Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/60 R18
Tires tested
10
Disciplines
13

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (0 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
126 ft -8 ft
134 ft Best
135 ft +1 ft
136 ft +2 ft
136 ft +2 ft
136 ft +2 ft
137 ft +3 ft
137 ft +3 ft
137 ft +3 ft
140 ft +6 ft
142 ft +8 ft

The difference between best and worst was 12.7% (16 ft ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
59.9 mph +1.1 mph
58.8 mph Best
58.6 mph -0.2 mph
58.5 mph -0.3 mph
58.3 mph -0.5 mph
58.3 mph -0.5 mph
58.3 mph -0.5 mph
58.2 mph -0.6 mph
58.2 mph -0.6 mph
57.9 mph -0.9 mph
57.2 mph -1.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (2.7 mph).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
135 ft Best 0 mph
141 ft +6 ft 16 mph
RefReference Summer
141 ft +6 ft 17 mph
141 ft +6 ft 17 mph
143 ft +8 ft 19 mph
146 ft +11 ft 22 mph
146 ft +11 ft 22 mph
147 ft +12 ft 23 mph
148 ft +13 ft 24 mph
150 ft +15 ft 26 mph
169 ft +34 ft 36 mph

The difference between best and worst was 25.5% (34 ft ≈ 2.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Superia Bluewin SUV 2 would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
52.4 mph Best
51.9 mph -0.5 mph
51.9 mph -0.5 mph
51.6 mph -0.8 mph
51.6 mph -0.8 mph
51.5 mph -0.9 mph
51.4 mph -1.0 mph
51.4 mph -1.0 mph
RefReference Summer
51.3 mph -1.1 mph
51.2 mph -1.2 mph
49.0 mph -3.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.4% (3.4 mph).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
15.89 s Best
15.95 s +0.06 s
RefReference Summer
16.02 s +0.13 s
16.07 s +0.18 s
16.11 s +0.22 s
16.11 s +0.22 s
16.14 s +0.25 s
16.15 s +0.26 s
16.17 s +0.28 s
16.2 s +0.31 s
16.89 s +1.00 s

The difference between best and worst was 6.3% (1 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
56.3 mph Best
55.3 mph -1.0 mph
RefReference Summer
54.3 mph -2.0 mph
54.2 mph -2.1 mph
53.9 mph -2.4 mph
53.1 mph -3.2 mph
52.9 mph -3.4 mph
52.8 mph -3.5 mph
52.6 mph -3.7 mph
49.5 mph -6.8 mph
47.4 mph -8.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (8.9 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
15.5 ft/s² Best
14.8 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
14.5 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
14.3 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
14.2 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
13.8 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²
13.5 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
13.2 ft/s² -2.3 ft/s²
12.2 ft/s² -3.3 ft/s²
11.9 ft/s² -3.6 ft/s²
10.0 ft/s² -5.5 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 35.5% (5.5 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (50 - 0 )

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
72 ft Best 0 mph
72 ft 0 ft 5 mph
73 ft +1 ft 11 mph
73 ft +1 ft 12 mph
73 ft +1 ft 12 mph
73 ft +1 ft 12 mph
74 ft +2 ft 13 mph
75 ft +3 ft 16 mph
76 ft +4 ft 18 mph
76 ft +4 ft 20 mph
RefReference Summer
160 ft +88 ft 59 mph

The difference between best and worst was 122.8% (88 ft ≈ 6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 20 mph when the Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
748 lbf Best
736 lbf -12 lbf
736 lbf -12 lbf
719 lbf -29 lbf
717 lbf -31 lbf
710 lbf -38 lbf
709 lbf -39 lbf
705 lbf -43 lbf
690 lbf -58 lbf
681 lbf -67 lbf
RefReference Summer
218 lbf -530 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 70.8% (530 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
36.0 mph Best
35.0 mph -1.0 mph
34.9 mph -1.1 mph
34.5 mph -1.5 mph
34.5 mph -1.5 mph
34.4 mph -1.6 mph
34.2 mph -1.8 mph
34.0 mph -2.0 mph
33.2 mph -2.8 mph
32.9 mph -3.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.6% (3.1 mph).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
16.4 ft/s² Best
16.1 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
15.9 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
15.8 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
15.8 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
15.7 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
15.6 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
14.9 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
14.8 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
14.5 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
7.5 ft/s² -8.9 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 54.1% (8.9 ft/s²).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
71.9 dB Best
72.7 dB +0.80 dB
72.8 dB +0.90 dB
73 dB +1.10 dB
73.1 dB +1.20 dB
73.3 dB +1.40 dB
73.8 dB +1.90 dB
73.9 dB +2.00 dB
74.1 dB +2.20 dB
RefReference Summer
74.4 dB +2.50 dB
74.6 dB +2.70 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (2.7 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
RefReference Summer
5.97 kg/t -0.40 kg/t $0
6.37 kg/t Best $0
6.98 kg/t +0.61 kg/t $28
7.43 kg/t +1.06 kg/t $49
7.43 kg/t +1.06 kg/t $49
7.63 kg/t +1.26 kg/t $58
7.66 kg/t +1.29 kg/t $60
7.8 kg/t +1.43 kg/t $66
7.93 kg/t +1.56 kg/t $72
7.99 kg/t +1.62 kg/t $75
8.39 kg/t +2.02 kg/t $93

The difference between best and worst was 40.5% (2.42 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV uses about 26 gal ($93) more fuel than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.