide good performance on dry roads, all for an affordable price. However, its capabilities are severely compromised on wet surfaces, where it showed generally weaker performance. Testers described its straight aquaplaning resistance as "bereits kritisch" (already critical) and noted its weakness in both wet handling and curved aquaplaning tests.
2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R18 • 2025
20th/52
2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test
225/40 R18 • 2025
20th/22
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro demonstrates respectable driving performance on dry pavement, maintaining decent handling characteristics and acceptable behavior in clear conditions. However, this Japanese-branded tire (developed by Sumitomo) reveals significant weaknesses where they matter most for winter safety. It shows weaker overall performance on snow with compromised grip and handling, while extended braking distances in both wet and dry conditions raise serious safety concerns. The tire also suffers from particularly rapid wear, resulting in the lowest projected mileage in the entire test—nearly 20,000 kilometers less than the longest-lasting competitors. This accelerated wear makes it extremely expensive over its shortened lifetime despite a mid-range purchase price around €510. The combination of safety compromises and poor durability makes the Falken impossible to recommend, as drivers would face both increased risk and the inconvenience and cost of premature replacement.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
18 inch
225/40R18 92 V XL D B 72
19 inch
235/35R19 91 W XL D B 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro >>

Questions and Answers for the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro Reviews

Given 94% while driving a Toyota CHR Hybrid (225/50 R18) on mostly town for 3,000 average miles
After my first winter of driving on them I must say I'm pleasantly surprised. It snowed quite a bit here compared to other years and despite the model not reviewing that well in snow conditions, it performed admirably, even in deeper snow. What really impressed me however was its dry and wet performance, it genuinely felt like a summer tire no matter how cold it got.
Helpful 1187
April 14, 2024
Given 98% while driving a Toyota RAV4 (225/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 7,000 spirited miles
Really solid tires, I didn't expect them to be good through snow however they performed very well. But they're even better on dry and wet roads.
Helpful 932
October 17, 2024
Given 83% while driving a Volkswagen Tiguan (235/55 R17) on mostly motorways for 2,000 average miles
I am not a high performance driver. I am driving with 110-120 km/h maximum speeds in motorways with curves. Regularly under mild weather conditions during winter (-3 to +15 Celsius) sometimes rainy but never iced or snowy roads. I would recommend these tires because of low price and extremely silent for a winter tire. Cons are relatively high fuel consumption & possibility of bad wear. No idea about
Helpful 754
February 23, 2024

How would you rate the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro?

Click a star to start your review

185 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro Reviews

Given 90% while driving a Citroën DS3 THP 150 (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
Really happy with these tires. Bought them a couple of months after release. Hands down better grip than my summer tires (Fulda) on wet. Foot 80-90% to the ground, FWD, not even a single squeak or spin. Drove in very harsh rain, absolutely no issue, glides over water (not literally). Handles aquaplaning well. Honestly, noise wise is a bit higher than summer tires, but it is what you expect. Comfort - it did not strike me as being bad, nor good, cannot comment really - maybe average. Overall - Highly Recommend, phenomenal bang for your buck.
Helpful 848
April 4, 2023
Rate the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro