The 2023 AutoBild Allrad tire test, conducted using a BMW X3, displayed various tires' performance in numerous categories. Auto Bild tested the popular 225/60 R18 SUV / CUV crossover size and also included a summer tire as reference.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 0.0 mph
Wet Braking: 62.1 → 0.0 mph

Dry

In dry conditions, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV were top performers in braking and handling respectively.

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	126 ft	-8 ft
1Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	134 ft	Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	135 ft	+1 ft
3Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	136 ft	+2 ft
4Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	136 ft	+2 ft
5Vredestein Wintrac Pro	136 ft	+2 ft
6Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	137 ft	+3 ft
6Superia Bluewin SUV 2	137 ft	+3 ft
8Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	137 ft	+3 ft
9Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	140 ft	+6 ft
10Firestone Winterhawk 4	142 ft	+8 ft

The difference between best and worst was 12.7% (16 ft ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	59.9 mph	+1.1 mph
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	58.8 mph	Best
2Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	58.6 mph	-0.2 mph
3Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	58.5 mph	-0.3 mph
4Vredestein Wintrac Pro	58.3 mph	-0.5 mph
4Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	58.3 mph	-0.5 mph
6Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	58.3 mph	-0.5 mph
7Superia Bluewin SUV 2	58.2 mph	-0.6 mph
8Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	58.2 mph	-0.6 mph
9Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	57.9 mph	-0.9 mph
10Firestone Winterhawk 4	57.2 mph	-1.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (2.7 mph).

Wet

For wet conditions, Pirelli's Scorpion Winter 2 excelled in braking while Goodyear's UltraGrip Performance Plus SUV showed superior handling. Bridgestone's Blizzak LM005 dominated in wet circle, straight aqua, and curved aquaplaning tests.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	135 ft	Best	0 mph
2Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	141 ft	+6 ft	16 mph
RefReference Summer	141 ft	+6 ft	17 mph
3Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	141 ft	+6 ft	17 mph
4Vredestein Wintrac Pro	143 ft	+8 ft	19 mph
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	146 ft	+11 ft	22 mph
6Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	146 ft	+11 ft	22 mph
7Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	147 ft	+12 ft	23 mph
8Firestone Winterhawk 4	148 ft	+13 ft	24 mph
9Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	150 ft	+15 ft	26 mph
10Superia Bluewin SUV 2	169 ft	+34 ft	36 mph

The difference between best and worst was 25.5% (34 ft ≈ 2.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Superia Bluewin SUV 2 would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	52.4 mph	Best
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	51.9 mph	-0.5 mph
3Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	51.9 mph	-0.5 mph
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	51.6 mph	-0.8 mph
5Vredestein Wintrac Pro	51.6 mph	-0.8 mph
6Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	51.5 mph	-0.9 mph
7Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	51.4 mph	-1.0 mph
7Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	51.4 mph	-1.0 mph
RefReference Summer	51.3 mph	-1.1 mph
9Firestone Winterhawk 4	51.2 mph	-1.2 mph
10Superia Bluewin SUV 2	49.0 mph	-3.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.4% (3.4 mph).

Wet Circle
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	15.89 s	Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	15.95 s	+0.06 s
RefReference Summer	16.02 s	+0.13 s
3Vredestein Wintrac Pro	16.07 s	+0.18 s
4Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	16.11 s	+0.22 s
4Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	16.11 s	+0.22 s
6Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	16.14 s	+0.25 s
7Firestone Winterhawk 4	16.15 s	+0.26 s
8Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	16.17 s	+0.28 s
9Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	16.2 s	+0.31 s
10Superia Bluewin SUV 2	16.89 s	+1.00 s

The difference between best and worst was 6.3% (1 s).

Straight Aqua
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	56.3 mph	Best
2Firestone Winterhawk 4	55.3 mph	-1.0 mph
RefReference Summer	54.3 mph	-2.0 mph
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	54.2 mph	-2.1 mph
4Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	53.9 mph	-2.4 mph
5Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	53.1 mph	-3.2 mph
6Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	52.9 mph	-3.4 mph
7Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	52.8 mph	-3.5 mph
8Vredestein Wintrac Pro	52.6 mph	-3.7 mph
9Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	49.5 mph	-6.8 mph
10Superia Bluewin SUV 2	47.4 mph	-8.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (8.9 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	15.5 ft/s²	Best
2Firestone Winterhawk 4	14.8 ft/s²	-0.7 ft/s²
3Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	14.5 ft/s²	-1.0 ft/s²
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	14.3 ft/s²	-1.2 ft/s²
RefReference Summer	14.2 ft/s²	-1.3 ft/s²
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	13.8 ft/s²	-1.7 ft/s²
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	13.5 ft/s²	-2.0 ft/s²
7Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	13.2 ft/s²	-2.3 ft/s²
8Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	12.2 ft/s²	-3.3 ft/s²
9Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	11.9 ft/s²	-3.6 ft/s²
10Superia Bluewin SUV 2	10.0 ft/s²	-5.5 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 35.5% (5.5 ft/s²).

Snow

In snowy conditions, Hankook, Michelin, and Firestone had notable performances in braking, traction, and handling respectively.

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	72 ft	Best	0 mph
2Firestone Winterhawk 4	72 ft	0 ft	5 mph
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	73 ft	+1 ft	11 mph
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	73 ft	+1 ft	12 mph
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	73 ft	+1 ft	12 mph
4Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	73 ft	+1 ft	12 mph
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	74 ft	+2 ft	13 mph
8Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	75 ft	+3 ft	16 mph
9Superia Bluewin SUV 2	76 ft	+4 ft	18 mph
10Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	76 ft	+4 ft	20 mph
RefReference Summer	160 ft	+88 ft	59 mph

The difference between best and worst was 122.8% (88 ft ≈ 6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 20 mph when the Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	748 lbf	Best
2Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	736 lbf	-12 lbf
3Firestone Winterhawk 4	736 lbf	-12 lbf
4Vredestein Wintrac Pro	719 lbf	-29 lbf
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	717 lbf	-31 lbf
6Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	710 lbf	-38 lbf
7Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	709 lbf	-39 lbf
8Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	705 lbf	-43 lbf
9Superia Bluewin SUV 2	690 lbf	-58 lbf
10Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	681 lbf	-67 lbf
RefReference Summer	218 lbf	-530 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 70.8% (530 lbf).

Snow Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Firestone Winterhawk 4	36.0 mph	Best
2Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	35.0 mph	-1.0 mph
3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	34.9 mph	-1.1 mph
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34.5 mph	-1.5 mph
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	34.5 mph	-1.5 mph
6Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	34.4 mph	-1.6 mph
7Superia Bluewin SUV 2	34.2 mph	-1.8 mph
8Vredestein Wintrac Pro	34.0 mph	-2.0 mph
9Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	33.2 mph	-2.8 mph
10Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	32.9 mph	-3.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.6% (3.1 mph).

Snow Slalom
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Firestone Winterhawk 4	16.4 ft/s²	Best
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	16.1 ft/s²	-0.3 ft/s²
3Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	15.9 ft/s²	-0.5 ft/s²
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	15.8 ft/s²	-0.6 ft/s²
5Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	15.8 ft/s²	-0.6 ft/s²
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	15.7 ft/s²	-0.7 ft/s²
7Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	15.6 ft/s²	-0.8 ft/s²
8Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	14.9 ft/s²	-1.5 ft/s²
9Superia Bluewin SUV 2	14.8 ft/s²	-1.6 ft/s²
10Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	14.5 ft/s²	-1.9 ft/s²
RefReference Summer	7.5 ft/s²	-8.9 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 54.1% (8.9 ft/s²).

Comfort

Michelin's tire also showcased the lowest noise levels.

Noise
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	71.9 dB	Best
2Firestone Winterhawk 4	72.7 dB	+0.80 dB
3Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	72.8 dB	+0.90 dB
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	73 dB	+1.10 dB
5Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	73.1 dB	+1.20 dB
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	73.3 dB	+1.40 dB
7Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	73.8 dB	+1.90 dB
8Superia Bluewin SUV 2	73.9 dB	+2.00 dB
9Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	74.1 dB	+2.20 dB
RefReference Summer	74.4 dB	+2.50 dB
10Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	74.6 dB	+2.70 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (2.7 dB).

Value

The Continental's WinterContact TS 870 P demonstrated lowest rolling resistance, albeit at a higher price point.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
RefReference Summer	5.97 kg/t	-0.40 kg/t	$0
1Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	6.37 kg/t	Best	$0
2Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	6.98 kg/t	+0.61 kg/t	$28
3Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV	7.43 kg/t	+1.06 kg/t	$49
3Superia Bluewin SUV 2	7.43 kg/t	+1.06 kg/t	$49
5Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2	7.63 kg/t	+1.26 kg/t	$58
6Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X	7.66 kg/t	+1.29 kg/t	$60
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	7.8 kg/t	+1.43 kg/t	$66
8Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	7.93 kg/t	+1.56 kg/t	$72
9Firestone Winterhawk 4	7.99 kg/t	+1.62 kg/t	$75
10Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV	8.39 kg/t	+2.02 kg/t	$93

The difference between best and worst was 40.5% (2.42 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV uses about 26 gal ($93) more fuel than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Gas/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

12,000 mi

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

$3.60/gal

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

The overall results highlight the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV as the top performers. The Continental demonstrated a commendable balance of performance across various tests, ensuring a high level of safety and handling in different weather conditions, and the Michelin proved to be a specialist in snow with excellent handling in all weathers and a pleasantly quiet rolling comfort, despite its high rolling resistance. Following closely were the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV and Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2, both praised for their handling qualities across different conditions. Goodyear showcased exemplary wet handling, while Pirelli was lauded for its consistently high performance level and precise handling, especially in snow and wet conditions

Dry98.8%

Wet95.6%

Snow96.5%

Comfort97%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	137 ft	+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	58.6 mph	-0.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	146 ft	+11 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	51.6 mph	-0.8 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	9^th / 10	16.2 s	+0.31 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 10	52.8 mph	-3.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5^th / 10	13.8 ft/s²	-1.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	73 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 10	717 lbf	-31 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	34.5 mph	-1.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	4^th / 10	15.8 ft/s²	-0.6 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	9^th / 10	74.1 dB	+2.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 10	6.37 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: B/B/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 865.00

Dry99.3%

Wet95.6%

Snow98.3%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance75.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	136 ft	+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	58.8 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	147 ft	+12 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	51.9 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	4^th / 10	16.11 s	+0.22 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 10	54.2 mph	-2.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	7^th / 10	13.2 ft/s²	-2.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	73 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 10	748 lbf	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	34.9 mph	-1.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	2^nd / 10	16.1 ft/s²	-0.3 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 10	71.9 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 10	8.39 kg/t	+2.02 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/68
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 780.00

Dry99%

Wet96.7%

Snow96%

Comfort98.5%

Rolling Resistance85.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	135 ft	+1 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	58.2 mph	-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	146 ft	+11 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	52.4 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better	2^nd / 10	15.95 s	+0.06 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 10	53.1 mph	-3.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 10	14.3 ft/s²	-1.2 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	73 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	8^th / 10	705 lbf	-43 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	34.5 mph	-1.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	5^th / 10	15.8 ft/s²	-0.6 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 10	73 dB	+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 10	7.43 kg/t	+1.06 kg/t

EU Label: C/C/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 785.00

Dry99%

Wet97.3%

Snow95.9%

Comfort98.4%

Rolling Resistance83.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	136 ft	+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	58.3 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	135 ft	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	51.5 mph	-0.9 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	4^th / 10	16.11 s	+0.22 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 10	52.9 mph	-3.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	8^th / 10	12.2 ft/s²	-3.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	73 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 10	709 lbf	-39 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	34.4 mph	-1.6 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	7^th / 10	15.6 ft/s²	-0.8 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 10	73.1 dB	+1.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 10	7.63 kg/t	+1.26 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 800.00

Dry98.8%

Wet96.2%

Snow96%

Comfort98.1%

Rolling Resistance81.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	136 ft	+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	58.3 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	143 ft	+8 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	51.6 mph	-0.8 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	3^rd / 10	16.07 s	+0.18 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 10	52.6 mph	-3.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6^th / 10	13.5 ft/s²	-2.0 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	74 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 10	719 lbf	-29 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	34.0 mph	-2.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	6^th / 10	15.7 ft/s²	-0.7 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 10	73.3 dB	+1.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 10	7.8 kg/t	+1.43 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 670.00

Dry97%

Wet97%

Snow98.2%

Comfort96.4%

Rolling Resistance83.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	140 ft	+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	57.9 mph	-0.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	141 ft	+6 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	51.4 mph	-1.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	8^th / 10	16.17 s	+0.28 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 10	53.9 mph	-2.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3^rd / 10	14.5 ft/s²	-1.0 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	72 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 10	736 lbf	-12 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	35.0 mph	-1.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	3^rd / 10	15.9 ft/s²	-0.5 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	10^th / 10	74.6 dB	+2.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 10	7.66 kg/t	+1.29 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 630.00

Dry99.7%

Wet93.6%

Snow92.8%

Comfort98.8%

Rolling Resistance80.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	134 ft	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	58.5 mph	-0.3 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	150 ft	+15 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	51.4 mph	-1.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	6^th / 10	16.14 s	+0.25 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	9^th / 10	49.5 mph	-6.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	9^th / 10	11.9 ft/s²	-3.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	75 ft	+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	6^th / 10	710 lbf	-38 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	32.9 mph	-3.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	10^th / 10	14.5 ft/s²	-1.9 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 10	72.8 dB	+0.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 10	7.93 kg/t	+1.56 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/70
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 545.00

Dry98.6%

Wet98.4%

Snow92.1%

Comfort97.4%

Rolling Resistance91.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	137 ft	+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	58.3 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	141 ft	+6 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	51.9 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	1^st / 10	15.89 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 10	56.3 mph	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1^st / 10	15.5 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	76 ft	+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	10^th / 10	681 lbf	-67 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	33.2 mph	-2.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	8^th / 10	14.9 ft/s²	-1.5 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 10	73.8 dB	+1.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 10	6.98 kg/t	+0.61 kg/t

EU Label: B/A/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 745.00

Dry95.7%

Wet95.8%

Snow99.5%

Comfort98.9%

Rolling Resistance79.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	142 ft	+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	57.2 mph	-1.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	148 ft	+13 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	51.2 mph	-1.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	7^th / 10	16.15 s	+0.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 10	55.3 mph	-1.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 10	14.8 ft/s²	-0.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	72 ft	0 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 10	736 lbf	-12 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	36.0 mph	Best in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better	1^st / 10	16.4 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 10	72.7 dB	+0.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 10	7.99 kg/t	+1.62 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/71
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 585.00

Dry98.6%

Wet87%

Snow93.2%

Comfort97.3%

Rolling Resistance85.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	137 ft	+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	58.2 mph	-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	169 ft	+34 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	49.0 mph	-3.4 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	10^th / 10	16.89 s	+1.00 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 10	47.4 mph	-8.9 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	10^th / 10	10.0 ft/s²	-5.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	76 ft	+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	9^th / 10	690 lbf	-58 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	34.2 mph	-1.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	9^th / 10	14.8 ft/s²	-1.6 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	8^th / 10	73.9 dB	+2.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 10	7.43 kg/t	+1.06 kg/t

EU Label: C/C/70
3PMSF: Yes
Price: 350.00

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Value

Results

Cross-check this test